Skip to main content
Log in

Fokus Sepsis und allgemeine Intensivmedizin 2022/2023

Zusammenfassung ausgewählter intensivmedizinischer Studien

Focus on sepsis and general intensive care medicine

Summary of selected intensive care studies

  • Journal Club
  • Published:
Die Anaesthesiologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Abdul-Aziz MH, Sulaiman H, Mat-Nor M‑B et al (2016) Beta-Lactam Infusion in Severe Sepsis (BLISS): a prospective, two-centre, open-labelled randomised controlled trial of continuous versus intermittent beta-lactam infusion in critically ill patients with severe sepsis. Intensive Care Med 42(10):1535–1545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-015-4188-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Angriman F, Muttalib F, Lamontagne F et al (2023) IV vitamin C in adults with sepsis: a Bayesian reanalysis of a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care Med. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000005871

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Annane D, Renault A, Brun-Buisson C et al (2018) Hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone for adults with septic shock. N Engl J Med 378(9):809–818. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1705716

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Annane D, Sébille V, Charpentier C et al (2002) Effect of treatment with low doses of hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone on mortality in patients with septic shock. JAMA 288(7):862–871. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.288.7.862

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Arabi YM, Aldawood AS, Haddad SH et al (2015) Permissive underfeeding or standard enteral feeding in critically ill adults. N Engl J Med 372(25):2398–2408. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1502826

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bosch NA, Teja B, Law AC et al (2023) Comparative effectiveness of fludrocortisone and hydrocortisone vs hydrocortisone alone among patients with septic shock. JAMA Intern Med 183(5):451–459. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.0258

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte (2023) Rote-Hand-Brief zu Propofol: Risiko für Sepsis bei Mehrfachentnahme aus einem Behältnis. https://www.bfarm.de/SharedDocs/Risikoinformationen/Pharmakovigilanz/DE/RHB/2023/rhb-propofol.html;jsessionid=0487E26BD1AE44F7C6A3621FAB80B22D.intranet251?nn=591002. Zugegriffen: 22.06.2023

  8. Chapman M, Peake SL, Bellomo R et al (2018) Energy-dense versus routine enteral nutrition in the critically ill. N Engl J Med 379(19):1823–1834. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1811687

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dequin P‑F, Meziani F, Quenot J‑P et al (2023) Hydrocortisone in severe community-acquired pneumonia. N Engl J Med 388(21):1931–1941. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2215145

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W et al (2021) Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Crit Care Med 49(11):e1063–e1143. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000005337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ewig S, Kolditz M, Pletz M et al (2021) Leitlinie Behandlung von erwachsenen Patienten mit ambulant erworbener Pneumonie – Update 2021. https://register.awmf.org/assets/guidelines/020-020l_S3_Behandlung-von-erwachsenen-Patienten-mit-ambulant-erworbener-Pneumonie__2021-05.pdf. Zugegriffen: 22.06.2023

  12. Fine MJ, Auble TE, Yealy DM et al (1997) A prediction rule to identify low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia. N Engl J Med 336(4):243–250. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199701233360402

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fujii T, Luethi N, Young PJ et al (2020) Effect of vitamin C, hydrocortisone, and thiamine vs Hydrocortisone alone on time alive and free of vasopressor support among patients with septic shock: the VITAMINS randomized clinical trial. JAMA 323(5):423–431. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.22176

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Heyland DK, Patel J, Compher C et al (2023) The effect of higher protein dosing in critically ill patients with high nutritional risk (EFFORT Protein): an international, multicentre, pragmatic, registry-based randomised trial. Lancet 401(10376):568–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02469-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ibarra-Estrada M, Kattan E, Aguilera-González P et al (2023) Early adjunctive methylene blue in patients with septic shock: a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care 27(1):110. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04397-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Kotani Y, Pruna A, Turi S et al (2023) Propofol and survival: an updated meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Crit Care 27(1):139. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04431-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Lamontagne F, Masse M‑H, Menard J et al (2022) Intravenous vitamin C in adults with sepsis in the intensive care unit. N Engl J Med 386(25):2387–2398. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2200644

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bernhard M, Hossfeld B, Bein B et al (2015) Handlungsempfehlung: Prähospitale Notfallnarkose beim Erwachsenen. https://www.ai-online.info/images/ai-ausgabe/2015/06-2015/2015_6_317-335_Handlungsempfehlung%20%20Praehospitale%20Notfallnarkose%20beim%20Erwachsenen.pdf. Zugegriffen: 22.06.2023

  19. Marik PE, Khangoora V, Rivera R et al (2017) Hydrocortisone, vitamin C, and thiamine for the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock: a retrospective before-after study. Chest 151(6):1229–1238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2016.11.036

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Matthay MA, Dahabreh IJ, Thompson BT (2023) Should we add fludrocortisone to hydrocortisone for treatment of septic shock? JAMA Intern Med 183(5):460–461. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.0257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Meyhoff TS, Hjortrup PB, Wetterslev J et al (2022) Restriction of intravenous fluid in ICU patients with septic shock. N Engl J Med 386(26):2459–2470. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2202707

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Monti G, Bradic N, Marzaroli M et al (2023) Continuous vs intermittent meropenem administration in critically ill patients with sepsis: the MERCY randomized clinical trial. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.10598

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Reignier J, Plantefeve G, Mira J‑P et al (2023) Low versus standard calorie and protein feeding in ventilated adults with shock: a randomised, controlled, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group trial (NUTRIREA-3). Lancet Respir Med. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00092-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Richter DC, Dietrich M, Lalev LD et al (2021) Prolonged infusion of β‑Lactams decreases mortality in patients with septic shock: a retrospective before-and-after study. Antibiotics. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10060687

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM et al (2020) Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990–2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 395(10219):200–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32989-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Russotto V, Myatra SN, Laffey JG et al (2021) Intubation practices and adverse peri-intubation events in critically ill patients from 29 countries. JAMA 325(12):1164–1172. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.1727

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Russotto V, Tassistro E, Myatra SN et al (2022) Peri-intubation cardiovascular collapse in patients who are critically ill: insights from the INTUBE study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 206(4):449–458. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202111-2575OC

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sevransky JE, Rothman RE, Hager DN et al (2021) Effect of vitamin C, thiamine, and Hydrocortisone on ventilator- and vasopressor-free days in patients with sepsis: the VICTAS randomized clinical trial. JAMA 325(8):742–750. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.24505

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Shapiro NI, Douglas IS, Brower RG et al (2023) Early restrictive or liberal fluid management for sepsis-induced hypotension. N Engl J Med 388(6):499–510. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2212663

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markus A. Weigand.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

M. Dietrich, M. Bernhard, C. Beynon, M.O. Fiedler, A. Hecker, C. Jungk, C. Nusshag, D. Michalski, F.C.F. Schmitt, T. Brenner, M.A. Weigand und C.J. Reuß geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Additional information

Da viele Studien unter Akronymen veröffentlicht und besprochen werden, gibt Tab. 1 einen Überblick über die im vergangenen Jahr erschienenen Studien unter gleichzeitiger Nennung der jeweiligen Akronyme (sofern vorhanden).

figure qr

QR-Code scannen & Beitrag online lesen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dietrich, M., Bernhard, M., Beynon, C. et al. Fokus Sepsis und allgemeine Intensivmedizin 2022/2023. Anaesthesiologie 72, 821–830 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-023-01334-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-023-01334-9

Navigation