Abstract
Background
Controversy still exists about the relative merits of the fixation devices for distal tibia fractures, and decision making remains difficult.
Objectives
This study aims to answer the question and find out when each implant is preferred.
Patients and methods
Of the patients treated at our hospitals for distal tibia fractures, 30 patients treated by minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) (group A) were matched to 30 patients treated by static reamed intramedullary nail (SR-IMN) (group B), with regard to age decade, gender, fracture type (open or closed), the AO/OTA classification of the fracture, and occupation category.
Results
No significant difference was found between the two groups regarding bone union and complications including angulation of >5°, shortening of >1 cm, implant failure, fixation loss, or deep infection. Group A had a shorter mean operative time and mean radiation exposure time. Group B had a shorter mean time from trauma to surgery and faster full weight-bearing, radiographic union, and return to work. Only three patients lost their previous job, two in group A and one in group B.
Conclusions
Both implants are useful and effective. The clear answer is that no best implant and preoperative planning is the cornerstone to determine the patient, fracture, and surgeon factors that give priority for one implant over the other.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Zelle BA, Bhandari M, Espiritu M, Koval KJ, Zlowodzki M (2006) Treatment of distal tibia fractures without articular involvement: a systematic review of 1125 fractures. J Orthop Trauma 20:76–79
Ronga M, Longo UG, Maffulli N (2010) Minimally invasive locked plating of distal tibia fractures is safe and effective. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(4):975–982
Maffulli N, Toms AD, McMurtie A, Oliva F (2004) Percutaneous plating of distal tibial fractures. Int Orthop 28:159–162
Oh CW, Kyung HS, Park IH, Kim PT, Ihn JC (2003) Distal tibial metaphyseal fractures treated by percutaneous plate osteosynthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 408:286–291
Moshieff R, Safran O, Segal D, Liebergall M (1999) The unreamed tibial nail in the treatment of distal metaphyseal fractures. Injury 30(2):83–90
Robinson CM, McLauchlan GJ, McLean IP, Court-Brown CM (1995) Distal metaphyseal fractures of the tibia with minimal involvement of the ankle. Classification and treatment by locked intramedullary nailing. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 77:781–787
Tyllianakis M, Megas P, Giannikas D, Lambiris E (2000) Interlocking intramedullary nailing in distal tibial fractures. Orthopedics 23:805–808
Orthopaedic Trauma Association Committee for Coding and Classification (1996) Fracture and dislocation compendium. J Orthop Trauma 10(suppl 1):v-ix, 1–154
Gustilo RB, Anderson JT (1976) Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones: retrospective and prospective analyses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58:453–458
Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Myerson MS, Sanders M (1994) Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int 15:349–353
Guo JJ, Tang N, Yang HL, Tang TS (2010) A prospective, randomized trial comparing closed intramedullary nailing with percutaneous plating in the treatment of distal metaphyseal fractures of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 92(7):984–988
Janssen KW, Biert J, VanKampen A (2007) Treatment of distal tibial fractures: plate versus nail: a retrospective outcome analysis of matched pairs of patients. Int Orthop 31(5):709–714
Im GI, Tae SK (2005) Distal metaphyseal fractures of tibia: a prospective randomized trial of closed reduction and intramedullary nail versus open reduction and plate and screws fixation. J Trauma 59:1219–1223
Milner SA (1997) A more accurate method of measurement of angulation after fractures of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 79:972–974
Yang SW, Tzeng HM, Chou YJ, Teng HP, Liu HH, Wong CY (2006) Treatment of distal tibial metaphyseal fractures: plating versus shortened intramedullary nailing. Injury 37:531–535
Vallier HA, Le TT, Bedi A (2008) Radiographic and clinical comparisons of distal tibia shaft fractures (4 to 11 cm proximal to the plafond): plating versus intramedullary nailing. J Orthop Trauma 22:307–311
Vallier HA, Cureton BA, Paterson BM (2011) Randomized, prospective comparison of plate versus intramedullary nail fixation for distal tibia shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma 25(12):736–741
Richmond J, Colleran K, Borens O, Kloen P, Helfet DL (2004) Nonunions of the distal tibia treated by reamed intramedullary nailing. J Orthop Trauma 18:603–610
Bahari S, Lenehan B, Khan H, McElwain JP (2007) Minimally invasive percutaneous plate fixation of distal tibia fractures. Acta Orthop Belg 73:635–640
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that he had no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ali, M., Othman, A.M.A., Yahya, M. et al. Plate or nail for distal tibia fractures: Is there a clear answer?. Eur Orthop Traumatol 6, 91–97 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12570-015-0289-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12570-015-0289-z