Skip to main content
Log in

Diagnostik, Befunde und Dokumentation bei multipler Sklerose

Diagnostic work-up, findings, and documentation of multiple sclerosis

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Die Radiologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Obwohl die multiple Sklerose (MS) die häufigste chronisch-entzündliche Erkrankung des zentralen Nervensystems (ZNS) ist, liegt die Rate der Fehldiagnosen hoch. Grund hierfür sind meist eine inadäquate Anwendung der McDonald-Kriterien und Fehlinterpretation der Bildgebung.

Ziel

Der Artikel gibt einen Überblick über typische klinische Symptome, die wichtigsten Sequenzen der Magnetresonanztomographie (MRT), die richtige Anwendung der McDonald-Kriterien und die Befundinterpretation.

Abstract

Background

Although multiple sclerosis is the most common chronic inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system, the rate of misdiagnosis in clinical practice is high. This is usually due to the inadequate application of the McDonald criteria and misinterpretation of images.

Objective

This review focuses on typical clinical symptoms, choice of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences, correct application of the McDonald criteria, and finally interpretation of the images.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3

Literatur

  1. Barkhof F, Filippi M, Miller DH et al (1997) Comparison of MRI criteria at first presentation to predict conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis. Brain 120(Pt 11):2059–2069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Biotti D, Bonneville F, Tournaire E et al (2017) Optic neuritis in patients with anti-MOG antibodies spectrum disorder: MRI and clinical features from a large multicentric cohort in France. J Neurol 264:2173–2175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brownlee WJ, Hardy TA, Fazekas F et al (2017) Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges. Lancet 389:1336–1346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Davies G, Keir G, Thompson EJ et al (2003) The clinical significance of an intrathecal monoclonal immunoglobulin band: a follow-up study. Neurology 60:1163–1166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Graber ML (2013) The incidence of diagnostic error in medicine. BMJ Qual Saf 22(Suppl 2):ii21–ii27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jurynczyk M, Geraldes R, Probert F et al (2017) Distinct brain imaging characteristics of autoantibody-mediated CNS conditions and multiple sclerosis. Brain 140:617–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kaisey M, Solomon AJ, Luu M et al (2019) Incidence of multiple sclerosis misdiagnosis in referrals to two academic centers. Mult Scler Relat Disord 30:51–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kelly SB, Chaila E, Kinsella K et al (2012) Using atypical symptoms and red flags to identify non-demyelinating disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 83:44–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kilsdonk ID, Wattjes MP, Lopez-Soriano A et al (2014) Improved differentiation between MS and vascular brain lesions using FLAIR* at 7 Tesla. Eur Radiol 24:841–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu S, Kullnat J, Bourdette D et al (2013) Prevalence of brain magnetic resonance imaging meeting Barkhof and McDonald criteria for dissemination in space among headache patients. Mult Scler 19:1101–1105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Improving Diagnosis in Healthcare (2015) National Academies Press. http://www.nationalacademies.org/hmd/Reports/2015/Improving-Diagnosis-in-Healthcare.aspx. Zugegriffen: 19.01.2023

  12. Mistry N, Abdel-Fahim R, Samaraweera A et al (2016) Imaging central veins in brain lesions with 3‑T T2*-weighted magnetic resonance imaging differentiates multiple sclerosis from microangiopathic brain lesions. Mult Scler 22:1289–1296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Reith W, Hausmann A, Kettner M (2022) New MRI guidelines for multiple sclerosis. Radiologe 62:322–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sati P, Thomasson DM, Li N et al (2014) Rapid, high-resolution, whole-brain, susceptibility-based MRI of multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 20:1464–1470

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Solomon AJ, Bourdette DN, Cross AH et al (2016) The contemporary spectrum of multiple sclerosis misdiagnosis: a multicenter study. Neurology 87:1393–1399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Solomon AJ, Pettigrew R, Naismith RT et al (2021) Challenges in multiple sclerosis diagnosis: misunderstanding and misapplication of the McDonald criteria. Mult Scler 27:250–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Solomon AJ, Watts R, Ontaneda D et al (2018) Diagnostic performance of central vein sign for multiple sclerosis with a simplified three-lesion algorithm. Mult Scler 24:750–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Solomon AJ, Weinshenker BG (2013) Misdiagnosis of multiple sclerosis: frequency, causes, effects, and prevention. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 13:403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Suthiphosuwan S, Sati P, Absinta M et al (2020) Paramagnetic rim sign in radiologically isolated syndrome. JAMA Neurol 77:653–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tallantyre EC, Dixon JE, Donaldson I et al (2011) Ultra-high-field imaging distinguishes MS lesions from asymptomatic white matter lesions. Neurology 76:534–539

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tartaglino LM, Friedman DP, Flanders AE et al (1995) Multiple sclerosis in the spinal cord: MR appearance and correlation with clinical parameters. Radiology 195:725–732

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Toledano M, Weinshenker BG, Solomon AJ (2015) A clinical approach to the differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 15:57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wen W, Sachdev P (2004) The topography of white matter hyperintensities on brain MRI in healthy 60- to 64-year-old individuals. Neuroimage 22:144–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Armin Bachhuber.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

A. Bachhuber gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Für diesen Beitrag wurden von den Autor/-innen keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.

Additional information

figure qr

QR-Code scannen & Beitrag online lesen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bachhuber, A. Diagnostik, Befunde und Dokumentation bei multipler Sklerose. Radiologie 63, 115–119 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-022-01104-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-022-01104-5

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation