Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reamed versus unreamed nail in the treatment of tibia shaft fractures

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of the prospective randomized study was to compare the results of the treatment of tibia shaft fractures (TSF) by reamed or unreamed intramedullar nail.

Methods

There were 103 patients with 104 TSF enrolled in the study within the period from December 2005 to June 2010. Seven patients were excluded from the study. Factors of injury severity, course of surgery and hospitalization, and incidence of early and delayed complications were recorded. X-ray was performed every 4 weeks until the fracture was healed. Functional results were evaluated at least 1 year after the surgery. Closed fractures were classified according to Tscherne classification and the open ones according to Gustilo classification.

Results

Forty-eight patients with 49 TSF were treated by unreamed tibial nail. There were 15 women and 33 men in this group. Injury severity score (ISS) ranged from 4 to 25 (ø 6.63). There were 45 closed fractures (0 16; I 22; II 7) and four open fractures (I 2; II 1; IIIA 1). In the reamed nail group there were 48 TSF. ISS ranged from 4 to 18 (ø 6.13). There were 35 closed (0 17; I 13; II 5) and 13 open (I 5; II 5; IIIA 3) fractures in this group. The time of operation was on average 15 min shorter in the unreamed nail group. X-ray healing was the same in both groups (18.12 versus 17.92 weeks). We had four patients in the unreamed nail group and six patients in the reamed nail group with delayed healing (28–44 weeks). We recorded no infection, loss of reduction or re-operation in both groups. Follow-up of functional results was 90 %.

Conclusions

There was no statistically significant difference in clinical and functional results between the groups. We suggest that both methods are comparable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Court-Brown CM. The management of femoral and tibial diaphyseal fractures. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1998;43:374–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hohaus T, Bula P, Bonnaire F. Intramedullary osteosynthesis in the treatment of lower extremity fractures. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2008;75:52–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Howard M, Court-Brown CM. Epidemiology and management of open fractures of the lower limb. Br J Hosp Med. 1997;57:582–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Perren SM. Fracture healing. The evolution of our understanding. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2008;75:241–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bhandari M, Adili A, Leone J, Lachowski RJ, Kwok DC. Early versus delayed operative management of closed tibial fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;368:230–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bhandari M, Guyatt GH, Swiontkowski MF, Schemitsch EH. Treatment of open fractures of the shaft of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:62–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Court-Brown CM. Reamed tibial nailing in Edinburgh (1985–1995). Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 1999;58:24–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Court-Brown CM. Reamed intramedullary tibial nailing: an overview and analysis of 1,106 cases. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18:96–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dědek T. Treatment of diaphyseal tibial fractures with injuries of soft tissues. Dissertation thesis. Charles University Prague, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, 1999.

  10. Merchant TC, Dietz FR. Long-term follow-up after fractures of the tibial and fibular shafts. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71:599–606.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Trlica J, Dědek T, Počepcov I, Folvarský J, Zahradníček J, Žvák I, Holeček T, Kočí J, Šmejkal K. Reamed and unreamed mailing of diaphyseal tibial fractures—our own group of patients and state of the art. Úrazová chirurgie. 2008;16:54–9.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Trlica J, Dědek T, Šmejkal K, Kočí J, Lochman P, Frank M. Expert tibial nail (ETN) for treatment of diaphyseal tibial fractures in current and extended indications: technique and clinical results. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2010;77:235–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Anglen JO, Blue JM. A comparison of reamed and unreamed nailing of the tibia. J Trauma. 1995;39:351–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bhandari M, Guyatt GH, Tong D, Adili A, Shaughnessy SG. Reamed versus nonreamed intramedullary nailing of lower extremity long bone fractures: a systematic overview and meta-analysis. J Orthop Trauma. 2000;14:2–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Keating JF, Blachut PA, O’Brien PJ, Court-Brown CM. Reamed nailing of Gustilo grade-IIIB tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82:1113–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Keating JF, O’Brien PJ, Blachut PA, Meek RN, Broekhuyse HM. Locking intramedullary nailing with and without reaming for open fractures of the tibial shaft. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:334–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Klein MP, Rahn BA, Frigg R, Kessler S, Perren SM. Reaming versus non-reaming in medullary nailing: interference with cortical circulation of the canine tibia. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1990;109:314–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Greenspan L, McLellan BA, Greig H. Abbreviated injury scale and injury severity score: a scoring chart. J Trauma. 1985;25:60–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tytherleigh-Strong GM, Keating JF, Court-Brown CM. Extra-articular fractures of the proximal tibial diaphysis: their epidemiology, management and outcome. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1997;42:334–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vaisto O, Toivanen J, Kannus P, Jarvinen M. Anterior knee pain after intramedullary nailing of fractures of the tibial shaft: an 8-year follow-up of a prospective, randomized study comparing two different nail-insertion techniques. J Trauma. 2008;64:1511–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Finkemeier CG, Schmidt AH, Kyle RF, Templeman DC, Varecka TF. A prospective, randomized study of intramedullary nails inserted with and without reaming for the treatment of open and closed fractures of the tibial shaft. J Orthop Trauma. 2000;14:187–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Court-Brown CM, Will E, Christie J, McQueen MM. Reamed or unreamed nailing for closed tibial fractures. A prospective study in Tscherne C1 fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78:580–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bhandari M, Guyatt G, Tornetta P, Schemitsch EH, Swiontkowski M, Sanders D, Walter SD. Randomized trial of reamed and unreamed intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:2567–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was supported by MH CZ-DRO (UHHK, 00179906) and by the Project (Ministry of Defence, Czech Republic) “A long-term organization development plan 1011”.

Conflict of interest

J. Trlica, J. Kočí, P. Lochman, K. Šmejkal, M. Frank, T. Holeček, L. Hasenöhrlová, J. Zahradníček, J. Folvarský, I. Žvák and T. Dědek declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standard statement

The study has been approved by local ethics committee and has, therefore, been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Lochman.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 180 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Trlica, J., Kočí, J., Lochman, P. et al. Reamed versus unreamed nail in the treatment of tibia shaft fractures. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 40, 489–493 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-013-0340-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-013-0340-0

Keywords

Navigation