Skip to main content
Log in

Komplikationsmanagement bei Hämorrhoidenoperationen

Complication management following hemorrhoid operations

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Chirurg Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Hämorrhoidenoperationen werden in Deutschland sehr häufig durchgeführt. Es kann bei dem Eingriff zu schwerwiegenden Komplikationen kommen, die ein entsprechendes Management erfordern.

Ziel der Arbeit

Darstellung der einzelnen Komplikationen einschließlich der entsprechenden Therapieoptionen.

Material und Methoden

Daten zu Operationsverfahren und Komplikationen aus der im Zeitraum vom 01.12.2009 bis zum 31.01.2010 durchgeführten elektronisch onlinebasierten Umfrage aller niedergelassenen oder angestellten viszeral- oder allgemeinchirurgisch tätigen Ärzte in Deutschland wurden ausgewertet sowie eine Recherche zur aktuellen Literatur (PubMed) durchgeführt.

Ergebnisse

Im Vergleich zur konventionellen Hämorrhoidektomie hat die Stapler-Hämorrhoidopexie Vorteile in der frühen postoperativen Phase. Patienten sollten allerdings vor Hämorrhoidopexie über die Möglichkeit postoperativer Defäkationsstörungen, eine erhöhte Rezidiv- und Reoperationsrate und das seltene Auftreten lebensbedrohlicher Komplikationen informiert werden.

Schlussfolgerungen

Ziel sollte es sein, durch Prävention, Patientenselektion, sorgfältige Indikationsstellung und entsprechende Expertise das Komplikationsrisiko gering zu halten. Im Falle von Komplikationen ist die frühzeitige Erkennung und direkte Einleitung einer adäquaten Behandlung entscheidend.

Abstract

Background

Hemorrhoid operations are performed frequently in Germany. After the operation severe complications can occur that require appropriate management.

Objective

Presentation of current complications and suitable therapeutic options.

Material and methods

Data including operative procedures and complications that have been collected in an electronic online-based survey of all resident, affiliated and private practice German surgeons during the period from 1 December 2009 to 31 January 2010 are presented. A review of the current literature in a PubMed search is given.

Results

Stapled hemorrhoidopexy has several benefits during the early postoperative phase in comparison to conventional hemorrhoidectomy; however, patients should be informed about the possibility of postoperative defecation disorders, elevated recurrence and reoperation rates and rare life-threatening complications.

Conclusion

The aim should be to keep risks at a low level by means of prevention, patient selection, careful analysis of indications and relevant expertise. In cases of complications early recognition and direct initiation of adequate treatment are crucial.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6

Literatur

  1. Altomare DF, Roveran A, Pecorella G et al (2006) The treatment of hemorrhoids: guidelines of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery. Tech Coloproctol 10:181–186

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brisinda G, Vanella S, Cadeddu F et al (2009) Surgical treatment of anal stenosis. World J Gastroenterol 15:1921–1928

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brusciano L, Ayabaca SM, Pescatori M et al (2004) Reinterventions after complicated or failed stapled hemorrhoidopexy. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1846–1851

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cheetham MJ, Mortensen NJ, Nystrom PO et al (2000) Persistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 356:730–733

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen HH, Wang JY, Changchien CR et al (2002) Risk factors associated with posthemorrhoidectomy secondary hemorrhage: a single-institution prospective study of 4,880 consecutive closed hemorrhoidectomies. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1096–1099

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen JS, You JF (2010) Current status of surgical treatment for hemorrhoids – systematic review and meta-analysis. Chang Gung Med J 33:488–500

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Corno F, Muratore A, Mistrangelo M et al (1995) Complications of the surgical treatment of hemorrhoids and its therapy. Ann Ital Chir 66:813–816

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Diaz-Palacios GA, Eslava-Schmalbach JH (2011) Perirectal block for out-patient anorectal surgery: a new technique. Biomedica 31:196–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dowden JE, Stanley JD, Moore RA (2010) Obstructed defecation after stapled hemorrhoidopexy: a report of four cases. American Surg 76:622–625

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ebert KH, Meyer HJ (2002) Results two years after stapler hemorrhoidectomy versus Milligan-Morgan procedure. Zentralbl Chir 127:9–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Giordano P, Gravante G, Sorge R et al (2009) Long-term outcomes of stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs conventional hemorrhoidectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Surg 144:266–272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hewitt WR, Sokol TP, Fleshner PR (1996) Should HIV status alter indications for hemorrhoidectomy? Dis Colon Rectum 39:615–618

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kersting S, Berg E (2013) Praktische Anwendung des „4-Säulen-Konzepts“ der situationsadaptierten Therapie des Hämorrhoidalleidens im alttäglichen Arbeitsfeld einer proktologischen Abteilung. Zentralbl Chir (noch nicht gedruckt)

  14. Khubchandani I, Fealk MH, Reed JF 3rd (2009) Is there a post-PPH syndrome? Tech Coloproctol 13:141–144

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Langenbach MR, Chondros S, Sauerland S (2014) Tamponade dressings may be unnecessary after haemorrhoidectomy: a randomised controlled clinical trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 29:395–400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Longo A (1998) Treatment of hemorrhoids disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: a new procedure. In: Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery; 1998 Jun 3–6. Monduzzi Publishing, Bologna, S 777–784

  17. Mccloud JM, Jameson JS, Scott AN (2006) Life-threatening sepsis following treatment for haemorrhoids: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 8:748–755

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Naldini G (2011) Serious unconventional complications of surgery with stapler for haemorrhoidal prolapse and obstructed defaecation because of rectocoele and rectal intussusception. Colorectal Dis 13:323–327

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nelson DW, Champagne BJ, Rivadeneira DE et al (2014) Prophylactic antibiotics for hemorrhoidectomy: are they really needed? Dis Colon Rectum 57:365–369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ng KH, Ho KS, Ooi BS et al (2006) Experience of 3711 stapled haemorrhoidectomy operations. Br J Surg 93:226–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Oughriss M, Yver R, Faucheron JL (2005) Complications of stapled hemorrhoidectomy: a French multicentric study. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 29:429–433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pattana-Arun J, Wesarachawit W, Tantiphlachiva K et al (2009) A comparison of early postoperative results between urgent closed hemorrhoidectomy for prolapsed thrombosed hemorrhoids and elective closed hemorrhoidectomy. J Med Assoc Thai 92:1610–1615

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pescatori M (2014) Prevention and treatment of complications in proctological surgery. Springer, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pescatori M, Gagliardi G (2008) Postoperative complications after procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedures. Tech Coloproctol 12:7–19

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Petersen S, Jongen J, Schwenk W (2011) Agraffectomy after low rectal stapling procedures for hemorrhoids and rectocele. Tech Coloproctol 15:259–264

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Porrett LJ, Porrett JK, Ho YH (2015) Documented complications of staple hemorrhoidopexy: a systematic review. Int Surg 100:44–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rakinic J, Poola VP (2014) Hemorrhoids and fistulas: new solutions to old problems. Curr Probl Surg 51:98–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ratnasingham K, Uzzaman M, Andreani SM et al (2010) Meta-analysis of the use of glyceryl trinitrate ointment after haemorrhoidectomy as an analgesic and in promoting wound healing. Int J Surg 8:606–611

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ritzert E (2013) Bislang nicht publizierte Daten der Dissertation: Deutschlandweite Umfrage zum Versorgungsstand der Therapie des Hämorrhoidalleidens. Aus der Chirurgischen Klinik der Medizinischen Fakultät Mannheim (Direktor: Prof. Dr. med. S. Post) und dem End- und Dickdarm-Zentrum Mannheim (Prof. Dr. med. A. Herold)

  30. Rosen L, Sipe P, Stasik JJ et al (1993) Outcome of delayed hemorrhage following surgical hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 36:743–746

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sielezneff I, Salle E, Lecuyer J et al (1997) Early postoperative morbidity after hemorrhoidectomy using the Milligan-Morgan technic. A retrospective studies of 1,134 cases. J Chir 134:243–247

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Sugimoto T, Tsunoda A, Kano N et al (2013) A randomized, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the effect of diltiazem gel on pain after hemorrhoidectomy. World J Surg 37:2454–2457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tokac M, Bozkurt B, Gurkan Dumlu E et al (2013) Evaluation of necessity for mechanical bowel preparation before Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized prospective clinical study. Minerva Chir 68:393–399

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Toyonaga T, Matsushima M, Sogawa N et al (2006) Postoperative urinary retention after surgery for benign anorectal disease: potential risk factors and strategy for prevention. Int J Colorectal Dis 21:676–682

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wolkomir AF, Luchtefeld MA (1993) Surgery for symptomatic hemorrhoids and anal fissures in Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum 36:545–547

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Yang J, Cui PJ, Han HZ et al (2013) Meta-analysis of stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy. World J Gastroenterol 19:4799–4807

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. You SY, Kim SH, Chung CS et al (2005) Open vs. closed hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 48:108–113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Kersting.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

S. Kersting, A. Herold, K.-P. Jung und E. Berg geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kersting, S., Herold, A., Jung, KP. et al. Komplikationsmanagement bei Hämorrhoidenoperationen. Chirurg 86, 726–733 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-015-0018-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-015-0018-8

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation