Organ donor pancreases for the study of human islet cell histology and pathophysiology: a precious and valuable resource
Direct in vivo assessment of pancreatic islet-cells for the study of the pathophysiology of diabetes in humans is hampered by anatomical and technological hurdles. To date, most of the information that has been generated is derived from histological studies performed on pancreatic tissue from autopsy, surgery, in vivo biopsy or organ donation. Each approach has its advantages and disadvantages (as summarised in this commentary); however, in this edition of Diabetologia, Kusmartseva et al ( https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-017-4494-x) provide further evidence to support the use of organ donor pancreases for the study of human diabetes. They show that length of terminal hospitalisation of organ donors prior to death does not seem to influence the frequency of inflammatory cells infiltrating the pancreas and the replication of beta cells. These findings are reassuring, demonstrating the reliability of this precious and valuable resource for human islet cells research.
KeywordsAutoptic samples Beta cells Islet cells Organ donors Pancreatectomy Pancreatic biopsies
Cold ischaemia time
Insulin-secreting beta cells, sophisticated and unique endocrine cells, comprise the majority of cells in the pancreatic islets. Their failure, owing to the interplay of genetic, epigenetic and environmental factors, is key to the onset and progression of type 1 and type 2 diabetes [1, 2]. Therefore, there is much interest in investigating the properties of beta cells in health and disease, with the hope of improving strategies for diabetes prevention and treatment [1, 2, 3, 4]. However, direct evaluation of beta cell features in vivo is substantially impeded by several factors. For instance, the pancreas is located deep in the abdomen, in close vicinity and/or direct contact to vital organs and vessels, and this anatomy makes accessibility extremely limited. In addition, despite much ongoing work, clinical-grade contrast agents and suitable techniques for beta cell imaging are not currently available . Further, owing to the relatively small size of islets, their scattered distribution in the pancreas and the low total amount of beta cells (≤1–2% of the whole pancreatic mass), it is difficult to study this organ. As a consequence, most information on islet and beta cell pathophysiology in humans derives from histological studies.
Sources of pancreatic tissue
For over a century since the discovery of the pancreatic islets in the rabbit by Paul Langerhans , microscopy-based investigations of the human pancreas have used samples from organs obtained at autopsy . This work has resulted in pioneering observations, such as the discovery of lesions in islets from individuals with diabetes, which was the first evidence for a link between alterations in islet morphology and the disease . Following on, particularly in the past few decades, changes in islet and/or beta cell mass, volume and area have been reported in autoptic pancreatic samples of those with either type 1 and (although with less consistent results) type 2 diabetes [9, 10, 11, 12]. Such an approach has also allowed for the assessment of morphological patterns associated with beta cell death and, in some cases, beta cell regeneration [9, 10, 11, 12]. One advantage of using pancreases from autopsies is the possibility to access the whole gland, which may permit detailed morphometric studies. However, the quality of autoptic pancreatic specimens may be jeopardised by variability in cold ischaemia time (CIT; the time between organ removal and chilling of the tissue), which in turn could lead to tissue autolysis and, therefore, limit the morphological quality of the samples and the stability of their cellular components .
Samples from surgery
More recently, pancreatic surgical samples obtained after removal of portions of the gland (usually owing to the presence of pancreatic tumours) have been used in research. This approach has been generally applied for the comparison of islets and beta cells from those with and without type 2 diabetes, and also to study beta cell traits in individuals with insulin resistance [14, 15, 16, 17]. Obvious advantages associated with the use of surgical samples are, for instance, minimal cold ischaemia and the possibility to evaluate insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity in the patients before and even after pancreatectomy, for analysis of correlation with histological findings. In addition, techniques have been developed for the in situ study of pancreatic exocrine and endocrine cells, using tissue slides from surgical pancreas samples . At the same time, a number of limitations should be taken into account, such as the possible presence of diabetes caused by the underlying disorder of the exocrine pancreas (type 3c diabetes, which may be erroneously classified as type 2 diabetes) [19, 20], the limited amount of tissue yielded, the variable regions of the pancreas subjected to resection and the possible influence of the diverse tumours on neighbouring cells.
Laparoscopic-assisted biopsy samples
On a few occasions, pancreatic tissue samples have been obtained by laparoscopic-assisted biopsy procedures in individuals with recent-onset type 1 diabetes [21, 22, 23]. This has allowed for the study of several morphological, functional and molecular properties of the islets and the beta cells early in the natural history of the disease, in samples of very good quality. However, pancreatic biopsy carries a high risk of complications, such as postoperative bleeding and leakage of amylase-rich pancreatic juice from the margins of the resection, which makes the use of this procedure for research purposes unacceptable in most cases.
Brain-dead organ donation
Validity of brain-dead organ donor pancreases for research
For the reasons mentioned above, the use of organ donor pancreases in research is being extensively implemented by single research groups and also, very importantly, by dedicated networks. For example, the Network for Pancreatic Organ donors with Diabetes (nPOD; www.jdrfnpod.org), which was started in 2007 by JDRF in the USA, has reported use of organ donor pancreases in their research. Similarly, the more recent programme INNODIA (an Innovative Medicines Initiative [IMI] 2 Joint Undertaking, receiving support from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations [EFPIA], JDRF, and the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust; https://innodia.eu/) has also adopted use of these samples. However, there are some concerns regarding the use of organ donor pancreases. For instance, the longer the interval between organ removal and tissue processing for clinical or research purposes (CIT), the worse the outcome of pancreas transplant or islet isolation . However, the duration of CIT can be controlled by the operators and is consistently registered, which should avoid the use of organs of poor quality caused by excessive CIT duration. On the contrary, for obvious reasons, research teams have no control of other typical steps in the organ donation timeline, such as the duration of hospital admission prior to brain death and the brain death to organ removal interval, both of which have been suggested to affect the properties of pancreatic non-endocrine and endocrine cells.
Importantly, however, in this edition of Diabetologia, Kusmartseva et al  report that duration of hospital time prior to organ donor death does not affect the frequency of cell infiltration into the pancreas or the amount of replicating beta cells, thus reinforcing the validity and value of this precious resource. The authors studied pancreases from 39 organ donors without a history of diabetes and collected sample sections from tissue blocks of the different regions (head, body and tail) of the gland. The donors were age, sex, BMI and ethnicity-matched in groups of three, and within each group, individuals varied in terms of duration of hospitalisation stay prior to organ retrieval (<3 days, 3 to <6 days or ≥6 days). In addition, the authors gathered information on the medications administered prior to death. Single or double immunohistochemistry staining was then performed to identify cells positive for insulin, the leucocyte marker CD45, the macrophage marker CD68 and the replication marker Ki67. The authors found that there were no differences in CD45+ and CD68+ cell frequencies between hospitalisation groups, suggesting no major impact of hospitalisation stay on the amount of these immune cells in the pancreas. In addition, the interaction of hospitalisation time with age group of organ donors also did not influence the amount of infiltrating immune cells. However, they observed that the frequency of CD45+ cells was lower in the head and the body vs tail areas. These regional differences have not been taken into account in a previous study addressing similar issues , which interestingly reported that a significantly higher infiltration of CD45+ and CD68+ in the body portion of the pancreas from organ donors, accompanied prolonged life support (the head and tail were not examined in this report).
Kusmartseva et al also found that length of hospitalisation prior to organ donation did not significantly influence beta cell replication, as assessed by evaluating the presence of the marker Ki67 in insulin positive cells. Cells positive for both insulin and Ki67 staining have been previously observed in surgical pancreatic samples  and some (although not all) studies using samples from organ donor pancreases [35, 36]. Interestingly, analyses with autoptic pancreatic specimens have shown extremely low or absent amounts of ‘replicating’ beta cells, suggesting that such a finding could, in part, be an artefact of the postmortem state .
Main advantages and disadvantages of pancreas sources
Overall tissue quality
Access to the whole pancreas
Use of autoptic tissue banks
Possible postmortem artefacts
Fair to good
Phenotypic characterisation of patients undergoing surgery
Limited amount of tissue
Type 3c diabetes to be considered
Possible influences of tumour on islet cell traits
The pancreatic tissue source closest to the in vivo situation
Limited amount of tissue
Complications owing to the procedure (bleeding, leakage)
Possibility to prepare isolated islets
Limited information on family and clinical history
Limited researcher control of steps from donor hospital admission to tissue processing
All authors are responsible for drafting the article and revising it critically for important intellectual content. All authors have approved the version to be published.
Duality of interest
The authors declare that there is no duality of interest associated with this manuscript.
- 6.Langerhans P (1869) Beitrage zur mikroscopischens anatomie der bauchspeichel druse. Inaugural dissertation. Berlin, Gustav Langes [document in German]Google Scholar
- 25.Butler AE, Campbell-Thompson M, Gurlo T et al (2013) Marked expansion of exocrine and endocrine pancreas with incretin therapy in humans with increased exocrine pancreas dysplasia and the potential for glucagon-producing neuroendocrine tumors. Diabetes 62:2595–2604CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 32.Solimena M, Schulte AM, Marselli L et al (2017) Systems biology of the IMIDIA biobank from organ donors and pancreatectomised patients defines a novel transcriptomic signature of islets from individuals with type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-017-4500-3
- 34.Kusmartseva I, Beery M, Philips T et al (2017) Hospital time prior to death and pancreas histopathology: implications for future studies. Diabetologia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-017-4494-x
- 41.European Commission (2014) Journalist workshop on organ donation and transplantation: recent facts and figures. Available from https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/blood_tissues_organs/docs/ev_20141126_factsfigures_en.pdf. Accessed 15 Nov 2017
- 42.U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (2017). Organ Procurement and Transplantation Netrwork. Available from https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov. Accessed 15 Nov 2017
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.