Skip to main content
Log in

Perkutane Techniken an der Brust- und Lendenwirbelsäule

Percutaneous techniques in the thoracic and lumbar spine

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Unfallchirurg Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Perkutane Instrumentierungstechniken an der Wirbelsäule gehören mittlerweile zum Standardportfolio vieler Kliniken. Während sich einige für diese Technik hervorragend geeignete Indikationen etabliert haben, besteht für andere eher eine Situation der Unsicherheit. Im Folgenden sollen neben den technischen Voraussetzungen zur Durchführung perkutaner Instrumentierungen im Bereich der thorakalen und der lumbalen Wirbelsäule auch gängige Indikationen und verschiedene perkutane Instrumentierungstechniken erläutert werden. Dies ist verbunden mit einer kritischen Darstellung dessen, was perkutan systemimmanent nicht oder noch nicht geleistet werden kann, um aufzuzeigen, dass das perkutane Vorgehen keinesfalls als bloße Evolution der bisherigen klassisch-offenen Techniken angesehen werden darf.

Abstract

Techniques of percutaneous spinal instrumentation have in the meantime become standard methods in many hospitals. While several indications have been established that are excellently suited to this technique, uncertainty prevails for other indications. This contribution intends to clarify the technical prerequisites for performing percutaneous instrumentation in the region of the thoracic and lumbar spine in addition to describing customary indications and various techniques of percutaneous instrumentation. This is combined with a critical assessment of what intrinsically cannot or cannot yet be achieved with a percutaneous approach to illustrate that the percutaneous procedure can by no means be considered a mere evolution of the previous classic open techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6
Abb. 7
Abb. 8
Abb. 9
Abb. 10
Abb. 11

Literatur

  1. Arts MP, Nieborg A, Brand R, Peul WC (2007) Serum creatine phosphokinase as an indicator of muscle injury after various spinal and nonspinal surgical procedures. J Neurosurg 7:282–286

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blattert TR, Glasmacher S, Riesner HJ, Josten C (2009) Revision characteristics of cement-augmented, cannulated-fenestrated pedicle screws in the osteoporotic vertebral body: a biomechanical in vitro investigation. J Neurosurg Spine 11:23–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bullmann V, Schmoelz W, Richter M et al (2010) Revision of cannulated and perforated cement-augmented pedicle screws: a biomechanical study in human cadavers. Spine 35:932–939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fan SW, Hu ZJ, Zhao FD et al (2010) Multifidus muscle changes and clinical effects of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion: minimally invasive procedure versus conventional open approach. Eur Spine J 19:316–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fuentes S, Metellus P, Fondop J et al (2007) Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation and kyphoplasty for management of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Neurochirurgie 53:272–276

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hashemi A, Bednar D, Ziada S (2009) Pullout strength of pedicle screws augmented with particulate calcium phosphate: An experimental study. Spine J 9:404–410

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Logroscino CA, Proietti L, Tamburelli FC (2009) Minimally invasive spine stabilisation with long implants. Eur Spine J 11(Suppl 1):75–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rodriguez-Vela J, Lobo-Escolar A, Joven-Aliaga E et al (2009) Perioperative and short-term advantages of mini-open approach for lumbar spinal fusion. Eur Spine J 18:1194–1201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Verlaan JJ, Dhert WJ, Verbout AJ et al (2005) Balloon vertebroplasty in combination with pedicle screw instrumentation: a novel technique to treat thoracic and lumbar burst fractures. Spine 30:73–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T.R. Blattert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blattert, T., Katscher, S. & Josten, C. Perkutane Techniken an der Brust- und Lendenwirbelsäule. Unfallchirurg 114, 17–25 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-010-1939-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-010-1939-9

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation