Abstract
Key message
Gene expression at the RBgh2 locus indicates involvement in cAMP/G-protein-coupled signalling and innate immunity in barley powdery mildew adult plant resistance.
Abstract
Barley powdery mildew is a globally significant disease, responsible for reduced grain yield and quality. A major effect adult plant resistance gene, RBgh2, was previously found in a landrace from Azerbaijan. The atypical phenotype suggested different underlying genetic factors compared to conventional resistance genes and to investigate this, genome-wide gene expression was compared between sets of heterogeneous doubled haploids. RBgh2 resistance is recessive and induces both temporary genome-wide gene expression changes during powdery mildew infection together with constitutive changes, principally at the RBgh2 locus. Defence-related genes significantly induced included homologues of genes associated with innate immunity and pathogen recognition. Intriguingly, RBgh2 resistance does not appear to be dependent on salicylic acid signalling, a key pathway in plant resistance to biotrophs. Constitutive co-expression of resistance gene homologues was evident at the 7HS RBgh2 locus, while no expression was evident for a 6-transmembrane gene, predicted in silico to contain both G-protein- and calmodulin-binding domains. The gene was disrupted at the 5′ end, and G-protein-binding activity was suppressed. RBgh2 appears to operate through a unique mechanism that co-opts elements of innate immunity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Barley powdery mildew is caused by the airborne ascomycete fungus Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei (Bgh). Two forms of genetic resistance predominate in barley cultivars; pathogen race-specific major resistance genes that are prone to breaking down, and broad-spectrum durable resistance achieved through the use of recessive alleles of the mlo gene (Jørgensen 1992; Reinstädler et al. 2010). mlo resistance has remained effective for over 50 years; however, mlo alleles are associated with pleiotropic effects and are implicated in increased susceptibility to several facultative fungal pathogens (Jarosch et al. 1999; Kumar et al. 2001; McGrann et al. 2014). Natural variants such as mlo-11 (cnv2) show reduced necrotic leaf lesions compared to other mlo alleles (Ge et al. 2016, 2021); nonetheless, extensive use of mlo in modern cultivars exerts strong adaptive pressure on the pathogen.
An alternative category of resistance is adult plant resistance (APR), which may be considered as non-race-specific and potentially durable (Hwang and Heitefuss 1982). APR resistance genes do not provide absolute resistance as conferred by major R-genes but different levels of partial resistance. APR against mildew has been reported in both wheat and barley although the underlying genetic defence mechanisms remain largely unresolved. In wheat, APR may be single or polygenic (Asad et al. 2014; Burdon et al. 2014; Johnson et al. 2003) and may provide resistance to more than one fungal pathogen, for example Lr34/Yr18/Pm38 and Lr67/Yr46/Sr55/Pm46 in wheat (Herrera-Foessel et al. 2014; Krattinger et al. 2009).
Ge et al. (2021) defined a barley APR locus, RBgh2, in an Azerbaijan landrace, Eth069. The resistance exhibited infrequent epidermal cell hypersensitive responses, normally indicative of race-specific resistance, and was characterised by penetration resistance associated with cell wall appositions and large 3,3-diaminobenzidine (DAB) halos with diffuse cytosolic vesicle‐like bodies. In adult leaves, small sparse mildew pustules were observed which is characteristic of APR whereby disease progression is limited. We hypothesised that these features suggested different underlying host genetic responses compared to classical race-specific or mlo resistance (Ge et al. 2020). Since the dominance of RBgh2 was not known, we set out to establish this, and, to investigate pathways and genes underlying RBgh2-mediated APR, gene expression involving sets of doubled haploids (DH) lines was studied to minimise genotype-specific expression changes in heterogeneous backgrounds unrelated to pathogen response.
Materials and methods
Barley and Bgh materials and propagation
Doubled haploid lines used in this study were produced from a cross between landrace Eth069 (PI 68192) and an Australian malting cultivar (cv.) Baudin as described in Ge et al. (2021). RBgh2 was mapped to a 0.69 centiMorgans (cM) interval, based on a genetic map containing 966 genotyping-by-sequencing codominant SNP markers with an average marker spacing of 1.16 cM. Four lines containing the RBgh2 APR gene (Ba69_012, Ba69_109, Ba69_288 and Ba69_304) and four susceptible lines (Ba69_106, ba69_118, Ba69_134 and Ba69_582) were selected for gene expression analysis, based on their disease phenotype and the SNP genotypic composition. Over 99% of each parental genome was shared across the lines in each category, with the remainder composed mainly of a region containing a second Eth069 APR locus, RBgh3, excluded on the basis of genetic markers indicating the susceptible parent genotype. Western Australian Bgh isolate Chi-001 was cultured for inoculations on detached leaves in benzimidazole agar plates (Tucker et al. 2013).
F1 progeny disease phenotyping
The dominance of RBgh2 was determined in crosses between the susceptible cv. Baudin and the resistant DH line RBgh2 12. To verify heterozygous F1 individuals, SNPs were detected by Sanger sequencing of HORVU7Hr1G002390. A CAPS marker was selected at the 3′ end, with PCR product cleavage by the restriction enzyme MseI. The PCR primers (5′–3′) used were CTTGCATCATGGGAAAACCAAC and GTTAACATGCTATGATTAAAAGTGTGC. F1 plants were grown to the fifth leaf stage and evaluated at 14 dpi following inoculation with Bgh isolate Chi-001.
Plant growth and inoculation for RNA extraction
Barley lines were sown in 20-cm diameter pots containing UWA Bio Mix (Richgro Garden Products, Jandakot, WA) and grown under a 12-h day–night cycle at 22 °C and 18 °C, respectively, in a climate-controlled growth room (Conviron Asia Pacific Pty Ltd, VIC, Australia). Four replicates of each DH line were planted for Bgh-inoculated and non-inoculated control samples, together with cv. Baudin as a standard susceptible control. Plants were placed in a randomised complete block design for each treatment and grown until the sixth leaf was fully expanded at around 5½ weeks post-germination, as APR is growth stage dependent and is fully effective from the fifth leaf (Ge et al. 2021).
Whole plant inoculations were conducted by first marking the borders of eight-centimetre 6th leaf sections with Micropore surgical tape (3 M, Saint Paul, MN, USA). The target sections were inoculated by gently tapping infected detached barley leaves from a height of 15 cm. Thereafter, entire plants were inoculated from a height of 50 cm. Leaf sections were harvested at 48-h post-inoculation (hpi) and flash frozen in liquid nitrogen. Susceptible DH lines and cv. Baudin were inspected at 7 dpi to confirm successful infection.
RNA extraction and sequencing
RNA was extracted with a RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Sample aliquots were taken to check RNA integrity on an agarose gel, the concentration measured with a Nanodrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA), then samples stored at − 80 °C. Before shipment, RNA samples were thawed on ice and 1 µg of each transferred to GenTegra-RNA tubes (Pleasanton, CA, USA) and freeze-dried for 1½ h. RNA samples were sent to Novogene (Singapore) for directional mRNA library preparation followed by 150 bp (base pairs) paired-end read sequencing on a NovaSeq 6000 platform (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).
RNA sequence analysis
The IBSC Morex barley reference genome assembly (European Nucleotide Archive accession GCA_901482405.1) was downloaded from EnsemblPlants (Howe et al. 2020) with low complexity repeats soft masked and gene annotation v48. The genome and gene annotation was indexed using Star v2.7 (Dobin et al. 2013) with the options—sjdbGTFfeatureExon CDS—sjdbOverhang 149.
The paired-end reads were trimmed for adapters and random 5′ hexamer primers using Trimmomatic v0.39 (Bolger et al. 2014) with the following options (HEADCROP:12 ILLUMINACLIP:ADAP:2:30:5 LEADING:10 TRAILING:10 SLIDINGWINDOW:4:25 MINLEN:50). Trimmed reads were aligned to the indexed barley genome using the STAR RNA aligner v2.7 (—twopassMode Basic—quantMode GeneCounts—outSAMtype BAM SortedByCoordinate). Sample metadata and a gene expression matrix were analysed using R v4.0.3 and the R package DESeq2 v1.30.0 (Love et al. 2014) for differential gene expression analysis based on negative binomial (a.k.a. Gamma-Poisson) distribution. Differentially expressed genes (DGEs) were significant at an adjusted p value (false discovery rate) ≤ 0.05 and log2 fold change ≥ 1. The analyses and expression data are available in RStudio v1.3.1093 (RStudio-Team 2020) markdown script at https://github.com/ccdmb/barley-DH-pow-rnaseq. Figure plots were constructed using R v4.0.3 and the packages chromPlot v1.10.0 and ggplot2 v3.3.3. De novo sample transcript assembly was conducted using Spades v3.13.0 (Bankevich et al. 2012) (–rna -m 63 -t 24), clustered using CD-HIT v4.6.8 (Fu et al. 2012; Li and Godzik 2006) (-T 10 -c 0.98) and coding sequence predicted using CodAn v1.2 (Nachtigall et al. 2021) (-c6 -H 98). Gene expression data from a previous study of powdery mildew infection of barley near-isogenic mlo lines (NILs) (Ge et al. 2020) were used to compare expression around the 7H RBgh2 locus and are also available through the GitHub link above.
Gene ontology term analysis of differentially expressed genes
Functional enrichment for differentially expressed genes was determined using R version 4.0.3, topGO v2.42.0 (Alexa et al. 2006) and Rgraphviz v2.34.0 (Hansen et al. 2020). The gene ontology (GO) terms for significantly differentially expressed genes (SDEGs) were compared to the ontologies for all genes in the barley genome (population background) to determine enrichment using Fisher’s exact test with p values ≤ 0.01. The analyses and data are available in RStudio v1.3.1093 (RStudio-Team 2020) markdown notebook https://github.com/ccdmb/barley-DH-pow-rnaseq.
Protein tertiary structure predictions
Protein tertiary structural predictions were conducted using ColabFold (Mirdita et al. 2021), powered by AlphaFold2 (Jumper et al. 2021) and RoseTTAFold (Baek et al. 2021) with default settings (MMseqs2 multiple sequence alignment, homo-oligomer 1, subsample true, number relax 0, use turbo true, rank by pLDDT, number of models 5, number of samples 1, max recycles 3 and tol 0). AlphaFold-Multimer was used for the prediction of the protein complexes between multiple proteins (Evans et al. 2021).
PCR amplification of Morex HORVU7Hr1G002390
PCR primers were designed to overlapping regions of the Morex HORVU7Hr1G002390 gene model (HORVU.MOREX.r3.7HG0636850), including approximately 1000 bp of the 5′ and 3′ UTRs (Table S1). PCR products were visualised by electrophoresis on a 1% TAE agarose gel.
Results
RBgh2 resistance is recessive
To determine dominance of RBgh2, a DH line was selected to generate F1 progeny as the original donor parent, Eth069, was found to be difficult to cross (Ge et al. 2021). Reciprocal crosses were made between the powdery mildew-susceptible parent cv. Baudin and DH line 12. All F1 progeny were susceptible, indicating that RBgh2 is recessive and not influenced by mitochondrial or chloroplast genes (Fig. 1).
RNA read coverage and summary of SDEGs in doubled haploid leaf samples
RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) yielded over 20 million reads for each replicate sample, except sample AU1_C, which yielded over 18 million (Figure S1). On average, 92% of total sample sequences mapped to the cv. Morex barley reference genome, with 83% of read alignments mapping uniquely and 9% to multiple loci. Some 24,346 barley genes (56% of all genes) were expressed with a read count ≥ 30. A principal component analysis (PCA) showed genotype accounted for 13% of the variation between samples while treatment (Bgh-inoculated or non-inoculated controls) accounted for 39% of variation (Figure S2).
Among significantly differentially expressed genes (SDEGs) between different treatments, a PCA showed four distinct clusters with 38% and 17% of the variation explained by treatment and genotype, respectively (Figure S3). In inoculated APR DH lines (group I, Fig. 2a), a total of 3910 SDEGs were identified compared to controls (Fig. 2b), with the majority, 2430, induced (Table S2a). Among inoculated susceptible DH lines (group II), 3561 SDEGs were identified compared with the controls, and of these 2280 genes were induced (Table S2b). Overall, a total of 2753 DE genes were shared between inoculated APR (group I) and susceptible (group II) genotypes compared to their respective controls (Fig. 2b).
GO terms enriched by SDEGs in APR and susceptible genotypes following Bgh inoculation
The APR DH SDEGs were significantly enriched for 44 GO term molecular functions and 37 biological processes, and the susceptible DH SDEGs were significantly enriched for 43 molecular functions and 46 biological processes, both compared to non-inoculated controls (Table S3). In each comparison, protein serine/threonine kinase activity was the most significant molecular function (p values of 4.5e−29 and 1e−30).
Major GO term differences between the APR lines during infection as compared to the controls were for increased manganese ion-binding, zinc ion and ammonium transmembrane transporter activities and tryptophan biosynthesis. Calcium-dependent phospholipid binding was supressed, together with DNA-3-methyladenine glycosylase activity and auxin signalling. In susceptible lines compared to their controls, terms for phenyl ammonia lyase (PAL) and cinnamic acid biosynthesis increased, while cadmium ion homeostasis, JA activity and several processes with GO terms associated with cell wall biogenesis were reduced.
In comparisons between SDEGs in the APR and susceptible DH lines following powdery mildew inoculation only, a modest number of genes (357) were differentially expressed (Table S2c). These were significantly enriched for 18 GO term molecular functions and 13 biological processes (Table S3), with ADP binding the most significant molecular function (p value of 7e−07). A total of 234 SDEGs were induced in the APR DHs relative to the susceptible DHs with enriched GO terms involved in ADP binding, tryptophan biosynthesis, regulation of proton transport, response to biotic stimulus and protein serine/threonine kinase activity (Fig. 2c). In the tryptophan biosynthetic pathway, four of the eight homologues for five key enzymes (trpA, trpB, trpC, trpD and trpG) were significantly induced (Figure S4). In contrast, enriched GO terms for supressed SDEGs included the adenylate cyclase-modulating G-protein-coupled receptor signalling pathway (including G-protein-coupled receptor binding) and positive regulation of peptidase activity, while malate synthase was prominent among GO terms for induced SDEGs in APR lines as compared to susceptible lines (Fig. 2c).
Defence-related genes differentially expressed during powdery mildew infection of RBgh2 DH lines
A large proportion (142/357) of SDEGs identified in inoculated APR RBgh2 DH lines compared to susceptible DH lines were involved in pathogen sensing, signalling and pathogen defence responses (Table 1). Of these, over 80% were annotated as having the pathogen recognition functions of receptor-like kinase, NB-ARC-like, LRR domain-containing and calmodulin-binding genes. Induction on genes in the SA pathway, which is commonly associated with resistance to biotrophic fungal pathogens in plants, was not observed in the APR lines. In contrast, two genes involved with JA and ethylene signalling were supressed. The majority of transcription factors (7/9) were also supressed in the APR lines.
Among biosynthetic and catabolic genes, six genes in the tryptophan pathway were exclusively expressed in the APR lines and were annotated as having roles in tryptophan biosynthesis, decarboxylation and possibly serotonin production. Cytochrome P450 genes were expressed in both genotypes although six were induced and three suppressed in the APR lines compared to the susceptible lines. Other genes notably induced in APR lines included pathogenesis-related (PR) thaumatin-like PR5 (HORVU5Hr1G005180) and subtilisin-like PR7 (HORVU3Hr1G077950).
Gene expression at the 7H RBgh2 locus
RBgh2 DH lines were unique in showing constitutive expression of several genes in the distal region of chromosome 7HS under the experimental conditions (Fig. 3a and Figure S5). These co-locate to within approximately 2 Mb of the closest genetic marker for the RBgh2 locus at 2,474,271 bps (Ge et al. 2021). Highly expressed genes (absolute log2 fold change ≥ 5, Table 2) were represented by three protein kinases, HORVU7Hr1G001600, HORVU7Hr1G001450 and HORVU7Hr1G001490, together with a NB-ARC LRR-like resistance gene (HORVU7Hr1G002350). These genes showed little or no expression in the susceptible DH lines, but were expressed in both the APR Bgh-inoculated and control samples. A second NB-ARC LRR gene (HORVU7Hr1G001540) and a hypothetical disease resistance protein (HORVU7Hr1G000050) were also constitutively expressed at a moderate level. A hypothetical aspartic peptidase domain-containing protein integral to the membrane (HORVU7Hr1G002490) was also highly expressed (log2 FC 9.87) (Table 2).
No expression in APR lines at the locus was found for the gene (HORVU7Hr1G002390). To investigate the gene, eight primer pairs were designed encompassing the entire 4-kb coding region. In cv. Baudin, all primer pairs amplified PCR products but in Eth069, only primers targeting the second half of the gene (exons 10–12) were successful, indicating substantial gene disruption (Table S1). Two other genes exhibited repressed expression, a hypothetical fatty acid hydroxylase (HORVU7Hr1G000980) (Table 2) and a LRR domain-containing protein (HORVU7Hr1G002910), which had low expression (log2 FC 2) in susceptible DH lines (Figure S6).
Gene expression at 7H RBgh2 locus does not correspond with mlo resistance
To explore any potential relationship between RBgh2 and mlo resistance, differentially expressed genes around the 7H RBgh2 locus were also compared in pre-existing near-isogenic line (NIL) data (Ge et al. 2020). The NILs contain the Mlo alleles mlo-11(cnv2) and mlo-11 in a cv. Baudin background, with mlo-5 in a cv. Pallas background. Relative mlo allele functional/phenotypic strengths are mlo-11(cnv2) < mlo-11 < mlo-5, respectively. Negligible to no NIL gene expression was identified for the hypothetical genes HORVU7Hr1G000050 and HORVU7Hr1G002490, the protein kinase Rpg1 (HORVU7Hr1G001450) and hypothetical kinase HORVU7Hr1G001490 (Fig. 3b). Furthermore, gene expression for the LRR NB-ARC domain-containing protein HORVU7Hr1G002350 and the serine/threonine protein kinase HORVU7Hr1G001600 was enhanced in the Pallas compared to the Baudin NILs. The expression patterns of these two genes together with HORVU7Hr1G000980 were similar to that of the APR DH lines suggesting a genotype-specific effect.
