Advertisement

Diabetologia

, Volume 61, Issue 4, pp 896–905 | Cite as

Early deficits in insulin secretion, beta cell mass and islet blood perfusion precede onset of autoimmune type 1 diabetes in BioBreeding rats

  • Anya Medina
  • Saba Parween
  • Sara Ullsten
  • Neelanjan Vishnu
  • Yuk Ting Siu
  • My Quach
  • Hedvig Bennet
  • Alexander Balhuizen
  • Lina Åkesson
  • Nils Wierup
  • Per Ola Carlsson
  • Ulf Ahlgren
  • Åke Lernmark
  • Malin Fex
Open Access
Article

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis

Genetic studies show coupling of genes affecting beta cell function to type 1 diabetes, but hitherto no studies on whether beta cell dysfunction could precede insulitis and clinical onset of type 1 diabetes are available.

Methods

We used 40-day-old BioBreeding (BB) DRLyp/Lyp rats (a model of spontaneous autoimmune type 1 diabetes) and diabetes-resistant DRLyp/+ and DR+/+ littermates (controls) to investigate beta cell function in vivo, and insulin and glucagon secretion in vitro. Beta cell mass was assessed by optical projection tomography (OPT) and morphometry. Additionally, measurements of intra-islet blood flow were performed using microsphere injections. We also assessed immune cell infiltration, cytokine expression in islets (by immunohistochemistry and qPCR), as well as islet Glut2 expression and ATP/ADP ratio to determine effects on glucose uptake and metabolism in beta cells.

Results

DRLyp/Lyp rats were normoglycaemic and without traces of immune cell infiltrates. However, IVGTTs revealed a significant decrease in the acute insulin response to glucose compared with control rats (1685.3 ± 121.3 vs 633.3 ± 148.7; p < 0.0001). In agreement, insulin secretion was severely perturbed in isolated islets, and both first- and second-phase insulin release were lowered compared with control rats, while glucagon secretion was similar in both groups. Interestingly, after 5–7 days of culture of islets from DRLyp/Lyp rats in normal media, glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) was improved; although, a significant decrease in GSIS was still evident compared with islets from control rats at this time (7393.9 ± 1593.7 vs 4416.8 ± 1230.5 pg islet−1 h−1; p < 0.0001). Compared with controls, OPT of whole pancreas from DRLyp/Lyp rats revealed significant reductions in medium (4.1 × 109 ± 9.5 × 107 vs 3.8 × 109 ± 5.8 × 107 μm3; p = 0.044) and small sized islets (1.6 × 109 ± 5.1 × 107 vs 1.4 × 109 ± 4.5 × 107 μm3; p = 0.035). Finally, we found lower intra-islet blood perfusion in vivo (113.1 ± 16.8 vs 76.9 ± 11.8 μl min−1 [g pancreas]−1; p = 0.023) and alterations in the beta cell ATP/ADP ratio in DRLyp/Lyp rats vs control rats.

Conclusions/interpretation

The present study identifies a deterioration of beta cell function and mass, and intra-islet blood flow that precedes insulitis and diabetes development in animals prone to autoimmune type 1 diabetes. These underlying changes in islet function may be previously unrecognised factors of importance in type 1 diabetes development.

Keywords

Beta cell dysfunction Beta cell mass Insulin secretion Islet blood flow Type 1 diabetes 

Abbreviations

AIRGlucose

Acute insulin response to glucose

BB

BioBreeding

GSIS

Glucose-stimulated insulin secretion

OPT

Optical projection tomography

ROS

Reactive oxygen species

SAB

Secretion assay buffer

Introduction

Type 1 diabetes is associated with the immune-mediated destruction of islet beta cells. Studies in human monozygotic twins, sharing identical genomes, demonstrate pairwise type 1 diabetes of 13–52%, suggesting that environmental and genetic causes may contribute similarly to the disease [1].

Research pertaining to the genetic contribution of type 1 diabetes have for the past decades focused on genetic loci implicated in regulation and selection of autoreactive T lymphocytes [2], although single nucleotide polymorphisms within the human insulin (INS) gene (mainly present in beta cells) remain one of the most important risk factors for the development of type 1 diabetes [3]. Recent studies have revealed that several candidate genes found in genome-wide association studies of type 1 diabetes susceptibility loci are expressed in beta cells and could thus influence beta cell function [4].

The BioBreeding (BB; LEW.1WR1) rat acts as a model of type 1 diabetes, whereby type 1 diabetes is suggested to originate from selective autoimmune destruction of beta cells [5]. As in humans, the major histocompatibility complex holds genetic factors that predict disease in this model [6, 7]. This explains some, but not all, of the inherited predisposition to type 1 diabetes. In the inbred BB rat strain BBDRLyp/Lyp (herein referred to as DRLyp/Lyp), onset of type 1 diabetes is linked to lymphopaenia, which is caused by a frameshift mutation in the Gimap5 gene, while their littermates DRLyp/+ and DR+/+ are resistant to diabetes [8, 9]. Loss of T cells because of lymphopaenia affects both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, especially ART2.1+ T cells [5]. In fact, depletion of the ART2.1+ T cells in diabetes-resistant BB rats induces type 1 diabetes, suggesting that loss of regulatory T cells is associated with insulitis and type 1 diabetes [10].

Early changes in beta cell function and blood glucose have not been elucidated in DRLyp/Lyp rats, although local changes in beta cells in inbred DRLyp/Lyp are reflected by production of eotaxin (an eosinophil and mast cell recruiting factor) in islets at about 40 days of age, before insulitis, hyperglycaemia and type 1 diabetes [11, 12]. However, positive staining of infiltrating monocytes remains to be shown at this age [11]. Additionally, islets from 40-day-old DRLyp/Lyp animals express lower levels of genes involved in the metabolism of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [13] and are more sensitive to changes in redox balance [14]. Over time, such an inherent sensitivity could contribute to accumulation of the ROS that diminish beta cell function, rendering cells more sensitive to immune cell attack.

Islet function is also dependent on functional islet vasculature and blood flow. In fact, inflammatory changes in vascular endothelial cells, characterised by increased expression of surface receptors, facilitate immune cell extravasation into the inflamed tissue [15]. Additionally, islet vasculature plays a critical role in maintaining oxygen and nutrient supply to the islets [16] and poor intra-islet blood flow is associated with changes in acute insulin response to glucose in vivo [17]. Interestingly, venular defects were observed in islets from BB (DP-BB/Wor) rats [18]. This, in combination with an underlying beta cell defect, could impair beta cell function and promote insulitis and beta cell destruction.

Currently, evidence of changes in beta cell function prior to onset of type 1 diabetes is limited. Therefore, we set out to explore whether insufficient beta cell function, or changes in beta cell mass and intra-islet blood flow, precede type 1 diabetes using the DRLyp/Lyp rat as a disease model.

Methods

Animals

The BB rat was originally derived from a Canadian colony of outbred Wistar rats (originating from the Ottawa Health Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada) that spontaneously develop hyperglycaemia and ketoacidosis, characteristics of clinical onset of type 1 diabetes. Heterozygous BB DRLyp/+ rats were used to obtain congenic DRLyp/Lyp rats as previously described [9, 19]. Briefly, the Lyp region from diabetes-prone BB rats was introgressed onto the diabetes-resistant BB rat and kept in sibling breeding for more than 50 generations by heterozygous breeders to yield 25% DRLyp/Lyp, 25% DR+/+ and 50% DRLyp/+ rats. All DRLyp/Lyp rats developed diabetes after transferring the entire colony from University of Washington, Seattle to Lund University (including the Clinical Research Centre in Malmö, Sweden), in 2008. Animals were bred/kept in a pathogen-free environment at the Clinical Research Centre in Malmö, Sweden. They were housed at 21–23°C (12 h light/dark cycle) and fed ad libidum. All experiments were approved by the Animal Ethical Committee in Uppsala and Lund. All animals used in experiments were 40 days old unless otherwise stated.

Genotyping

Tail snips were obtained from rat pups between 25–30 days of age. DNA was isolated and genotyped based on microsatellite analysis, as previously described [9, 20].

Blood glucose and plasma insulin levels

Blood glucose was tested daily at 08:00 hours in DRLyp/Lyp (n = 225, 129 male [M]/96 female [F]) and control rats (DRLyp/+ and DR+/+; n = 100, 50M/50F) from day 37 (ELTE XL glucometer; Bayer Diabetes Care, Tarrytown, NY, USA). Animals were considered to have developed diabetes when blood glucose levels were >11.1 mmol/l for two consecutive days. Serum insulin was measured in a baseline group at 37–41 days of age (DRLyp/Lyp: n = 7, 4M/3F; control rats: n = 10, 5M/5F), at 50 days (DRLyp/Lyp: n = 6, 3M/3F; control rats: n = 10, 5M/5F), at 60 days (DRLyp/Lyp: n = 6, 3M/3F; control rats: n = 11, 6M/5F) and at type 1 diabetes onset (DRLyp/Lyp: n = 7, 4M/3F; control rats: n = 9, 5M/4F) in 10 μl of serum (rat insulin ELISA, Mercodia, Uppsala, Sweden). Blood was obtained from venipuncture of the tail vein in the fed state.

IVGTT

Glucose (1 g/kg) (Sigma Aldrich, Stockholm, Sweden) was injected into the tail vein of DRLyp/Lyp (n = 10, 6M/4F) and control (n = 10, 6M/4F) rats after 6 h of fasting. Blood samples were collected from the sublingual vein at 0, 1, 5, 10, 20, 50 and 75 min. Plasma glucose and insulin levels were measured (Infinity Glucose Oxidase Liquid Stable Reagent, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA and Rat Insulin ELISA, Mercodia, respectively).

Perifusion of isolated islets

Islets from DRLyp/Lyp (n = 14, 9M/5F) and control rats (n = 8, 4M/4F) were isolated using collagenase digestion and incubated in RPMI-1640 medium containing 11.1 mmol/l glucose (Sigma Aldrich) + 10% FBS overnight at 37°C. Seventy islets per chamber were used in perifusion experiments (Suprafusion 1000 System; Brandel, Glasgow, UK). Islets were perifused with secretion assay buffer (SAB) containing: 114 mmol/l NaCl, 4.7 mmol/l KCl, 1.2 mmol/l KH2PO4, 1.16 mmol/l MgSO4, 25.5 mmol/l NaHCO3, 20 mmol/l HEPES, 2.5 mmol/l CaCl2 and 0.2% BSA (fatty acid free) (pH 7.2), supplemented with 2.8 mmol/l glucose for 2 h prior to sampling. Consecutive samples were taken at 2.8 mmol/l glucose to determine basal insulin release before challenging islets with a high glucose concentration (16.7 mmol/l). Experiments were concluded by estimating maximal insulin response by the addition of SAB containing 35 mmol/l KCl. The flow rate was 0.1 ml/min and temperature was kept at 37°C. Each fraction of perifusate was collected at 4 min intervals and stored at −20°C until analysed (Rat Insulin ELISA, Mercodia).

Batch incubation of isolated islets of Langerhans

Isolated islets from DRLyp/Lyp and control rats were cultured overnight (RPMI-1640 medium, 11.1 mmol/l glucose, 10% FBS [Sigma Aldrich]; DRLyp/Lyp: n = 6, 3M/3F; controls: n = 6, 3M/3F), or for 5–7 days (RPMI medium, 5.6 mmol/l glucose, 10% FBS + penicillin [100 units/ml]–streptomycin [100 μg/ml]; DRLyp/Lyp: n = 6, 3M/3F; controls: n = 7, 3M/4F) at 37°C, 5% CO2. Groups of three islets were placed in a well of a 96-well plate with SAB containing either 2.8 mmol/l or 16.7 mmol/l glucose at 37°C, 5% CO2. Experiments were performed with 6–8 replicates for each condition. Insulin and glucagon levels were determined after 1 h (Rat Insulin ELISA and Glucagon ELISA, respectively; Mercodia).

Insulin content

Total insulin was extracted from 50 islets per animal (DRLyp/Lyp: n = 6, 3M/3F; controls: n = 6, 3M/3F) using acid ethanol (0.18 mmol/l HCl in 95% ethanol). Extracted insulin was diluted and total insulin was measured (Rat Insulin ELISA; Mercodia).

qPCR of islets of Langerhans

Isolated islets from DRLyp/Lyp (n = 6, 3M/3F) and control (n = 7, 3M/4F) rats were frozen (−80°C) after isolation or after 5–7 days in culture (37°C, 5% CO2 in RPMI medium, 5.6 mmol/l glucose, 10% FBS + penicillin [100 units/ml]–streptomycin [100 μg/ml]). Total RNA was extracted (RNAeasy RNA purification kit; Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and equal quantities of RNA were reverse transcribed (RevertAid First-Strand cDNA synthesis kit; Fermentas, Vilnius, Lithuania). mRNA levels were quantified (Maxima Probe/ROX qPCR Master Mix; Fermentas, Thermo Scientific, Helsingborg, Sweden) using an ABI PRISM 7900 (Applied Biosystems ViiA Real Time PCR System; Life Technologies, Foster City, CA, USA), using probes for Il1b (ID no. Rn00580432), Tnf-α (also known as Tnf) (ID no. Rn01525859), Ifng (ID no. Rn00594078) and Glut2 (also known as Slc2a2) (ID no. Rn00563565) (Applied Biosystems). Samples were run in triplicate and the transcript quantity was normalised to the geometric mean of mRNA levels of the reference genes (Applied Biosystems) Ppia (ID no. Rn00690933), Polr2a (ID no. Rn01752026) and Hprt (also known as Hprt1) (ID no. Rn01527840), using the formula 2(minCt – sampleCt).

Blood flow measurements and islet morphometry

DRLyp/Lyp (n = 11, 4M/7F) and control (n = 15, 6M/9F) rats were anaesthetised (i.p. injection of thiobutabarbital sodium; 120 mg/kg; Inactin; Sigma Aldrich) and placed on a heating pad to maintain body temperature. The trachea was detached and a polyethylene catheter was inserted to secure free airways. Catheters were inserted into the right ascending aorta and the left femoral artery. A pressure transducer was connected to the ascending aorta catheter. A blood sample was taken for blood glucose measurement (Freestyle Lite; Abbott, Calameda, CA, USA). When blood pressure had stabilised (10–15 min), animals were injected with 1.5 × 105 microspheres (diameter: 10 μm) (E-Z Trac Ultraspheres; Stason Labs, Irwin, CA, USA) into the ascending aorta and blood was collected as described [21]. Animals were then euthanised and the pancreas and adrenal glands were dissected, weighed, cut in pieces and placed between object glasses. Object glasses containing pancreatic tissue were freeze–thawed to visualise islets [21]. The percentage of islet volume was determined by a point-counting [22], and the number of microspheres in the exocrine and endocrine pancreas, adrenal glands and reference sample was counted in a bright and dark field illumination microscope.

Optical projection tomography imaging and quantification of islet beta cell distribution

Following euthanisation using CO2, pancreases from DRLyp/Lyp (n = 6, 4M/2F) and control (n = 4, 2M/2F) rats were excised and processed for optical projection tomography (OPT) imaging [23]. Antibodies used for whole mount immunohistochemistry were: guinea pig anti-insulin (1:500; A0564; DAKO Denmark, Glostrup, Denmark) and IRDye 680 goat anti-guinea pig (1:250; 926-68077; LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA). Pancreatic lobes were scanned individually using a near-infrared OPT setup equipped with a 665/45 excitation and a 725/50 emission filter (Chroma). Beta cell volumes were reconstructed based on the signal from insulin-specific antibodies and pseudo-coloured to highlight the distribution of small <1 × 106 μm3 (white), medium 1 × 106 μm3 to 5 × 106 μm3 (yellow) and large >5 × 106 μm3 (red) islets [23, 24].

Live single cell ATP/ADP ratio measurements

Single cell ATP/ADP ratio measurements in islets from DRLyp/Lyp (n = 91 islets) and control rats (n = 70 islets) were performed using the ATP biosensor, Perceval (Addgene, Cambridge, MA, USA). Islets were transduced [25, 26], plated and incubated on poly-d-lysine coated 8-well chambered cover glasses (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) for 2 h with RPMI medium + penicillin (100 units/ml)–streptomycin (100 μg/ml) containing the Perceval adenovirus. Fresh medium was added and cells were incubated overnight. The following day, cells were pre-incubated at 37°C in 400 μl buffer P (135 mmol/l NaCl, 3.6 mmol/l KCl, 1.5 mmol/l CaCl2, 0.5 mmol/l MgSO4, 0.5 mmol/l Na2HPO4, 10 mmol/l HEPES, 5 mmol/l NaHCO3, pH 7.4) containing 2.8 mmol/l glucose for 1.5 h. After this, cells were first imaged in the presence of low (2.8 mmol/l) glucose and then in the presence of high glucose (16.7 mmol/l) to investigate the basal and stimulated ATP/ADP ratio. Thereafter, ATP synthesis was inhibited by the addition of the ATP synthase inhibitor oligomycin (0.02 mg/ml) and an ionophore that uncouples ATP synthesis, carbonyl cyanide-p-trifluoromethoxyphenylhydrazone (FCCP; 0.05 mmol/l). Cells were imaged using 490 nm excitation and 520 nm emission filter settings on a Zeiss LSM510 inverted confocal fluorescence microscope (Zeiss, Oberkocken, Germany).

Immunohistochemical analysis of islets of Langerhans

Pancreatic sections from DRLyp/Lyp (n = 10, 5M/5F) and control (n = 10, 5M/5F) rats were collected on slides and air-dried overnight at 37°C. Slides were deparaffinised [27] and sections incubated with the following primary antibodies overnight at 4°C in moisturising chambers: mouse anti-glucagon (1:9000; G-2654, Sigma Aldrich), guinea pig anti-proinsulin (1:2500; 9003; EuroDiagnostica) and rabbit anti-CD3 (1:200; C7930; Sigma Aldrich). Sections were rinsed in PBS with Triton X-100 for 2 × 10 min. Antibodies for insulin and glucagon was carefully validated as detailed [27, 28]. CD3 specificity was tested using primary antisera pre-absorbed with homologous antigen (100 μg/ml antiserum). Pancreatic sections were incubated with the following secondary antibodies with specificity for mouse, guinea pig, or rabbit IgG: goat anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 568, (1:400; A21124; Invitrogen, Thermo Scientific, Helsingborg, Sweden), goat anti-guinea Pig, Alexa Fluor 594, (1:400; A11076; Thermo Scientific) and goat anti-rabbit, Alexa Fluor 594, (1:400; A11012; Thermo Scientific) [27].

Immunofluorescence was examined in an epi-fluorescence microscope (Olympus, BX60, Tokyo, Japan). By changing filters, double staining was used to determine the location of the different secondary antibodies in one sample. Images were captured with a digital camera (Nikon DS-2Mv, Tokyo, Japan).

