Advertisement

Diabetologia

, Volume 61, Issue 8, pp 1794–1803 | Cite as

Loss of CXCR3 expression on memory B cells in individuals with long-standing type 1 diabetes

  • Wendy E. Powell
  • Stephanie J. Hanna
  • Claire N. Hocter
  • Emma Robinson
  • Joanne Davies
  • Gareth J. Dunseath
  • Stephen Luzio
  • Daniel Farewell
  • Li Wen
  • Colin M. Dayan
  • David A. Price
  • Kristin Ladell
  • F. Susan Wong
Open Access
Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis

Islet-specific autoantibodies can predict the development of type 1 diabetes. However, it remains unclear if B cells, per se, contribute to the causal pancreatic immunopathology. We aimed to identify phenotypic signatures of disease progression among naive and memory B cell subsets in the peripheral blood of individuals with type 1 diabetes.

Methods

A total of 69 participants were recruited across two separate cohorts, one for discovery purposes and the other for validation purposes. Each cohort comprised two groups of individuals with type 1 diabetes (one with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes and the other with long-standing type 1 diabetes) and one group of age- and sex-matched healthy donors. The phenotypic characteristics of circulating naive and memory B cells were investigated using polychromatic flow cytometry, and serum concentrations of various chemokines and cytokines were measured using immunoassays.

Results

A disease-linked phenotype was detected in individuals with long-standing type 1 diabetes, characterised by reduced C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 3 (CXCR3) expression on switched (CD27+IgD−) and unswitched (CD27intermediateIgD+) memory B cells. These changes were associated with raised serum concentrations of B cell activating factor and of the CXCR3 ligands, chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand (CXCL)10 and CXCL11. A concomitant reduction in CXCR3 expression was also identified on T cells.

Conclusions/interpretation

Our data reveal a statistically robust set of abnormalities that indicate an association between type 1 diabetes and long-term dysregulation of a chemokine ligand/receptor system that controls B cell migration.

Keywords

Autoimmunity B cells B220 BAFF CD24 CD95 CXCL10 CXCL11 CXCR3 Type 1 diabetes 

Abbreviations

BAFF

B cell activating factor

CXCL

Chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand

CXCR3

C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 3

IQR

Interquartile range

MFI

Median fluorescence intensity

PBMC

Peripheral blood mononuclear cell

SPADE

Spanning-tree progression analysis of density-normalised events

Introduction

Type 1 diabetes is a multifactorial autoimmune disorder triggered by islet antigen-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell-mediated destruction of insulin-producing cells in the pancreas. Although the presence of various autoantibodies can predict the onset of type 1 diabetes, it remains unclear if the corresponding autoreactive B cells play a determinative role in the underlying immunopathology. Clinical studies have shown that B cell depletion with rituximab temporarily slows the decline of C-peptide levels in the blood of individuals with type 1 diabetes [1]. Moreover, B cells are present in the pancreatic islets at the time of diagnosis [2] and persist in situ throughout the course of disease [3].

A previous study identified transitional CD27−IgD+IgM− B cell expansions in individuals with type 1 diabetes and healthy carriers of the PTPN22 genetic variant 1858T, which predisposes to a variety of autoimmune disorders [4]. In contrast, no disease-specific alterations in the B cell compartment were detected in another study, designed to quantify the expression levels of CD19, CD24, CD27, CD38, IgD and IgM in individuals with type 1 diabetes and age- and sex-matched healthy donors [5]. Equivalent results were obtained in a comprehensive analysis of children with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes compared with healthy control individuals [6]. However, increased frequencies of marginal zone CD19+CD21+CD23− B cells and decreased frequencies of regulatory CD1d+CD5+CD19+ and follicular CD19+CD21−CD23+ B cells have been reported in Chinese individuals with type 1 diabetes [7]. Similarly, decreased frequencies of CD40+ and interleukin (IL)-10+ B cells were detected in another cohort of individuals with type 1 diabetes relative to healthy donors [8]. In addition, high-affinity insulin-binding naive B cells are lost from the anergic compartment in individuals with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes, but return in individuals with long-standing type 1 diabetes [9]. Thus, whilst differences are present in those with type 1 diabetes compared with healthy individuals, a consistent disease-relevant phenotype in the circulating B cell pool has not been delineated.

To inform this ongoing debate, we conducted an extensive flow cytometric analysis of B cell subsets in individuals with type 1 diabetes and age- and sex-matched healthy donors.

Methods

Study design and setting

This study was designed to compare the phenotypes of circulating B and T cells (using flow cytometry to analyse cell-surface markers) and levels of serum chemokines and cytokines in healthy donors and people with newly diagnosed or long-standing type 1 diabetes. Venous blood samples were collected from individuals in South Wales between 2012 and 2014. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were analysed in two batches (2013 and 2014). Serum samples were cryopreserved and analysed as a single batch.

