Skip to main content
Log in

When males whistle at females: complex FM acoustic signals in cockroaches

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Naturwissenschaften Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Male cockroaches of the species Elliptorhina chopardi expel air through a pair of modified abdominal spiracles during courtship. This air expulsion simultaneously produces air and substrate-borne vibrations. We described and compared in details these two types of vibrations. Our analysis of the air-borne signals shows that males can produce three categories of signals with distinct temporal and frequency parameters. “Pure whistles” consist of two independent harmonic series fast frequency modulated with independent harmonics that can cross each other. “Noisy whistles” also possess two independent voices but include a noisy broad-band frequency part in the middle. Hiss sounds are more noise-like, being made of a broad-band frequency spectrum. All three call types are unusually high in dominant frequency (>5 kHz) for cockroaches. The substrate-borne signals are categorised similarly. Some harmonics of the substrate-borne signals were filtered out, however, making the acoustic energy centered on fewer frequency bands. Our analysis shows that cockroach signals are complex, with fast frequency modulations and two distinct voices. These results also readdress the question of what system could potentially receive and decode the information contained within such complex sounds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Aubin T, Jouventin P, Hildebrand C (2000) Penguins use the two voice system to recognize each other. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:1081–1087

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL (1998) Principles of animal communication. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark DC, Moore AJ (1995) Variation and repeatability of male agonistic hiss characteristics and their relationship to social rank in Gromphadorhina portentosa. Anim Behav 50:719–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Čokl A, Virant-Doberlet M (1997) Tuning of tibial organ receptor cells in Periplaneta americana L. J Exp Zool 278:395–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser J, Nelson MC (1982) Frequency modulated courtship song in a cockroach. Anim Behav 30:627–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser J, Nelson MC (1984) Communication in the courtship of a Madagascan hissing cockroach. I. Normal courtship. Anim Behav 32:194–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie DM (1966) Sound production and reception in a cockroach. J Exp Biol 45:321–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Holy TE, Guo Z (2005) Ultrasonic songs of male mice. PLoS Biol 3:e386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Khanna H, Gaunt LL, McCallum DA (1997) Digital spectrographic cross-correlation: tests of sensitivity. Bioacoustics 7:209–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson MC (1979) Sound production in the cockroach Gromphadorhina portentosa: the sound-producing apparatus. J Comp Physiol A 132:27–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson MC, Fraser J (1980) Sound production in the cockroach, Gromphadorhina portentosa: evidence for communication by hissing. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 6:305–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robert D, Göpfert MC (2002) Acoustic sensitivity of fly antennae. J Insect Physiol 48:189–196

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roth LM, Hartman B (1967) Sound production and its evolutionary significance in the Blattaria. Ann Entomol Soc Am 60:740–752

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw SR (1994) Detection of airborne sound by a cockroach vibration detector: a possible missing link in insect auditory evolution. J Exp Biol 193:13–47

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Specht R (2004) AVISOFT-SAS Lab Pro. Avisoft, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Sueur J, Aubin T, Simonis-Sueur C (2006) Seewave. Université Paris XI-MNHN, Paris

  • Suthers RA (1990) Contributions to birdsong from the left and right sides of the intact syrinx. Nature 347:473–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yager DD (2005) Cockroach homologs of Praying Mantis peripheral auditory system components. J Morph 265:120–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Gérard Dutrilleux for maintaining the electronic recording system, Julie Chébaux for data acquisition, Anne Cherpin for the advice in rearing cockroaches, Christine Marlet for taking care of insects, Meta Virant-Doberlet and Elizabeth Tuck for critical reading of the manuscripts. We gratefully acknowledge Knowles Company for providing miniature accelerometers. We thank Charlie Henry and four other reviewers for their helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jérôme Sueur.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

S1

S1—Successive air-borne recording of a pure-whistle (PW), a noisy-whistle (NW), and a hiss (H) emitted by a male of E. Chopardi. See Fig. 1. Sound has been filtered out to increase quality. Pauses between calls are not natural (233 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sueur, J., Aubin, T. When males whistle at females: complex FM acoustic signals in cockroaches. Naturwissenschaften 93, 500–505 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-006-0135-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-006-0135-9

Keywords

Navigation