Abstract
The prevailing approach of total clearing to contain the spread of invasive plants (IP) in South Africa is generating enormous lignocellulosic wastes. This study examined the possibility of utilizing these wastes in the production of geopolymer composites for use in outdoor environments. Untreated wood particles from Acacia mearnsii and A. longifolia, as well as sugarcane bagasse residues, were incorporated into a geopolymer matrix developed from a binary precursor system of 75% fly ash and 25% metakaolin. The variables considered included precursor-activator ratio (PA), curing pattern (CP), lignocellulosic material (LM), and alkali concentration (Mcon). The production process was established using a mixed factorial experimental design. PA and CP were considered at 2 levels, while LM and MCon were considered at 3 levels. The density of the boards exceeded 1 g cm−3 and are classified as high-density boards. The boards have comparable sorption properties to the cement-bonded particleboard according to the EN 632-2: 2007 standard. However, only A. longifolia boards produced with 12 M NaOH and PA ratio of 2:1 met the mechanical strength requirements. Thermogravimetric analysis revealed that the boards are thermally stable. These results have shown that South African woody IPs are suitable for geopolymer wood composites, but there is still concern about their durability in the alkaline matrix. Scanning electron microscopy micrographs indicated mineralization of the particles and a partial degradation of hemicellulose was confirmed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Although the degraded components did not prevent geopolymer setting, there is need to further investigate the extent and means of preventing degradation as this can derail the intended use of the product.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alomayri T (2017) Effect of glass microfibre addition on the mechanical performances of fly ash-based geopolymer composites. J Asian Ceram Soc 5:334–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jascer.2017.06.007
Alomayri T, Shaikh FUA, Low IM (2013) Characterisation of cotton fibre-reinforced geopolymer composites. Compos Part B Eng 50:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.01.013
Alomayri T, Vickers L, Shaikh FUA, Low IM (2014) Mechanical properties of cotton fabric reinforced geopolymer composites at 200-1000 C. J Adv Ceram 3:184–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40145-014-0109-x
Amiandamhen SO, Meincken M, Tyhoda L (2016) Magnesium based phosphate cement binder for composite panels: a response surface methodology for optimisation of processing variables in boards produced from agricultural and wood processing industrial residues. Ind Crops Prod 94:746–754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.09.051
Amiandamhen SO, Meincken M, Tyhoda L (2018a) The effect of chemical treatments of natural fibres on the properties of phosphate-bonded composite products. Wood Sci Technol 52:653–675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-018-0999-9
Amiandamhen SO, Montecuccoli Z, Meincken M, Barbu MC, Tyhoda L (2018b) Phosphate bonded wood composite products from invasive Acacia trees occurring on the Cape Coastal plains of South Africa. Eur J Wood Prod 76:437–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-017-1191-x
Amiandamhen SO, Meincken M, Tyhoda L (2019) Phosphate bonded natural fibre composites: a state of the art assessment. SN Appl Sci 1:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-0910-9
Andini S, Cioffi R, Colangelo F et al (2008) Coal fly ash as raw material for the manufacture of geopolymer-based products. Waste Manag. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.02.001
ANSI (1999) A208.1-1999, Particleboard, American National Standard, Composite Panel Association, Gaithersburg
ASTM (1999) ASTM D1037-99, standard test methods for evaluating properties of wood-base fiber and particle panel materials, ASTM International. Annu B ASTM Stand. https://doi.org/10.1520/D1037-99
ASTM (2019) ASTM C618-19, standard specification for coal fly ash and raw or calcined natural pozzolan for use in concrete. Annu B ASTM Stand. https://doi.org/10.1520/C0618-19
Barbosa VFF, Mackenzie KJD, Thaumaturgo C (2000) Synthesis and characterisation of materials based on inorganic polymers of alumina and silica: sodium polysialate polymers. Int J Inorg Mater 2:309–317
Buchwald A, Hilbig H, Kaps C (2007) Alkali-Activated metakolin-slag blends—performance and structure in dependance of their composition. J Mater Sci 42:3024–3032
Castaldelli VN, Moraes JCB, Akasaki JL et al (2016) Study of the binary system fly ash/sugarcane bagasse ash (FA/SCBA) in SiO2/K2O alkali-activated binders. Fuel 174:307–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.02.020
Chareerat T, Lee-Anansaksiri A, Chindaprasirt P (2006) Synthesis of high calcium fly ash and calcined kaoline geopolymer mortar. In: International conference on pozzolan, concrete and geopolymer. Khhon Kaen, Thailand, p May 24–25
Chen R (2014) Bio Stabilization for Geopolymer Enhancement and Mine Tailings Dust Control. Dissertation. University of Arizona
Chen R, Ahmari S, Zhang L (2014) Utilization of sweet sorghum fiber to reinforce fly ash-based geopolymer. J Mater Sci 49:2548–2558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-013-7950-0
Chimphango A (2020) The valorisation of paper sludge for green composite material. M.Sc. Dissertation. Stellenbosch University
Cioffi R, Maffucci L, Santoro L (2003) Optimization of geopolymer synthesis by calcination and polycondensation of a kaolinitic residue. Resour Conserv Recycl 40(1):27–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(03)00023-5
Corrales RCNR, Mendes FMT, Perrone CC et al (2012) Structural evaluation of sugar cane bagasse steam pretreated in the presence of CO2 and SO2. Biotechnol Biofuels 5:36. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-5-36
Criado M, Palomo A, Fernández-Jiménez A (2005) Alkali activation of fly ashes. Part 1: effect of curing conditions on the carbonation of the reaction products. Fuel 84:2048–2054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2005.03.030
Davidovits J (2008) Geopolymer chemistry and applications, 3rd edn. Institute Geopolymere, Saint-Quentin
DEA (Department of Environment Affairs) (2012) National Waste information baseline report. Department of Environmental Affairs, Pretoria
Duan P, Yan C, Zhou W, Luo W (2016) Fresh properties, mechanical strength and microstructure of fly ash geopolymer paste reinforced with sawdust. Constr Build Mater 111:600–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.091
Fauzi A, Fadhil M, Malkawi AB et al (2016) Study of fly ash characterization as a cementitious material. Procedia Eng 148:487–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.535
Fernandez-Jimenez A, Monzo M, Vicent M, Barba A, Palomo A (2008) Alkaline activation of metakaolin-fly ash mixtures: obtain of zeoceramics and zeocements. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 108:41–49
Görhan G, Aslaner R, Şinik O (2016) The effect of curing on the properties of metakaolin and fly ash-based geopolymer paste. Compos Part B Eng 97:329–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.05.019
Guo X, Pan X (2018) Mechanical properties and mechanisms of fiber reinforced fly ash–steel slag based geopolymer mortar. Constr Build Mater 179:633–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.198
Habert G, D’Espinose De Lacaillerie JB, Roussel N (2011) An environmental evaluation of geopolymer based concrete production: reviewing current research trends. J Clean Prod 19:1229–1238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.03.012
Hajiha H, Sain M, Mei LH (2014) Modification and characterization of hemp and sisal fibers modification and characterization of hemp and sisal fibers. J Nat Fibers 11:144–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2013.861779
Hardjito D, Rangan BV (2005) Development and properties of low-calcium fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Research report GC1, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia
Herrmann A, Nickel J, Riedel U (1998) Construction materials based upon biologically renewable resources—from components to finished parts. Polym Degrad Stab 59:251–261
Huang LH, Qin TF (2005) Study on the difference of chemical properties among five acacia species. Forest Research 18(2):191–194. http://europepmc.org/abstract/CBA/520748. Accessed 13 Nov 2020
Ibraheem SA, Sreenivasan SS, Abdan K et al (2016) The effects of combined chemical treatments on the mechanical properties of three grades of sisal. BioResources 11:8968–8980
Kong DLY, Sanjayan JG (2008) Damage behavior of geopolymer composites exposed to elevated temperatures. Cem Concr Compos 30:986–991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2008.08.001
Korniejenko K, Mikuła J, Łach M (2015) Fly ash based fiber-reinforced geopolymer composites as the environmental friendly alternative to cementitious materials. In: Proceedings of 2015 international conference on bio-medical engineering and environmental technology (BMEET 2015). London, March, 21–22, 2015, pp 164–171
Le Maitre DC, Versfeld DB, Chapman R (2000) The impact of invading alien plants on surface water resources in South Africa: a preliminary assessment. Water SA 26:397–408
Le Quéré C, Andrew RM, Friedlingstein P et al (2018) Global carbon budget 2017. Earth Syst Sci Data 10:405–448. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-405-2018
Li Z, Wang X, Wang L (2006) Properties of hemp fibre reinforced concrete composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 37:497–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.01.032
Liu W, Mohanty AK, Askeland P et al (2004) Influence of fiber surface treatment on properties of Indian grass fiber reinforced soy protein based biocomposites. Polymer (Guildf) 45:7589–7596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2004.09.009
Machado G, Santos F, Faria D et al (2018) Characterization and potential evaluation of residues from the sugarcane industry of Rio Grande do Sul in biorefinery processes. Nat Resour 9(5):175–187. https://doi.org/10.4236/nr.2018.95011
Mellado A, Catalán C, Bouzón N et al (2014) Carbon footprint of geopolymeric mortar: study of the contribution of the alkaline activating solution and assessment of an alternative route. RSC Adv 4:23846–23852. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA03375B
Miranda I, Gominho J, Mirra I, Pereira H (2012) Chemical characterization of barks from Picea abies and Pinus sylvestris after fractioning into different particle sizes. Ind Crop Prod 36:395–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.10.035
Mohr BJ, El-Ashkar NH, Kurtis KE (2004) Fiber-cement composites for housing construction: state-of-the-art review. In: Proc NSF hous res agenda work, p 17
Natali A, Manzi S, Bignozzi MC (2011) Novel fiber-reinforced composite materials based on sustainable geopolymer matrix. Procedia Eng 21:1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2120
Neupane K, Kidd P, Chalmers D et al (2016) Investigation on compressive strength development and drying shrinkage of ambient cured powder-activated geopolymer concretes. Aust J Civ Eng 14:72–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/14488353.2016.1163765
Pacheco-Torgal F, Jalali S (2011) Cementitious building materials reinforced with vegetable fibres: a review. Constr Build Mater 25:575–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.07.024
Petermann JC, Saeed A, Hammons MI (2010) Alkali-activated geopolymers: a literature review. Air Force Res Lab. AFRL-RX-TY-TR-2010-0097. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada559113
Puertas F, Martinez-Ramirez S, Alonso S, Vazquez T (2000) Alkali-activated fly ash/slag cement: strength behavior and hydration products. Cem Concr Res 301(10):1625–1632
Sarmin SN (2016) The influence of different wood aggregates on the properties of geopolymer composites. Key Eng Mater 723:74–79. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.723.74
Sarmin S, Welling J (2015) Study on properties of lightweight cementitious wood composite containing fly ash/metakaolin. Pro Ligno 11:116–121
Sarmin SN, Welling J (2016) Lightweight geopolymer wood composite synthesized from alkali-activated fly ash and metakaolin. J Teknol 78:49–55. https://doi.org/10.11113/.v78.8734
Sawpan MA, Pickering KL, Fernyhough A (2011) Effect of fibre treatments on interfacial shear strength of hemp fibre reinforced polylactide and unsaturated polyester composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 42:1189–1196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.05.003
Sebio-Puñal T, Naya S, López-Beceiro J et al (2012) Thermogravimetric analysis of wood, holocellulose, and lignin from five wood species. J Therm Anal Calorim 109:1163–1167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-011-2133-1
Shackleton R (2016) How South Africa’s second most invasive tree can be managed better. In: Convers. AFRICA. http://theconversation.com/how-south-africas-second-most-invasive-tree-can-be-managed-better-62723. Accessed 13 Nov 2020
Soutsos M, Boyle AP, Vinai R et al (2016) Factors influencing the compressive strength of fly ash based geopolymers. Constr Build Mater 110(1):355–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.11.045
Tran DH, Louda P, Bortnovsky O, Bezucha P (2009) Effect of curing temperature on flexural properties of silica-based geopolymer-carbon reinforced composite. Manuf Eng 37:492–497
Valencia Saavedra WG, Mejía de Gutiérrez R (2017) Performance of geopolymer concrete composed of fly ash after exposure to elevated temperatures. Constr Build Mater 154:229–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.208
Van Langenberg K, Grigsby W, Ryan G (2010) Green adhesives: options for the Australian industry—summary of recent research into green adhesives from renewable materials and identification of those that are closet to commercial uptake. Forest & Wood Products Australia Project Number: PNB158-0910. Vol. 61, Issue: June, pp 10–16
Ye H, Zhang Y, Yu Z, Mu J (2018) Effects of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin on the morphology and mechanical properties of metakaolin-based geopolymer. Constr Build Mater 173:10–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.028
Yuan J, He P, Jia D et al (2016) Effect of curing temperature and SiO2/K2O molar ratio on the performance of metakaolin-based geopolymers. Ceram Int 42:16184–16190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.07.139
Yunsheng Z, Wei S, Zongjin L et al (2008) Impact properties of geopolymer based extrudates incorporated with fly ash and PVA short fiber. Constr Build Mater 22:370–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.08.006
Zhang HY, Kodur V, Cao L, Qi SL (2014) Fiber reinforced geopolymers for fire resistance applications. Procedia Eng 71:153–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.04.022
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the German Academic Exchange (DAAD) and DLR for funding this study under the BioHome Project in collaboration with the University of Hamburg, Germany and Addis Ababa Institute of Technology, Ethiopia.
Funding
The research was done in the BioHome Project funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [Grant Number: 01DG17007A] and the DAAD Project [Grant Number: 57359374].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Olayiwola, H.O., Amiandamhen, S.O., Meincken, M. et al. Investigating the suitability of fly ash/metakaolin-based geopolymers reinforced with South African alien invasive wood and sugarcane bagasse residues for use in outdoor conditions. Eur. J. Wood Prod. 79, 611–627 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-020-01636-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-020-01636-4