Advertisement

Diabetologia

, Volume 61, Issue 7, pp 1548–1559 | Cite as

A heterogeneous response of liver and skeletal muscle fat to the combination of a Paleolithic diet and exercise in obese individuals with type 2 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial

  • Julia Otten
  • Andreas Stomby
  • Maria Waling
  • Andreas Isaksson
  • Ingegerd Söderström
  • Mats Ryberg
  • Michael Svensson
  • Jón Hauksson
  • Tommy Olsson
Open Access
Article

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis

The aim of the study was to investigate ectopic fat deposition and insulin sensitivity, in a parallel single-blinded randomised controlled trial, comparing Paleolithic diet alone with the combination of Paleolithic diet and exercise in individuals with type 2 diabetes.

Methods

Thirty-two individuals with type 2 diabetes with BMI 25–40 kg/m2 and 30–70 years of age followed a Paleolithic diet ad libitum for 12 weeks. In addition, study participants were randomised by computer program to either supervised combined exercise training (PD-EX group) or standard care exercise recommendations (PD group). Staff performing examinations and assessing outcomes were blinded to group assignment. Thirteen participants were analysed in each group: hepatic and peripheral insulin sensitivity were measured using the hyperinsulinaemic–euglycaemic clamp technique combined with [6,6-2H2]glucose infusion, and liver fat was assessed by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy; both analyses were secondary endpoints. Intramyocellular lipid (IMCL) content was measured by magnetic resonance spectroscopy as a secondary analysis. All examinations were performed at Umeå University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden.

Results

Both study groups showed a median body weight loss of 7 kg. Fat mass decreased by 5.7 kg in the PD group and by 6.5 kg in the PD-EX group. Maximum oxygen uptake increased in the PD-EX group only. Liver fat showed a consistent reduction (74% decrease) in the PD group, while the response in the PD-EX group was heterogeneous (p < 0.05 for the difference between groups). IMCL content of the soleus muscle decreased by 40% in the PD group and by 22% in the PD-EX group (p < 0.05 for the difference between groups). Both groups improved their peripheral and adipose tissue insulin sensitivity, but not their hepatic insulin sensitivity. Plasma fetuin-A decreased by 11% in the PD group (p < 0.05) and remained unchanged in the PD-EX group. Liver fat changes during the intervention were correlated with changes in fetuin-A (rS = 0.63, p < 0.01). Participants did not report any important adverse events caused by the intervention.

Conclusions/interpretation

A Paleolithic diet reduced liver fat and IMCL content, while there was a tissue-specific heterogeneous response to added exercise training.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01513798

Funding

Swedish Diabetes Research Foundation, County Council of Västerbotten, Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation, King Gustav V and Queen Victoria’s Foundation

Keywords

Exercise Hyperinsulinaemic–euglycaemic clamp Insulin sensitivity Intramyocellular fat Liver fat Nutrition Obesity Paleolithic diet Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy Weight loss 

Abbreviations

ALT

Alanine aminotransferase

AST

Aspartate aminotransferase

CRP

C-reactive protein

EGP

Endogenous glucose production

FFM

Fat-free mass

IMCL

Intramyocellular lipid

NAFLD

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

PD group

Paleolithic diet group

PD-EX group

Paleolithic diet and exercise group

Introduction

Fat accumulation outside adipose tissue, i.e. ectopic fat in liver and muscle, is linked to decreased insulin sensitivity and type 2 diabetes [1, 2]. However, intervention studies are needed to test a putative causal relationship between changes in ectopic lipid deposition and insulin sensitivity. Diet-induced weight loss in obese individuals is associated with reduction of fat in liver and skeletal muscle [3, 4, 5]. This has been linked to improved insulin sensitivity but has not been a universal finding. Notably, there are conflicting data regarding the effect of macronutrient composition on ectopic fat [3, 4, 5, 6, 7]. Two recent studies on obese postmenopausal women found that a Paleolithic diet consumed ad libitum with a moderately decreased carbohydrate intake and a high content of mono- and polyunsaturated fatty acids effectively reduced liver fat [8, 9]. Furthermore, a Paleolithic diet efficiently improved glucose tolerance in overweight individuals and in people with type 2 diabetes [10, 11, 12].

In contrast to the well-established relationship between diet-induced weight loss and decreased liver fat, it remains unclear whether exercise training decreases liver fat independently of weight reduction. An earlier intervention study in participants with type 2 diabetes reported that 4 months of either aerobic or resistance training was associated with a slight decrease in liver fat [13]. However, aerobic exercise combined with diet intervention does not appear to cause further liver fat reduction compared with diet intervention alone [14, 15]. To our knowledge, no prior study has investigated liver fat changes associated with diet in combination with both aerobic and resistance training. Interestingly, fetuin-A, a multifunctional protein secreted from both liver and adipose tissue, has been suggested as a putative link between insulin resistance and liver and adipose tissue function [16, 17].

Several studies show that individuals with obesity, insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes have higher intramyocellular lipid (IMCL) content compared with lean and healthy individuals [18, 19]. In obese individuals, weight reduction decreases IMCL content and simultaneously improves insulin sensitivity [20, 21]. However, lean endurance-trained athletes exhibit IMCL content measured at rest that is nearly as high as that of people with type 2 diabetes, but with concomitant normal insulin sensitivity, referred to as the athlete’s paradox [18]. Moreover, IMCL content is reduced immediately following an acute bout of aerobic exercise in young lean individuals [22]. This suggests that IMCL is an important intracellular source of energy during exercise in people with high insulin sensitivity. This dynamic response does not occur in obese individuals, who show unchanged IMCL content after 1 h of cycling [23]. Notably, a 12 week exercise intervention in individuals with type 2 diabetes found an increased IMCL content with concomitantly increased insulin sensitivity [24].

Owing to these inconclusive data, it is of major interest to study how a combination of diet intervention and aerobic and resistance training influences ectopic fat deposition and tissue-specific insulin sensitivity in individuals with type 2 diabetes. We therefore tested the hypothesis that overweight individuals with type 2 diabetes on a 12 week Paleolithic diet would exhibit a decrease in liver fat and IMCL content, associated with an improvement in hepatic and peripheral insulin sensitivity. Moreover, we hypothesised that combined aerobic and resistance exercise training would lead to a further improvement in liver fat and peripheral insulin sensitivity.

Methods

Study design

Overweight and obese individuals with type 2 diabetes consumed a Paleolithic diet for 12 weeks. In addition, the participants were randomised to receive either supervised exercise training for 3 h per week (PD-EX group) or standard care exercise recommendations (PD group). The reduction of fat mass was the primary endpoint of this study and has been published previously [25]. The outcome measurements of this article are secondary endpoints (liver fat and peripheral and hepatic insulin sensitivity) and secondary analyses (IMCL).

Participants and randomisation

We used advertisements in local newspapers and posters at Umeå University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden, to recruit individuals with type 2 diabetes, age 30–70 years and BMI 25–40 kg/m2. For inclusion, participants were required to have an HbA1c 48–95 mmol/mol (6.5–10.8%) and be treated with diet and/or metformin. Women had to be postmenopausal. Exclusion criteria were smoking, BP >160/100 mmHg, macroalbuminuria, cardiovascular disease, beta blocker use, severe illness and higher levels of training (e.g. moderate endurance training five times a week, resistance training every other week).

A total of 261 individuals were assessed for eligibility, of whom 32 fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were randomised to the two groups (Fig. 1). Randomisation, using the computer program MinimPy version 0.3 [26], was performed by a statistician blinded to the study and not involved in data collection or analysis. Participants were assigned to either the PD group or the PD-EX group, using biased-coin minimisation with an allocation ratio of 1:1 [27]. The nurses and technicians who performed the examinations were blinded to group affiliation. All participants gave written informed consent. The study protocol was in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration and was approved by the Regional Ethical Review Board, Umeå, Sweden.
Fig. 1

CONSORT flow diagram

Diet intervention

The Paleolithic diet included lean meat, eggs, fish, seafood, nuts, fruits and vegetables. Dairy products, cereals, legumes and added sugar and salt were excluded. Energy intake was ad libitum. Each study group attended five group sessions run by a trained dietitian, and participants could contact the dietitian by e-mail or phone between meetings. Dietary intake was assessed at baseline and at 12 weeks, using a 4 day self-reported weighed food record. A trained dietitian converted the food records into estimated energy and nutrient intakes using the nutritional calculation program Dietist XP 3.2 (Kost och Näringsdata, Bromma, Sweden).

Exercise intervention

Prior to randomisation, all participants were advised to perform at least 30 min of moderate exercise daily in accordance with the current guidelines for people with type 2 diabetes. The PD-EX group additionally underwent a training protocol combining aerobic exercise and resistance training in 1 h sessions three times weekly at the Sports Medicine Unit at Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. Low-intensity aerobic exercise was performed on a cross-trainer, and moderate- or high-intensity interval training was performed on a cycle ergometer. Resistance training included upper and lower body exercises involving multiple muscle groups. All exercise sessions were supervised by personal trainers with a Bachelor of Science degree in sports medicine.

Body composition, liver fat, IMCL, \( \overset{\cdot }{V}{\mathbf{O}}_{\mathbf{2max}} \) and energy expenditure

Body composition analysis was performed using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (Lunar Prodigy X-ray Tube Housing Assembly, Brand BX-1L, Model 8743; GE Medical Systems, Madison, WI, USA) at the Clinical Research Centre at Umeå University Hospital. \( \overset{\cdot }{V}{\mathrm{O}}_{2\max } \) was determined during a standard cardiopulmonary exercise test on a cycle ergometer at the Department of Clinical Physiology at Umeå University Hospital. Resting energy expenditure was measured by indirect calorimetry (Datex-Ohmeda Deltatrac II; Datex-Ohmeda, Madison, WI, USA) and adjusted by subtracting 5% during 8 h of sleep. Physical activity energy expenditure was estimated using a combined heart rate monitor and accelerometer for 7 consecutive days (Actiheart; CamNtech, Cambridge, UK) as previously described [28]. Total energy expenditure was calculated as the sum of resting energy expenditure and physical activity energy expenditure with added 10% for diet-induced thermogenesis.

Liver fat and tibialis anterior/soleus muscle fat were analysed by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy as described in the electronic supplementary material (ESM) Methods.

Insulin sensitivity and insulin clearance

Insulin sensitivity was assessed using the hyperinsulinaemic–euglycaemic clamp technique combined with [6,6-2H2]glucose infusion as previously described [24]. On the day of examination, participants came to the Clinical Research Centre at Umeå University Hospital in the fasted state having refrained from physical exercise for the prior 48 h. A catheter was placed in an antecubital vein for infusion. For blood sampling, a catheter was placed in the contralateral arm, retrograde into a superficial dorsal hand vein, with the hand placed in a heated box for arterialisation. Primed constant infusion of [6,6-2H2]glucose (APL, Stockholm, Sweden) at a rate of 0.22 μmol kg−1 min−1 was initiated at t = 0 min and continued until t = 360 min. At t = 180 min, we initiated primed constant infusion of short-acting insulin (Actrapid; Novo Nordisk, Bagsværd, Denmark) at a rate of 40 mU m−2 min−1, which continued until t = 360 min. Between t = 180 min and t = 360 min, blood was sampled every 5 min for immediate determination of plasma glucose concentration (HemoCue 201 RT; Radiometer Medical, Brønshøj, Denmark). Plasma glucose was clamped at 8 mmol/l by infusion of 20% glucose at a variable rate. This plasma glucose level was chosen based on previous hyperinsulinaemic–euglycaemic clamp studies [29, 30]. Arterialised blood was sampled for determination of plasma glucose and [6,6-2H2]glucose at t = 0, 150, 160, 170, 180, 330, 340, 350 and 360 min. We analysed plasma insulin at t = 0, 180, 240, 300 and 360 min, and NEFA at t = 0, 240, 270, 300, 330 and 360 min.

Gene expression

Real-time quantitative PCR was used to determine relative gene expression of TNFα and IL6 in subcutaneous adipose tissue of the abdomen (see ESM Methods for further details).

Blood sample analysis

Blood samples were taken in the fasting state from a peripheral vein, followed by immediate analysis of plasma insulin, HbA1c, serum triacylglycerols, plasma aspartate aminotransferase (AST), plasma alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and plasma C-reactive protein (CRP) in the Clinical Chemistry unit at Umeå University Hospital. For NEFA analysis, plasma was stored at −80°C and later analysed using the NEFA-HR2 kit (Wako Chemicals, Neuss, Germany). Serum fetuin-A concentrations were determined using a human fetuin-A ELISA kit (BioVendor, Brno, Czech Republic).

The arterialised venous samples of the hyperinsulinaemic–euglycaemic clamp were analysed for [6,6-2H2]glucose and unlabelled glucose using GC-MS at the Swedish Metabolomics Centre, Umeå, Sweden. The samples (100 μl) were extracted with 90% methanol (900 μl), including 13C6-d-glucose as internal standard, then derivatised by addition of freshly prepared acetic anhydride/pyridine (1/1 vol./vol.). Next, the solvent was removed by a stream of N2, and thereafter the samples were dissolved in ethyl acetate. These samples were injected by an Agilent 7693 autosampler (Agilent Technologies, Atlanta, GA, USA) into an Agilent 7890A gas chromatograph, and analysed in an Agilent 7010C QQQ mass spectrometer operating in selected ion monitoring mode. The fragment ion m/z 244 was used to detect [6,6-2H2]glucose; m/z 242 was used for unlabelled glucose and m/z 247 for 13C6-d-glucose. To determine levels of [6,6-2H2]glucose and unlabelled glucose, calibration curves were set up between calibrants and internal standard.

Calculations

Endogenous glucose production (EGP) was determined using Steele’s single-pool non-steady-state equation [31]. The glucose distribution volume was estimated as 0.1625 l/kg body weight. The suppression of EGP (%) was calculated as [EGP basal (t = 150, 160, 170, 180 min) − EGP clamp (t = 330, 340, 350, 360 min)] × 100 / EGP basal. To determine the rate of disappearance, the glucose infusion rate during the last 30 min of clamping was added to the EGP clamp and corrected for the non-steady-state condition using Steele’s equation. One participant was excluded from calculations of EGP and rate of disappearance because the [6,6-2H2] glucose infusion pump did not work properly during the third hour of the examination. Suppression of NEFA (%) was calculated as [(NEFA at t = 0 min) − (NEFA at t = 240, 270, 300, 330, 360 min)] − 100 / (NEFA at t = 0 min) [32]. Insulin clearance during insulin infusion was calculated by dividing the insulin infusion rate [mU (kg FFM)−1 min−1], where FFM is fat-free mass, by the mean plasma insulin concentration during insulin infusion [32].

Statistical analysis

Several variables showed a skewed distribution; thus, we used the Wilcoxon rank-sum test to compare the treatment effect (change from baseline to 12 weeks) between the PD and PD-EX groups. The change over time within each intervention group was determined using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Correlation analyses were performed using Spearman’s rho (rS). A two-sided p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using R, version 3.2.2, a language and environment for statistical computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Data are presented as median (interquartile range).

Results

Participant characteristics and intervention validation

The main results of the intervention have been previously published [25]. In the present substudy, we found no between-group differences in baseline characteristics except a higher fasting glucose in the PD-EX group (Table 1). Median weight loss was 7 kg in both groups (Table 1). Fat mass decreased by 5.7 kg in the PD group and by 6.5 kg in the PD-EX group (Table 1). Food records showed that both study groups similarly reduced total energy intake during the ad libitum diet intervention, mostly by decreasing intake of carbohydrates and saturated fatty acids (Table 2). \( \overset{\cdot }{V}{\mathrm{O}}_{2\max } \) increased by 10% in the PD-EX group and decreased by 3% in the PD group (p < 0.01 for between-group difference). Total physical activity energy expenditure did not change in either group (Table 2).
Table 1

Baseline characteristics, body weight, and fasting blood samples

Variable

PD group

PD-EX group

n (male/female)

13 (9/4)

13 (8/5)

Age, years

60 (54, 64)

61 (58, 67)

Diabetes duration, years

3 (2, 6)

5 (1, 8)

Body weight, kg

  Baseline

90.0 (83.3, 103.2)

97.2 (82.9, 107.4)

  Change 0–12 weeks

−7.1 (−9.8, −5.6)***

−7.0 (−9.7, −5.6)***

BMI, kg/m2

  Baseline

31.4 (29.4, 33.7)

31.4 (29.0, 34.6)

  Change 0–12 weeks

−2.4 (−3.1, −1.8)***

−2.3 (−3.4, −2.2)***

Fat mass, kg

  Baseline

34.4 (30.1, 37.9)

33.6 (29.2, 39.2)

  Change 0–12 weeks

−5.7 (−8.2, −4.0)***

−6.5 (−8.9, −5.1)***

HbA1c, mmol/mol

  Baseline

55 (48, 58)

56 (50, 59)

  Change 0–12 weeks

−11 (−15, −5)**

−11 (−18, −7)**

HbA1c,%

  Baseline

7.2 (6.5, 7.5)

7.3 (6.7, 7.5)

  Change 0–12 weeks

−1.0 (−1.4, −0.5)**

−1.0 (−1.7, −0.6)**

Fasting plasma glucose, mmol/l

  Baseline

8.0 (6.9, 8.5)

8.6 (7.7, 10.5)

  Change 0–12 weeks

−0.9 (−1.8, −0.1)*

−2.0 (−3.0, −1.0)**

Serum triacylglycerols, mmol/l

  Baseline

2.4 (1.4, 3.1)

1.7 (1.0, 2.3)

  Change 0–12 weeks

−0.6 (−1.8, −0.2)*

−0.4 (−1.0, −0.1)**

Plasma NEFA, mmol/l

  Baseline

0.60 (0.53, 0.78)

0.80 (0.65, 0.90)

  Change 0–12 weeks

0.03 (−0.02, 0.20)

−0.04 (−0.12, 0.17)

Plasma AST, μkat/l

  Baseline

0.59 (0.53, 0.71)

0.55 (0.51, 0.66)

  Change 0–12 weeks

−0.05 (−0.14, 0.14)

0.02 (−0.20, 0.22)

Plasma ALT, μkat/l

  Baseline

0.67 (0.53, 0.91)

0.54 (0.48, 0.78)

  Change 0–12 weeks

−0.12 (−0.34, −0.08)**

−0.07 (−0.16, 0.07)

Data are reported as median (interquartile range)

*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 for the within-group change over time from baseline to 12 weeks

p < 0.05 between the PD and PD-EX groups

Table 2

Energy balance and dietary intake

Variable

PD group (n = 12)

PD-EX group (n = 12)

Energy intake, kJ/day

  Baseline

8330 (6204, 10,778)

6673 (5569, 9443)

  Change 0–12 weeks

−1377 (−3284, −1025)**

−2155 (−3330, −649)**

Total energy expenditure, kJ/day

  Baseline

12,619 (11,129, 13,933)

12,485 (9196, 16,778)

  Change 0–12 weeks

−954 (−1485, −285)*

−1305 (−2414, 1201)

Resting energy expenditure, kJ/day

  Baseline

6791 (6184, 7243)

7268 (5565, 7958)

  Change 0–12 weeks

−510 (−774, −188)**

−381 (−715, −92)**

Physical activity energy expenditure, kJ/day

  Baseline

4276 (3615, 5519)

4201 (3008, 7201)

  Change 0–12 weeks

−117 (−870, 372)

−88 (−1686, 1640)

Protein, g/day

  Baseline

80 (69, 95)

77 (63, 106)

  Change 0–12 weeks

5 (−17, 23)

1 (−16, 14)

Protein, g kg−1 day−1

  Baseline

0.85 (0.66, 1.14)

0.78 (0.73, 1.02)

  Change 0–12 weeks

0.10 (−0.09, 0.35)

0.06 (−0.12, 0.25)

Carbohydrate, g/day

  Baseline

204 (148, 280)

169 (152, 197)

  Change 0–12 weeks

−89 (−122, −49)**

−92 (−117, −67)**

Total fat, g/day

  Baseline

84 (58, 115)

64 (46, 98)

  Change 0–12 weeks

−12 (−38, 8)

−10 (−33, 24)

Saturated fatty acids, g/day

  Baseline

31 (21, 48)

25 (19, 35)

  Change 0–12 weeks

−14 (−33, −5)**

−12 (−23, −6)**

Monounsaturated fatty acids, g/day

  Baseline

32 (25, 41)

26 (16, 37)

  Change 0–12 weeks

4 (−16, 14)

5 (−6, 18)

Polyunsaturated fatty acids, g/day

  Baseline

11 (9, 14)

9 (7, 16)

  Change 0–12 weeks

1 (−5, 5)

1 (−3, 7)

Protein, E%

  Baseline

17 (14, 19)

18 (17, 20)

  Change 0–12 weeks

7 (4, 11)**

6 (3, 12)**

Carbohydrate, E%

  Baseline

41 (38, 46)

45 (32, 49)

  Change 0–12 weeks

−10 (−18, −3)*

−14 (−21, −7)**

Total fat, E%

  Baseline

40 (36, 41)

32 (31, 44)

  Change 0–12 weeks

6 (−6, 11)

9 (2, 14)*

Saturated fatty acids, E%

  Baseline

15 (13, 18)

13 (12, 17)

  Change 0–12 weeks

−5 (−8, −3)**

−4 (−7, −2)**

Monounsaturated fatty acids, E%

  Baseline

16 (14, 17)

12 (10, 17)

  Change 0–12 weeks

5 (−3, 11)

10 (5, 12)**

Polyunsaturated fatty acids, E%

  Baseline

5.0 (4.7, 6.4)

5.6 (3.8, 6.4)

  Change 0–12 weeks

2.1 (−0.5, 3.6)*

3.2 (0.9, 3.7)**

Data are reported as median (interquartile range)

*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 for the within-group change over time from baseline to 12 weeks

E%, energy per cent

Insulin sensitivity and insulin clearance

Peripheral insulin sensitivity, measured as the rate of disappearance during the hyperinsulinaemic–euglycaemic clamp, increased by 53% in the PD group (p < 0.05) and by 42% in the PD-EX group (p < 0.01) (Table 3). Hepatic insulin sensitivity, measured as suppression of EGP, remained essentially unchanged during the intervention (Table 3). Both study groups showed increased NEFA suppression during the hyperinsulinaemic–euglycaemic clamp. Adipose tissue insulin sensitivity, calculated as NEFA suppression during the whole clamp examination, increased by 3.4% in both intervention groups (p < 0.05 in the PD group, p < 0.01 in the PD-EX group) (Table 3). When the insulin sensitivity measures were normalised for plasma insulin during the clamp, the PD group showed more pronounced improvement compared with the PD-EX group (Table 3). This was due to increased insulin clearance in the PD group (p < 0.05 for the between-group difference; Fig. 2). The intervention groups did not significantly differ in any measure of insulin sensitivity.
Table 3

Insulin sensitivity

Insulin sensitivity

PD group

PP-EX group

Peripheral insulin sensitivity

  Rate of disappearance, mg kg−1 min−1

  

    Baseline

3.79 (2.95, 4.23)

3.87 (3.02, 5.26)

    Change 0–12 weeks

2.05 (0.32, 3.59)*

1.15 (0.67, 2.66)**

  Rate of disappearance/insulin, μg kg−1 min−1 per mU/l

    Baseline

34.2 (28.6, 49.2)

46.2 (35.0, 74.5)

    Change 0–12 weeks

28.9 (11.8, 61.5)**

14.6 (5.0, 30.3)**

Hepatic insulin sensitivity

  EGP, mg kg−1 min−1

    Baseline

1.81 (1.56, 1.99)

1.78 (1.51, 2.49)

    Change 0–12 weeks

0.04 (−0.06, 0.55)

0.11 (−0.18, 0.60)

  Suppression of EGP, %

    Baseline

96 (83, 128)

114 (85, 121)

    Change 0–12 weeks

13 (−10, 44)

11 (−33, 35)

  Suppression of EGP/insulin, % per mU/l

    Baseline

0.98 (0.77, 1.36)

1.51 (0.97, 1.74)

    Change 0–12 weeks

0.22 (−0.03, 0.91)*

0.06 (−0.45, 0.55)

Adipose tissue insulin sensitivity

  Suppression of NEFA, %

    Baseline

88 (80, 93)

89 (85, 93)

    Change 0–12 weeks

3.4 (1.3, 5.7)*

3.4 (0.2, 7.8)**

  Suppression of NEFA/insulin, % per mU/l1

    Baseline

0.83 (0.74, 1.08)

1.12 (0.95, 1.27)

    Change 0–12 weeks

0.14 (0.03, 0.31)**

0.11 (−0.06, 0.20)

Data are reported as median (interquartile range)

*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 for the within-group change over time from baseline to 12 weeks

p < 0.05 between the PD and PD-EX groups

Fig. 2

Insulin clearance during 12 weeks of intervention in the PD and PD-EX groups. *p < 0.05 for the within-group change over time from baseline to 12 weeks. p < 0.05 for the intervention effect between the PD group and the PD-EX group

Fat in soleus and tibialis anterior muscle

IMCL content of the soleus muscle decreased by 40% in the PD group, but showed no significant change in the PD-EX group (Fig. 3a). Tibialis anterior IMCL content did not change significantly in either intervention group (data not shown). Tibialis anterior IMCL content at baseline was associated with peripheral insulin sensitivity (rS = −0.45, p < 0.05) and fasting plasma NEFA (rS = 0.59, p < 0.05). Changes in tibialis and soleus muscle IMCL content during the intervention were not correlated with changes in peripheral insulin sensitivity.
Fig. 3

IMCL content of the soleus muscle (a) and liver fat (b) during 12 weeks of intervention in the PD and PD-EX groups. IMCL is normalised to the creatine concentration of the muscle. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 for the within-group change over time from baseline to 12 weeks. p < 0.05 for the intervention effect between the PD group and the PD-EX group

Liver fat

All participants in the PD group decreased their liver fat, while the intervention response was more heterogeneous in the PD-EX group (Fig. 3b). Median hepatic lipid reduction was 74% for the PD group and 32% for the PD-EX group (p < 0.05 for the difference between groups).

Liver fat increased substantially in three individuals in the PD-EX group. After exclusion of these outliers, the median decrease in liver fat in the PD-EX group was 43% (p < 0.05), with no significant difference between the intervention groups (p = 0.08). Excluding the three outliers did not alter the results of the other statistical analyses (ESM Table 1). The three individuals whose liver fat increased during the intervention had a greater decrease in soleus muscle IMCL content compared with the other participants in the PD-EX group (ESM Table 1). \( \overset{\cdot }{V}{\mathrm{O}}_{2\max } \), plasma triacylglycerols, plasma AST, plasma ALT and plasma CRP were improved or unchanged in these three individuals (ESM Table 1).

Liver fat was not associated with hepatic insulin sensitivity at baseline. The decrease in liver fat during the intervention was correlated with an improvement in hepatic insulin sensitivity in the PD group (rS = −0.62, p < 0.05) but not in the PD-EX group. Liver fat was associated with adipose tissue insulin sensitivity (NEFA suppression during the clamp) at baseline (rS = −0.58, p < 0.01).

Plasma fetuin-A

Plasma fetuin-A decreased by 11% in the PD group (p < 0.05) and remained unchanged in the PD-EX group (Fig. 4). Liver fat changes during the intervention were strongly correlated with changes in fetuin-A (rS = 0.63, p < 0.01; Fig. 5). Changes in adipose tissue insulin sensitivity (suppression of NEFA/insulin) were also associated with changes in fetuin-A (rS = 0.51, p < 0.01). By contrast, we found no association between changes in fetuin-A levels and changes in hepatic or peripheral sensitivity. The three participants in the PD-EX group who showed increased liver fat also showed increased plasma fetuin-A levels (Fig. 5).
Fig. 4

Plasma fetuin-A levels during 12 weeks of intervention in the PD and PD-EX groups. *p < 0.05 for the within-group change over time from baseline to 12 weeks

Fig. 5

Association between change in liver fat and change in plasma fetuin-A during the intervention

Inflammation in plasma and adipose tissue

Plasma CRP decreased in the PD-EX group (p < 0.05; Table 4). In adipose tissue, IL6 and TNFα gene expression did not change significantly during the intervention. During the intervention, the change in TNFα gene expression in subcutaneous adipose tissue was associated with the change in fasting plasma NEFA (rS = 0.45, p < 0.05).
Table 4

Inflammatory markers in plasma and subcutaneous adipose tissue

Marker

PD group

PD-EX group

Plasma CRP, nmol/l

  Baseline

11 (6, 27)

13 (6, 23)

  Change 0–12 weeks

−2 (−9, 1)

−3 (−8, 0)*

IL6 in s.c. adipose tissue, relative expression of mRNA

  Baseline

0.81 (0.42, 1.16)

0.79 (0.61, 1.17)

  Change 0–12 weeks

0.15 (−0.45, 0.62)

−0.14 (−0.42, 0.01)

TNFα in s.c. adipose tissue, relative expression of mRNA

  Baseline

2.19 (1.79, 3.03)

2.45 (1.89, 3.81)

  Change 0–12 weeks

−0.06 (−0.53, 0.35)

−0.70 (−1.02, 0.32)

Data are reported as median (interquartile range)

*p < 0.05 for the within-group change over time from baseline to 12 weeks

Discussion

This intervention with a Paleolithic diet in overweight individuals with type 2 diabetes showed decreased ectopic lipid accumulation in liver and soleus muscle, as well as improved peripheral insulin sensitivity. On a group level, the addition of combined resistance and aerobic exercise training to the diet intervention reduced the effect on muscle and liver fat content. This was due to the considerable heterogeneity in response to exercise. Decreased liver fat during the intervention was strongly associated with reduction in plasma fetuin-A levels in both intervention groups. This was linked to an improvement in adipose tissue insulin sensitivity.

Current guidelines for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) recommend lifestyle interventions involving diet and exercise to decrease liver fat [33]. However, earlier studies suggest a complex relationship between liver fat and the effect of lifestyle interventions. Two short-term studies showed that weight reduction by a low-carbohydrate diet effectively reduced liver fat [4, 5]. We found a reduction in liver fat after a Paleolithic diet with a moderately reduced carbohydrate content. We anticipated that our combined intervention in individuals with type 2 diabetes would show an additional fat-decreasing effect on the liver, as a recent meta-analysis concluded that exercise reduces hepatic fat content [34]. Unexpectedly, three individuals in the PD-EX group showed a clear increase in liver fat. After exclusion of these three individuals, we found that liver fat decreased significantly in both study groups, with no difference between groups, while all other comparisons were unaltered. There may be several explanations for the unexpected response regarding liver fat in some individuals, including a prolonged exercise-induced increase in liver fat in some individuals or increased metabolic flexibility. The three individuals whose liver fat increased during 12 weeks of exercise thus showed decreased or unchanged inflammation (plasma CRP levels), triacylglycerol levels and liver enzymes, indicating improved metabolic health in this subgroup. A third possibility is that the participants did not refrain from exercise for 48 h before the examination as they were supposed to, leading to a decrease in muscle fat and an increase in liver fat.

In healthy people with normal weight and in overweight individuals, an acute bout of aerobic exercise immediately increases liver fat [35, 36]. This exercise-induced increase in liver fat seems to be mainly due to the rise in plasma NEFA during and after exercise [35, 36]. All participants in our study were told to refrain from exercise for 48 h prior to liver fat examination. A possible explanation for the conundrum could be that an exercise-induced increase in liver fat may last longer than 2 days in some individuals.

Lipolysis and inflammation are closely linked [37]. During our intervention, decreasing TNFα expression in adipose tissue was associated with decreasing plasma NEFA levels. Moreover, we found an association between liver fat and suppressibility of NEFA production, highlighting the importance of plasma NEFA concentration for hepatic lipid content. In NAFLD, most triacylglycerols in the fatty liver originate from plasma NEFA, and most plasma NEFA originate from adipose tissue [38]. Plasma NEFA uptake in liver cells and esterification into hepatic triacylglycerols are insulin-independent, depending only on the plasma NEFA concentration [39]. Notably, the percentage of plasma NEFA taken up by the liver remains constant both during and after exercise [40].

Plasma NEFA concentrations are also important for IMCL content, and we found that fasting plasma NEFA levels were closely associated with IMCL content of the tibialis anterior muscle. In healthy individuals, IMCL is used as an energy substrate during exercise and is replenished during recovery. Endurance athletes who performed 3 h of cycling exercise had a 20% decrease in IMCL content in the legs and a simultaneous 38% increase in IMCL content in the non-exercising arms [22]. Importantly, obesity and type 2 diabetes are associated with a lack of this dynamic response to exercise, which may be related to continuously increased plasma NEFA levels [23]. However, if adipose tissue lipolysis is reduced with a nicotinic acid analogue, plasma NEFA levels are reduced and the decrease in IMCL content during one bout of exercise is more pronounced [41].

Another contributing factor to the heterogeneous response in the combined diet and exercise intervention is the intake of carbohydrates. Suppression of adipose tissue lipolysis through insulin administration or carbohydrate ingestion leads to a reduction in plasma NEFA levels. Indeed, glucose ingestion during exercise causes plasma NEFA levels to decrease below fasting levels during and after exercise [36, 42]. Accordingly, glucose supplementation during and after cycling prevents an increase in liver fat during the recovery phase [36]. Furthermore, studies with isoenergetic diets show a decrease in liver fat only with high-carbohydrate diets, not with high-fat diets [6, 7]. Although energy intake was ad libitum in our study, participants reported decreases in carbohydrate and total energy intake. More detailed studies of macronutrient intake in relation to exercise are therefore of interest regarding the effects on hepatic lipid content.

Fetuin-A is secreted mainly from liver and adipose tissue and is elevated in type 2 diabetes and NAFLD [17, 43, 44]. Circulating fetuin-A levels have been associated with severity of liver steatosis, independently of insulin resistance, and with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis [45, 46]. Our results showed a strong association between fetuin-A levels and changes in liver fat content. Changes in circulating fetuin-A levels were also associated with the ability to suppress NEFA production. Since fetuin-A can be secreted by both hepatocytes and adipocytes, it remains unclear whether fetuin-A secreted by the liver influences adipose tissue or the other way round.

The PD group increased insulin clearance, which might have been due to the improvement in liver fat content. Hepatocytes thus show impaired insulin clearance when loaded with triacylglycerols in vitro [47], and liver fat is inversely related to insulin clearance in vivo [48].

Improvement of hepatic insulin sensitivity was less pronounced in our intervention: only if normalised by insulin, the PD group increased hepatic insulin sensitivity. This may relate to the relatively well-preserved hepatic insulin sensitivity in our study cohort. In most studies, diet-induced weight loss in people with type 2 diabetes causes an increase in hepatic insulin sensitivity, but some authors report it unchanged [49, 50].

A limitation of our study is that the insulin dose might have been too high to detect changes in hepatic insulin sensitivity. Moreover, target plasma glucose during the euglycaemic clamp was 8 mmol/l, which may not represent euglycaemia, especially after the intervention when fasting glucose was normalised. A lower insulin dose and a lower glucose target during the clamp studies might have detected more subtle changes in hepatic insulin sensitivity. Indeed, we have previously demonstrated an improvement in HOMA-IR after 5 weeks and 6 months following a Paleolithic diet in healthy overweight participants [8, 9].

Another limitation is that we had to exclude soleus muscle measurements from three participants because we could not separate the intramyocellular and extramyocellular lipid signals. This is a known technical difficulty related to the fact that soleus muscle fibres are not aligned in parallel to the main magnetic field. This shortage of data limits our ability to draw conclusions regarding the effects of the intervention on different skeletal muscle types. Finally, analyses of gene variants that may influence liver fat accumulation, e.g. PNPLA3, are of interest in future intervention studies.

In conclusion, our results indicate that an exercise intervention is associated with a heterogeneous response in liver fat content in obese individuals with type 2 diabetes, despite improved metabolic health. Further studies are needed to understand how exercise changes liver fat and hepatic insulin sensitivity in relation to energy balance and macronutrient intake among individuals with obesity and type 2 diabetes.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the study participants; the research nurses I. Arnesjö, K. Iselid, L. Uddståhl, C. Ring and L. H. Bergman at the Clinical Research Centre, (Umeå University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden) for performing the clamp examinations; A. Tellström (Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden) for guiding participants during the diet intervention; and K. Lundgren (Swedish Metabolomics Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden) for the GC-MS analysis of [6,6-2H2]glucose. Parts of this paper were presented at the 52nd Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes, Munich, Germany, 12–16 September 2016.

Contribution statement

JO designed the study, recruited the participants, collected the data, performed the statistical analyses and wrote the manuscript. AS, MW, MR, MS and JH designed the study, interpreted the data and revised the manuscript. MW implemented the dietary intervention. AI conducted the exercise intervention, analysed and interpreted the data and drafted the article. IS analysed fetuin-A, TNFα and IL6 and drafted the article. JH analysed the spectroscopy data. TO designed the study, interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript. All authors gave their final approval of the manuscript to be published. JO is the guarantor of this work and, as such, had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Funding

This study was supported by grants from the Swedish Diabetes Research Foundation (2014-096), the County Council of Västerbotten (VLL-460481), the Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation (20120450), and King Gustav V and Queen Victoria’s Foundation.

Duality of interest

The authors declare that there is no duality of interest associated with this manuscript.

Supplementary material

125_2018_4618_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (158 kb)
ESM (PDF 158 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Cusi K (2016) Treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: current approaches and future directions. Diabetologia 59:1012–1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Perseghin G, Scifo P, De Cobelli F et al (1999) Intramyocellular triglyceride content is a determinant of in vivo insulin resistance in humans: a 1H-13C nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy assessment in offspring of type 2 diabetic parents. Diabetes 48:1600–1606CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Haufe S, Engeli S, Kast P et al (2011) Randomized comparison of reduced fat and reduced carbohydrate hypocaloric diets on intrahepatic fat in overweight and obese human subjects. Hepatology 53:1504–1514CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Browning JD, Baker JA, Rogers T, Davis J, Satapati S, Burgess SC (2011) Short-term weight loss and hepatic triglyceride reduction: evidence of a metabolic advantage with dietary carbohydrate restriction. Am J Clin Nutr 93:1048–1052CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kirk E, Reeds DN, Finck BN, Mayurranjan SM, Patterson BW, Klein S (2009) Dietary fat and carbohydrates differentially alter insulin sensitivity during caloric restriction. Gastroenterology 136:1552–1560CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Westerbacka J, Lammi K, Hakkinen AM et al (2005) Dietary fat content modifies liver fat in overweight nondiabetic subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:2804–2809CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    van Herpen NA, Schrauwen-Hinderling VB, Schaart G, Mensink RP, Schrauwen P (2011) Three weeks on a high-fat diet increases intrahepatic lipid accumulation and decreases metabolic flexibility in healthy overweight men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96:E691–E695CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ryberg M, Sandberg S, Mellberg C et al (2013) A Palaeolithic-type diet causes strong tissue-specific effects on ectopic fat deposition in obese postmenopausal women. J Intern Med 274:67–76CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Otten J, Mellberg C, Ryberg M et al (2016) Strong and persistent effect on liver fat with a Paleolithic diet during a two-year intervention. Int J Obes 40:747–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lindeberg S, Jonsson T, Granfeldt Y et al (2007) A Palaeolithic diet improves glucose tolerance more than a Mediterranean-like diet in individuals with ischaemic heart disease. Diabetologia 50:1795–1807CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jonsson T, Granfeldt Y, Ahren B et al (2009) Beneficial effects of a Paleolithic diet on cardiovascular risk factors in type 2 diabetes: a randomized cross-over pilot study. Cardiovasc Diabetol 8:35CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Frassetto LA, Schloetter M, Mietus-Synder M, Morris RC Jr, Sebastian A (2009) Metabolic and physiologic improvements from consuming a paleolithic, hunter-gatherer type diet. Eur J Clin Nutr 63:947–955CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bacchi E, Negri C, Targher G et al (2013) Both resistance training and aerobic training reduce hepatic fat content in type 2 diabetic subjects with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (the RAED2 Randomized Trial). Hepatology 58:1287–1295CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tamura Y, Tanaka Y, Sato F et al (2005) Effects of diet and exercise on muscle and liver intracellular lipid contents and insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetic patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:3191–3196CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bozzetto L, Prinster A, Annuzzi G et al (2012) Liver fat is reduced by an isoenergetic MUFA diet in a controlled randomized study in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 35:1429–1435CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stefan N, Haring HU (2013) Circulating fetuin-A and free fatty acids interact to predict insulin resistance in humans. Nat Med 19:394–395CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Trepanowski JF, Mey J, Varady KA (2015) Fetuin-A: a novel link between obesity and related complications. Int J Obes 39:734–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Goodpaster BH, He J, Watkins S, Kelley DE (2001) Skeletal muscle lipid content and insulin resistance: evidence for a paradox in endurance-trained athletes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:5755–5761CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Falholt K, Jensen I, Lindkaer Jensen S et al (1988) Carbohydrate and lipid metabolism of skeletal muscle in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabet Med 5:27–31CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Greco AV, Mingrone G, Giancaterini A et al (2002) Insulin resistance in morbid obesity: reversal with intramyocellular fat depletion. Diabetes 51:144–151CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gray RE, Tanner CJ, Pories WJ, MacDonald KG, Houmard JA (2003) Effect of weight loss on muscle lipid content in morbidly obese subjects. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 284:E726–E732CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schrauwen-Hinderling VB, van Loon LJ, Koopman R, Nicolay K, Saris WH, Kooi ME (2003) Intramyocellular lipid content is increased after exercise in nonexercising human skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol (1985) 95:2328–2332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ipavec-Levasseur S, Croci I, Choquette S et al (2015) Effect of 1-h moderate-intensity aerobic exercise on intramyocellular lipids in obese men before and after a lifestyle intervention. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 40:1262–1268CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Meex RC, Schrauwen-Hinderling VB, Moonen-Kornips E et al (2010) Restoration of muscle mitochondrial function and metabolic flexibility in type 2 diabetes by exercise training is paralleled by increased myocellular fat storage and improved insulin sensitivity. Diabetes 59:572–579CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Otten J, Stomby A, Waling M et al (2017) Benefits of a Paleolithic diet with and without supervised exercise on fat mass, insulin sensitivity, and glycemic control: a randomized controlled trial in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev  https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.2828
  26. 26.
    Saghaei M, Saghaei S (2011) Implementation of an open-source customizable minimization program for allocation of patients to parallel groups in clinical trials. J Biomed Sci Eng 4:734–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pocock SJ, Simon R (1975) Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial. Biometrics 31:103–115CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Brage S, Brage N, Franks PW, Ekelund U, Wareham NJ (2005) Reliability and validity of the combined heart rate and movement sensor Actiheart. Eur J Clin Nutr 59:561–570CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ryysy L, Hakkinen AM, Goto T et al (2000) Hepatic fat content and insulin action on free fatty acids and glucose metabolism rather than insulin absorption are associated with insulin requirements during insulin therapy in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes 49:749–758CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Juurinen L, Kotronen A, Graner M, Yki-Järvinen H (2008) Rosiglitazone reduces liver fat and insulin requirements and improves hepatic insulin sensitivity and glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes requiring high insulin doses. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93:118–124CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Steele R (1959) Influences of glucose loading and of injected insulin on hepatic glucose output. Ann N Y Acad Sci 82:420–430CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kotronen A, Juurinen L, Tiikkainen M, Vehkavaara S, Yki-Järvinen H (2008) Increased liver fat, impaired insulin clearance, and hepatic and adipose tissue insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes. Gastroenterology 135:122–130CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE et al (2012) The diagnosis and management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: practice guideline by the American Gastroenterological Association, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, and American College of Gastroenterology. Gastroenterology 142:1592–1609CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Golabi P, Locklear CT, Austin P et al (2016) Effectiveness of exercise in hepatic fat mobilization in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: systematic review. World J Gastroenterol 22:6318–6327CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Egger A, Kreis R, Allemann S et al (2013) The effect of aerobic exercise on intrahepatocellular and intramyocellular lipids in healthy subjects. PLoS One 8:e70865CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bilet L, Brouwers B, van Ewijk PA et al (2015) Acute exercise does not decrease liver fat in men with overweight or NAFLD. Sci Rep 5:9709CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Chen Z, Yu R, Xiong Y, Du F, Zhu S (2017) A vicious circle between insulin resistance and inflammation in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Lipids Health Dis 16:203CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Donnelly KL, Smith CI, Schwarzenberg SJ, Jessurun J, Boldt MD, Parks EJ (2005) Sources of fatty acids stored in liver and secreted via lipoproteins in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Clin Invest 115:1343–1351CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Vatner DF, Majumdar SK, Kumashiro N et al (2015) Insulin-independent regulation of hepatic triglyceride synthesis by fatty acids. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:1143–1148CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Van Hall G, Bulow J, Sacchetti M, Al Mulla N, Lyngso D, Simonsen L (2002) Regional fat metabolism in human splanchnic and adipose tissues; the effect of exercise. J Physiol 543:1033–1046CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    van Loon LJ, Manders RJ, Koopman R et al (2005) Inhibition of adipose tissue lipolysis increases intramuscular lipid use in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetologia 48:2097–2107CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Schrauwen P, Hesselink MK, Vaartjes I et al (2002) Effect of acute exercise on uncoupling protein 3 is a fat metabolism-mediated effect. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 282:E11–E17CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ix JH, Wassel CL, Kanaya AM et al (2008) Fetuin-A and incident diabetes mellitus in older persons. JAMA 300:182–188CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ou HY, Yang YC, Wu HT, Wu JS, Lu FH, Chang CJ (2012) Increased fetuin-A concentrations in impaired glucose tolerance with or without nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, but not impaired fasting glucose. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97:4717–4723CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Rametta R, Ruscica M, Dongiovanni P et al (2014) Hepatic steatosis and PNPLA3 I148M variant are associated with serum fetuin-A independently of insulin resistance. Eur J Clin Investig 44:627–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kahraman A, Sowa JP, Schlattjan M et al (2013) Fetuin-A mRNA expression is elevated in NASH compared with NAFL patients. Clin Sci (Lond) 125:391–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Strang BD, Bertics SJ, Grummer RR, Armentano LE (1998) Relationship of triglyceride accumulation to insulin clearance and hormonal responsiveness in bovine hepatocytes. J Dairy Sci 81:740–747CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Goto T, Onuma T, Takebe K, Kral JG (1995) The influence of fatty liver on insulin clearance and insulin resistance in non-diabetic Japanese subjects. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 19:841–845PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Petersen KF, Dufour S, Befroy D, Lehrke M, Hendler RE, Shulman GI (2005) Reversal of nonalcoholic hepatic steatosis, hepatic insulin resistance, and hyperglycemia by moderate weight reduction in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 54:603–608CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Nowotny B, Zahiragic L, Bierwagen A et al (2015) Low-energy diets differing in fibre, red meat and coffee intake equally improve insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetes: a randomised feasibility trial. Diabetologia 58:255–264CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Division of MedicineUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden
  2. 2.Department of Food and NutritionUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden
  3. 3.Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Sports Medicine UnitUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden
  4. 4.Department of Radiation Sciences, Radiation Physics and Biomedical EngineeringUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden

Personalised recommendations