Skip to main content
Log in

Chronische Pankreatitis: Grenzen der Anwendbarkeit unizentrischer Studien

Chronic pancreatitis: limitations of the applicability of unicentric studies

  • In der Diskussion
  • Published:
Der Chirurg Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The Original Article was published on 28 February 2018

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Diener MK, Hüttner FJ, Kieser M et al (2017) Partial pancreatoduodenectomy versus duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection in chronic pancreatitis: the multicentre, randomised, controlled, double-blind ChroPac trial. Lancet 390(10099):1027–1037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Strobel O, Büchler MW (2017) Pankreatoduodenektomie vs. duodenumerhaltende Pankreaskopfresektion bei chronischer Pankreatitis. Chirurg 88(12):1062

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Beger HG, Witte C et al (1980) Experiences with duodenum-sparing pancreas head resection in chronic pancreatitis. Chirurg 51:303–307

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Frey CF, Smith GJ (1987) Description and rationale of a new operation for chronic pancreatitis. Pancreas 2:701–707

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gloor B, Friess H, Uhl W, Buchler MW (2001) A modified technique of the Beger and Frey procedure in patients with chronic pancreatitis. Dig Surg 18:21–25

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Strobel O, Büchler MW, Werner J (2009) Duodenumerhaltende Pankreaskopfresektion. Technik nach Beger, Technik nach Frey und Berner Modifikation. Chirurg 80(1):22–27

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Strobel O, Büchler MW, Werner J (2009) Surgical therapy of chronic pancreatitis: indications, techniques and results. Int J Surg 7(4):305–312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Keck T, Adam U, Makowiec F et al (2012) Short- and long-term results of duodenum-preservation versus resection for the management of chronic pancreatitis: a prospective, randomized study. Surgery 152:S95–S102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Farkas G, Leindler L, Daróczi M (2006) Prospective randomised compaarison of organ-preserving pancreatic head resection with pylorus-reserving pancreaticoduodenectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 391:338–342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Klempa I, Spatny M, Menzel J et al (1995) Pancreatic function and quality of life after resection of the head of the pancreas in chronic pancreatitits: A prospective, randomized comparative study after duodenum-preserving resection of the head of the pancreas versus Whipple’s operation. Chirurg 66(4):350–359

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gurusamy KS, Lusuku C, Halkias C, Davidson BR (2016) Duodenumpreserving pancreatic resection versus pancreaticoduodenectomy for chronic pancreatitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011521.pub2

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kleeff J, Stoss C, Mayerle J et al (2016) Evidence-based surgical treatments for chronic pancreatitis. Dtsch Arztebl Int 113:489–496

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. W. Büchler.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

O. Strobel, M.K. Diener und M.W. Büchler geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Strobel, O., Diener, M.K. & Büchler, M.W. Chronische Pankreatitis: Grenzen der Anwendbarkeit unizentrischer Studien. Chirurg 89, 397–400 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-018-0623-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-018-0623-4

Navigation