The Mlo paralogue HORVU7Hr1G002390 was expressed in all Baudin and Pallas NILs and for wild-type (WT) Mlo in cv. Baudin (S0) and cv. Pallas (P18). However, there was a higher expression in NILs with a Pallas genetic background and a slightly greater expression for inoculated samples dependent on the mlo allele. In ascending order of expression levels, lowest expression (log2 8) was in non-inoculated controls for WT Mlo (S0) and mlo-11(cnv2) (S2). Medium expression (log2 9) expression was in Bgh-inoculated cv. Baudin (S0), mlo-11(cnv2) (S2) and mlo-11 (S12), together with S12 (mlo-11) and cv. Pallas (P18) non-inoculated controls. Highest (log2 10) expression was in Bgh-inoculated cv. Pallas (P18), inoculated mlo-5 (P22) and mlo-5 controls. Overall, the data suggest a different gene expression pattern among genes at the RBgh2 locus in mlo lines, with HORVU7Hr1G002390 induced following Bgh infection which was dependent on both the genetic background and mlo allele.
Homology of HORVU7Hr1G002390 with Mlo
HORVU7Hr1G002390 is classed at EBI as a paralogue of Mlo (HORVU.MOREX.r3.4HG0410620), the suppressor of broad-spectrum powdery mildew resistance (Piffanelli et al. 2002). To investigate the similarity, a full-length splicing isoform in cv. Baudin, tr_12967 was identified by de novo assembly of RNA reads (Figure S7). An alignment of predicted proteins between tr_12967 and HORVU7Hr1G002390 with Mlo showed a low identity of 32.5% (Figure S8). However, the C-terminal calmodulin (CaM)-binding domain was conserved for three of the five predicted hydrophobic residues important for CaM binding (Kim et al. 2002a).
Constitutively expressed and repressed SDEGs outside the 7H RBgh2 locus
Several genes in RBgh2 APR DH lines were found in both inoculated and non-inoculated controls. These included two co-suppressed acyl-coenzyme A oxidases on chromosome 5H (HORVU5Hr1G006930) and 6H (HORVU6Hr1G020600) (Figure S6). On chromosome 7H, a WD40 repeat-containing protein (HORVU7Hr1G006140) and a hypothetical protein (HORVU7Hr1G006780) were also suppressed. Constitutively expressed genes were limited to a hypothetical protein (HORVU2Hr1G116490) on chromosome 2H. Genotype-dependent expression was also evident, for example five genes on chromosome 2 were expressed in all APR DH lines except Ba69_109, suggesting these are dispensable for resistance (Figure S6).
Discussion
Gene expression changes governed by RBgh2 primarily involve sensing and initiating defence responses, with conspicuous constitutive expression at the RBgh2 locus. A prominent feature of RBgh2 lines was a complete lack of expression of HORVU7Hr1G002390 and suppression of genes potentially involved in cAMP/G-protein-coupled signalling, with the implications explored below.
Genome-wide, resistance gene homologues (RLKs, LRRs and NB-ARCs) and a relatively large number of calmodulin-binding genes (33) were induced. Calcium ion influxes into the cytosol following recognition of either PAMPs (pathogen-associated molecular patterns), and/or DAMPs (damage-associated molecular patterns), play a pivotal role in the strength and specificity of plant immune responses through calmodulin-like proteins (Cheval et al. 2013; Seong and Matzinger 2004). The number of induced calmodulin-binding genes may be significant to RBgh2 resistance given their participation in both pathotype-specific and innate immunity. In concert, suppression of calcium-dependent phospholipid binding was evident, which may mobilise cytosolic Ca2+ to activate defence responses (Lecourieux et al. 2006).
Key metabolic processes defining APR were the activation of cytochrome P450 monooxygenases and genes involving tryptophan biosynthesis, decarboxylation and synthesis of serotonin. P450 monooxygenases have diverse roles in biosynthetic and catabolic pathways that include the biosynthesis of core components of the phenylpropanoid pathway, leading to defence-related compounds such as cyanogenic glucosides and lignins (Schuler and Werck-Reichhart 2003). Their involvement in tryptophan metabolism has been demonstrated in Arabidopsis, where conversion of tryptophan to indole-3-acetaldoxime leads to the production of the Brassicaceae antimicrobial compounds camalexin and indole glucosinolate (Hull et al. 2000; Tzin and Galili). Subsequently, tryptophan-derived phytochemicals were shown to be essential for non-adapted or innate antifungal immunity (Consonni et al. 2010; Hiruma et al. 2013). In rice, serotonin, a derivative of decarboxylation of tryptophan to tryptamine, supresses growth of Bipolaris oryzae (Ishihara et al. 2008). Significant induction of malate synthase was also observed. Malate is involved in central metabolism and in plant defence provides NADPH reducing energy and backbone structures for defence compounds via the phenylpropanoid pathway (Casati et al. 1999).
Only two transcription factors were significantly induced in inoculated APR DH lines compared to susceptible lines. HORVU5Hr1G019000 has an FHY3/FAR1 (IPR031052) domain found in the Arabidopsis light signalling FHY3 and FAR1 proteins. Double null mutant studies showed FHY3 and FAR1 modulate plant immunity by negatively regulating ROS accumulation, oxidative stress and SA-dependent cell death (Ma et al. 2016) through the NB-LRR-mediated SA signalling pathway, reducing pathogenesis-related (PR) gene expression and resistance to Pseudomonas syringae bacteria (Wang et al. 2016). However, PR gene expression was unaffected in single mutants, and the relevance of the barley homologue requires further study. The second gene induced was a MADS-box transcription factor (HORVU5Hr1G082120). Such genes are key components of gene regulatory networks in response to stressful conditions, including oxidative stress (Castelan-Munoz et al. 2019).
Among PR genes, only HORVU5Hr1G005180, a PR5 thaumatin-like orthologue and HORVU3Hr1G077950, a PR7 subtilisin-like serine proteinase, were induced in Bgh-inoculated APR DH lines. Many thaumatin-like proteins have antimicrobial activities, where membrane permeability changes cause leakage of fungal hyphae cytoplasmic material, resulting in eventual cell rupture and an increased uptake of antifungal proteins (Sudisha et al. 2012). In Arabidopsis, PR7-like AtSBT3.3 primes innate immune responses via chromatin remodelling of SA-dependent defence genes and MAP kinase activation (Gil et al. 2005).
De-repression of defence-related genes
Surprisingly, only two genes involving the primary plant defence signalling pathways for salicylic acid (SA), jasmonic acid (JA) and ethylene (ET) showed significantly altered expression, both being supressed. These compounds have different roles against fungal pathogens depending on their modes of obtaining plant nutrients. SA is central to resistance against biotrophs, while JA and to a lesser extent ethylene are antagonistic to SA, contributing to the defence against necrotrophs (Shigenaga and Argueso 2016). Quantitative PCR experiments with isochorismate synthase, which leads to SA production, and 13-lipoxygenase, leading to JA production, showed low or similar expression relative to susceptible controls (data not shown). The supressed JA pathway gene, HORVU7Hr1G041260, is annotated as a ZIM-domain (JAZ) JA repressor, which regulates host and non-host production of reactive oxygen species in the chloroplast and cell death (Ishiga et al. 2013). These responses were in tomato and Nicotiana benthamiana against Pseudomonas syringae, a necrotroph, and might, therefore, be regarded as antagonistic to biotrophic resistance. Equally, given the involvement of JAZ proteins in the ethylene, salicylic acid, gibberellic acid and auxin plant hormone pathways (Kazan and Manners 2012; Wager and Browse 2012), a barley homologue in the context of RBgh2 resistance may contribute to an effective immune response. Further indirect evidence of some involvement of the JA pathway was evident in the constitutive suppression of two acyl-coenzyme A oxidases. In Arabidopsis, several isozymes are involved in JA synthesis. However, their relevance to barley powdery mildew resistance requires further investigation as they individually appear to influence specific downstream pathogen and cell development functions (Schilmiller et al. 2007). An intriguing gene suppressed in RBgh2 lines was a WD40 repeat-containing protein (HORVU7Hr1G006140). The orthologue in wheat, TaHOS15, increases susceptibility to Bgt via a transcriptional repressor complex acting on the chromatin of wheat defence-related genes (Liu et al. 2019), with lower expression fine-tuning innate immunity.
Concerted gene expression at the 7H RBgh2 locus
Significant differential gene expression was identified for several resistance genes at the 7H RBgh2 locus in Bgh-inoculated DH APR lines. The majority of these were constitutively expressed. Two are serine–threonine receptor-like kinases; ABC1037 (HORVU7Hr1G001600) (Brueggeman et al. 2006) and Rpg1 (HORVU7Hr1G001450) a stem rust resistance gene (Brueggeman et al. 2002). Although not reported for the Rpg1 locus, in wheat partial or slow rusting resistance is associated with partial resistance to mildew. The Lr34/Yr18/Pm38 gene encodes an ABC transporter (Krattinger et al. 2009) while the gene or tightly linked genes providing Lr67/Yr46/Sr55/Pm46 resistances is yet to be isolated (Herrera-Foessel et al. 2014).
Two NB-ARC LRR disease resistance-like genes (HORVU7Hr1G002350 and HORVU7Hr1G001540) and kinase-like domain-containing proteins (HORVU7Hr1G001490 and HORVU7Hr1G001600), together with predicted gene models, were also constitutively expressed at the 7H RBgh2 locus and may have a role in mildew resistance. Kinases are sometimes required and co-expressed with NBS-LRR genes to provide disease resistance (Ade et al. 2007). One of the predicted genes, HORVU7Hr1G000050, had no annotated protein domain family; however, a PANTHER classifier (PTHR23155:SF1087) describes the protein as a putative disease resistance protein and is classed as an antimicrobial response protein. A second predicted gene model, HORVU7Hr1G001520, lacked annotation (Table 2). The range of resistance-associated genes co-expressed at the RBgh2 locus suggests a pathogen other than barley powdery mildew may equally have initiated directional selection.
The 7H RBgh2 locus contains a novel Mlo-like ancient paralogue
HORVU7Hr1G002390, which lies within the RBgh2 locus, lacked expression in the APR DH lines and PCR data indicated substantial disruption of the 3′ end of the gene. HORVU7Hr1G002390 is a paralogue of the prototypic seven-transmembrane domain MLO protein, mutations of which confer Bgh race non-specific penetration resistance (Büschges et al. 1997), with 32% amino acid homology and six transmembrane domains. Like Mlo, HORVU7Hr1G002390 appears to have a calmodulin (CaM)-binding C-terminus domain (Kim et al. 2002a, 2002b) with at least three conserved hydrophobic residues predicted to be important for binding. CaM is a calcium sensor and messenger intermediate that binds MLO for full susceptibility to Bgh (Kim et al. 2002b; Kusch and Panstruga 2017) and is structurally similar to G-protein-coupled receptors although MLO was found to function independently of heterotrimeric G proteins. The cv. Baudin transcript, by contrast, encodes a protein that appeared, by in silico protein structural analysis, to bind both G-protein and calmodulin to form a trimeric protein structure (Figure S9). Although further evidence is needed, suppression of G-protein-binding activity in RBgh2 lines indirectly supports this domain.
The involvement of HORVU7Hr1G002390 in RBgh2 barley powdery mildew resistance is circumstantial and is qualified by a current lack of gene complementation or silencing. This study is based on comparisons to the barley reference genome (cv. Morex). Plant genomes show extensive presence/absence and copy number variations, often involving resistance gene homologues (Jayakodi et al. 2020). Such differences may have affected the expression analysis, while the existence of other genes conferring RBgh2 resistance in the parental landrace Eth069 cannot be discounted. The nature of HORVU7Hr1G002390 is further complicated by the cv. Baudin transcript containing an alternative ATG start codon in the first exon (Figure S8), which we assume does not affect function. Despite this, the recessive nature of the resistance and suppression of G-protein-binding activity are suggestive of HORVU7Hr1G002390 involvement. G-protein subunits are evolutionarily conserved, and in mammals, cAMP levels following G-protein ligand binding are a key regulator of innate immune responses, transcription and translation (Ho et al. 2009; Serezani et al. 2008; Ye et al. 1996). Research in barley is lacking but in Arabidopsis, the Gα subunit was recently shown to mediate innate immunity against bacterial flagellin (Xu et al. 2019).
RBgh2 resistance is recessive with conspicuous constitutive expression of genes at the RBgh2 locus. Genome-wide, many of the gene expression changes are associated with innate immunity in the literature (activation of the tryptophan pathway, induction of calmodulin-binding genes and cytochrome P450 monooxygenases, transcription factors and PR5 and PR7) or are a generic response, such as activation of a large number of resistance gene homologues. Constitutive expression changes included suppression of a ZIM-domain (JAZ) JA repressor and a WD40 repeat-containing protein. Together with the macroscopic and cytological observations of Ge et al. (2021), the results in this study indicate a unique mechanism underlying RBgh2 barley powdery mildew resistance.
Data availability
The RNA sequence read data in this manuscript have been deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive under BioProject PRJEB46882, accession numbers ERR6473254-ERR6473324. Gene expression analyses are available as R-markdown notebooks at https://github.com/ccdmb/barley-DH-pow-rnaseq.
References
Ade J, DeYoung BJ, Golstein C, Innes RW (2007) Indirect activation of a plant nucleotide binding site-leucine-rich repeat protein by a bacterial protease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:2531–2536
Alexa A, Rahnenfuhrer J, Lengauer T (2006) Improved scoring of functional groups from gene expression data by decorrelating GO graph structure. Bioinformatics 22:1600–1607
Asad MA, Bai B, Lan C, Yan J, Xia X, Zhang Y, He Z (2014) Identification of QTL for adult-plant resistance to powdery mildew in Chinese wheat landrace Pingyuan 50. Crop J 2:308–314
Baek M, DiMaio F, Anishchenko I, Dauparas J, Ovchinnikov S, Lee GR, Wang J, Cong Q, Kinch LN, Schaeffer RD, Millan C, Park H, Adams C, Glassman CR, DeGiovanni A, Pereira JH, Rodrigues AV, van Dijk AA, Ebrecht AC, Opperman DJ, Sagmeister T, Buhlheller C, Pavkov-Keller T, Rathinaswamy MK, Dalwadi U, Yip CK, Burke JE, Garcia KC, Grishin NV, Adams PD, Read RJ, Baker D (2021) Accurate prediction of protein structures and interactions using a three-track neural network. Science 373:871–876
Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA (2012) SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477
Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B (2014) Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120
Brueggeman R, Rostoks N, Kudrna D, Kilian A, Han F, Chen J, Druka A, Steffenson B, Kleinhofs A (2002) The barley stem rust-resistance gene Rpg1 is a novel disease-resistance gene with homology to receptor kinases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:9328–9333
Brueggeman R, Drader T, Kleinhofs A (2006) The barley serine/threonine kinase gene Rpg1 providing resistance to stem rust belongs to a gene family with five other members encoding kinase domains. Theor Appl Genet 113:1147–1158
Burdon JJ, Barrett LG, Rebetzke G, Thrall PH (2014) Guiding deployment of resistance in cereals using evolutionary principles. Evol Appl 7:609–624
Büschges R, Hollricher K, Panstruga R, Simons G, Wolter M, Frijters A, van Daelen R, van der Lee T, Diergaarde P, Groenendijk J, Töpsch S, Vos P, Salamini F, Schulze-Lefert P (1997) The barley Mlo gene: a novel control element of plant pathogen resistance. Cell 88:695–705
Casati P, Drincovich MF, Edwards GE, Andreo CS (1999) Malate metabolism by NADP-malic enzyme in plant defense. Photosynth Res 61:99–105
Castelan-Munoz N, Herrera J, Cajero-Sanchez W, Arrizubieta M, Trejo C, Garcia-Ponce B, Sanchez MP, Alvarez-Buylla ER, Garay-Arroyo A (2019) MADS-box genes are key components of genetic regulatory networks involved in abiotic stress and plastic developmental responses in plants. Front Plant Sci 10:853
Cheval C, Aldon D, Galaud J-P, Ranty B (2013) Calcium/calmodulin-mediated regulation of plant immunity. Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta (BBA) 1833:1766–1771
Consonni C, Bednarek P, Humphry M, Francocci F, Ferrari S, Harzen A, Loren V, van Themaat E, Panstruga R (2010) Tryptophan-derived metabolites are required for antifungal defense in the Arabidopsis mlo2 mutant. Plant Physiol 152:1544–1561
Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Jha S, Batut P, Chaisson M, Gingeras TR (2013) STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29:15–21
Evans R, O’Neill M, Pritzel A, Antropova N, Senior A, Green T, Žídek A, Bates R, Blackwell S, Yim J, Ronneberger O, Bodenstein S, Zielinski M, Bridgland A, Potapenko A, Cowie A, Tunyasuvunakool K, Jain R, Clancy E, Kohli P, Jumper J, Hassabis D (2021) Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. bioRxiv:2021.2010.2004.463034
Fu L, Niu B, Zhu Z, Wu S, Li W (2012) CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics 28:3150–3152
Ge X, Deng W, Lee ZZ, Lopez-Ruiz FJ, Schweizer P, Ellwood SR (2016) Tempered mlo broad-spectrum resistance to barley powdery mildew in an Ethiopian landrace. Sci Rep 6:29558
Ge C, Moolhuijzen P, Hickey L, Wentzel E, Deng W, Dinglasan EG, Ellwood SR (2020) Physiological changes in barley mlo-11 powdery mildew resistance conditioned by tandem repeat copy number. Int J Mol Sci 21:8769
Ge C, Wentzel E, D’Souza N, Chen K, Oliver RP, Ellwood SR (2021) Adult resistance genes to barley powdery mildew confer basal penetration resistance associated with broad-spectrum resistance. Plant Genome. https://doi.org/10.1002/tpg2.20129
Gil MJ, Coego A, Mauch-Mani B, Jordá L, Vera P (2005) The Arabidopsis csb3 mutant reveals a regulatory link between salicylic acid-mediated disease resistance and the methyl-erythritol 4-phosphate pathway. Plant J 44:155–166
Hansen KD, Gentry J, Long L, Gentleman R, Falcon S, Hahne F, Sarkar D (2020) Rgraphviz: provides plotting capabilities for R graph objects. R package version 2.34.0. edn
Herrera-Foessel SA, Singh RP, Lillemo M, Huerta-Espino J, Bhavani S, Singh S, Lan C, Calvo-Salazar V, Lagudah ES (2014) Lr67/Yr46 confers adult plant resistance to stem rust and powdery mildew in wheat. Theor Appl Genet 127:781–789
Hiruma K, Fukunaga S, Bednarek P, Piślewska-Bednarek M, Watanabe S, Narusaka Y, Shirasu K, Takano Y (2013) Glutathione and tryptophan metabolism are required for Arabidopsis immunity during the hypersensitive response to hemibiotrophs. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:9589
Ho MKC, Su Y, Yeung WWS, Wong YH (2009) Regulation of transcription factors by heterotrimeric G proteins. Curr Mol Pharmacol 2:19–31
Howe KL, Contreras-Moreira B, De Silva N, Maslen G, Akanni W, Allen J, Alvarez-Jarreta J, Barba M, Bolser DM, Cambell L, Carbajo M, Chakiachvili M, Christensen M, Cummins C, Cuzick A, Davis P, Fexova S, Gall A, George N, Gil L, Gupta P, Hammond-Kosack KE, Haskell E, Hunt SE, Jaiswal P, Janacek SH, Kersey PJ, Langridge N, Maheswari U, Maurel T, McDowall MD, Moore B, Muffato M, Naamati G, Naithani S, Olson A, Papatheodorou I, Patricio M, Paulini M, Pedro H, Perry E, Preece J, Rosello M, Russell M, Sitnik V, Staines DM, Stein J, Tello-Ruiz MK, Trevanion SJ, Urban M, Wei S, Ware D, Williams G, Yates AD, Flicek P (2020) Ensembl Genomes 2020-enabling non-vertebrate genomic research. Nucleic Acids Res 48:D689–D695
Hull AK, Vij R, Celenza JL (2000) Arabidopsis cytochrome P450s that catalyze the first step of tryptophan-dependent indole-3-acetic acid biosynthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci 97:2379–2384
Hwang BK, Heitefuss R (1982) Characterization of adult plant resistance of spring barley to powdery mildew (Erysiphe graminis f. sp. hordei) I. Race specificity and expression of resistance. J Phytopathol 104:168–178
Ishiga Y, Ishiga T, Uppalapati SR, Mysore KS (2013) Jasmonate ZIM-domain (JAZ) protein regulates host and nonhost pathogen-induced cell death in tomato and Nicotiana benthamiana. PLoS ONE 8:e75728
Ishihara A, Hashimoto Y, Tanaka C, Dubouzet JG, Nakao T, Matsuda F, Nishioka T, Miyagawa H, Wakasa K (2008) The tryptophan pathway is involved in the defense responses of rice against pathogenic infection via serotonin production. Plant J 54:481–495
Jarosch B, Kogel K-H, Schaffrath U (1999) The ambivalence of the barley Mlo locus: Mutations conferring resistance against powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei) enhance susceptibility to the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 12:508–514
Jayakodi M, Padmarasu S, Haberer G, Bonthala VS, Gundlach H, Monat C, Lux T, Kamal N, Lang D, Himmelbach A, Ens J, Zhang X-Q, Angessa TT, Zhou G, Tan C, Hill C, Wang P, Schreiber M, Boston LB, Plott C, Jenkins J, Guo Y, Fiebig A, Budak H, Xu D, Zhang J, Wang C, Grimwood J, Schmutz J, Guo G, Zhang G, Mochida K, Hirayama T, Sato K, Chalmers KJ, Langridge P, Waugh R, Pozniak CJ, Scholz U, Mayer KFX, Spannagl M, Li C, Mascher M, Stein N (2020) The barley pan-genome reveals the hidden legacy of mutation breeding. Nature 588:284–289
Johnson JW, Ge Y-f, Roberts JJ, Raymer P, Seo Y (2003) Adult-plant resistance to powdery mildew in Knox 62 wheat. Cereal Res Commun 31:281–288
Jørgensen JH (1992) Discovery, characterization and exploitation of Mlo powdery mildew resistance in barley. Euphytica 63:141–152
Jumper J, Evans R, Pritzel A, Green T, Figurnov M, Ronneberger O, Tunyasuvunakool K, Bates R, Zidek A, Potapenko A, Bridgland A, Meyer C, Kohl SAA, Ballard AJ, Cowie A, Romera-Paredes B, Nikolov S, Jain R, Adler J, Back T, Petersen S, Reiman D, Clancy E, Zielinski M, Steinegger M, Pacholska M, Berghammer T, Bodenstein S, Silver D, Vinyals O, Senior AW, Kavukcuoglu K, Kohli P, Hassabis D (2021) Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596:583–589
Kazan K, Manners JM (2012) JAZ repressors and the orchestration of phytohormone crosstalk. Trends Plant Sci 17:22–31
Kim MC, Lee SH, Kim JK, Chun HJ, Choi MS, Chung WS, Moon BC, Kang CH, Park CY, Yoo JH, Kang YH, Koo SC, Koo YD, Jung JC, Kim ST, Schulze-Lefert P, Lee SY, Cho MJ (2002a) Mlo, a modulator of plant defense and cell death, is a novel calmodulin-binding protein. Isolation and characterization of a rice Mlo homologue. J Biol Chem 277:19304–19314
Kim MC, Panstruga R, Elliott C, Muller J, Devoto A, Yoon HW, Park HC, Cho MJ, Schulze-Lefert P (2002b) Calmodulin interacts with MLO protein to regulate defence against mildew in barley. Nature 416:447–451
Krattinger SG, Lagudah ES, Spielmeyer W, Singh RP, Huerta-Espino J, McFadden H, Bossolini E, Selter LL, Keller B (2009) A putative ABC transporter confers durable resistance to multiple fungal pathogens in wheat. Science 323:1360–1363
Kumar J, Hückelhoven R, Beckhove U, Nagarajan S, Kogel K-H (2001) A compromised Mlo pathway affects the response of barley to the necrotrophic fungus Bipolaris sorokiniana (teleomorph: Cochliobolus sativus) and its toxins. Phytopathology 91:127–133
Kusch S, Panstruga R (2017) mlo-based resistance: an apparently universal “weapon” to defeat powdery mildew disease. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 30:179–189
Lecourieux D, Ranjeva R, Pugin A (2006) Calcium in plant defence-signalling pathways. New Phytol 171:249–269
Li W, Godzik A (2006) Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 22:1658–1659
Liu J, Zhi P, Wang X, Fan Q, Chang C (2019) Wheat WD40-repeat protein TaHOS15 functions in a histone deacetylase complex to fine-tune defense responses to Blumeria graminis f.sp. tritici. J Exp Bot 70:255–268
Love MI, Huber W, Anders S (2014) Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 15:550
Ma L, Tian T, Lin R, Deng XW, Wang H, Li G (2016) Arabidopsis FHY3 and FAR1 regulate light-Induced myo-inositol biosynthesis and oxidative stress responses by transcriptional activation of MIPS1. Mol Plant 9:541–557
McGrann GRD, Stavrinides A, Russell J, Corbitt MM, Booth A, Chartrain L, Thomas WTB, Brown JKM (2014) A trade off between mlo resistance to powdery mildew and increased susceptibility of barley to a newly important disease, Ramularia leaf spot. J Exp Bot 65:1025–1037
Mirdita M, Ovchinnikov S, Steinegger M (2021) ColabFold - Making protein folding accessible to all. bioRxiv
Nachtigall PG, Kashiwabara AY, Durham AM (2021) CodAn: predictive models for precise identification of coding regions in eukaryotic transcripts. Brief Bioinform. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbaa045
Piffanelli P, Zhou F, Casais C, Orme J, Jarosch B, Schaffrath U, Collins NC, Panstruga R, Schulze-Lefert P (2002) The barley MLO modulator of defense and cell death is responsive to biotic and abiotic stress stimuli. Plant Physiol 129:1076–1085
Reinstädler A, Müller J, Czembor JH, Piffanelli P, Panstruga R (2010) Novel induced mlo mutant alleles in combination with site-directed mutagenesis reveal functionally important domains in the heptahelical barley Mlo protein. BMC Plant Biol 10:31–31
RStudio-Team (2020) RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. In: RStudio (ed) 1.3.1093 edn. RStudio, PBC, Boston, MA
Schilmiller AL, Koo AJK, Howe GA (2007) Functional diversification of acyl-coenzyme A oxidases in jasmonic acid biosynthesis and action. Plant Physiol 143:812–824
Schuler MA, Werck-Reichhart D (2003) Functional genomics of P450s. Annu Rev Plant Biol 54:629–667
Seong S-Y, Matzinger P (2004) Hydrophobicity: an ancient damage-associated molecular pattern that initiates innate immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol 4:469–478
Serezani CH, Ballinger MN, Aronoff DM, Peters-Golden M (2008) Cyclic AMP: master regulator of innate immune cell function. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 39:127–132
Shigenaga AM, Argueso CT (2016) No hormone to rule them all: interactions of plant hormones during the responses of plants to pathogens. Semin Cell Dev Biol 56:174–189
Sudisha J, Sharathchandra RG, Amruthesh KN, Kumar A, Shetty HS (2012) Pathogenesis related proteins in plant defense response. Prog Biol Control 12:379–403
Tucker MA, Jayasena K, Ellwood SR, Oliver RP (2013) Pathotype variation of barley powdery mildew in Western Australia. Austral Plant Pathol 42:617–623
Tzin V, Galili G (2010) The biosynthetic pathways for shikimate and aromatic amino acids in Arabidopsis thaliana. The Arabidopsis Book. Am Soc Plant Biol 8:e0132
Wager A, Browse J (2012) Social network: JAZ protein interactions expand our knowledge of Jasmonate Signaling. Front Plant Sci 3:41
Wang W, Tang W, Ma T, Niu D, Jin JB, Wang H, Lin R (2016) A pair of light signaling factors FHY3 and FAR1 regulates plant immunity by modulating chlorophyll biosynthesis. J Integr Plant Biol 58:91–103
Xu L, Yao X, Zhang N, Gong B-Q, Li J-F (2019) Dynamic G protein alpha signaling in Arabidopsis innate immunity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 516:1039–1045
Ye RD, Pan Z, Kravchenko VV, Browning DD, Prossnitz ER (1996) Gene transcription through activation of G-protein-coupled chemoattractant receptors. Gene Expr 5:205–215
Acknowledgements
The project was supported by the Centre for Crop and Disease Management, a cooperative research vehicle of the Grains Research and Development Corporation and Curtin University. We thank the Australian Government National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy (NCRIS) for providing access to Pawsey Supercomputing under the National Computational Merit Allocation Scheme (NCMAS), together with the Nectar Research and Pawsey Nimbus Cloud resources.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions. This research was funded under Grains Research and Development Corporation grant CUR00023 B4.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
EW and SE performed plant growth chamber and laboratory procedures, CG made the F1 crosses and PM conducted the bioinformatics analyses. CG, PM and SE interpreted the gene expression data. The manuscript was drafted by PM, with contributions from SE. SE conceptualised the project. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
All authors declare no conflicts of interest and no financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Communicated by Reem Aboukhaddour.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Moolhuijzen, P., Ge, C., Palmiero, E. et al. A unique resistance mechanism is associated with RBgh2 barley powdery mildew adult plant resistance. Theor Appl Genet 136, 145 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-023-04392-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-023-04392-0