Abstract
Purpose
The aim of the prospective randomized study was to compare the results of the treatment of tibia shaft fractures (TSF) by reamed or unreamed intramedullar nail.
Methods
There were 103 patients with 104 TSF enrolled in the study within the period from December 2005 to June 2010. Seven patients were excluded from the study. Factors of injury severity, course of surgery and hospitalization, and incidence of early and delayed complications were recorded. X-ray was performed every 4 weeks until the fracture was healed. Functional results were evaluated at least 1 year after the surgery. Closed fractures were classified according to Tscherne classification and the open ones according to Gustilo classification.
Results
Forty-eight patients with 49 TSF were treated by unreamed tibial nail. There were 15 women and 33 men in this group. Injury severity score (ISS) ranged from 4 to 25 (ø 6.63). There were 45 closed fractures (0 16; I 22; II 7) and four open fractures (I 2; II 1; IIIA 1). In the reamed nail group there were 48 TSF. ISS ranged from 4 to 18 (ø 6.13). There were 35 closed (0 17; I 13; II 5) and 13 open (I 5; II 5; IIIA 3) fractures in this group. The time of operation was on average 15 min shorter in the unreamed nail group. X-ray healing was the same in both groups (18.12 versus 17.92 weeks). We had four patients in the unreamed nail group and six patients in the reamed nail group with delayed healing (28–44 weeks). We recorded no infection, loss of reduction or re-operation in both groups. Follow-up of functional results was 90 %.
Conclusions
There was no statistically significant difference in clinical and functional results between the groups. We suggest that both methods are comparable.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Court-Brown CM. The management of femoral and tibial diaphyseal fractures. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1998;43:374–80.
Hohaus T, Bula P, Bonnaire F. Intramedullary osteosynthesis in the treatment of lower extremity fractures. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2008;75:52–60.
Howard M, Court-Brown CM. Epidemiology and management of open fractures of the lower limb. Br J Hosp Med. 1997;57:582–7.
Perren SM. Fracture healing. The evolution of our understanding. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2008;75:241–6.
Bhandari M, Adili A, Leone J, Lachowski RJ, Kwok DC. Early versus delayed operative management of closed tibial fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;368:230–9.
Bhandari M, Guyatt GH, Swiontkowski MF, Schemitsch EH. Treatment of open fractures of the shaft of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:62–8.
Court-Brown CM. Reamed tibial nailing in Edinburgh (1985–1995). Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 1999;58:24–30.
Court-Brown CM. Reamed intramedullary tibial nailing: an overview and analysis of 1,106 cases. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18:96–101.
Dědek T. Treatment of diaphyseal tibial fractures with injuries of soft tissues. Dissertation thesis. Charles University Prague, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, 1999.
Merchant TC, Dietz FR. Long-term follow-up after fractures of the tibial and fibular shafts. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71:599–606.
Trlica J, Dědek T, Počepcov I, Folvarský J, Zahradníček J, Žvák I, Holeček T, Kočí J, Šmejkal K. Reamed and unreamed mailing of diaphyseal tibial fractures—our own group of patients and state of the art. Úrazová chirurgie. 2008;16:54–9.
Trlica J, Dědek T, Šmejkal K, Kočí J, Lochman P, Frank M. Expert tibial nail (ETN) for treatment of diaphyseal tibial fractures in current and extended indications: technique and clinical results. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2010;77:235–41.
Anglen JO, Blue JM. A comparison of reamed and unreamed nailing of the tibia. J Trauma. 1995;39:351–5.
Bhandari M, Guyatt GH, Tong D, Adili A, Shaughnessy SG. Reamed versus nonreamed intramedullary nailing of lower extremity long bone fractures: a systematic overview and meta-analysis. J Orthop Trauma. 2000;14:2–9.
Keating JF, Blachut PA, O’Brien PJ, Court-Brown CM. Reamed nailing of Gustilo grade-IIIB tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82:1113–6.
Keating JF, O’Brien PJ, Blachut PA, Meek RN, Broekhuyse HM. Locking intramedullary nailing with and without reaming for open fractures of the tibial shaft. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:334–41.
Klein MP, Rahn BA, Frigg R, Kessler S, Perren SM. Reaming versus non-reaming in medullary nailing: interference with cortical circulation of the canine tibia. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1990;109:314–6.
Greenspan L, McLellan BA, Greig H. Abbreviated injury scale and injury severity score: a scoring chart. J Trauma. 1985;25:60–4.
Tytherleigh-Strong GM, Keating JF, Court-Brown CM. Extra-articular fractures of the proximal tibial diaphysis: their epidemiology, management and outcome. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1997;42:334–8.
Vaisto O, Toivanen J, Kannus P, Jarvinen M. Anterior knee pain after intramedullary nailing of fractures of the tibial shaft: an 8-year follow-up of a prospective, randomized study comparing two different nail-insertion techniques. J Trauma. 2008;64:1511–6.
Finkemeier CG, Schmidt AH, Kyle RF, Templeman DC, Varecka TF. A prospective, randomized study of intramedullary nails inserted with and without reaming for the treatment of open and closed fractures of the tibial shaft. J Orthop Trauma. 2000;14:187–93.
Court-Brown CM, Will E, Christie J, McQueen MM. Reamed or unreamed nailing for closed tibial fractures. A prospective study in Tscherne C1 fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78:580–3.
Bhandari M, Guyatt G, Tornetta P, Schemitsch EH, Swiontkowski M, Sanders D, Walter SD. Randomized trial of reamed and unreamed intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:2567–78.
Acknowledgments
The study was supported by MH CZ-DRO (UHHK, 00179906) and by the Project (Ministry of Defence, Czech Republic) “A long-term organization development plan 1011”.
Conflict of interest
J. Trlica, J. Kočí, P. Lochman, K. Šmejkal, M. Frank, T. Holeček, L. Hasenöhrlová, J. Zahradníček, J. Folvarský, I. Žvák and T. Dědek declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical standard statement
The study has been approved by local ethics committee and has, therefore, been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Trlica, J., Kočí, J., Lochman, P. et al. Reamed versus unreamed nail in the treatment of tibia shaft fractures. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 40, 489–493 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-013-0340-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-013-0340-0