Participants

Adults with newly diagnosed or long-standing type 1 diabetes were recruited for this study, together with age- and sex-matched healthy donors (age was matched to ±2 years). Type 1 diabetes was diagnosed according to criteria established by the American Diabetes Association [10]. Insulin treatment was commenced within 1 month of diagnosis. Time from diagnosis was categorised as less than 1 year for newly diagnosed individuals and more than 3 years for those with long-standing diabetes. Age- and sex-matched healthy donors were seronegative for islet-specific autoantibodies, with no personal or family history of type 1 diabetes or other autoimmune conditions. The discovery cohort (Study A) included n = 10 newly diagnosed individuals (mean age 33.4 years, range 23–44 years), n = 10 individuals with long-standing diabetes (mean age 40.2 years, range 29–50 years) and n = 15 healthy donors (mean age 38.2 years, range 24–50 years). The validation cohort (Study B) included n = 10 newly diagnosed individuals (mean age 24.3 years, range 19–34 years), n = 10 individuals with long-standing diabetes (mean age 38.5 years, range 23–48 years) and n = 14 healthy donors (mean age 32.5 years, range 22–48 years). Additional participants were recruited for immunoassay analysis of serum chemokines and cytokines (n = 34 newly diagnosed individuals; n = 21 individuals with long-standing diabetes; n = 33 healthy donors, not matched). Cohort details are summarised in electronic supplementary material (ESM) Tables 1–3.

Ethics

This study was approved by the South East Wales Research Ethics Committee and conducted in accordance with the principles of Good Clinical Practice established by the International Council for Harmonisation and the World Health Organization. All participants provided written informed consent prior to enrolment, as mandated by the Declaration of Helsinki.

Islet-specific autoantibodies

Serum autoantibodies specific for GAD, islet antigen-2 and zinc transporter-8 were quantified by ELISA (RSR, Cardiff, UK). Positive thresholds were set at 5 U/ml for GAD, 7.5 U/ml for islet antigen-2 and 15 U/ml for zinc transporter-8.

HLA class II genotyping

Genomic DNA was extracted from whole blood samples collected in EDTA. HLA-DRB alleles (DRB1*0101-0103, DRB1*1501-1505, DRB1*1601-1606, DRB1*0301, DRB1*0401-0422, DRB1*1101-1121, DRB1*1201-1203, DRB1*1302-1305/DRB1*1303-1304, DRB1*1401/1404/1405, DRB1*0701-0702, DRB1*0805-0801, DRB1*0901, DRB1*1001, DRB3*0101-0301 and DRB4*0101) were resolved using PCRs with sequence-specific primers [11] (ESM Table 4).

Blood samples

PBMCs were isolated from heparinised samples of whole blood via density gradient centrifugation using Lymphoprep (STEMCELL Technologies, Cambridge, UK). Aliquots of 5–20 × 106 PBMCs/ml per vial were stored in liquid nitrogen after cooling overnight to −80°C at a controlled rate of −1°C/min in 90% AIM-V medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Hemel Hempstead, UK) supplemented with 10% dimethyl sulfoxide (Sigma-Aldrich, Gillingham, UK) (vol./vol.).

Flow cytometry

Thawed PBMCs were blocked using TruStain (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA) for 5 min at room temperature, stained with LIVE/DEAD Fixable Aqua (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 10 min at room temperature and labelled with titrated concentrations of the following monoclonal antibodies for 30 min at 4°C: α-CD19-PE-Cy7 (clone SJ25C1) and α-CD24-APC-eFluor780 (clone SN3) (both from eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA); α-CD3-BV711 (clone OKT3), α-CD45R/B220-BV421 (clone RA3-6B2) and α-IgD-AF488 (clone IA6-2) (all from BioLegend); α-CD27-Q605 (clone CLB-27/1) (Thermo Fisher Scientific); α-CD21-PE-Cy5 (clone B-ly4), α-CD38-PE-CF594 (clone HIT2) and α-C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 3 (CXCR3)-PE (clone IC6/CXCR3) (all from BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA); and α-CD95-APC (clone DX2) (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). Cells were then washed in PBS containing 0.5% BSA (wt/vol.) and 2 mmol/l EDTA, fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde (wt/vol.) and acquired using a special-order system FACSAria II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). Further details are available in ESM Table 5. Data were acquired in a blinded fashion and analysed using FlowJo software version 10 (Tree Star, Ashland, OR, USA).

Spanning-tree progression analysis of density-normalised events

Live B cells were identified in serial gates as singlets, lymphocytes, LIVE/DEAD Fixable Aqua−, CD3− and CD19+ events using FlowJo software version 10. Compensated flow cytometry standard files were exported and concatenated for spanning-tree progression analysis of density-normalised events (SPADE) using fixed settings (K-means algorithm, 100 clusters and arcsinh transformation with cofactor 150) in SPADE software version 3.0 (http://pengqiu.gatech.edu/software/SPADE/) [12, 13]. The following markers were included in the analysis: CD19, CD21, CD24, CD27, CD38, CD95, B220, CXCR3 and IgD. Auto-partitioning was used to divide the resulting trees into eight areas. Median expression of each marker was calculated for each donor in each node. Data from the two cohorts were tested for normality and then analysed separately because of differences in flow cytometer set-up between Study A and Study B. As the data were normally distributed, an unpaired Student’s t test was used to compare the transformed median fluorescence intensity (MFI) of each marker in each area for newly diagnosed individuals and those with long-standing diabetes vs healthy donors in Study A. The analysis was repeated in Study B for markers identified as significantly different in newly diagnosed individuals and those with long-standing diabetes relative to healthy donors in Study A. In a final step, B cells were gated manually, using FlowJo software version 10, to confirm differences in MFI for each marker of interest, and significance was assessed using a one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test.

Serum chemokines/cytokines

Serum samples were analysed using the U-PLEX platform (Meso Scale Diagnostics, Rockville, MD, USA) to quantify chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand (CXCL)10, CXCL11, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10 and IFN-γ or using DuoSet ELISA kits to quantify CXCL9, B cell activating factor (BAFF) and TGF-β (R&D Systems, Abingdon, UK). Data were analysed using the Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc test.

Statistics

As there were no existing data to guide power calculations, and given the large number of variables under consideration, together with the modes of analysis we planned to employ simultaneously across all groups of participants, sample sizes were determined in part by feasibility. Significant results from Study A were treated as hypothesis-generating and tested for validation purposes in Study B. An unpaired Student’s t test was used to assess differences in mean values between two groups.

One-way ANOVA (for normally distributed data) or the Kruskal–Wallis test (for non-normally distributed data) were used with corrections for multiple comparisons to assess differences in mean values between three or more groups. All statistical tests were performed using Prism software version 6 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA).

Results

CXCR3 expression is reduced on memory B cells in individuals with type 1 diabetes

To evaluate the phenotypic characteristics of naive and memory B cells in individuals with type 1 diabetes, we developed a polychromatic flow cytometry panel incorporating a viability dye and monoclonal antibodies specific for CD3, CD19, CD21, CD24, CD27, CD38, CD45R/B220, CD95, CXCR3 and IgD. This panel was used to stain PBMCs from individuals with type 1 diabetes (categorised as newly diagnosed or long-standing) and healthy donors assigned randomly to separate cohorts for discovery (Study A) and validation (Study B). The data were then concatenated and analysed using SPADE.

In contrast to manual analyses of high-dimensional flow cytometry data, which may be subject to bias and user error, SPADE is a form of multivariate analysis that automatically groups closely related cells into clusters, also termed ‘nodes’, based on the expression pattern of all selected markers [14]. These clusters are reduced to a two-dimensional visual representation in which areas containing cells with similar phenotypes and marker expression are automatically partitioned. Using this approach, we identified eight phenotypically distinct B cell populations (Fig. 1a). The SPADE analysis first identified two areas of naive cells (CD27−IgD+), each of which had distinct expression of other markers (only markers that differed between the two areas are listed, with box-plots of each marker shown in Fig. 1b): area 1 cells were CD19+CD21−CD24++CD38++, and area 4 cells were CD19++CD21+CD24+CD38+. Second, there were two clusters of switched CD27+IgD− memory cells: area 2 cells were CXCR3++, and area 7 cells were CXCR3−. Third, two further areas of switched CD27−IgD− memory cells were identified: area 5 cells were CD19++CD21+CD38+CD95−B220+, and area 8 cells were CD19+CD21−CD38−CD95+B220−. Finally, there were two clusters of unswitched CD27intermediate(int)IgD+ B cells (area 3 cells were CD21−/+B220+CXCR3+, and area 6 cells were CD21+B220−CXCR3−). The MFI of each marker was then determined in each area for each sample (Fig. 1b), and unpaired Student’s t tests were used to compare area-specific differences in the expression of each marker between each diabetes group and healthy donors, with the main difference being found in CXCR3 (Fig. 1c). Non-significant results in Study A were excluded from the analysis in Study B. This strategy was adopted to minimise type 1 errors arising from multiple comparisons. Moreover, we only accepted results where a significant difference in Study A was replicated in Study B.
Fig. 1

Automated phenotypic analysis of B cells. (a) SPADE image of pooled B cells from all participants, auto-partitioned into eight annotated areas with node size scaled to the log number of cells in each node, showing median CXCR3 expression (transformed values in SPADE using arcsinh transformation with cofactor 150) as a heatmap. Annotated areas: 1. naive (CD27–IgD+); 2. switched memory (CD27+IgD–); 3. unswitched (CD27intIgD+); 4. naive (CD27–IgD+); 5. switched (CD27–IgD–); 6. unswitched (CD27intIgD+); 7. switched memory (CD27+IgD–); 8. switched (CD27-IgD–). (b) Box plots of marker distribution in each area (or in all areas [All]) for the pooled samples depicted in (a) (central lines indicate medians, and outer lines indicate IQRs). (c) CXCR3 expression (transformed values) in area 2 for each individual. (d) SPADE image of pooled B cells from all participants, auto-partitioned into eight annotated areas (as in a) with node size scaled to the log number of cells in each node, showing the ratio of median CXCR3 expression (individuals with long-standing diabetes:healthy donors; transformed values) in Study B. (e) Histogram overlays of CXCR3 expression in area 2 for Studies A and B. Orange, newly diagnosed individuals; blue, individuals with long-standing diabetes; grey, healthy donors. (f) CD24 expression (transformed values) in area 2 for each individual. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, †p < 0.005, Student’s t test. AU, arbitrary units; HD, healthy donor; ND, newly diagnosed diabetes; LS, long-standing diabetes. Means ± SEM are shown

Statistical analysis of area 2, which comprised switched memory B cells with a CD21+CD24+CD27+CD38intCD95+IgD− phenotype (Fig. 1a), revealed that CXCR3 expression was reduced in individuals with long-standing diabetes relative to healthy donors in Study A (p < 0.05) and Study B (p < 0.005; Fig. 1c). A similar pattern was observed for newly diagnosed individuals relative to healthy donors in Study A (p < 0.05; Fig. 1c), with a non-significant trend to reduced levels in Study B (p = 0.07). These changes were further visualised by displaying the intensity of CXCR3 expression in individuals with long-standing diabetes vs healthy donors (Fig. 1d) and by overlaying histograms of CXCR3 expression in area 2 (Fig. 1e). No significant correlation was observed between CXCR3 expression levels and the presence of HLA-DRB1*03 or HLA-DRB1*04 in healthy donors (data not shown).

In similar analyses, we found decreased levels of CD24 expression on switched CD21+CD24+CD27+CD38intCD95+IgD− memory B cells (area 2) in newly diagnosed individuals and those with long-standing diabetes vs healthy donors (newly diagnosed individuals: p < 0.01 in Study A, p < 0.01 in Study B; individuals with long-standing diabetes: p < 0.05 in Study A, p < 0.005 in Study B; Fig. 1f). Other significant differences were also noted across both datasets in the diabetes groups compared with healthy donors (Fig. 2). In particular, CXCR3 expression was reduced on unswitched CD27intIgD+ memory B cells (area 3) in individuals with long-standing diabetes vs healthy donors (p < 0.01 in Study A, p < 0.01 in Study B), CD45R/B220 expression was reduced on both unswitched CD27intIgD+ memory B cells (area 3: p < 0.005 in Study A, p < 0.005 in Study B) and naive CD27−IgD+ B cells (area 4: p < 0.05 in Study A, p < 0.005 in Study B), and CD95 expression was reduced on switched CD27+IgD− memory B cells (area 7: p < 0.05 in Study A, p < 0.01 in Study B). Furthermore, in individuals with newly diagnosed diabetes, CD24 expression was reduced on unswitched CD27intIgD+ memory B cells (area 6: p < 0.01 in Study A, p < 0.05 in Study B).
Fig. 2

Extended phenotypic analysis of B cells. Expression levels of surface markers that differed significantly between B cell subsets in individuals with type 1 diabetes and healthy donors are shown (transformed values in SPADE using arcsinh transformation with cofactor 150) for each participant (related to Fig. 1a). (a) CXCR3 expression in area 3 (unswitched CD27int); (b) CD24 expression in area 6 (unswitched CD27int); (c) B220 expression in area 3 (unswitched CD27int); (d) B220 expression in area 4 (naive cells); and (e) CD95 expression in area 7 (switched CD27+ memory cells). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, †p < 0.005, Student’s t test. AU, arbitrary units; HD, healthy donor; ND, newly diagnosed diabetes; LS, long-standing diabetes. Means ± SEM are shown

To confirm these findings, we quantified expression levels of CXCR3 and CD24 on switched CD27+IgD− memory B cells using a manual gating strategy implemented with FlowJo software (Fig. 3). A clear reduction in MFI was observed for CXCR3 expression in individuals with long-standing diabetes vs healthy donors (p < 0.01 in Study A, p < 0.005 in Study B; Fig. 3a). In contrast, CD24 expression was only reduced in Study B (p < 0.01; Fig. 3b).
Fig. 3

Conventional phenotypic analysis of B and T cells. Manually gated CD27+CXCR3+IgD− B cells were analysed for expression of (a) CXCR3 and (b) CD24. (c) Manually gated CXCR3+ T cells were analysed for expression of CXCR3. (d) Manually gated CD38+CXCR3+ T cells were quantified in each individual. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, †p < 0.005, one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test. Values are MFI calculated in FlowJo (not transformed). AU, arbitrary units; HD, healthy donor; ND, newly diagnosed diabetes; LS, long-standing diabetes. Means ± SEM are shown

CXCR3 and CD38 expression are reduced on T cells in individuals with type 1 diabetes

A parallel analysis of CD3+ T cells revealed that CXCR3 expression was reduced in four of the eight areas identified by SPADE (Fig. 4a, b) in individuals with long-standing diabetes vs healthy donors (areas 2, 4, 5 and 6: p < 0.005 in Study A, p < 0.005 in Study B; Fig. 4c–f). High expression levels of CD38 accompanied high expression levels of CXCR3 in area 4 (Fig. 4g). In both area 4 (CD38hiCXCR3hi) and area 6 (CD38intCXCR3hi), CD38 expression was reduced in individuals with long-standing diabetes vs healthy donors (area 4: p < 0.05 in Study A, p < 0.005 in Study B; area 6: p < 0.05 in Study A, p < 0.05 in Study B; Fig. 4i, j), whereas in area 3 (CXCR3lo), CD38 expression was increased in newly diagnosed individuals vs healthy donors (p < 0.05 in Study A, p < 0.005 in Study B; Fig. 4h). The frequency of CD3+ T cells in area 4 was also lower in individuals with long-standing diabetes vs healthy donors (p < 0.05 in Study A, p < 0.05 in Study B; Fig. 4k).
Fig. 4

Phenotypic analysis of T cells. (a) SPADE image of pooled T cells from all participants, auto-partitioned into eight annotated areas with node size scaled to the log number of cells in each node (see b for details of each numbered area), showing median CXCR3 expression (transformed values in SPADE using arcsinh transformation with cofactor 150) as a heatmap. (b) Box plots of marker distribution in each area (or in all areas [All]) for the pooled samples depicted in (a) (the central line in the box plot indicates median, and outer lines IQR). (c–f) CXCR3 expression (transformed values in SPADE using arcsinh transformation with cofactor 150) in the indicated areas (depicted in a) for each participant. (g) SPADE image of pooled T cells from all individuals, auto-partitioned into eight annotated areas (as in a) with node size scaled to the log number of cells in each node, showing median CD38 expression (transformed values in SPADE) as a heatmap. (h–j) CD38 expression (transformed values in SPADE) in the indicated areas (depicted in a) for each participant. (k) Number of cells in area 4 for each participant. *p < 0.05, †p < 0.005, Student’s t test. AU, arbitrary units; HD, healthy donor; ND, newly diagnosed diabetes; LS, long-standing diabetes. Means ± SEM are shown

These findings were confirmed using a manual gating strategy, which showed that CXCR3 expression was reduced on CD3+ T cells in individuals with long-standing diabetes vs healthy donors (p < 0.01 in Study A, p < 0.01 in Study B; Fig. 3c). The frequency of CD3+CD38hiCXCR3hi T cells was also lower in individuals with long-standing type 1 diabetes vs healthy donors (p < 0.05 in Study A, p < 0.05 in Study B; Fig. 3d).

CXCR3 ligand concentrations are increased in individuals with type 1 diabetes

To shed light on these phenotypic changes, we measured serum levels of the CXCR3 ligands CXCL9, CXCL10 and CXCL11, together with IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IFN-γ, TGF-β and BAFF, which modulates the chemotactic properties of B cells to other chemokines [15, 16]. It is also notable that altered expression of the BAFF receptor has been reported in children with type 1 diabetes [15, 16]. Serum concentrations of CXCL10 and CXCL11 were significantly increased in newly diagnosed individuals and those with long-standing diabetes vs healthy donors (CXCL10: p < 0.005 for newly diagnosed individuals vs healthy donors, p < 0.01 for individuals with long-standing diabetes vs healthy donors; CXCL11: p < 0.05 for newly diagnosed individuals vs healthy donors, p < 0.05 for individuals with long-standing diabetes vs healthy donors; Fig. 5a, b). In contrast, serum concentrations of CXCL9 were generally low, with no significant differences among participant groups (Fig. 5c). Serum concentrations of BAFF were significantly increased in individuals with long-standing diabetes vs healthy donors (p < 0.01; Fig. 5d). There were no significant differences among groups with respect to serum concentrations of IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IFN-γ or TGF-β (data not shown).
Fig. 5

Analysis of serum chemokines and cytokines. Serum concentration of (a) CXCL10, (b) CXCL11, (c) CXCL9 and (d) BAFF for each participant. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, †p < 0.005, Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc test. HD, healthy donor; ND, newly diagnosed diabetes; LS, long-standing diabetes. Medians ± IQR are shown

Discussion

The generation of memory B cells from naive precursors is critical for the induction and maintenance of protective antibody responses to infectious agents [17]. Substantial phenotypic heterogeneity exists among memory B cells, and in various autoimmune conditions, such as rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus, altered subset profiles correlate with disease activity [18]. However, few such associations have been described in individuals with type 1 diabetes.

In this study, we examined the phenotypic characteristics of naive and memory B cells in adults with type 1 diabetes and age- and sex-matched healthy donors. Our data showed that CXCR3 expression was reduced on memory B cells in individuals with long-standing diabetes. These changes were associated with raised serum concentrations of BAFF and the CXCR3 ligands CXCL10 and CXCL11. In line with previous studies, we also found that CXCR3 expression was reduced on CD3+ T cells in individuals with long-standing diabetes [19, 20].

Although the changes in CXCR3 expression were only significant in one of the newly diagnosed cohorts, they showed the same downward trend that we observed in the long-standing diabetes cohorts, along with the same significant increases in serum levels of CXCL10 and CXCL11. We therefore suggest that the lack of statistical significance in one of the newly diagnosed cohorts was due to a small sample size, rather than a change in CXCR3 expression limited to individuals with long-standing diabetes.

CXCR3 is constitutively expressed or readily upregulated on a substantial proportion of memory B cells [21, 22]. In contrast to individuals with rheumatoid arthritis or systemic lupus erythematosus [23], we found that expression levels of CD24 and CXCR3 on switched CD21+CD24+CD27+CD38intCD95+IgD− memory B cells were reduced in individuals with long-standing diabetes. These cells are analogous to a highly activated population of CD21+CD24+CD27+CD38+CD95+CXCR3+IgD− B cells, in which decreased expression levels of CD21 and increased expression levels of CD95 and CXCR3 correlate with activation status [18]. Moreover, they are clearly distinct from regulatory CD27−CD24hiCD38hi B cells, which are defective in immune-deficient and other autoimmune conditions [5, 24, 25]. It is also notable that we did not detect increased expression levels of CD95 on switched memory B cells, as described previously in individuals with rheumatoid arthritis [26]. Instead, we found that CD95 expression was reduced on switched CD27+IgD− memory B cells in individuals with long-standing diabetes, consistent with the findings of a recent study by Hanley and colleagues, who also reported lower frequencies of CD24++CD38++ B cells in people with type 1 diabetes [27]. This latter phenotype is indicative of regulatory B cells [28], but does not match the profiles we identified in areas 2 and 6 of the SPADE tree, where reduced expression of CD24 was apparent in newly diagnosed individuals and those with long-standing diabetes. However, it has been reported that people with asthma have decreased percentages of CD24+CD27+ B cells, which are required for the induction of IL10+ T cells [29]. Phenotypically, these cells would be represented in area 2 of the B cell SPADE tree, although the physiological function of the decrease in CD24 expression that we observed is currently unknown.

Serum concentrations of CXCL10 are known to be elevated in individuals with recent-onset type 1 diabetes [30, 31, 32], although there has been one report of decreased CXCL10 levels in children with type 1 diabetes [33] (reviewed in [34]). In a longitudinal study of children enrolled at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes, significantly higher CXCL10 levels were found in these participants compared with healthy control individuals [30]. Serum CXCL10 concentrations remained elevated at 1 month post diagnosis and then declined over the next 9-–30 months, persisting at levels above those detected in healthy control individuals [30]. Another study demonstrated that CXCL10 levels increase over time in at-risk individuals, peaking as they become seropositive for islet autoantibodies, irrespective of further progression to clinical type 1 diabetes [35]. In line with these earlier reports, we found increased serum concentrations of CXCL10 in adults with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes and slightly lower levels in adults with long-standing type 1 diabetes (but elevated compared with healthy control individuals). We further demonstrated increased serum levels of CXCL11 in adults with type 1 diabetes, irrespective of time from diagnosis. Decreased expression levels of CXCR3 on memory B cells in individuals with type 1 diabetes may therefore reflect ligand-induced receptor internalisation and/or downregulation [36]. However, it has also been shown that reduced expression of CXCR3 can lead to increased ligand concentrations, as the receptor has a scavenger function [37]. An alternative possibility is that memory CXCR3hi B cells traffic to the pancreas or pancreatic lymph nodes in individuals with type 1 diabetes, as shown previously for memory T cells [38, 39]. A similar phenomenon may explain why circulating switched memory B cells in individuals with type 1 diabetes also express lower levels of the adhesion molecule CD24.

CXCR3 is widely expressed in the CD3+ compartment, especially among T helper type 1-polarised CD4+ and effector CD8+ T cells [40]. In line with previous studies [19, 20], we found reduced expression levels of CXCR3 on circulating CD3+ T cells in individuals with type 1 diabetes. These findings are compatible with disease-associated trafficking of CD3+CXCR3hi T cells to the pancreas [19, 20, 33]. In addition, we observed a simultaneous decrease in CD38 expression on a proportion of these CD3+ T cells. High levels of CD38 have been described on a subpopulation of peripheral CD4+CD25+CD127dim regulatory T cells, which are sensitive to therapeutic intervention with the CD38-specific monoclonal antibody daratumumab in individuals with multiple myeloma [41]. It has also been reported that CD8+CXCR3+ T cells exert regulatory functions in humans [42]. Alternatively, the CD27+CD38+CD95+CXCR3+ T cell population found in area 4 may represent a stem cell-like memory (TSCM) subset [43]. It is notable in this regard that autoantibodies specific for CD38 have been detected in individuals with type 1 diabetes [44].

In addition to CXCL10 and CXCL11, our analysis of serum chemokines and cytokines revealed elevated concentrations of BAFF in individuals with long-standing diabetes. This cytokine plays a key role in the development of diabetes in NOD mice [45, 46], and previous studies have reported increased serum levels of BAFF in individuals with autoimmune thyroid diseases [47] and rheumatoid arthritis [48]. Decreased expression of the BAFF receptor has also been reported on B cells in children with type 1 diabetes [15]. Intriguingly, BAFF has been shown to enhance the chemotaxis of primary human B cells in response to a variety of chemokines [16]. A disease-relevant synergy may therefore exist in the setting of type 1 diabetes among raised levels of BAFF, CXCL10 and CXCL11.

Future studies will focus on investigating the ability of B cells from individuals with type 1 diabetes to migrate in response to physiological levels of CXCL10 and CXCL11, in the presence and absence of BAFF. It will be important to ascertain whether abnormal blood glucose and insulin levels in individuals with type 1 diabetes contribute to the loss of CXCR3 on memory B cells by studying the effects of ex-vivo culture and by correlating HbA1c values with chemokine and chemokine receptor expression levels. It is notable in this context that glycosylation of the extracellular domains may increase signalling via CXCR3 [49]. A detailed study of postmortem pancreatic histological samples, available from the nPOD collection, may allow the identification of CXCR3++ B cells that trafficked to the pancreas during life, and were thus lost from the periphery. Similarly, the source of raised CXCR3 ligands in the serum remains unknown. Although there is some evidence that the inflamed pancreas can produce CXCR3 ligands in individuals with type 1 diabetes [39], it is also possible that these chemokines are produced in response to elevated glucose levels in the periphery, an effect that could be determined by longitudinal measurements of chemokine levels in conjunction with measurements of HbA1c.

In conclusion, we have identified a mechanistically cohesive immune profile associated with type 1 diabetes. The key abnormalities suggest long-term disruption of a chemokine ligand/receptor system that controls B cell migration. On this basis, we propose that related parameters may find utility as cellular and/or soluble biomarkers to monitor and/or predict the development of islet-specific autoantibody responses.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank K. Miners (Division of Infection and Immunity, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK) for assistance with flow cytometry, J. Pell, R. Stenson, A. Bishop, A. Howell and A. Clark (Centre for Endocrinology and Metabolism, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK) for participant recruitment and W. J. Watkins (Division of Infection and Immunity, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK) for statistical input. We thank P. Qiu (Department of Biochemical Engineering, Georgia Tech and Emory University) for helpful advice on SPADE. We also thank the volunteers who participated in this study.

Contribution statement

WEP, SJH, CNH, ER, JD, GD, SL, DF and KL contributed to the acquisition and analysis of the data. WEP, SJH, LW, CMD, DAP, KL and FSW designed experiments, analysed results and interpreted the data. WEP, SJH, DAP, KL and FSW drafted the manuscript. CNH, ER, JD, GD, SL, DF, LW and CMD revised the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript. The project was conceived by FSW, who is the guarantor of this work.

Funding

This study was funded by Diabetes UK (11/0004319). DAP is a Wellcome Trust Senior Investigator (100326/Z/12/Z).

Duality of interest

The authors declare that there is no duality of interest associated with this manuscript.

Supplementary material

125_2018_4651_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (305 kb)
ESM Tables (PDF 304 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Pescovitz MD, Greenbaum CJ, Bundy B et al (2014) B-lymphocyte depletion with rituximab and β-cell function: two-year results. Diabetes Care 37:453–459CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Itoh N, Hanafusa T, Miyazaki A et al (1993) Mononuclear cell infiltration and its relation to the expression of major histocompatibility complex antigens and adhesion molecules in pancreas biopsy specimens from newly diagnosed insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus individuals. J Clin Invest 92:2313–2322CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Willcox A, Richardson SJ, Bone AJ, Foulis AK, Morgan NG (2009) Analysis of islet inflammation in human type 1 diabetes. Clin Exp Immunol 155:173–181CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Habib T, Funk A, Rieck M et al (2012) Altered B cell homeostasis is associated with type I diabetes and carriers of the PTPN22 allelic variant. J Immunol 188:487–496CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thompson WS, Pekalski ML, Simons HZ et al (2014) Multi-parametric flow cytometric and genetic investigation of the peripheral B cell compartment in human type 1 diabetes. Clin Exp Immunol 177:571–585CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Viisanen T, Ihantola EL, Näntö-Salonen K et al (2017) Circulating CXCR5+PD-1+ICOS+ follicular T helper cells are increased close to the diagnosis of type 1 diabetes in children with multiple autoantibodies. Diabetes 66:437–447CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Deng C, Xiang Y, Tan T et al (2016) Altered peripheral B-lymphocyte subsets in type 1 diabetes and latent autoimmune diabetes in adults. Diabetes Care 39:434–440CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kleffel S, Vergani A, Tezza S et al (2015) Interleukin-10+ regulatory B cells arise within antigen-experienced CD40+ B cells to maintain tolerance to islet autoantigens. Diabetes 64:158–171CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Smith MJ, Packard TA, O’Neill SK et al (2015) Loss of anergic B cells in prediabetic and new-onset type 1 diabetic individuals. Diabetes 64:1703–1712CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    American Diabetes Association (2008) Standards of medical care in diabetes—2008. Diabetes Care 31(Suppl 1):S12–S54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Aitken RJ, Mortimer GL, Gillespie KM (2016) Type 1 diabetes high-risk HLA class II determination by polymerase chain reaction sequence-specific primers. Methods Mol Biol 1433:13–20CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Anchang B, Hart TD, Bendall SC et al (2016) Visualization and cellular hierarchy inference of single-cell data using SPADE. Nat Protoc 11:1264–1279CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Qiu P (2017) Toward deterministic and semiautomated SPADE analysis. Cytometry A 91:281–289CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Saeys Y, Van Gassen S, Lambrecht BN (2016) Computational flow cytometry: helping to make sense of high-dimensional immunology data. Nat Rev Immunol 16:449–462CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Parackova Z, Klocperk A, Rataj M et al (2017) Alteration of B cell subsets and the receptor for B cell activating factor (BAFF) in paediatric individuals with type 1 diabetes. Immunol Lett 189:94–100CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Badr G, Borhis G, Lefevre EA et al (2008) BAFF enhances chemotaxis of primary human B cells: a particular synergy between BAFF and CXCL13 on memory B cells. Blood 111:2744–2754CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yoshida T, Mei H, Dorner T et al (2010) Memory B and memory plasma cells. Immunol Rev 237:117–139CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kaminski DA, Wei C, Qian Y, Rosenberg AF, Sanz I (2012) Advances in human B cell phenotypic profiling. Front Immunol 3:302CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lohmann T, Laue S, Nietzschmann U et al (2002) Reduced expression of Th1-associated chemokine receptors on peripheral blood lymphocytes at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 51:2474–2480CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yamada S, Oikawa Y, Sakai G, Atsumi Y, Maruyama T, Shimada A (2006) Expression levels of CXC chemokine receptors 3 are associated with clinical phenotype of type 1 diabetes. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1079:186–189CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hauser AE, Debes GF, Arce S et al (2002) Chemotactic responsiveness toward ligands for CXCR3 and CXCR4 is regulated on plasma blasts during the time course of a memory immune response. J Immunol 169:1277–1282CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Muehlinghaus G, Cigliano L, Huehn S et al (2005) Regulation of CXCR3 and CXCR4 expression during terminal differentiation of memory B cells into plasma cells. Blood 105:3965–3971CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Henneken M, Dörner T, Burmester GR, Berek C (2005) Differential expression of chemokine receptors on peripheral blood B cells from individuals with rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Res Ther 7:R1001–R1013CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vlkova M, Ticha O, Nechvatalova J et al (2015) Regulatory B cells in CVID individuals fail to suppress multifunctional IFN-γ+TNF-α+CD4+ T cells differentiation. Clin Immunol 160:292–300CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Blair PA, Noreña LY, Flores-Borja F et al (2010) CD19+CD24hiCD38hi B cells exhibit regulatory capacity in healthy individuals but are functionally impaired in systemic lupus erythematosus individuals. Immunity 32:129–140CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Adlowitz DG, Barnard J, Biear JN et al (2015) Expansion of activated peripheral blood memory B cells in rheumatoid arthritis, impact of B cell depletion therapy, and biomarkers of response. PLoS One 10:e0128269CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hanley P, Sutter JA, Goodman NG et al (2017) Circulating B cells in type 1 diabetics exhibit fewer maturation-associated phenotypes. Clin Immunol 183:336–343CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mauri C, Menon M (2015) The expanding family of regulatory B cells. Int Immunol 27:479–486CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    van der Vlugt LE, Mlejnek E, Ozir-Fazalalikhan A et al (2014) CD24hiCD27+ B cells from individuals with allergic asthma have impaired regulatory activity in response to lipopolysaccharide. Clin Exp Allergy 44:517–528CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Antonelli A, Fallahi P, Ferrari SM et al (2008) Serum Th1 (CXCL10) and Th2 (CCL2) chemokine levels in children with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes: a longitudinal study. Diabet Med 25:1349–1353PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Shimada A, Morimoto J, Kodama K et al (2001) Elevated serum IP-10 levels observed in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 24:510–515CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nicoletti F, Conget I, Di Mauro M et al (2002) Serum concentrations of the interferon-γ-inducible chemokine IP-10/CXCL10 are augmented in both newly diagnosed type I diabetes mellitus individuals and subjects at risk of developing the disease. Diabetologia 45:1107–1110CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hedman M, Faresjö M, Axelsson S, Ludvigsson J, Casas R (2008) Impaired CD4+ and CD8+ T cell phenotype and reduced chemokine secretion in recent-onset type 1 diabetic children. Clin Exp Immunol 153:360–368CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Antonelli A, Ferrari SM, Corrado A, Ferrannini E, Fallahi P (2014) CXCR3, CXCL10 and type 1 diabetes. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 25:57–65CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Waugh K, Snell-Bergeon J, Michels A et al (2017) Increased inflammation is associated with islet autoimmunity and type 1 diabetes in the Diabetes Autoimmunity Study in the Young (DAISY). PLoS One 12:e0174840CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Colvin RA, Campanella GSV, Sun J, Luster AD (2004) Intracellular domains of CXCR3 that mediate CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 function. J Biol Chem 279:30219–30227CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cardona AE, Sasse ME, Liu L et al (2008) Scavenging roles of chemokine receptors: chemokine receptor deficiency is associated with increased levels of ligand in circulation and tissues. Blood 112:256–263CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sarkar SA, Lee CE, Victorino F et al (2012) Expression and regulation of chemokines in murine and human type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 61:436–446CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Frigerio S, Junt T, Lu B et al (2002) β cells are responsible for CXCR3-mediated T cell infiltration in insulitis. Nat Med 8:1414–1420CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Groom JR, Luster AD (2011) CXCR3 in T cell function. Exp Cell Res 317:620–631CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Krejcik J, Casneuf T, Nijhof IS et al (2016) Daratumumab depletes CD38+ immune regulatory cells, promotes T cell expansion, and skews T cell repertoire in multiple myeloma. Blood 128:384–394CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Shi Z, Okuno Y, Rifa’i M et al (2009) Human CD8+CXCR3+ T cells have the same function as murine CD8+CD122+ Treg. Eur J Immunol 39:2106–2119CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Mahnke YD, Brodie TM, Sallusto F, Roederer M, Lugli E (2013) The who’s who of T cell differentiation: human memory T cell subsets. Eur J Immunol 43:2797–2809CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mallone R, Ortolan E, Baj G et al (2001) Autoantibody response to CD38 in Caucasian individuals with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: immunological and genetic characterization. Diabetes 50:752–762CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Mariño E, Walters SN, Villanueva JE, Richards JL, Mackay CR, Grey ST (2014) BAFF regulates activation of self-reactive T cells through B cell dependent mechanisms and mediates protection in NOD mice. Eur J Immunol 44:983–993CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Zekavat G, Rostami SY, Badkerhanian A et al (2008) In vivo BLyS/BAFF neutralization ameliorates islet-directed autoimmunity in nonobese diabetic mice. J Immunol 181:8133–8144CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Fabris M, Grimaldi F, Villalta D et al (2010) BLyS and April serum levels in individuals with autoimmune thyroid diseases. Autoimmun Rev 9:165–169CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wei F, Chang Y, Wei W (2015) The role of BAFF in the progression of rheumatoid arthritis. Cytokine 76:537–544CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Sun C, Zhu X, Tao T et al (2017) The β4GalT1 affects the fibroblast-like synoviocytes invasion in rheumatoid arthritis by modifying N-linked glycosylation of CXCR3. Eur J Cell Biol 96:172–181CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wendy E. Powell
    • 1
  • Stephanie J. Hanna
    • 1
  • Claire N. Hocter
    • 1
  • Emma Robinson
    • 1
  • Joanne Davies
    • 1
  • Gareth J. Dunseath
    • 2
  • Stephen Luzio
    • 2
  • Daniel Farewell
    • 3
  • Li Wen
    • 4
  • Colin M. Dayan
    • 1
  • David A. Price
    • 1
  • Kristin Ladell
    • 1
  • F. Susan Wong
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Infection and ImmunityCardiff University School of MedicineCardiffUK
  2. 2.Diabetes Research Unit CymruSwansea UniversitySwanseaUK
  3. 3.Division of Population MedicineCardiff University School of MedicineCardiffUK
  4. 4.Section of Endocrinology, Yale University School of MedicineNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations