Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Einfluss von „neuen“ Sprachprozessoren auf die Sprachverständlichkeit der Kochleaimplantat-Träger

Influence of “novel” speech processors on the speech perception performance of cochlear implant users

  • Im Fokus
  • Published:
HNO Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. MED-EL (2009) http://www.medel.com/US/img/download/20712US_r10_FocusOn_FineHearing.pdf, Stand 30.03.09

  2. Battmer RD, Feldmeier I, Kohlenberg A, Lenarz T (1997) Performance of the new clarion speech processor 1.2 in quiet and in noise. Am J Otolaryngol 18:144–146

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berger K, Bagus H, Michels H et al (2006) Multizentrumstudie über ESPrit™ 3G für Nucleus 22. HNO 54:353–360

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Boëx C, Pelizzone M, Montandon P (1996) Speech recognition with a CIS strategy for the ineraid multichannel cochlear implant. Am J Otolaryngol 17:61–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bosco E, D’Agosta L, Mancini P et al (2005) Speech perception results in children implanted with clarion devices: Hi-resolution and standard resolution modes. Acta Otolaryngol 125:148–158

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Brendel M, Buechner A, Krueger B et al (2008) Evaluation of the Harmony soundprocessor in combination with the speech coding strategy HiRes 120. Otol Neurotol 29:199–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cafarelli Dees D, George C, Stevenson F et al (1995) Comparison of two cochlear implant speech processors in better versus poorer performers. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 166:258–260

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cohen NL, Waltzman SB, Roland JT Jr et al (1997) Results of speech processor upgrade in a population of veterans affairs cochlear implant recipients. Am J Otolaryngol 18:462–465

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cowan RS, Brown C, Whitford LA et al (1995) Speech perception in children using the advanced Speak speech-processing strategy. Am Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 166:318–321

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dillier N, Battmer RD, Döring WH, Müller-Deile J (1995) Multicentric field evaluation of a new speech coding strategy for cochlear implants. Audiology 34:145–159

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dillier N, Bögli H, Spillmann T (1992) Digital speech processing for cochlear implants. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 54:299–307

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Helms J, Müller J, Schön F et al (2001) Comparison of the TEMPO+ ear-level speech processor and the cis pro+ body-worn processor in adult MED-EL cochlear implant users. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 63:31–40

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Koch DB, Osberger MJ, Segel P, Kessler D (2004) Hi resolution and conventional sound processing in the HiResolution bionic ear: using appropriate outcome measures to assess speech recognition ability. Audiol Neurootol 9:214–223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kompis M, Vischer MW, Häusler R (1999) Performance of compressed analogue (CA) and continuous interleaved sampling (CIS) coding strategies for cochlear implants in quiet and noise. Acta Otolaryngol 119:659–664

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Krueger B, Joseph G, Rost U et al (2008) Performance groups in adult cochlear implant users: speech perception results from 1984 until today. Otol Neurotol 29:509–512

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lawson DT, Wilson BS, Finley CC (1993) New processing strategies for multichannel cochlear prostheses. Prog Brain Res 97:313–321

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Manrique M, Huarte A, Morera C et al (2005) Speech perception with the ACE and the SPEAK speech coding strategies for children implanted with the nucleus cochlear implant. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 69:1667–1674

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Müller-Deile J, Kortmann T, Hoppe U et al (2009) Verbesserung der Sprachverständlichkeit durch neuen Kochleaimplantat-Sprachprozessor. HNO (im Druck)

  19. Riss D, Arnoldner C, Reiss S et al (2008) 1-year results using the opus speech processor with the fine structure speech coding strategy. Acta Otolaryngol 3:1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sehgal ST, Kirk KI, Svirsky M, Miyamoto RT (1998) The effects of processor strategy on the speech perception performance of pediatric nucleus multichannel cochlear implant users. Ear Hear 19:149–161

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Skinner MW, Clark GM, Whitford LA et al (1994) Evaluation of a new spectral peak coding strategy for the nucleus 22 channel cochlear implant system. Am J Otolaryngol 15:15–27

    Google Scholar 

  22. Whitford LA, Seligman PM, Everingham CE et al (1995) Evaluation of the nucleus spectra 22 processor and new speech processing strategy (SPEAK) in postlinguistically deafened adults. Acta Otolaryngol 115:629–637

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wilson BS, Lawson DT, Zerbi M et al (1995) New processing strategies in cochlear implantation. Am J Otolaryngol 16:669–675

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Plastische Operationen, HELIOS-Klinikum Erfurt, Nordhäuserstraße 74, 99089, Erfurt, Deutschland

    I. Baljić M. Sc.

  2. Klinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Kommunikationsstörungen, HELIOS-Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Deutschland

    I. Baljić M. Sc.

Authors
  1. I. Baljić M. Sc.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. Baljić M. Sc..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baljić, I. Einfluss von „neuen“ Sprachprozessoren auf die Sprachverständlichkeit der Kochleaimplantat-Träger. HNO 57, 563–566 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-009-1925-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-009-1925-0

Search

Navigation