Abstract
Background
Hip fractures are a common event in older adults and are associated with significant morbidity, mortality and costs. This review examines the necessary elements required to implement a successful geriatric fracture program and identifies some of the barriers faced when implementing a successful program.
Intervention
The Geriatric Fracture Center (GFC) is a treatment model that standardizes the approach to the geriatric fracture patient. It is based on five principles: surgical fracture management; early operative intervention; medical co-management with geriatricians; patient-centered, standard order sets to employ best practices; and early discharge planning with a focus on early functional rehabilitation. Implementing a geriatric fracture program begins with an assessment of the hospital’s data on hip fractures and standard care metrics such as length of stay, complications, time to surgery, readmission rates and costs. Business planning is essential along with the medical planning process.
Conclusion
To successfully develop and implement such a program, strong physician leadership is necessary to articulate both a short- and long-term plan for implementation. Good communication is essential—those organizing a geriatric fracture program must be able to implement standardized plans of care working with all members of the healthcare team and must also be able to foster relationships both within the hospital and with other institutions in the community. Finally, a program of continual quality improvement must be undertaken to ensure that performance outcomes are improving patient care.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
NHDS (2015) National Hospital Discharge Survey, National Center for Health Statistics, “Health Data, Interactive, Health care Use and Expenditures”, Centers for Disease Control. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db182.htm. Accessed 31 Jan 2016.
National Center for Injury Prevention and Control CfDCaPCfDCaP (2015) Injury Prevention & Control: Data & Statistics (WISQARS). http://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/. Accessed 15 Oct 2015.
Brown CA, Starr AZ, Nunley JA. Analysis of past secular trends of hip fractures and predicted number in the future 2010–2050. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26(2):117–22. doi:10.1097/BOT.0b013e318219c61a.
Mears S, Kates S, Ahmed O, Bass J, Tyler W, et al. A guide to improving the care of patients with fragility fractures, second edition. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2015;6(2):58–120.
Kannus P, Parkkari J, Sievanen H, Heinonen A, Vuori I, Jarvinen M. Epidemiology of hip fractures. Bone. 1996;18(1 Suppl):57S–63S.
Braithwaite RS, Col NF, Wong JB. Estimating hip fracture morbidity, mortality and costs. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51(3):364–70 (pii: jgs51110).
Cummings SR, Rubin SM, Black D. The future of hip fractures in the United States. Numbers, costs, and potential effects of postmenopausal estrogen. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;252:163–6.
Shiga T, Wajima Z, Ohe Y. Is operative delay associated with increased mortality of hip fracture patients? Systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Can J Anaesth. 2008;55(3):146–54. doi:10.1007/BF03016088.
Giusti A, Barone A, Razzano M, Pizzonia M, Pioli G. Optimal setting and care organization in the management of older adults with hip fracture. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2011;47(2):281–96 (pii: R33112529).
Balasubramanian A, Tosi LL, Lane JM, Dirschl DR, Ho PR, O’Malley CD. Declining rates of osteoporosis management following fragility fractures in the U.S., 2000 through 2009. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2014;96(7):e52. doi:10.2106/JBJS.L.01781.
Friedman SM, Mendelson DA, Bingham KW, Kates SL. Impact of a comanaged Geriatric Fracture Center on short-term hip fracture outcomes. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(18):1712–7. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2009.321.
Friedman SM, Mendelson DA, Kates SL, McCann RM. Geriatric co-management of proximal femur fractures: total quality management and protocol-driven care result in better outcomes for a frail patient population. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56(7):1349–56. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01770.x.
Kates SL, Mendelson DA, Friedman SM. Co-managed care for fragility hip fractures (Rochester model). Osteoporos Int. 2010;21(Suppl 4):S621–5. doi:10.1007/s00198-010-1417-9.
Prestmo A, Hagen G, Sletvold O, Helbostad JL, Thingstad P, Taraldsen K, Lydersen S, Halsteinli V, Saltnes T, Lamb SE, Johnsen LG, Saltvedt I. Comprehensive geriatric care for patients with hip fractures: a prospective, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;385(9978):1623–33. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62409-0.
Schnell S, Friedman SM, Mendelson DA, Bingham KW, Kates SL. The 1-year mortality of patients treated in a hip fracture program for elders. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2010;1(1):6–14. doi:10.1177/2151458510378105.
Kates SL, Mendelson DA, Friedman SM. The value of an organized fracture program for the elderly: early results. J Orthop Trauma. 2011;25(4):233–7. doi:10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181e5e901.
Della Rocca GJ, Moylan KC, Crist BD, Volgas DA, Stannard JP, Mehr DR. Comanagement of geriatric patients with hip fractures: a retrospective, controlled, cohort study. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2013;4(1):10–5. doi:10.1177/2151458513495238.
Collinge CA, McWilliam-Ross K, Beltran MJ, Weaver T. Measures of clinical outcome before, during, and after implementation of a comprehensive geriatric hip fracture program: is there a learning curve? J Orthop Trauma. 2013;27(12):672–6. doi:10.1097/BOT.0b013e318291f0e5.
Gu Q, Koenig L, Mather RC 3rd, Tongue J. Surgery for hip fracture yields societal benefits that exceed the direct medical costs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(11):3536–46. doi:10.1007/s11999-014-3820-6.
Moja L, Piatti A, Pecoraro V, Ricci C, Virgili G, Salanti G, Germagnoli L, Liberati A, Banfi G. Timing matters in hip fracture surgery: patients operated within 48 h have better outcomes. A meta-analysis and meta-regression of over 190,000 patients. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e46175. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046175.
Simunovic N, Devereaux PJ, Sprague S, Guyatt GH, Schemitsch E, Debeer J, Bhandari M. Effect of early surgery after hip fracture on mortality and complications: systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2010;182(15):1609–16. doi:10.1503/cmaj.092220.
Liem IS, Kammerlander C, Suhm N, Kates SL, Blauth M. Literature review of outcome parameters used in studies of geriatric fracture centers. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014;134(2):181–7. doi:10.1007/s00402-012-1594-4.
Fisher AA, Davis MW, Rubenach SE, Sivakumaran S, Smith PN, Budge MM. Outcomes for older patients with hip fractures: the impact of orthopedic and geriatric medicine cocare. J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20(3):172–8. doi:10.1097/01.bot.0000202220.88855.16 (discussion 179-180).
O’Malley NT, Blauth M, Suhm N, Kates SL. Hip fracture management, before and beyond surgery and medication: a synthesis of the evidence. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011;131(11):1519–27. doi:10.1007/s00402-011-1341-2.
Alagiakrishnan K, Wiens CA. An approach to drug induced delirium in the elderly. Postgrad Med J. 2004;80(945):388–93. doi:10.1136/pgmj.2003.017236.
Wilk A, Sajjan S, Modi A, Fan CP, Mavros P. Post-fracture pharmacotherapy for women with osteoporotic fracture: analysis of a managed care population in the USA. Osteoporos Int. 2014;25(12):2777–86. doi:10.1007/s00198-014-2827-x.
Kates SL, Kates OS, Mendelson DA. Advances in the medical management of osteoporosis. Injury. 2007;38(Suppl 3):S17–23. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2007.08.007.
Bukata SV, Kates SL, O’Keefe RJ. Short-term and long-term orthopaedic issues in patients with fragility fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(8):2225–36. doi:10.1007/s11999-011-1779-0.
Kates SL. Lean business model and implementation of a geriatric fracture center. Clin Geriatr Med. 2014;30(2):191–205 (3/4/2014).
Kates SL, O’Malley N, Friedman SM, Mendelson DA. Barriers to implementation of an organized geriatric fracture program. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2012;3(1):8–16. doi:10.1177/2151458512436423.
Kates SL, Behrend C, Mendelson DA, Cram P, Friedman SM. Hospital readmission after hip fracture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015;135(3):329–37. doi:10.1007/s00402-014-2141-2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Niladri Basu, M. Natour, Varatharaj Mounasamy and Stephen L. Kates declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Compliance with ethical guidelines
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Basu, N., Natour, M., Mounasamy, V. et al. Geriatric hip fracture management: keys to providing a successful program. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 42, 565–569 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-016-0685-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-016-0685-2