Abstract
Species distribution modeling (SDM) is increasingly used to reveal biogeographical relationships, for example the sympatric range for species coexistence, and fundamental questions about niche evolution between related species. We explored the sympatric ranges between three Procapra species (Procapra przewalskii, Procapra Picticaudata, and Procapra gutturosa) via two methods of defining the study region (method 1, in which models were developed in a larger region including the whole geographic range of Procapra, and method 2 in which a smaller region surrounding focal species’ localities was used and then projected to the larger region). We also quantified environmental niche divergence between gazelles across the whole range in Procapra. Models for gazelles generally performed well. Compared with method 2, method 1 led to larger predicted areas with high suitability and was less concentrated around known localities. Clamping, which deals with variables outside the training range, varied between gazelles and occurred primarily in regions unsuitable for respective species. For all gazelle pairs, models revealed an overlap zone where more than one species should occur, while the estimates varied between the two methods. Moreover, we found that the niche overlap was closely associated with geographic distance but not with phylogenetic distance among gazelles. Our findings indicate that SDM is a useful tool for testing whether related species tend to be in sympatry at large scales, with method 1 leading to more realistic predictions for Procapra. This study provides evidence of a distinct niche divergence among related species and supports the theory that ecological speciation plays a significant role in lineage generation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acevedo P, Jiménez-Valverde A, Lobo JM, Real R (2012) Delimiting the geographical background in species distribution modelling. Journal of Biogeography. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2012.02713.x
Acevedo P, Ward AI, Real R, Smith GC (2010) Assessing biogeographical relationships of ecologically related species using favourability functions: a case study on British deer. Divers Distrib 16:515–528
Anderson RP, Peterson AT, Gomez-Laverde M (2002) Using niche-based GIS modeling to test geographic predictions of competitive exclusion and competitive release in South American pocket mice. Oikos 98:3–16
Anderson RP, Raza A (2010) The effect of the extent of the study region on GIS models of species geographic distributions and estimates of niche evolution: preliminary tests with montane rodents (genus Nephelomys) in Venezuela. J Biogeogr 37:1378–1393
Araújo MB, Luoto M (2007) The importance of biotic interactions for modelling species distributions under climate change. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16:743–753
Araújo MB, New M (2007) Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Trends Ecol Evol 22:42–47
Bahn V, McGill BJ (2007) Can niche-based distribution models outperform spatial interpolation? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16:733–742
Barton N (2001) The role of hybridization in evolution. Mol Ecol 10:551–558
Barve N, Barve V, Jiménez-Valverde A, Lira-Noriega A, Maher SP, Peterson AT, Soberón J, Villalobos F (2011) The crucial role of the accessible area in ecological niche modeling and species distribution modeling. Ecol Modell 222:1810–1819
Braunisch V, Suchant R (2010) Predicting species distributions based on incomplete survey data: the trade-off between precision and scale. Ecography 33:826–840
Buckley LB, Davies TJ, Ackerly DD et al (2010) Phylogeny, niche conservatism and the latitudinal diversity gradient in mammals. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 277:2131–2138
Chefaoui RM, Lobo JM (2008) Assessing the effects of pseudo-absences on predictive distribution model performance. Ecol Modell 210:478–486
Clark EL, Munkhbat J, Dulamtseren S, Baillie JEM, Batsaikhan N, King SRB, Samiya R, Stubbe M (2006) Summary conservation action plans for Mongolian mammals. Zoological Society of London, London
Costa GC, Schlupp I (2010) Biogeography of the Amazon molly: ecological niche and range limits of an asexual hybrid species. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 19:442–451
Doebeli M, Dieckmann U (2003) Speciation along environmental gradients. Nature 421:259–264
Duncan RP, Cassey P, Blackburn TM (2009) Do climate envelope models transfer? A manipulative test using dung beetle introductions. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 276:1449–1457
Elith J, Graham CH, Anderson RP et al (2006) Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29:129–151
GLC (2003) Global Land Cover 2000 database. European Commission, Joint Research Centre. <http://gem.jrc.ec.europa.eu/products/glc2000/glc2000.php>. Cited 10 Oct 2009
Guisan A, Thuiller W (2005) Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecol Lett 8:993–1009
Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 25:1965–1978
Hu J, Hu H, Jiang Z (2010a) The impacts of climate change on the wintering distribution of an endangered migratory bird. Oecologia 164:555–565
Hu J, Jiang Z (2010) Predicting the potential distribution of the endangered Przewalski’s gazelle. J Zool 282:54–63
Hu J, Jiang Z (2011) Climate change hastens the conservation urgency of an endangered ungulate. PLoS One 6:e22873
Hu J, Ping X, Cai J, Li Z, Li C, Jiang Z (2010b) Do local communities support the conservation of endangered Przewalski’s gazelle? Eur J Wildl Res 56:551–560
IUCN SSC Antelope Specialist Group (2008) Procapra przewalskii. In: IUCN 2010. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2010.4. Available at: http://www.iucnredlist.org/. Accessed 20 Dec 2010
