Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

67/m mit Becken- und Leistenschmerzen nach transurethraler Prostataresektion

Vorbereitung auf die Facharztprüfung: Fall 9

67/m with pelvis and groin pain after transurethral resection of the prostate

Preparation for the specialist examination: case 9

  • Facharzt-Training
  • Published:
Der Urologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1

Literatur

  1. Beer E (1928) Periostitis and ostitis of the symphysis and rami of the pubis following suprapubic cystotomies. J Urol 20(2):233–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ziesel C, Frees S, Thomas C, Stein R, Gillitzer R, Thüroff JW (2016) Pubic symphysitis after transurethral resection of the prostate. World J Urol 34(2):275–280

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Garg G, Deliso M, Li S, Sharma P, Abdelbaki A, Gupta N (2018) Prostatosymphyseal fistula after transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), a rare and difficult to recognize complication. Urol Case Rep 21:70–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Elshout PJ, Verleyen P, Putzeys G (2015) Osteitis pubis after TURP: a rare complication difficult to recognize. Urol Case Rep 4:55–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Whelan L, Mullarkey E, Woo HH (2015) Prostatosymphyseal fistula treated by robotic assisted radical prostatectomy. Case Rep Urol 2015:582705

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Plateau B, Ruivard M, Montoriol PF (2015) Prostatosymphyseal fistula and osteomyelitis pubis following transurethral resection of the prostate: CT and MRI findings. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 59(6):713–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gillitzer R, Melchior SW, Jones J, Fichtner J, Thüroff JW (2001) Prostatosymphyseal fistula after transurethral resection of the prostate. J Urol 166(3):1001–1002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gerullis H, Eitzen A, Uphoff J et al (2017) Recurrent symphysitis culminating in pelvic ring fracture after hyperextended transurethral prostate resection and vaporization with symphysis erosion: a case report. J Med Case Rep 11(1):141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Davis NF, Torregiani W, Thornhill J (2016) Osteitis pubis after standard bipolar TURP surgery: insight into aetiology, diagnosis, management and prevention of this rarity. BMJ Case Rep 2016:bcr2015212420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Steinbach HL, Petrakis NL, Gilfillan RS, Smith DR (1955) The pathogenesis of osteitis pubis. J Urol 74(6):840–846

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Thabit AK, Fatani DF, Bamakhrama MS, Barnawi OA, Basudan LO, Alhejaili SF (2019) Antibiotic penetration into bone and joints: an updated review. Int J Infect Dis 81:128–136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Füllhase C (2016) Transurethral resection of the prostate. Urologe A 55(11):1433–1439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gilfrich C, Leicht H, Fahlenbrach C, Jeschke E, Popken G, Stolzenburg JU, Weißbach L, Zastrow C, Günster C (2016) Morbidity and mortality after surgery for lower urinary tract symptoms: a study of 95 577 cases from a nationwide German health insurance database. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 19(4):406–411

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rassweiler J, Teber D, Kuntz R, Hofmann R (2006) Complications of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP)—incidence, management, and prevention. Eur Urol 50(5):969–979 (discussion 980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wilhelm K, Cazana IM, Schoenthaler M, Katzenwadel A, Spaeth J, Miernik A (2018) Low-pressure monopolar electroresection of the prostate for glands sized 〉 70 vs. 〈 70 cc performed with continuous irrigation and suprapubic suction: perioperative and long-term outcome. World J Urol 36(3):449–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Alexander CE, Scullion MM, Omar MI, Yuan Y, Mamoulakis C, N’Dow JM, Chen C, Lam TB (2019) Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic obstruction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009629.pub4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Bschleipfer T, Oelke M, Rieken M (2019) Diagnostic procedures and diagnostic strategy for lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia : an overview. Urologe A 58(3):238–247

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gratzke C, Bachmann A, Descazeaud A, Drake MJ, Madersbacher S, Mamoulakis C, Oelke M, Tikkinen KAO, Gravas S (2015) EAU guidelines on the assessment of non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms including benign prostatic obstruction. Eur Urol 67(6):1099–1109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Choo MS, Yoo C, Cho SY, Jeong SJ, Jeong CW, Ku JH, Oh SJ (2017) Development of decision support formulas for the prediction of bladder outlet obstruction and prostatic surgery in patients with lower urinary tract symptom/benign prostatic Hyperplasia: part I, development of the formula and its internal validation. Int Neurourol J 21(Suppl 1):S55–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Magistro G, Stief CG, Gratzke C (2019) Novel minimally invasive treatment options for male lower urinary tract symptom. Urologe A 58(3):254–262

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Schöb DS, Reichelt AC, Gross AJ, Abt D, Miernik A, Gratzke C (2020) Neue operative Techniken zur Therapie des benignen Prostatasyndroms [Novel surgical techniques for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia]. Urologe A. 59(3):347–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-020-01149-1. PMID: 32072200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nguyen DD, Barber N, Bidair M et al (2020) Waterjet ablation therapy for endoscopic resection of prostate tissue trial (WATER) vs WATER II: comparing Aquablation therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia in 30–80 and 80–150 mL prostates. BJU Int 125(1):112–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Elterman D, Bach T, Rijo E et al (2020) Transfusion rates after 800 Aquablation procedures using various haemostasis methods. BJU Int. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14990

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Urologische Klinik, St. Elisabeth Klinikum Straubing, St. Elisabeth-Str. 23, 94315, Straubing, Deutschland

    Marlene Haccius, Christian Gilfrich &  Matthias May

Authors
  1. Marlene Haccius
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christian Gilfrich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Matthias May
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthias May.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

M. Haccius, C. Gilfrich und M. May geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Für diesen Beitrag wurden von den Autoren keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien. Für Bildmaterial oder anderweitige Angaben innerhalb des Manuskripts, über die Patienten zu identifizieren sind, liegt von ihnen und/oder ihren gesetzlichen Vertretern eine schriftliche Einwilligung vor.

The supplement containing this article is not sponsored by industry.

Additional information

Redaktion

U. Necknig, Garmisch-Partenkirchen

M. S. Michel, Mannheim

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Haccius, M., Gilfrich, C. & May, M. 67/m mit Becken- und Leistenschmerzen nach transurethraler Prostataresektion. Urologe 59 (Suppl 2), 202–208 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-020-01354-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-020-01354-y

Schlüsselwörter

Search

Navigation