Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Minimally invasive spine stabilisation with long implants

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Originally aimed at treating degenerative syndromes of the lumbar spine, percutaneous minimally invasive posterior fixation is nowadays even more frequently used to treat some thoracolumbar fractures. According to the modern principles of saving segment of motion, a short implant (one level above and one level below the injured vertebra) is generally used to stabilise the injured spine. Although the authors generally use a short percutaneous fixation in treating thoracolumbar fractures with good results, they observed some cases in which the high fragmentation of the vertebral body and the presence of other associated diseases (co-morbidities) did not recommend the use of a short construct. The authors identified nine cases, in which a long implant (two levels above and two levels below the injured vertebra) was performed by a percutaneous minimally invasive approach. Seven patients (five males/two females) were affected by thoracolumbar fractures. T12 vertebra was involved in three cases, L1 in two cases, T10 and L2 in one case, respectively. Two fractures were classified as type A 3.1, two as A 3.2, two as A 3.3 and one as B 2.3, according to Magerl. In the present series, there were also two patients affected by a severe osteolysis of the spine (T9 and T12) due to tumoral localisation. All patients operated on with long instrumentation had a good outcome with prompt and uneventful clinical recovery. At the 1-year follow-up, all patients except one, who died 11 months after the operation, did not show any radiologic signs of mobilisation or failure of the implant. Based on the results of the present series, the long percutaneous fixation seems to represent an effective and safe system to treat particular cases of vertebral lesions. In conclusion, the authors believe that a long implant might be an alternative surgical method compared to more aggressive or demanding procedures, which in a few patients could represent an overtreatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Magerl F, Aebi M, Gertzbein SB et al (1994) A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries. Eur Spine J 3:184–201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Verlaan JJ, Diekerhof CH, Buskens E et al (2004) Surgical treatment of traumatic fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine: a systematic review of the literature on techniques, complications, and outcome. Spine 29:803–814

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Stadhouder A, Buskens E, de Klerk LW et al (2008) Traumatic thoracic and lumbar spinal fractures: operative or nonoperative treatment: comparison of two treatment strategies by means of surgeon equipoise. Spine 33:1006–1017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Parker JW, Lane JR, Karaikovic EE et al (2000) Successful short-segment instrumentation and fusion for thoracolumbar spine fractures: a consecutive 41/2-year series. Spine 25:1157–1170

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. McCormack T, Karaikovic E, Gaines RW (1994) The load sharing classification of spine fractures. Spine 19:1741–1744

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Altay M, Ozkurt B, Aktekin CN et al (2007) Treatment of unstable thoracolumbar junction burst fractures with short- or long-segment posterior fixation in Magerl type A fractures. Eur Spine J 16:1145–1155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Barbanti Brodano G, De Iure F, Cappuccio M et al (2007) Osteosintesi con tecnica percutanea mininvasiva nel trattamento delle fratture vertebrali toraciche e lombari. Esperienza preliminare. GIOT 33:78–85

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cho DY, Lee WY, Sheu PC (2003) Treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures with polymethyl methacrylate vertebroplasty and short-segment pedicle screw fixation. Neurosurgery 53:1354–1360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Verlaan JJ, Dhert WJ, Verbout AJ et al (2005) Balloon vertebroplasty in combination with pedicle screw instrumentation: a novel technique to treat thoracic and lumbar burst fractures. Spine 30:E73–E79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fuentes S, Metellus P, Fondop J et al (2007) Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation and kyphoplasty for management of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Neurochirurgie 53:272–276

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Maciejczak A, Barnas P, Dudziak P et al (2007) Posterior keyhole corpectomy with percutaneous pedicle screw stabilization in the surgical management of lumbar burst fractures. Neurosurgery 60:232–242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Denis F (1984) Spinal instability as defined by the three-column spine concept in acute spinal trauma. Clin Orthop Relat Res 189:65–76

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang ST, Ma HL, Liu CL et al (2006) Is fusion necessary for surgically treated burst fractures of the thoracolumbar and lumbar spine? A prospective, randomized study. Spine 31:2646–2652

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

None of the authors has any potential conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Ciro Tamburrelli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Logroscino, C.A., Proietti, L. & Tamburrelli, F.C. Minimally invasive spine stabilisation with long implants. Eur Spine J 18 (Suppl 1), 75–81 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-0995-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-0995-8

Keywords

Navigation