Jiang Z (2004) Przewalski’s Gazelle. China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing
Lawler JJ, Shafer SL, White D, Kareiva P, Maurer EP, Blaustein AR, Bartlein PJ (2009) Projected climate-induced faunal change in the Western Hemisphere. Ecology 90:588–597
Lei R, Jiang Z, Hu Z, Yang W (2004) Taxonomic status of Procapra and the classification of Chinese antelopes and gazelles. Acta Zootaxon Sin 29:622–627
Li Z, Jiang Z, Beauchamp G (2010) Nonrandom mixing between groups of Przewalski’s gazelle and Tibetan gazelle. J Mammal 91:674–680
Li Z, Jiang Z, Li C (2008) Dietary overlap of Przewalski’s gazelle, Tibetan gazelle, and Tibetan sheep on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. J Wildl Manage 72:944–948
Lobo JM, Jiménez-Valverde A, Real R (2008) AUC: a misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 17:145–151
Lomolino M, Riddle B, Brown J (2006) Biogeography. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland
Mallon DP (2008) Procapra gutturosa. In: IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, IUCN 2010 Version 2010.4. Available at: http://www.iucnredlist.org/. Accessed 21 Dec 2010
Mallon DP, Bhatnagar YV (2008) Procapra picticaudata. In: IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, IUCN 2010. Version 2010.4. Available at: http://www.iucnredlist.org/. Accessed 21 Dec 2010
Mallon DP, Jiang Z (2009) Grazers on the plains: challenges and prospects for large herbivores in Central Asia. J Appl Ecol 46:516–519
Martínez-Freiría F, Sillero N, Lizana M, Brito JC (2008) GIS-based niche models identify environmental correlates sustaining a contact zone between three species of European vipers. Divers Distrib 14:452–461
Olson KA, Fuller TK, Mueller T, Murray MG, Nicolson C, Odonkhuu D, Bolortsetseg S, Schaller GB (2010) Annual movements of Mongolian gazelles: nomads in the Eastern Steppe. J Arid Environ 74:1435–1442
Orr MR, Smith TB (1998) Ecology and speciation. Trends Ecol Evol 13:502–506
Pearson RG, Dawson TP (2003) Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 12:361–371
Peterson AT, Soberón J, Sánchez-Cordero V (1999) Conservatism of ecological niches in evolutionary time. Science 285:1265–1267
Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Modell 190:231–259
Phillips SJ, Dudík M (2008) Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography 31:161–175
Putman R (1996) Competition and resource partitioning in temperate ungulate assemblies. Chapman & Hall, London
Real R, Barbosa AM, Rodríguez A, García FJ, Vargas JM, Palomo LJ, Delibes M (2009) Conservation biogeography of ecologically interacting species: the case of the Iberian lynx and the European rabbit. Divers Distrib 15:390–400
Rundle HD, Nosil P (2005) Ecological speciation. Ecol Lett 8:336–352
Sanderson EW, Jaiteh M, Levy MA, Redford KH, Wannebo AV, Woolmer G (2002) The human footprint and the last of the wild. BioScience 52:891–904
Schaller G (1998) Wildlife of the Tibetan steppe. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Schluter D (2009) Evidence for ecological speciation and its alternative. Science 323:737–741
Svenning JC, Normand S, Kageyama M (2008) Glacial refugia of temperate trees in Europe: insights from species distribution modelling. J Ecol 96:1117–1127
Turelli M, Barton NH, Coyne JA (2001) Theory and speciation. Trends Ecol Evol 16:330–343
Turner M, Gardner R, O’Neill R (2001) Landscape ecology in theory and practice: pattern and process. Springer-Verlag, New York
USGS (2009) HYDRO1k elevation derivative database. <http://eros.usgs.gov/#/Find_Data/Products_and_Data_Available/gtopo30/hydro>. Cited December 2008
Van Horn B (2002) Approaches to habitat modeling: the tensions between pattern and process and between specificity and generality. In: Scott JM, Heglund PJ, Haufler JB et al (eds) Predicting species occurrences: issues of scale and accuracy. Island Press, Washington, pp 63–72
VanDerWal J, Shoo LP, Graham C, William SE (2009) Selecting pseudo-absence data for presence-only distribution modeling: how far should you stray from what you know? Ecol Modell 220:589–594
Wake DB, Hadly EA, Ackerly DD (2009) Biogeography, changing climates, and niche evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:19631–19636
Warren DL, Glor RE, Turelli M (2008) Environmental niche equivalency versus conservatism: quantitative approaches to niche evolution. Evolution 62:2868–2883
Wiens J (2002) Predicting species occurrences: progress, problems, and prospects. In: Scott JM, Heglund PJ, Haufler JB et al (eds) Predicting species occurrences: issues of accuracy and scale. Island Press, Washington, pp 739–749
Acknowledgments
This project was supported by the National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (No. 31070469), the Knowledge Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (the Field Front Project, No. Y1B302100; the Key Program, No. KSCX2-EW-Z-4), and the Science and Technology Supporting Project of MOST (No. 2008BAC39B04). We are grateful to Steven Phillips for adapting the Maxent application several times. We thank Miguel B. Araújo, Yang Liu, Jing Chen, and Zhenhua Luo for their comments on earlier drafts and Anne Bjorkman for improving the English language of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Communicated by: Sven Thatje
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hu, J., Jiang, Z. Detecting the potential sympatric range and niche divergence between Asian endemic ungulates of Procapra . Naturwissenschaften 99, 553–565 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-012-0933-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-012-0933-1