Abstract
Because of their low incidence, studies about carpal fractures are rare. The aim of the present study was to analyze epidemiology and treatment of fractured carpal bones. We retrospectively analyzed data of 178 patients admitted to our emergency room with carpal fractures over 6 years. More males than woman were injured. In 91%, a CT scan was performed. The most commonly affected bone was the triquetrum followed by the scaphoid. Almost all triquetral fractures were treated conservatively as opposed to perilunate dislocations that were all operated on. Half of all patients with scaphoid fractures were operated. Young men had the highest risk to sustain a carpal fracture. The triquetrum and the scaphoid are most frequently affected. Usually a CT scan is needed. Treatment of scaphoid and perilunate luxation fractures is rather operative whereas the other fractures mostly allow conservative casting. Nevertheless, correct indication for treatment is important to avoid sequelae.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Hand fractures comprise about a fifth of all fractures treated in an emergency setting, resulting in an annual incidence of about 3–4/100,000. Within these, 8% are fractures of the carpal bones. [1]. The fractures of the carpal bones are rare compared to the fractures of the metacarpals and the phalanxes [2]. They comprise about 8% of these fractures [3].
Most studies focus on diagnostic and treatment options for scaphoid fractures as these are stated to be the most common among the carpal bones [4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. Just a few publications address the incidence and treatment options for the fractures of the other carpals [11,12,13]. Due to their outstanding importance for overall hand function, missed carpal fractures may cause pain, dysfunction, and loss of productivity making carpal fractures an important issue [2].
The anatomy of the carpus is complex consisting of two rows of carpal bones. The proximal row includes the scaphoid, the lunate, the triquetrum, the latter with the adjacent pisiforme as a volar sesamoid bone. The second row contains the trapezium, trapezoid, capitate, and the hamate. Because of this complex anatomy, usually a CT scan is needed for correct diagnosis for carpal fractures as they might be missed on conventional radiographic pictures [13].
This study focuses on the overall incidence of fractures of the different carpal bones and their treatment strategies based on current epidemiological data.
Patients and methods
After attaining institutional review board approval (GN239/16), we retrospectively analyzed the occurrence of the different carpal fractures and the method of treatment used in patients admitted to our emergency room in the period between 2013 and 2018, retrospectively. All patients included were ≥ 18 years old. We performed a computer based ICD-10 search as well as a search in our radiological reports for fractures of each carpal bone. Overall, carpal fractures occurred in 178 of the 16,157 patients who were admitted to our emergency room during this period.
Data were obtained by analysis of the institution’s data-base, charts, and radiological examinations. This included age, sex, injury etiology, fracture type, and treatment methods.
Trauma mechanism as low-energy trauma (i.e., fall from standing or seating height, crushing injury, hyperextension, distortions) and high-energy trauma (i.e., motor vehicle accident, bicycle accident, fall from high altitude) were noted.
Results
Patient and injury details
In the period of 2013 to 2018, 178 patients (1.1% of all patients admitted to our emergency room) were diagnosed with a carpal fracture having in sum 229 carpal fractures. Of these 28.7% (51) were female and 71.3% (127) male. The mean age was 43.6 years ranging from 18 to 89 years. 86% of the patients were younger than 65 years and subsequently 14% older than 65 years. In the male population, almost all patients (93.7%) were younger than 65. Only 6.3% were older than 65. In female population, two-third (66.7%) were younger than 65 and 33.3% older (Fig. 1A).
Distribution between sides was almost equal with 50% (89) injuries on the right hand and 47.8% (85) on the left hand. Carpal fractures of both hands were only seen in 2.2% (4). Most of the patients were diagnosed with just one carpal fracture (143; 80.3%). Only 35 (19.7%) patients had multiple carpal fractures.
More than half of all patients (57.5%) had no accompanying injuries (Fig. 1B). The remaining 42.5% of patients suffered an additional hand related injury. Most common were fractures of the distal radius and ulna with 27%, ligamentous injuries with 9.6% and metacarpal or phalangeal fractures in 9% (Fig. 1B). Accompanying soft tissue injuries were rare with only 1.1%. Other injuries were diagnosed in 3.4%. 15.7% of all fractures were due to industrial accidents.
Most of the injuries were due to a downfall on the hand (85.4%) (Fig. 2B). Only 14.6% were based on a different trauma mechanism like circular saw injury or violent dispute. A normal downfall on the hand (41.6%) was the most common cause for carpal fractures followed by followed by falls from the bike (23.6%), from high altitude (7.9%) from the motorcycle (4.5%), from the stairs (3.9%) or from the skate- or hoverboard (3.4%) summing up to a total of 43.3% of patients sustaining a high energy trauma (Fig. 2B).
For diagnosis, the majority of the patients received a CT scan (91%). Only conventional X-ray pictures were taken in the remaining patients with 9%. MRI scan was additionally performed in 5.6%. Usually, the additional MRI as performed when concomitant ligament injuries were suspected. Only in one case the MRI was used to control a scaphoid fracture.
Fracture distribution
The most common diagnosed fracture was of the os triquetrum with 28.8% followed by the scaphoid fracture with 27.9% both together add up to more than half of all fractures (Fig. 3). Also frequent were fractures of the hamate and the trapezium with 11.4% and 9.6% respectively (Fig. 3). Fractures of the pisiform, the capitate, the trapezoid, and the lunate as well as perilunate fracture dislocation were rare with 6.6% for lunate, 4.4% for pisiform and capitate, 3.1% for trapezoid, and 3.9% for perilunate fracture dislocation (Fig. 3).
Therapy
Most of the carpal fractures were treated conservatively with splint immobilization (62.5%). 19.1% of the patients underwent surgery because of the carpal fracture and 13.5% because of concomitant injury. In 5%, surgery was recommended but patients did not come back on the appointed date (Fig. 4).
All perilunate fracture dislocations were treated operatively. Of scaphoid fractures, more than half underwent surgery (53.2%). Of those only 6.3% had accompanying fractures. In 4.7% of the cases surgery was recommended but treatment was continued elsewhere. In capitate fractures, 60% of the patients underwent surgery. Half of them (30%) had also concomitant injuries that were treated operatively. Choice of treatment in lunatum fractures was almost equally distributed between operative and conservative treatment as 42.9% received surgery and 57.1% not. Of these 42.9% all surgeries were due to concomitant injuries (Fig. 4).
In contrast, fractures of the os triquetrum and the os trapezium were treated conservatively with 80.3% and 77.3%, respectively and the surgeries performed were most likely due to concomitant injury on the wrist or hand (15.2% and 13.6%). Trapezoid fractures underwent surgical intervention more often with 42.9%, but all interventions were due to concomitant injury. Fractures of the hamate were treated conservatively in 42.3% and surgery was primarily performed due to accompanying fractures (34.6%). Only 7.7% underwent surgery because of the hamate fracture itself. In pisiform fractures, only 10% (1) were treated operatively because of concomitant injury, the remaining fractures were treated conservatively (Fig. 4).
Discussion
Carpal fractures are rare ranging below 8% of all hand fractures [3]. Disproportionally often they are found in young men. These representing two-thirds of the study population that suffer from these fractures (66.8%). Our results are similar to other epidemiological studies concerning the occurrence of carpal fractures. In earlier studies, the surplus of carpal fractures in the population of young male persons was mostly explained by their leisure time activities and sports [14]. Although young men are affected most frequently, these injuries are rarely related to industrial accidents (15.7%). This is supported by the fact, that a common cause for the injury mechanism is falling from bike, motorcycle, skate- or hoverboard that are usually leisure time activities.
In contrast to the literature, we did not find another peak of carpal fractures in older women, because women over the age of 65 just accounted for 9.6% of the fractures.
Otherwise, our findings were similar to literature as we noted concomitant injuries, like fracture of the distal radius or ulna, metacarpal and finger fractures in more than half of the cases. We also found that usually there is just one carpal fracture and just one hand involved. As most of the carpal fractures are caused by some kind of downfall, there is no preference to the side injured.
In our population almost all fractures were diagnosed by CT scan (91%). This is fairly explainable by the fact that on conventional radiography carpal fractures might not be seen [13]. For scaphoid fractures the sensitivity has been described as 70% and is surely below 50% for the other carpal fractures [2]. Thus in case of indistinct radiological finding or clinical suspicion a CT scan is performed in our clinic.
Usually, MRI is not needed for the diagnosis. In our study, only in rare cases a MRI was needed additionally. According to literature it was mostly performed if a concomitant soft tissue injury was suspected as TFCC lesions or scapholunate ligament ruptures. [15] Furthermore, MRI can be useful for occult scaphoid fractures, imaging in children or evaluation of the age of the fracture. [16, 17]. With regard to our study, MRI imaging is seldom needed in case of a carpal fracture.
Distribution of carpal fractures between the different bones vary greatly among the studies. Studies of Oh et al. (2015), van Onselen et al. (2003), and our own distribution of fractures of the different carpal bones are enlisted in Table 1 [3, 13]. Different study design might explain this high variety in fracture incidence of the different carpal bones. Whereas Oh et al. analyzed the 3D CT scans of the wrist, von Onselen analyzed the combined data from CT scans and clinical records. In our study we conducted a search of clinical records and clinically indicated CT scan and reports and verified the carpal fractures by a different observant. In our own data, we found high numbers of additionally verified carpal fractures in the radiological reports that were not noted in the clinical records. This fact leading to the assumption, that carpal fractures that do not need additional treatment might often be omitted in clinical records.
This is supported by the fact that most of the carpal fractures do not need surgical intervention and simple immobilization is sufficient in most singular carpal fracture cases. In our study, only 19.1% of patients received operative treatment because of the carpal fracture and 62.5% were treated conservatively. Another 13.5% just underwent surgical procedures because of concomitant injuries that needed to be operated anyway. Just all perilunate fracture dislocations were treated operatively and there as a high number of operative treated scaphoid fractures as well (53.2%).
Conclusion
Compared to the fractures of the metacarpals and phalanxes, carpal bones are less affected by fractures and occur most often in young men. Although literature is mainly focused on the scaphoid, in our study, the incidence of scaphoid fractures is second to triquetrum fractures.
Usually a CT scan is needed for correct diagnosis. Furthermore, proper treatment typically needs fracture analysis by CT scan. Thus, in cases of clinical suspicions a CT scan should be performed for a correct diagnosis to enable an adequate treatment to avoid compromising sequelae of the wrist.
Availability of data and materials
The data sets used and analyzed in the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Laugharne E, Bhavsar D, Rajaratnam V. The distribution of hand fractures: a British perspective. Eur J Plast Surg. 2013;36:367–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-012-0775-2.
Pan T, Lögters TT, Windolf J, Kaufmann R. Uncommon carpal fractures. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016;42:15–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-015-0618-5.
van Onselen EBH, Karim RB, Hage JJ, Ritt MJPF. Prevalence and distribution of hand fractures. J Hand Surg Br. 2003;28:491–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0266-7681(03)00103-7.
Lawton JN, Nicholls MA, Charoglu CP. Immobilization for scaphoid fracture: forearm rotation in long arm thumb-spica versus Munster thumb-spica casts. Orthopedics. 2007;30:612–4. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20070801-07.
DaCruz DJ, Taylor RH, Savage B, Bodiwala GG. Ultrasound assessment of the suspected scaphoid fracture. Arch Emerg Med. 1988;5:97–100. https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.5.2.97.
Thorpe AP, Murray AD, Smith FW, Ferguson J. Clinically suspected scaphoid fracture: a comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and bone scintigraphy. Br J Radiol. 1996;69:109–13. https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-69-818-109.
Querellou S, Arnaud L, Williams T, Breton S, Colin D, Le Roux P-Y, et al. Role of SPECT/CT compared with MRI in the diagnosis and management of patients with wrist trauma occult fractures. Clin Nucl Med. 2014;39:8–13. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0b013e31828164da.
Rhemrev SJ, de Zwart AD, Kingma LM, Meylaerts SAG, Arndt J-W, Schipper IB, Beeres FJP. Early computed tomography compared with bone scintigraphy in suspected scaphoid fractures. Clin Nucl Med. 2010;35:931–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0b013e3181f9de26.
Saedén B, Törnkvist H, Ponzer S, Höglund M. Fracture of the carpal scaphoid. A prospective, randomised 12-year follow-up comparing operative and conservative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:230–4. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.83b2.11197.
Kaewlai R, Avery LL, Asrani AV, Abujudeh HH, Sacknoff R, Novelline RA. Multidetector CT of carpal injuries: anatomy, fractures, and fracture-dislocations. Radiographics. 2008;28:1771–84. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.286085511.
Christie BM, Michelotti BF. Fractures of the carpal bones. Clin Plast Surg. 2019;46:469–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2019.03.007.
Akdemir UO, Atasever T, Sipahioğlu S, Türkölmez S, Kazimoğlu C, Sener E. Value of bone scintigraphy in patients with carpal trauma. Ann Nucl Med. 2004;18:495–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02984566.
Oh E, Kim H-j, Hong S, Hwang J, Lim H, Park S, Hwang J. Evaluation for fracture patterns around the wrist on three-dimensional extremity computed tomography, especially focused on the triquetrum. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2015;59:47–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.12265.
Packer GJ, Shaheen MA. Patterns of hand fractures and dislocations in a district general hospital. J Hand Surg Br. 1993;18:511–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-7681(93)90161-8.
Murthy NS, Ringler MD. MR imaging of carpal fractures. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2015;23:405–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mric.2015.04.006.
Lögters T, Windolf J. Frakturen der Handwurzelknochen. Chirurg. 2016;87:893–906. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-016-0274-2.
Clementson M, Björkman A, Thomsen NOB. Acute scaphoid fractures: guidelines for diagnosis and treatment. EFORT Open Rev. 2020;5:96–103. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.5.190025.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. No founding was received for the present study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Ethics approval
The experimental study was approved by institutional review board of the Johann-Wolfgang Goethe University (GN239/16).
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication:
Not applicable.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Boeddrich, O., Sander, A.L., Lustenberger, T. et al. Epidemiology of carpal fractures: is it only about the scaphoid?. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 49, 1499–1503 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-02213-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-02213-5