Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Transurethrale Resektion der Prostata und Modifikationen (bipolar, Elektrovaporisation)

Transurethral resection of the prostate and current modifications (bipolar, electrovaporization)

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Urologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die transurethrale Resektion der Prostata (TURP) ist das operative Referenzverfahren, da sich über einen minimal-invasiven natürlichen Zugangsweg eine effektive Entfernung der benignen Prostatahyperplasie erreichen lässt, was zu einer relevanten und nachhaltigen Verbesserung der Symptomatik und Lebensqualität, der Miktionsparameter und der Obstruktion führt. Bei der TURP wird das Gewebe mittels hochfrequentem (HF-)chirurgischem Schnitt mit schnittsynchroner Blutstillung abgetragen. Viele Modifikationen der TURP (z. B. die Video-TURP) haben sich allgemein durchgesetzt und den Standard verändert. Grund für weitere Modifikationen war die Verbesserung der im Einzelfall unausgewogenen Balance zwischen Schnitt und Blutstillung zugunsten einer Verbesserung der Blutstillung. Dies konnte mit verschiedenen Modifikationen (HF-Modulation, Bandschlinge und bipolare Resektion) oder neuen Verfahren (Vaporisation und Enukleation) erreicht werden, die den Standard der TURP zwar bisher nicht verdrängt haben, aber sich daneben etablierten.

Abstract

Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is the surgical standard which is truly minimally invasive by using a natural orifice and is also of durable efficacy. The use of TURP removes tissue from benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and leads to clinically relevant improvement in symptoms and quality of life as well as in micturition parameters and obstruction. Tissue is removed by high frequency (HF) current with synchronous hemostasis. Many modifications of TURP, such as the use of video, have become generally accepted and improved the standard. Other modifications were developed because the balance between cutting and hemostasis needed improvement in favor of hemostasis. Several modifications of TURP, such as modulation of HF pulses, band loops and bipolar resection and new procedures, such as vaporization and enucleation showed improved hemostasis. These modifications and procedures, however, have not yet replaced standard TURP but have become established as additional options.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Autorino R, Damiano R et al (2009) Four-year outcome of a prospective randomised trial comparing bipolar plasmakinetic and monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate. Eur Urol 55:922–929

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bach T, Herrmann TR, Cellarius C et al (2009) Bipolar resection of the bladder and prostate–initial experience with a newly developed regular sized loop resectoscope. J Med Life 2:443–446

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Berger AP, Wirtenberger W, Bektic J et al (2004) Safer transurethral resection of the prostate: coagulating intermitting cutting reduces hemostatic complications. J Urol 171:289–291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Berges R, Dreikorn K, Höfner K et al (2003) Leitlinien der Deutschen Urologen zur Therapie des benignen Prostatasyndroms (BPS). Leitlinien der Deutschen Urologen. Urologe A 42:722–738

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Berges R, Muschter R, Höfner K (2007) Alternative, minimalinvasive Therapien beim benignen Prostatasyndrom. Dtsch Ärzteblatt 104(37):2501–2510

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bliem F, Lamche M, Janda R et al (2003) Blutverlust und Einschwemmung bei TURP vs. TUVRP unter Niederdruck- bzw. Hochdruckbedingungen. Urologe A 42:1477–1484

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Boy O et al (2003) Prostataresektion. In: Mohr VD, Bauer J, Döbler K, Fischer B, Woldenga C (Hrsg) Qualität sichtbar machen. BQS-Qualitätsreport 2002. Bundesgeschäftsstelle Qualitätssicherung gGmbH, Düsseldorf, S 138–149

  8. Cabelin MA, Te AE, Kaplan SA (2000) Transurethral vaporization of the prostate: current techniques. Curr Urol Rep 1:116–123

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dorflinger T, Jensen FS et al (1992) Transurethral prostatectomy compared with incision of the prostate in the treatment of prostatism caused by small benign prostate glands. Scand J Urol Nephrol 26:333–338

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dunsmuir WD, McFarlane JP et al (2003) Gyrus bipolar electrovaporization vs transurethral resection of the prostate: a randomized prospective single-blind trial with 1 y follow-up. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 6:182–186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fagerstrom T, Nyman CR et al (2010) Bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate causes less bleeding than the monopolar technique: a single-centre randomized trial of 202 patients. BJU Int 105:1560–1564

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Faul P, Farin G, Reich O, Steude U (1996) The ‚band electrode’: first experiences with a novel TURP procedure to improve hemostasis. Eur Urol 30:403–408

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ferretti S, Azzolini N, Barbieri A et al (2004) Randomized comparison of loops for transurethral resection of the prostate: preliminary results. J Endourol 18:897–900

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gupta NP, Anand A (2009) Comparison of TURP, TUVRP, and HoLEP. Curr Urol Rep 10:276–278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hartung R, Barba M (2000) Instrumentelle Therapie der benignen Prostatahyperplasie. Dtsch Ärztebl 97(15):989–997

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hartung R, Fastenmeier K, Barba M, Leyh H (2001) Coagulating intermittent cutting: improved high-frequency surgery in transurethral prostatectomy. Tech Urol 7:271–275

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hartung R, Leyh H, Liapi C et al (2001) Coagulating intermittent cutting. Improved high-frequency surgery in transurethral prostatectomy. Eur Urol 39:676–679

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Helke C, Manseck A, Hakenberg OW, Wirth MP (2001) Is transurethral vaporesection of the prostate better than standard transurethral resection? Eur Urol 39:551–557

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hon NH, Brathwaite D, Hussain Z et al (2006) A prospective, randomized trial comparing conventional transurethral prostate resection with PlasmaKinetic vaporization of the prostate: physiological changes, early complications and long-term followup. J Urol 176:205–209

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kaya C, Ilktac A et al (2007) The long-term results of transurethral vaporization of the prostate using plasmakinetic energy. BJU Int 99:845–848

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kupeli S, Yilmaz E, Soygur T, Budak M (2001) Randomized study of transurethral resection of the prostate and combined transurethral resection and vaporization of the prostate as a therapeutic alternative in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Endourol 15:317–321

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu CK, Lee WK, Ko MC et al (2006) Transurethral RollerLoop vapor resection of prostate for treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: a 2-year follow-up study. Scand J Urol Nephrol 40:409–415

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Madersbacher S, Alivizatos G, Nordling J et al (2004) EAU 2004 guidelines on assessment, therapy and follow-up of men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction (BPH guidelines). Eur Urol 46:547–554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mamoulakis C, Trompetter M et al (2009) Bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate: the ‚golden standard‘ reclaims its leading position. Curr Opin Urol 19:26–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mamoulakis C, Ubbink DT et al (2009) Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Urol 56:798–809

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Muschter R (2003) Transurethral resection and incision oft he prostate, and open prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia. In: Bruskewitz RC (ed) Atlas of the prostate, 2nd edn. Current Medicine Inc, Philadelphia, pp 71–83

  27. Oelke M, Michel MC, Höfner K (2008) Deutsche Leitlinien zur Diagnostik des benignen Prostatasyndroms. Was ist neu in 2007? Urologe A 47:149–154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Poulakis V, Dahm P, Witzsch U et al (2004) Transurethral electrovaporization vs transurethral resection for symptomatic prostatic obstruction: a meta-analysis. BJU Int 94:89–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rassweiler J, Schulze M, Stock C et al (2007) Bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate–technical modifications and early clinical experience. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 16:11–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Reich O, Faul P (2004) The Band Electrode: ongoing experience with a novel TURP loop to improve hemostasis in 265 patients. Urol Int 72:40–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Reich O, Schneede P, Zaak D et al (2003) Ex-vivo comparison of the haemostatic properties of standard transurethral resection and transurethral vaporization resection of the prostate. BJU Int 92:319–322

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Reich O, Seitz M (2008) Laservaporisation der Prostata: Alles im grunen Bereich? Urologe A 47:461–462, 464–466

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Talic RF, El Tiraifi A, El Faqih SR et al (2000) Prospective randomized study of transurethral vaporization resection of the prostate using the thick loop and standard transurethral prostatectomy. Urology 55:886–891

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Yang Q, Peters TJ et al (2001) Transurethral incision compared with transurethral resection of the prostate for bladder outlet obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Urol 165:1526–1532

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Iori F, Franco G et al (2008) Bipolar transurethral resection of prostate: clinical and urodynamic evaluation. Urology 71:252–255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt für sich und seine Koautoren an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Diakoniekrankenhaus Rotenburg (Wümme) gGmbH, Elise-Averdieck-Straße 17, 27356, Rotenburg, Deutschland

    R. Muschter

  2. Asklepios Klinik Harburg, Urologisches Zentrum Hamburg, Hamburg, Deutschland

    T. Bach

  3. Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, LMU München, München, Deutschland

    M. Seitz

Authors
  1. R. Muschter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T. Bach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Seitz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Muschter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Muschter, R., Bach, T. & Seitz, M. Transurethrale Resektion der Prostata und Modifikationen (bipolar, Elektrovaporisation). Urologe 52, 331–338 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-012-3088-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-012-3088-y

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Search

Navigation