Statistical analysis

Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. IVGTTs, AUC and acute insulin response to glucose (AIRGlucose) were calculated as described [6, 29, 30]. Mann–Whitney non-parametrical testing was employed in all experiments, except for analysis of islet size (OPT), blood flow measurements, 1 h batch experiments, insulin content, qPCR and ATP/ADP measurements, which were analysed with Student’s t tests, and plasma insulin levels, which were assessed using a two-way ANOVA. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 6 software (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. All experiments were performed and analysed in a randomised and blinded fashion when possible. Outliers were identified using Grubbs test for outliers.

Results

Diagnosis of diabetes

DRLyp/Lyp and control (DRLyp/+ and DR+/+) rats were followed by daily blood glucose measurements until diagnosis of type 1 diabetes (Fig. 1a). Cumulative incidence revealed that all DRLyp/Lyp rats had developed diabetes by 80 days of age (Fig. 1b). Mean age at onset of type 1 diabetes was 60 days ranging from 47 to 80 days (Fig. 1d). Female rats developed diabetes earlier than males (Fig. 1c; p = 0.004).
Fig. 1

(a) Daily glucose levels in 40-day-old female and male DRLyp/Lyp (circles), control (DRLyp/+, triangles and DR+/+, squares) rats presented as days before onset of type 1 diabetes. (b) Cumulative increase in diabetes incidence in male (solid line, squares) and female (dotted line, circles) DRLyp/Lyp rats. (c) Diabetes-free survival in male (solid line) and female (dotted line) DRLyp/Lyp rats. (d) Age at onset in female (F) and male (M) DRLyp/Lyp rats. Data shown as means ± SEM. **p < 0.01. DRLyp/Lyp: n = 225, 129M/96F; DRLyp/+ and DR+/+: n = 100, 50M/50F

Serum insulin prior to type 1 diabetes onset

Basal insulin levels were evaluated in DRLyp/Lyp and control rats over time. Despite normoglycaemia prior to onset of type 1 diabetes, insulin levels were lower at all time points in DRLyp/Lyp rats and failed to increase with age compared with control rats (Fig. 2a; p = 0.0004).
Fig. 2

(a) Serum insulin over time in DRLyp/Lyp (black circles) and control rats (white squares). At 37–41 days of age: DRLyp/Lyp, n = 7 (4M/3F), control, n = 10 (5M/5F); at 50 days of age: DRLyp/Lyp, n = 6 (3M/3F), control, n = 10 (5M/5F); at 60 days of age: DRLyp/Lyp, n = 6 (3M/3F), control, n = 11 (6M/5F; at type 1 diabetes onset: DRLyp/Lyp, n = 7 (4M/3F), control n = 9 (5M/4F). (bf) IVGTTs in 40-day-old DRLyp/Lyp (black circles/bars; n = 10, 6M/4F) and control rats (white squares/bars; n = 10, 6M/4F). (b) Plasma glucose, (c) plasma insulin, (d) AUC for glucose and (e) AUC for insulin. (f) AIRGlucose. Data shown as means ± SEM. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001. T1D, type 1 diabetes

In vivo insulin release is perturbed in DRLyp/Lyp rats

In vivo glucose homeostasis and beta cell function were assessed with an IVGTT in DRLyp/Lyp rats. DRLyp/Lyp rats remained glucose tolerant (Fig. 2b). No difference in glucose clearance between groups was observed, also shown as AUC for glucose (Fig. 2d). However, DRLyp/Lyp rats secreted less insulin during the initial time points of the IVGTT vs controls (Fig. 2c) which was further highlighted by a reduction in AUC for insulin in DRLyp/Lyp rats (Fig. 2e; 19466.9 ± 1060.2 vs 14310.8 ± 1454.2 pmol/l × min; p = 0.04) and a decrease in the AIRGlucose (Fig. 2f; 1685.3 ± 121.3 vs 633.3 ± 148.7; p < 0.0001).

Insulin secretion is decreased in islets from DRLyp/Lyp rats

To assess differences in insulin release (as evident by the IVGTT) between DRLyp/Lyp and control rats, we characterised the dynamics of insulin secretion in vitro using a perifusion setup. Islets from DRLyp/Lyp and control rats were first subjected to a low concentration of glucose (2.8 mmol/l) (Fig. 3a). Basal insulin secretion was similar between the groups. When challenging islets with a stimulatory concentration of glucose (16.7 mmol/l) during a 40 min period, the amount of insulin secreted by islets from DRLyp/Lyp rats was reduced. Control rats responded robustly to elevated glucose concentrations (Fig. 3b; control vs DR Lyp/Lyp AUC: 398.2 ± 53.8 vs 206.1 ± 21.6 pmol/l × min; p = 0.002). When islets were further challenged with 35 mmol/l KCl and 16.7 mmol/l glucose for 12 min, islets from DRLyp/Lyp rats continued to secrete less insulin than those from control rats (Fig. 3c; control vs DR Lyp/Lyp AUC: 171.5 ± 18.8 vs 123.9 ± 14.9 pmol/l × min; p = 0.02). Insulin content, however, was similar in islets from DRLyp/Lyp and control rats (Fig. 3d).
Fig. 3

(a) Isolated islets from 40-day-old DRLyp/Lyp (black circles; n = 14, 9M/5F) and control rats (white squares; n = 8, 4M/4Fe) were perifused with 2.8 mmol/l and 16.7 mmol/l glucose (G) with and without 35 mmol/l KCl (K+). (bc) AUC for secreted insulin (b) 16–56 min at 16.7 mmol/l glucose and (c) 70–80 min at 16.7 mmol/l glucose + KCl. (d) Total insulin content in islets from DRLyp/Lyp (n = 6, 3M/3F) and control rats (n = 6, 3M/3F). (ef) One-hour batch incubation of isolated islets cultured (e) over night or (f) for 5–7 days. Islets were stimulated with either 2.8 or 16.7 mmol/l glucose. Overnight incubation: DRLyp/Lyp, n = 6, (3M/3F), control, n = 6 (3M/3F); 5–7 day incubation: DRLyp/Lyp, n = 6 (3M/3F), control, n = 7 (3M/4F). White bars, control rats; black bars, DRLyp/Lyp rats. Data shown as means ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001

Comparable results to those obtained in perifused islets were observed when islets were exposed to low (2.8 mmol/l) and high (16.7 mmol/l) glucose concentrations during a 1 h static incubation. A reduction both in basal insulin secretion (282.5 ± 59.4 vs 186.0 ± 62.3 pg islet−1 h−1; p = 0.003) and in glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS; 963.1 ± 162.1 vs 280.3 ± 64.4 pg islet−1 h−1; p < 0.0001) from islets from DRLyp/Lyp rats vs control rats was evident (Fig. 3e). Glucagon secretion was similar in islets from both groups when exposed to low and high glucose concentrations (ESM Fig. 1a).

Previous work suggests that removing islets from an inflammatory milieu can restore GSIS [31]. Therefore, we cultured islets from DRLyp/Lyp and control rats for 5–7 days. Insulin secretion was measured after exposure to low (2.8 mmol/l) and high (16.7 mmol/l) glucose concentrations in a 1 h static incubation. Overall insulin secretion was improved, both in DRLyp/Lyp and control rat islets, but a significant decrease in GSIS was still evident in islets from DRLyp/Lyp rats vs controls (Fig. 3f; 4416.8 ± 1230.5 vs 7393.9 ± 1593.7 pg islet−1 h−1; p < 0.0001).

Il1b, Ifng and Tnf-α expression in islets isolated from DRLyp/Lyp rats

Next we determined expression of cytokines in islets isolated from DRLyp/Lyp and control rats. RNA was extracted either immediately after isolation or after culturing islets for 5–7 days. Il1b was present at similar levels in islets just after isolation (ESM Fig. 1b). However, Tnf-α and Ifng were undetectable. When islets where cultured over a 5–7 day period, detectable levels of all cytokines were present (ESM Fig. 1c) but did not differ between groups.

Islet blood perfusion

To determine if reduced insulin secretion in vivo was associated with microcirculatory changes [17, 32], we measured islet blood perfusion. Mean arterial blood pressure was recorded in animals prior to blood flow measurements with no significant difference between the two groups (data not shown).

Whole pancreatic blood flow did not differ between DRLyp/Lyp and control rats (Fig. 4a). Interestingly, islet blood flow was significantly reduced by 25% in the DRLyp/Lyp animals vs controls (Fig. 4b; 76.9 ± 11.8 vs 113.1 ± 16.8 μl min−1 [g pancreas]−1; p = 0.023).
Fig. 4

(a) Whole pancreatic blood flow and (b) islet blood flow in 40-day-old DRLyp/Lyp (n = 11, 4M/7F) and control rats (n = 15, 6M/9F). White bars, control rats; black bars, DRLyp/Lyp rats. Data shown as means ± SEM. *p < 0.05

Small and medium sized islets are less common in the pancreas of DRLyp/Lyp rats

To understand whether the observed perturbation in insulin secretion in vivo was accompanied by differences in beta cell mass, we performed OPT on the whole pancreas from DRLyp/Lyp and control rats. Overall, beta cell mass did not differ between groups (Fig. 5a). However, there was a reduction in small (1.4 × 109 ± 4.5 × 107 vs 1.6 × 109 ± 5.1 × 107 μm3; p = 0.035) and medium sized islets (3.8 × 109 ± 5.8 × 107 vs 4.1 × 109 ± 9.5 × 107 μm3; p = 0.044) in the DRLyp/Lyp rats vs control rats (Fig. 5b). Representative images from the OPT of splenic, duodenal and gastric pancreatic lobes from a heterozygote DRLyp/+ rat and a DRLyp/Lyp rat (Fig. 6) present size determination by colour coding. Islets were stained with insulin: red depicts large islets, yellow depicts medium sized islets and white depicts small islets. Additionally, we employed a morphometrical method to assess islet mass in our model [22]. We found no decrease in overall islet mass in the DRLyp/Lyp rats compared with controls (ESM Fig. 1d).
Fig. 5

(a) Overall beta cell volume in 40-day-old DRLyp/Lyp (n = 6, 4M/2F) and control rats (n = 4, 2M/2F). (b) Islet volumes of arbitrarily chosen islet size categories in DRLyp/Lyp and control rats. White bars, control rats; black bars, DRLyp/Lyp rats. Data shown as means ± SEM. *p < 0.05

Fig. 6

Representative OPT images from a splenic, duodenal and gastric pancreatic lobe from a 40-day-old heterozygote DRLyp/+ rat (control) and a DRLyp/Lyp rat. Scale bar, 2 mm

ATP/ADP ratio is increased in islets from DRLyp/Lyp rats

GSIS is dependent on mitochondrial metabolism and the resulting increase in intracellular ratio of ATP/ADP [33]. Therefore, we assessed ATP/ADP ratio in beta cells from DRLyp/Lyp and control rats (Fig. 7a). Interestingly, we observed elevated basal ATP/ADP levels in beta cells from DRLyp/Lyp vs control rats (Fig. 7b; basal Perceval emission at 520 nm: 1333.1 ± 47.3 vs 1094.7 ± 36.4; p = 0.0003). Addition of 20 mmol/l glucose raised the ATP/ADP ratio even further in DRLyp/Lyp vs control rats (visualised as Δmax in Fig. 7c; 336.4 ± 31.3 vs 252.2 ± 24.8; p = 0.03; and slope-increase in Fig. 7d: 4.6 ± 0.5 vs 3.2 ± 0.4; p = 0.02). Moreover, AUC for the whole trace was higher in beta cells from DRLyp/Lyp rats (Fig. 7e; p = 0.003). Since mice lacking Glut2 lose the first phase of insulin secretion [34] and display a similar secretory pattern as our model, we investigated Glut2 expression in islets from DRLyp/Lyp and control rats. However, expression of Glut2 was similar in islets from both groups (ESM Fig. 1e).
Fig. 7

(a) ATP/ADP ratio in beta cells from DRLyp/Lyp (black circles; n = 91 islets) and control rats (white squares; n = 70 islets). (b) Basal ATP/ADP ratio, (c) Δmax ATP/ADP ratio, (d) slope increase of ATP/ADP ratio and (e) AUC for ATP/ADP measurements in beta cells from DRLyp/Lyp (black) and control rats (white). Data shown as means ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. AU, arbitrary units; G, glucose (mmol/l); FCCP, carbonyl cyanide-4-(trifluoromethoxy)phenylhydrazone; G, glucose (mmol/l)

Islet morphology and CD3+ cells are similar in DRLyp/Lyp and control rats

To determine changes in islet morphology in DRLyp/Lyp rats, we performed insulin and glucagon staining. Islets in pancreatic sections from both DRLyp/Lyp and control rats displayed normal islet architecture (core of beta cells surrounded by alpha cells; Fig. 8a,c). To confirm previous findings that 40-day-old DRLyp/Lyp rats do not present immune cell infiltration, we performed staining using a CD3+ specific antibody combined with a nuclear DAPI. As expected, staining was sparse, but similar in DRLyp/Lyp and control animals (Fig. 8b,d).
Fig. 8

Pancreatic sections from (a,b) 40-day-old DRLyp/Lyp and (c,d) control rats (DRLyp/+ and DR+/+). Sections were stained for (a,c) insulin (green) and glucagon (red), and (b,d) CD3+ (red) with nuclear DAPI (blue). Scale bar, 50 μm

Discussion

The present study demonstrates that GSIS is perturbed in the DRLyp/Lyp rat as compared with diabetes-resistant littermates. The secretory defect was accompanied by significant reductions in the number of medium and small sized islets, and reduced intra-islet blood flow. Notably, these islet-specific derangements were observed at 40 days of age before hyperglycaemia, insulitis and onset of type 1 diabetes.

Type 1 diabetes is associated with the immune-mediated destruction of beta cells, resulting in insulin deficiency. Recent advances have highlighted genetic and functional changes within the beta cell as part of type 1 diabetes pathology [4, 29], suggesting that beta cells may have an inherent sensitivity that possibly makes them susceptible to autoimmune attack. We observed a significant reduction in insulin secretion both in vivo and in vitro in isolated islets from DRLyp/Lyp rats. Indeed, a previous study showed that non-inbred BB rats (BB/Hagedorn; a model where lymphopenia is not present) displayed diminished release of insulin during stimulation with 20 mmol/l glucose in perfused whole pancreas at 50 days of age (before onset of type 1 diabetes) [35]. Similar observations have been made in islets from NOD mice, where insulin secretion immediately after isolation was perturbed (due to insulitis). However, culture of islets from NOD mice over a 5–7 day period improved insulin secretion significantly [31]. Indeed, islets from DRLyp/Lyp rats displayed an improved response to glucose after a culturing period; however, a secretory defect was still evident. Similarly, islets removed from people with new-onset type 1 diabetes show improved GSIS after culture [36]. It is noteworthy, however, that GSIS could not be fully restored in all individuals. A major difference between those studies and ours is that insulitis is not present in 40-day-old DRLyp/Lyp rats. Islets from 40-day-old DRLyp/Lyp rats show reduced expression of the complement inhibitor protein CD59. CD59 is pivotal for normal beta cell exocytosis [37], suggesting that beta cell exocytosis is compromised in DRLyp/Lyp rats. This corresponds to our perifusion data, where islets from DRLyp/Lyp rats display an improved response to 35 mmol/l KCl, suggesting that insulin is not lost, rather that exocytosis is compromised. A previous study highlighted similar findings where non-metabolic secretagogues elicit insulin release in prediabetic conditions and in type 1 diabetes [38]. Additionally, insulin content is not altered in isolated islets from 40-day-old DRLyp/Lyp rats, which further supports this notion.

In prediabetic NOD mice, beta cell dysfunction is suggested to occur as a consequence of early immune cell infiltration and activation of inflammatory cascades [39]. However, the DRLyp/Lyp rats do not display any major infiltration by mononuclear cells until a few days prior to clinical onset of type 1 diabetes [13]. We confirmed this, and islets from DRLyp/Lyp rats did not show increased infiltration of CD3+ cells in pancreatic sections. Moreover, we were unable to detect elevated expression of Il1b, Ifng and Tnf-α in islets from DRLyp/Lyp rats; cytokines that could be indicative of early immune processes within the islets [40, 41].

Beta cell mass is tightly regulated during fetal life, a time point representing a critical window when the appropriate number of beta cells are set in place [42]. A potential weakness in the present study is that we have not investigated neonatal beta cell growth and postnatal expansion of beta cells in our model. It may very well be that DRLyp/Lyp rats are born with a reduced number of beta cells, or fail to expand their beta cell mass during postnatal stages. We observe significant reductions in small and medium sized islets in DRLyp/Lyp compared with control rats, albeit overall islet mass was not changed. A previous study shows that smaller islets contain more insulin per islet volume in situ and secrete insulin more efficiently in vitro [43]. In addition, large islets may be subjected to both hyperplasia and hypoxia [44], resulting in impaired beta cell function. Thus, loss of small and medium sized islets may very well impact insulin secretion. Additionally, OPT has an advantage over more conventional methods, since it can give information on spatial position and volume of individual insulin-expressing islets throughout the pancreas, with high resolution and the opportunity to categorise islets by size [23].

Another important factor influencing beta cell function is nutritional blood status and islet blood flow. This could be considered as the main avenue by which beta cells are kept informed of the body’s nutritional state [45]. We observed reduced intra-islet blood flow in DRLyp/Lyp rats. The importance of this finding for development of type 1 diabetes remains to be determined, but in general lower blood perfusion in islets could compromise beta cell function through hypoxia or limited dispersal of insulin into the systemic circulation [17, 32]. Moreover, decreased blood flow decreases shear stress, which increases the tendency for leucocyte adhesion in venules even in the absence of additional activators [46]. This could promote islet immune cell infiltration. Indeed, a previous study showed a venular defect in a related rat strain (BB/Wor rat), which supports our findings [18]. Currently, any relationship between blood flow changes and lymphopenia in DRLyp/Lyp rats remains unknown. High basal islet blood flow in diabetes-resistant (and/or wild-type) animals is to a large extent mediated by locally generated nitric oxide from endothelial cells and inhibiting this system decreases blood perfusion [47]. It is noteworthy that studies on islet endothelial cells from young normoglycaemic diabetes-prone and diabetes-resistant BB rats have shown that diabetes-prone rats exhibit considerably lower endothelial cell nitric oxide synthase activity than diabetes-resistant rats [48].

Insulin release is to a large extent dependent on mitochondrial metabolism of glucose and the resulting increase in intracellular ratio of ATP/ADP [33]. Glucose uptake into beta cells is the initial step in GSIS. In rodents this is mediated by GLUT2 [49]. Mice lacking Glut2 lose the first phase of insulin secretion [34]. Thus, both the ATP/ADP ratio and Glut2 expression could influence GSIS in DRLyp/Lyp rats. We observed no changes in Glut2 expression. Intriguingly, however, ATP/ADP levels were elevated in islets from DRLyp/Lyp rats, which could signify a compensatory mechanism as mitochondria are striving to maintain a sufficient ATP/ADP ratio and coupling factors to ensure sufficient insulin release. It may also suggest that the secretory deficiency lies distal of ATP generation (i.e. depolarisation of the plasma membrane/Ca2+ influx or exocytosis). Clearly, more intense research efforts are required in this area.

In summary, our results show that DRLyp/Lyp rats display a secretory defect prior to autoimmune onset of type 1 diabetes. This is manifested by perturbations in insulin secretion in vivo and in vitro, partial loss of beta cell mass and reduced intra-islet blood flow; all of which are factors that influence beta cell function. These changes may be of importance for the development of type 1 diabetes.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank L. Faxius and A-.H. T. Fischer for excellent technical assistance.

Data availability statement

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Funding

This study was supported in part by the Swedish Research Council (K2013-99X-22212-01-5 and K2016-01495_3 [MF], K2011-54X-15312-07-6 [ÅL], K2013-55X-15043-10-5 [POC]), the Novo Nordisk Foundation, the JDRF, The Gyllenstiernska Krapperup Foundation, The Crafoord Foundation, SUS Funds, and the Skåne County Council for Research and Development.

Duality of interest

No conflicts of interest are reported by any of the authors.

Contribution statement

The study was designed by MF and ÅL. Blood sampling, glucose analyses and genotyping of BB rats was performed by LÅ, AM and YTS. Islet isolation, data acquisition, analysis and interpretation of perifusion studies and batch incubations were performed by AM, YTS, HB and AB. IVGTTs and analysis thereof was performed by MF and AM. NV performed ATP/ADP measurements/imaging and data analysis. Pancreatic blood flow and intra-islet blood flow experiments and analysis was performed by SU, MQ and POC. Preparation of pancreas for OPT and data analysis was performed by AM, SP and UA. Immunohistochemistry was performed by AM and NW, and analysis thereof was performed by NW. Expression and analysis of genes was performed by AM. The manuscript was drafted by AM and MF. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript. MF is the guarantor of this work.

Supplementary material

125_2017_4512_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (91 kb)
ESM (PDF 90 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Hyttinen V, Kaprio J, Kinnunen L, Koskenvuo M, Tuomilehto J (2003) Genetic liability of type 1 diabetes and the onset age among 22,650 young Finnish twin pairs: a nationwide follow-up study. Diabetes 52:1052–1055CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bluestone JA, Herold K, Eisenbarth G (2010) Genetics, pathogenesis and clinical interventions in type 1 diabetes. Nature 464:1293–1300CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bell GI, Horita S, Karam JH (1984) A polymorphic locus near the human insulin gene is associated with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Diabetes 33:176–183CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Floyel T, Kaur S, Pociot F (2015) Genes affecting beta-cell function in type 1 diabetes. Curr Diab Rep 15:97CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Crisa L, Mordes JP, Rossini AA (1992) Autoimmune diabetes mellitus in the BB rat. Diabetes Metab Rev 8:4–37CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Colle E, Guttmann RD, Seemayer T (1981) Spontaneous diabetes mellitus syndrome in the rat: association with the major histocompatibility complex. J Exp Med 154:1237–1242CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    You S, Chatenoud L (2016) Autoimmune Diabetes: An Overview of Experimental Models and Novel Therapeutics. Methods Mol Biol 1371:117–142CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hornum L, Romer J, Markholst H (2002) The diabetes-prone BB rat carries a frameshift mutation in Ian4, a positional candidate of Iddm1. Diabetes 51:1972–1979CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    MacMurray AJ, Moralejo DH, Kwitek AE et al (2002) Lymphopenia in the BB rat model of type 1 diabetes is due to a mutation in a novel immune-associated nucleotide (Ian)-related gene. Genome Res 12:1029–1039CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nakamura N, Tsutsumi Y, Kimata S et al (1991) Induction of diabetes by PolyI:C and anti-RT6.1 antibody treatment in DR-BB rats. Endocrinol Jpn 38:523–526CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hessner MJ, Wang X, Meyer L et al (2004) Involvement of eotaxin, eosinophils, and pancreatic predisposition in development of type 1 diabetes mellitus in the BioBreeding rat. J Immunol 173:6993–7002CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Geoffrey R, Jia S, Kwitek AE et al (2006) Evidence of a functional role for mast cells in the development of type 1 diabetes mellitus in the BioBreeding rat. J Immunol 177:7275–7286CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bogdani M, Henschel AM, Kansra S et al (2013) Biobreeding rat islets exhibit reduced antioxidative defense and N-acetyl cysteine treatment delays type 1 diabetes. J Endocrinol 216:111–123CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lenzen S (2008) Oxidative stress: the vulnerable beta-cell. Biochem Soc Trans 36:343–347CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wojcikiewicz EP, Abdulreda MH, Zhang X, Moy VT (2006) Force spectroscopy of LFA-1 and its ligands, ICAM-1 and ICAM-2. Biomacromolecules 7:3188–3195CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Carlsson PO, Liss P, Andersson A, Jansson L (1998) Measurements of oxygen tension in native and transplanted rat pancreatic islets. Diabetes 47:1027–1032CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Carlsson PO, Berne C, Jansson L (1998) Angiotensin II and the endocrine pancreas: effects on islet blood flow and insulin secretion in rats. Diabetologia 41:127–133CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Majno G, Joris I, Handler ES, Desemone J, Mordes JP, Rossini AA (1987) A pancreatic venular defect in the BB/Wor rat. Am J Pathol 128:210–215PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bieg S, Moller C, Olsson T, Lernmark A (1997) The lymphopenia (lyp) gene controls the intrathymic cytokine ratio in congenic BioBreeding rats. Diabetologia 40:786–792CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Moralejo DH, Park HA, Speros SJ et al (2003) Genetic dissection of lymphopenia from autoimmunity by introgression of mutated Ian5 gene onto the F344 rat. J Autoimmun 21:315–324CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Carlsson PO, Olsson R, Kallskog O, Bodin B, Andersson A, Jansson L (2002) Glucose-induced islet blood flow increase in rats: interaction between nervous and metabolic mediators. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 283:E457–E464CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Carlsson PO, Andersson A, Jansson L (1996) Pancreatic islet blood flow in normal and obese-hyperglycemic (ob/ob) mice. Am J Phys 271:E990–E995Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Eriksson AU, Svensson C, Hornblad A et al (2013) Near infrared optical projection tomography for assessments of beta-cell mass distribution in diabetes research. J Vis Exp 71:e50238Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hörnblad A, Cheddad A, Ahlgren U (2014) An improved protocol for optical projection tomography imaging reveals lobular heterogeneities in pancreatic islet and β-cell mass distribution. Islets 3:204–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Berg J, Hung YP, Yellen G (2009) A genetically encoded fluorescent reporter of ATP:ADP ratio. Nat Methods 6:161–166CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Li J, Shuai HY, Gylfe E, Tengholm A (2013) Oscillations of sub-membrane ATP in glucose-stimulated beta cells depend on negative feedback from Ca(2+). Diabetologia 56:1577–1586CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Landerholm K, Falkmer SE, Jarhult J, Sundler F, Wierup N (2011) Cocaine- and amphetamine-regulated transcript in neuroendocrine tumors. Neuroendocrinology 94:228–236CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wierup N, Svensson H, Mulder H, Sundler F (2002) The ghrelin cell: a novel developmentally regulated islet cell in the human pancreas. Regul Pept 107:63–69CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Soleimanpour SA, Stoffers DA (2013) The pancreatic beta cell and type 1 diabetes: innocent bystander or active participant? Trends Endocrinol Metab 24:324–331CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fex M, Haemmerle G, Wierup N et al (2009) A beta cell-specific knockout of hormone-sensitive lipase in mice results in hyperglycaemia and disruption of exocytosis. Diabetologia 52:271–280CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Strandell E, Eizirik DL, Sandler S (1990) Reversal of beta-cell suppression in vitro in pancreatic islets isolated from nonobese diabetic mice during the phase preceding insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Clin Invest 85:1944–1950CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hashimoto S, Kubota N, Sato H et al (2015) Insulin receptor substrate-2 (Irs2) in endothelial cells plays a crucial role in insulin secretion. Diabetes 64:876–886CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mulder H, Ling C (2009) Mitochondrial dysfunction in pancreatic beta-cells in type 2 diabetes. Mol Cell Endocrinol 297:34–40CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Guillam MT, Hummler E, Schaerer E et al (1997) Early diabetes and abnormal postnatal pancreatic islet development in mice lacking Glut-2. Nat Genet 17:327–330CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Svenningsen A, Dyrberg T, Markholst H, Binder C, Lernmark A (1986) Insulin release and pancreatic insulin is reduced in young prediabetic BB rats. Acta Endocrinol 112:367–371PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Krogvold L, Skog O, Sundstrom G et al (2015) Function of isolated pancreatic islets from patients at onset of type 1 diabetes: insulin secretion can be restored after some days in a nondiabetogenic environment in vitro: results from the DiViD study. Diabetes 64:2506–2512CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Krus U, King BC, Nagaraj V et al (2014) The complement inhibitor CD59 regulates insulin secretion by modulating exocytotic events. Cell Metab 19:883–890CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ganda OP, Srikanta S, Brink SJ et al (1984) Differential sensitivity to beta-cell secretagogues in “early” type I diabetes mellitus. Diabetes 33:516–521CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tersey SA, Nishiki Y, Templin AT et al (2012) Islet beta-cell endoplasmic reticulum stress precedes the onset of type 1 diabetes in the nonobese diabetic mouse model. Diabetes 61:818–827CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Jiang Z, Woda BA (1991) Cytokine gene expression in the islets of the diabetic Biobreeding/Worcester rat. J Immunol 146:2990–2994PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Toyoda H, Formby B, Magalong D et al (1994) In situ islet cytokine gene expression during development of type I diabetes in the non-obese diabetic mouse. Immunol Lett 39:283–288CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bouwens L, Rooman I (2005) Regulation of pancreatic beta-cell mass. Physiol Rev 85:1255–1270CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Huang HH, Novikova L, Williams SJ, Smirnova IV, Stehno-Bittel L (2011) Low insulin content of large islet population is present in situ and in isolated islets. Islets 3:6–13CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Parween S, Kostromina E, Nord C, Eriksson M, Lindstrom P, Ahlgren U (2016) Intra-islet lesions and lobular variations in beta-cell mass expansion in ob/ob mice revealed by 3D imaging of intact pancreas. Sci Rep 6:34885CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hellerstrom C (1984) The life story of the pancreatic B cell. Diabetologia 26:393–400CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ploppa A, Kampmann M, Johannes T, Haeberle HA, Nohe B (2012) Effects of different leukocyte subpopulations and flow conditions on leukocyte accumulation during reperfusion. J Vasc Res 49:169–180CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Carlsson PO, Sandler S, Jansson L (1998) Pancreatic islet blood perfusion in the nonobese diabetic mouse: diabetes-prone female mice exhibit a higher blood flow compared with male mice in the prediabetic phase. Endocrinology 139:3534–3541CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Suschek CV, Bonmann E, Kolb-Bachofen V (1999) A regulatory defect of constitutive no-synthase in islet endothelial cells correlates with probability of disease manifestation in BBdp rats. Diabetologia 42:457–464CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Orci L, Thorens B, Ravazzola M, Lodish HF (1989) Localization of the pancreatic beta cell glucose transporter to specific plasma membrane domains. Science 245:295–297CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anya Medina
    • 1
  • Saba Parween
    • 2
  • Sara Ullsten
    • 3
  • Neelanjan Vishnu
    • 1
  • Yuk Ting Siu
    • 1
  • My Quach
    • 3
  • Hedvig Bennet
    • 1
  • Alexander Balhuizen
    • 1
  • Lina Åkesson
    • 1
  • Nils Wierup
    • 1
  • Per Ola Carlsson
    • 3
  • Ulf Ahlgren
    • 2
  • Åke Lernmark
    • 1
  • Malin Fex
    • 1
  1. 1.Lund University Diabetes Centre, Clinical Research Centre, Skåne University Hospital (SUS)MalmöSweden
  2. 2.Umeå Centre for Molecular MedicineUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden
  3. 3.Medical Cell BiologyUppsala Biomedical CentreUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations