Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mortality following bone metastasis and skeletal-related events among women with breast cancer: a population-based analysis of U.S. Medicare beneficiaries, 1999–2006

  • Epidemiology
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the study is to quantify the impact of bone metastasis and skeletal-related events (SREs) on mortality in older breast cancer patients. Using the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare database, we identified women aged 65 years or older diagnosed with breast cancer between July 1, 1999 and December 31, 2005 and followed them to determine deaths occurring through December 31, 2006. We classified patients as having possible bone metastasis and SREs using discharge diagnoses from inpatient claims and diagnoses paired with procedure codes from outpatient claims. We used Cox regression to estimate mortality hazards ratios (HR) among women with bone metastasis with or without SRE, compared with women without bone metastasis. Among 98,260 women with breast cancer (median follow-up, 3.3 years), 7,189 (7.3%) had bone metastasis either at breast cancer diagnosis (1.5%) or during follow-up (5.8%). SREs occurred in 3,319 (46%) of women with bone metastasis. HRs for risk of death were 4.9 (95% CI 4.7–5.1) and 6.2 (95% CI 5.9–6.5), respectively, for women with bone metastasis but no SRE and for women with bone metastasis plus SRE, compared with women without bone metastasis. In analyses restricted to women with bone metastasis, the adjusted HR was 1.5 (95% CI 1.4–1.6) for women with bone metastasis plus SRE, compared with women with bone metastasis but without SRE. Having a bone metastasis, as indicated by Medicare claims, was associated strongly with mortality among women with breast cancer. This association was stronger for bone metastasis complicated by SRE than for bone metastasis without SRE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Altekruse SF, Kosary CL, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Waldron W, Ruhl J, Howlader N, Tatalovich Z, Cho H, Mariotto A, Eisner MP, Lewis DR, Cronin K, Chen HS, Feuer EJ, Stinchcomb DG, Edwards BK (eds) (2009) SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2007, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda

  2. Horner MJ, Ries LAG, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Howlader N, Altekruse SF, Feuer EJ, Huang L, Mariotto A, Miller BA, Lewis DR, Eisner MP, Stinchcomb DG, Edwards BK (eds) (2009) SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2006, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda. http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2006/, based on November 2008 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site

  3. Ries, LAG, Eisner MP, Kosary CL (2002) SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1973–1999. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda. http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1973_1999/. Accessed 25 Aug 2010

  4. Yancik R, Ries LG, Yates JW (1989) Breast cancer in aging women. A population-based study of contrasts in stage, surgery, and survival. Cancer 63:976–981

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. American Cancer Society Breast Cancer Facts & Figures 2009–2010. Atlanta, GA: 2010. www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@nho/documents/document/f861009final90809pdf.pdf. Accessed 25 Aug 2010

  6. Scheid V, Buzdar AU, Smith TL, Hortobagyi GN (1986) Clinical course of breast cancer patients with osseous metastasis treated with combination chemotherapy. Cancer 58:2589–2593

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Coleman RE (2006) Clinical features of metastatic bone disease and risk of skeletal morbidity. Clin Cancer Res 12:6243s–6249s

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Weinfurt KP, Castel LD, Li Y, Timbie JW, Glendenning GA, Schulman KA (2004) Health-related quality of life among patients with breast cancer receiving zoledronic acid or pamidronate disodium for metastatic bone lesions. Med Care 42:164–175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bouchardy C, Rapiti E, Blagojevic S, Vlastos AT, Vlastos G (2007) Older female cancer patients: importance, causes, and consequences of undertreatment. J Clin Oncol 25(14):1858–1869

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Eaker S, Dickman PW, Bergkvist L, Holmberg L (2006) Uppsala/Orebro Breast Cancer Group. Differences in management of older women influence breast cancer survival: results from a population-based database in Sweden. PLoS Med 3(3):e25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Enger SM, Thwin SS, Buist DS, Field T, Frost F, Geiger AM, Lash TL, Prout M, Yood MU, Wei F, Silliman RA (2006) Breast cancer treatment of older women in integrated health care settings. J Clin Oncol 24(27):4377–4383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kimmick G, Muss HB (2004) Breast cancer in older patients. Semin Oncol 31:234–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yong M, Jensen AO, Jacobson JB, Norgaard M, Fryzek JP, Sorensen HT (2009) Survival in breast cancer patients with bone metastases and skeletal-related events: a population-based cohort study in Denmark (1999–2007). J Clin Oncol 27:e22210

    Google Scholar 

  14. Potosky AL, Riley GF, Lubitz JD, Mentnech RM, Kessler LG (1993) Potential for cancer related health services research using a linked medicare-tumor registry database. Med Care 31:732–748

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Warren JL, Klabunde CN, Schrag D, Bach PB, Riley GF (2002) Overview of the SEER-medicare data: content, research applications, and generalizability to the United States elderly population. Med Care 40:IV-3-18

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gornick ME, Warren JL, Eggers PW et al (1996) Thirty years of medicare: impact on the covered population. Health Care Financ Rev 18:179–237

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Romano PS, Roos LL, Jollis JG (1993) Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: differing perspectives. J Clin Epidemiol 46:1075–1079, discussion 81–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P et al (2005) Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care 43:1130–1139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gooley TA, Leisenring W, Crowley J, Storer BE (1999) Estimation of failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks: new representation of old estimators. Stat Med 18:695–706

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kalbfleish JD, Prentice RL (1980) The statistical analysis of failure time data. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cox DR (1972) Regression models and life-tables (with discussion). J Royal Stat Soc 34:187–220

    Google Scholar 

  22. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC, USA

  23. Mundy GR (2002) Metastasis to bone: causes, consequences and therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Cancer 2:584–593

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Coleman RE, Rubens RD (1987) The clinical course of bone metastases from breast cancer. Br J Cancer 55:61–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Jacobson AF, Shapiro CL, Van den Abbeele AD, Kaplan WD (2001) Prognostic significance of the number of bone scan abnormalities at the time of initial bone metastatic recurrence in breast carcinoma. Cancer 91:17–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Coleman RE, Smith P, Rubens RD (1998) Clinical course and prognostic factors following bone recurrence from breast cancer. Br J Cancer 77:336–340

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Coleman RE (1997) Skeletal complications of malignancy. Cancer 80:1588–1594

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Coleman RE (2004) Bisphosphonates: clinical experience. Oncologist 9(Suppl 4):14–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Saad F, Lipton A, Cook R, Chen YM, Smith M, Coleman R (2007) Pathologic fractures correlate with reduced survival in patients with malignant bone disease. Cancer 110:1860–1867

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rove KO, Crawford ED (2009) Metastatic cancer in solid tumors and clinical outcome: skeletal-related events. Oncology 23(14):21–27

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lipton A, Theriault RL, Hortobagyi GN et al (2000) Pamidronate prevents skeletal complications and is effective palliative treatment in women with breast carcinoma and osteolytic bone metastases: long term follow-up of two randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Cancer 88:1082–1090

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Rosen LS, Gordon D, Kaminski M et al (2003) Long-term efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid compared with pamidronate disodium in the treatment of skeletal complications in patients with advanced multiple myeloma or breast carcinoma: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, comparative trial. Cancer 98:1735–1744

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by a contract between UAB and Amgen, Inc. Only the authors from UAB have access to the Medicare data used. The analysis, presentation, and interpretation of the results are solely the responsibility of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nalini Sathiakumar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sathiakumar, N., Delzell, E., Morrisey, M.A. et al. Mortality following bone metastasis and skeletal-related events among women with breast cancer: a population-based analysis of U.S. Medicare beneficiaries, 1999–2006. Breast Cancer Res Treat 131, 231–238 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-011-1721-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-011-1721-x

Keywords

Navigation