Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

38/w mit Magenperforation und Gewichtsverlust

Vorbereitung auf die Facharztprüfung: Fall 27

38/f—Gastric perforation and loss of weight

Preparation for the medical specialist examination: part 27

  • Facharzt-Training
  • Published:
Die Chirurgie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4

Literatur

  1. Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, Deutsche Krebshilfe, AWMF) (2019): S3-Leitlinie Magenkarzinom, Langversion 2.0, AWMF Registernummer: 032/009OL.

  2. Ramos RF et al (2016) Staging laparoscopy in gastric cancer to detect peritoneal metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 42(9):1315–1321

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gurski LN, McMillian N, Pluchino LMA et al (2019) NCCN guidelines version 2.2018 panel members gastric cancer

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jacquet P, Sugarbaker PH (1996) Clinical research methodologies in diagnosis and staging of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. In: Sugarbaker PH (Hrsg) Peritoneal carcinomatosis: principles of management. Cancer treatment and research, Bd. 82. Springer, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  5. Thomassen I, de Hingh IH et al (2014) Peritoneal carcinomatosis is less frequently diagnosed during laparoscopic surgery compared to open surgery in patients with colorectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 40:511–514

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jamel S, Hanna GB et al (2018) Prognostic significance of peritoneal lavage cytology in staging gastric cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastric Cancer 21(1):10–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rau B, Brandl A et al (2018) Indikation von CRS und HIPEC beim peritoneal metastasierten Magenkarzinom, Peritoneale Tumoren und Metastasen. Springer, Berlin, S 195–204

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dobrindt EM, Gül-Klein S, Vilchez AME et al (2022) Peritonealkarzinose des Magenkarzinoms. Chirurgie. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-022-01699-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Martins AF et al (2022) Impact of cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic Intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the treatment of gastric cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 29:7528–7537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gockel I, Thieme R et al (2018) Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM): results of a single-center experience and register study. J Gastric Cancer 18(4):379–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rau B, Brandl A, Piso P et al (2020) Peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer: results from the German database. Gastric Cancer 23:11–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hübner M, Nelson G et al (2020) Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) with or without hyperthermic IntraPEritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC): Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations. Eur J Surg Oncol 46(12):2292–2310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Osario J et al (2021) Improved postoperative outcomes and reduced transfusion rates after implementation of a Patient Blood Management program in gastric cancer surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 47(6):1449–1457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chia CS et al (2016) Patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastric cancer treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic Intraperitoneal chemotherapy: is cure a possibility? Ann Surg Oncol 23(6):1971–1979

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral‑, Transplantations‑, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, AöR, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland

    P. Rhode, T. Schönherr &  I. Gockel

Authors
  1. P. Rhode
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T. Schönherr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. I. Gockel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Rhode.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

P. Rhode, T. Schönherr und I. Gockel geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Für diesen Beitrag wurden von den Autor/-innen keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien. Für Bildmaterial oder anderweitige Angaben innerhalb des Manuskripts, über die Patient/-innen zu identifizieren sind, liegt von ihnen und/oder ihren gesetzlichen Vertretern/Vertreterinnen eine schriftliche Einwilligung vor.

The supplement containing this article is not sponsored by industry.

Additional information

figure qr

QR-Code scannen & Beitrag online lesen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rhode, P., Schönherr, T. & Gockel, I. 38/w mit Magenperforation und Gewichtsverlust. Chirurgie 93 (Suppl 1), 124–128 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-022-01767-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-022-01767-9

Schlüsselwörter

Search

Navigation