Skip to main content
Log in

Metastasen der Extremitäten

Übersicht über operative Versorgungsstrategien

Metastatic disease in long bones

Review of surgical treatment options

  • Originalien
  • Published:
Der Unfallchirurg Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die operative Versorgung von ossären Metastasen ist heute die häufigste onkologische Operation in der Orthopädie bzw. Unfallchirurgie. Aufgrund einer längeren Überlebenswahrscheinlichkeit und einer steigenden Inzidenz von ossären Metastasen kommt es zu einem vermehrten Auftreten von durch Metastasen verursachten Komplikationen wie pathologischen Frakturen oder Implantatversagen nach bereits operativ versorgter Metastase. Zwar ist die Metastasenchirurgie weiterhin meist Bestandteil eines palliativen Therapiekonzepts; dank einer suffizienten Therapie der Primärtumoren, tumorspezifisch orientierter Nachsorgeprotokolle und der Varianz in der Prognose der einzelnen Entitäten muss jedoch eine individuelle, prognoseadaptierte Therapiestrategie verfolgt werden. Abhängig von der Lebenserwartung des Patienten treten aggressivere Operationsverfahren mit dem Ziel einer adäquaten, lokalen Tumorkontrolle in den Vordergrund. Die prognoseadaptierte Versorgung erfordert Erfahrung und sollte daher an einem interdisziplinären Tumorzentrum erfolgen. Dieser Beitrag stellt einen Überblick über die heutigen Therapiekonzepte der operativen Versorgung von Extremitätenmetastasen zusammen. Verfahren zur Knochen- und Weichteilüberbrückung wie winkelstabile Verbundosteosynthesen, Marknagelosteosynthesen, Endoprothesen sowie modulare Tumorprothesen werden vorgestellt.

Abstract

Surgery in metastatic bone disease is currently the most frequent type of surgery in orthopedic oncology. Improved survival rates and an increasing incidence of bone metastasis have led to an increase in complications caused by metastatic disease, such as pathological fractures or hardware failure after operative treatment. Although surgery of metastatic lesions remains a palliative therapy concept, because of sufficient therapy for the primary carcinomas, tumor-specific-oriented follow-up protocols and a variation in the prognosis for the individual entities, an individually adapted treatment strategy is necessary. Depending on the life expectancy, more aggressive surgical procedures with the goal of adequate local tumor control have come into focus. Therefore, prognosis-tailored treatment requires an experienced team and should be performed in a multidisciplinary tumor center. The current article provides an overview of recent therapy concepts for the surgical treatment including endoprosthetic reconstruction, internal fixation with either intramedullary nailing or plate fixation devices, often augmented with bone cement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6
Abb. 7

Literatur

  1. Toyoda Y, Shinohara N, Harabayashi T et al (2007) Survival and prognostic classification of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma of bone. Eur Urol 52:163–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kobayashi T, Ichiba T, Sakuyama T et al (2012) Possible clinical cure of metastatic breast cancer: lessons from our 30-year experience with oligometastatic breast cancer patients and literature review. Breast Cancer 19(3):218–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. O’Shaughnessy J, Miles D, Vukelja S et al (2002) Superior survival with capecitabine plus docetaxel combination therapy in anthracycline-pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer: phase III trial results. J Clin Oncol 20:2812–2823

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bickels J, Kollender Y, Wittig JC, Meller I, Malawer MM (2005) Function after resection of humeral metastases: analysis of 59 consecutive patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 437:201–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yazawa Y, Frassica FJ, Chao EY et al (1990) Metastatic bone disease. A study of the surgical treatment of 166 pathologic humeral and femoral fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 251:213–219

    Google Scholar 

  6. Enneking WF, Spanier SS, Goodman MA (1980) A system for the surgical staging of musculoskeletal sarcoma. Clin Orthop 153:106–120

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fottner A, Szalantzy M, Wirthmann L, Stähler M, Baur-Melnyk A, Jansson V, Dürr H (2010) Bone metastases from renal cell carcinoma: patient survival after surgical treatment. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:145

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Böhm P, Huber J (2002) The surgical treatment of bony metastases of the spine and limbs. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84(4):521–529

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ahrens H, Gosheger G, Streitbürger A, Gebert C, Hardes J (2006) Antimikrobielle Silberbeschichtung von Tumorprothesen. Onkologe 12(2):145–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chia SK, Speers CH, D’yachkova Y et al (2007) The impact of new chemotherapeutic and hormone agents on survival in a population-based cohort of women with metastatic breast cancer. Cancer 110:973–979

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Thurman SA, Ramakrishna NR, DeWeese TL (2001) Radiation therapy for the treatment of locally advanced and metastatic prostate cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 15:423–443

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hartsell WF, Scott CB, Bruner DW et al (2005) Randomized trial of short-versus long-course radiotherapy for palliation of painful bone metastases. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:798–804

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kachnic L, Berk L (2005) Palliative single-fraction radiation therapy: How much more evidence is needed? J Natl Cancer Inst 97:786–788

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu JS, Wong R, Johnston M, Bezjak A, Whelan T (2003) Cancer care ontario practice guidelines initiative supportive care group meta-analysis of dose-fractionation radiotherapy trials for the palliation of painful bone metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 55:594–605

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Koswig S, Budach V (1999) Remineralization and pain relief in bone metastases after different radiotherapy fractions (10 times 3 Gy vs. 1 time 8 Gy): a prospective study. Strahlenther Onkol 175:500–508

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sathiakumar N, Delzell E, Morrisey MA et al (2012) Mortality following bone metastasis and skeletal-related events among women with breast cancer: a population-based analysis of U.S. Medicare beneficiaries, 1999–2006. Breast Cancer Res Treat 131:231–238

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Decroisette C, Monnet I, Berard H et al (2011) Epidemiology and treatment costs of bone metastases from lung cancer: a French prospective, observational, multicenter study (GFPC 0601). J Thorac Oncol 6:576–582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Steensma M, Boland PJ, Morris CD et al (2012) Endoprosthetic treatment is more durable for pathologic proximal femur fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:920–926

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chavey D, Lewis VO, Moon BS et al (2012) Durability of cephalomedullary nail fixation for treatment of metastatic peritrochanteric femoral lesions. Lecture abstract, MSTS Annual Meeting, session III. ,

  20. Ratasvuori M, Wedin R, Keller J et al (2013) Insight opinion to surgically treated metastatic bone disease: Scandinavian Sarcoma Group Skeletal Metastasis Registry report of 1195 operated skeletal metastasis. Surg Oncol 22:132–138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bickels J, Kollender Y, Wittig JC, Meller I, Malawer MM (2005) Function after resection of humeral metastases: analysis of 59 consecutive patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 437:201–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kollender Y, Bickels J, Price WM et al (2000) Metastatic renal cell carcinoma of bone: indications and technique of surgical intervention. J Urol 164:1505–1508

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gainor BJ, Buchert P (1963) Fracture healing in metastatic bone disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res 178:297–302

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bauer HC (2005) Controversies in the surgical management of skeletal metastases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:608–617

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lin PP, Mirza AN, Lewis VO et al (2007) Patient survival after surgery for osseous metastases from renal cell carcinoma. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:1794–1801

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Evenski A, Ramasunder S, Fox W et al (2012) Treatment and survival of osseous renal cell carcinoma metastases. J Surg Oncol 106:850–855

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dürr HR, Maier M, Pfahler M et al (1999) Surgical treatment of osseous metastases in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999:283–290

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wedin R, Bauer HCF, Wersall P (1999) Failures after operation of sceletal metastatic leasions of long bones. Clin Orthop Rel Res 358:128–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ratasvuori M, Wedin R, Hansen BH, Keller J et al (2014) Prognostic role of en-bloc resection and late onset of bone metastasis in patients with bone-seeking carcinomas of the kidney, breast, lung, and prostate: SSG study on 672 operated skeletal metastases. J Surg Oncol 110(4):360–365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Baloch KG, Grimer RJ, Carter SR et al (2000) Radical surgery for the solitary bony metastasis from renal-cell carcinoma. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82-B:62–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Les KA, Nicholas RW, Rougraff B et al (2001) Local progression after operative treatment of metastatic kidney cancer. Clin Orthop Relat Res 390:206–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hansen BH, Keller J, Laitinen M (2004) The scandinavian sarcoma group skeletal metastasis register. Survival after surgery for bone metastases in the pelvis and extremities. Acta Orthop Scand 75(Suppl 311):11–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Nathan SS, Healey JH, Mellano D et al (2005) Survival in patients operated on for pathologic fracture: implications for end-of-life orthopedic care. J Clin Oncol 23:6072–6082

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Insa A, Lluch A, Prosper F et al (1999) Prognostic factors predicting survival from first recurrence in patients with metastatic breast cancer: analysis of 439 patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 56:67–78

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. James JJ, Evans AJ, Pinder SE et al (2003) Bone metastases from breast carcinoma: histopathological – radiological correlations and prognostic features. Br J Cancer 89:660–665

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Utzschneider S, Weber P, Fottner A, Wegener B, Jansson V, Dürr HR (2009) Prognoseadaptierte operative Behandlung von Knochenmetastasen. Orthopäde 38:308–315

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Fidler M (1973) Prophylactic internal fixation of secondary neoplastic deposits in long bones. Br Med J 1:341–343

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Saad F, Lipton A, Cook R et al (2007) Pathologic fractures correlate with reduced survival in patients with malignant bone disease. Cancer 110:1860–1867

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Harrington KD (1986) Impending pathological fractures from metastatic malignancy. Evaluation and management. In: Anderson LD (Hrsg) Instructional course lectures, Bd. 35. Mosby, St. Louis, S 357–381

    Google Scholar 

  40. Mirels H (1989) Metastatic disease in long bones. Clin Orthop 249:256–264

    Google Scholar 

  41. Damron TA, Morgan H, Prakash D et al (2003) Critical evaluation of Mirels’ rating system for impending pathologic fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 415(Suppl):S201–S207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Ward WG, Holsenbeck S, Dorey FJ, Spang J, Howe D (2003) Metastatic disease of the femur: surgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 415(Suppl):S230–S244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Murray PJ, Damron TA, Green JK, Morgan HD, Werner FW (2004) Contained femoral defects: biomechanical analysis of pin augmentation in cement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 420:251–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Toy PC, France J, Randall RL et al (2006) Reconstruction of noncontained distal femoral defects with polymethylmethacrylate and crossed-screw augmentation: a biomechanical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(1):171–178

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Townsend PW, Smalley SR, Cozad SC et al (1995) Role of postoperative radiation therapy after stabilization of fractures caused by metastatic disease. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 31(1):43–49

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Strube HD, Ritter G (1985) Die Verbundosteosynthese: Indikation – Biomechanik – Operationstechnik. Unfallchirurg 88:53–62

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Wedin R, Hansen BH et al (2012) Complications and survival after surgical treatment of 214 metastatic lesions of the humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21:1049–1055

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Gregory JJ, Ockendon M et al (2011) The outcome of locking plate fixation for the treatment of periarticular metastases. Acta Orthop Belg 77(3):362–370

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Friedl W, Mieck U, Fritz T (1992) Chirurgische Therapie von Knochenmetastasen der oberen und unteren Extremität. Chirurg 62:897–911

    Google Scholar 

  50. Sharma H, Bhagat S, McCaul J et al (2007) Intramedullary nailing for pathological femoral fractures. J Orthop Surg 15(3):291–294

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Keating JF, Burke T, Macauley P (1990) Proximal femoral replacement for pathological fracture. Injury 21(4):231–233

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Sim FH, Frassica FJ, Chao EYS (1995) Orthopaedic management using new devices and prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res 312:160–172

    Google Scholar 

  53. Janssen SJ, Kortlever JT, Ready JE et al (2016) Complications after surgical management of proximal femoral metastasis: a retrospective study of 417 patients. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 24(7):483–494

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Ward WG, Holsenbeck S, Dorey FJ et al (2003) Metastatic disease of the femur: surgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 415(Suppl):230–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Wedin R, Bauer HC (2005) Surgical treatment of skeletal metastatic lesions of the proximal femur: endoprosthesis or reconstruction nail? J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:1653–1657

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Harvey N, Ahlmann ER, Allison DC et al (2012) Endoprostheses last longer than intramedullary devices in proximal femur metastases. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:684–691

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Quinn RH, Drenga J (2006) Perioperative morbidity and mortality after reconstruction for metastatic tumors of the proximal femur and acetabulum. J Arthroplasty 21(2):227–232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Cannon CP, Mirza AN, Lin PP et al (2008) Proximal femoral endoprosthesis for the treatment of metastatic disease. Orthopedics 31(4):361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Chandrasekar CR, Grimer RJ, Carter SR et al (2009) Modular endoprosthetic replacement for tumors of the proximal femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91:108–112

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Ahlmann ER, Menendez LR (2006) Intercalary endoprosthetic reconstruction for diaphyseal bone tumours. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88(11):1487–1491

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Damron TA, Leerapun T, Hugate RR et al (2008) Does the second-generation intercalary humeral spacer improve on the first? Clin Orthop Relat Res 466(6):1309–1317

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Thanos L, Mylona S, Galani P et al (2008) Radiofrequency ablation of osseous metastases for the palliation of pain. Skeletal Radiol 37(3):189–194

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Santiago FR, del Mar Castellano García M, Montes JLM, García MR, Fernández JMT (2009) Treatment of bone tumours by radiofrequency thermal ablation. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2(1):43–50

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Cazzato RL, Buy X, Eker O et al (2014) Percutaneous long bone cementoplasty of the limbs, experience with fifty-one non-surgical patients. Eur Radiol 24:3059–3068

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Franz Liska.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

Franz Liska, Philipp Schmitz, Norbert Harrasser, Peter Prodinger, Hans Rechl und Rüdiger von Eisenhart-Rothe geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von den Autoren durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Additional information

Redaktion

W. Mutschler, München

H. Polzer, München

B. Ockert, München

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liska, F., Schmitz, P., Harrasser, N. et al. Metastasen der Extremitäten. Unfallchirurg 121, 37–46 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-016-0282-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-016-0282-1

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation