Skip to main content
Log in

Predictors of toxicity after curative reirradiation with intensity modulated radiotherapy or proton therapy for recurrent head and neck carcinoma: new dose constraints for pharyngeal constrictors muscles and oral cavity

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Our study aims to identify predictive factors of moderate to severe (grade ≥ 2) late toxicity after reirradiation (reRT) of recurrent head and neck carcinoma (HNC) and explore the correlations between dose organs at risk (OAR) and grade ≥ 2 toxicity.

Material and methods

Between 09/2007 and 09/2019, 55 patients were re-irradiated with IMRT or proton therapy with curative intent for advanced HNC. Our study included all patients for whom data from the first and second irradiations were available. Co-variables, including interval to reRT, size of re-irradiated PTV, and dose to OAR, were analyzed as potential predictors for developing moderate to severe long-term toxicity with death as a competing risk. Receiver-operator characteristics (ROC) analysis assessed the association between dose/volume parameters and the risk of toxicity.

Results

Twenty-three patients participated in our study. After a median follow-up of 41 months, 65% of the patients experienced grade ≥ 2 late toxicity. The average dose to pharyngeal constrictor muscles (PCM) at the time of reRT showed an association with the risk of grade ≥ 2 dysphagia: AUC = 0.78 (95% CI: 0.53–1), optimal cut-off value = 36.7 Gy (sensitivity 62%/specificity 100%). The average dose to the oral cavity at the time of reRT showed an association with the risk of grade ≥ 2 dysgeusia: AUC = 0.96 (0.89–1), optimal cut-off value = 20.5 Gy (sensitivity 100%/specificity 88%).

Conclusion

Our analysis depicted an association between the dose to OAR and the risk of developing moderate to severe dysphagia and dysgeusia and proposed new dose constraints for PCM (36.7 Gy) and oral cavity (20.5 Gy).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cooper JS, Zhang Q, Pajak TF et al (2012) Long-term follow-up of the RTOG 9501/intergroup phase III trial: postoperative concurrent radiation therapy and chemotherapy in high-risk squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 84:1198–1205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.05.008

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Setton J, Caria N, Romanyshyn J et al (2012) Intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of oropharyngeal cancer: an update of the memorial Sloan-Kettering cancer center experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 82:291–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nichols AC, Kneuertz PJ, Deschler DG et al (2011) Surgical salvage of the oropharynx after failure of organ-sparing therapy. Head Neck 33:516–524. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.21480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bachar GY, Goh C, Goldstein DP et al (2009) Long-term outcome analysis after surgical salvage for recurrent tonsil carcinoma following radical radiotherapy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 267:295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-009-1070-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Taussky D, Dulguerov P, Allal AS (2005) Salvage surgery after radical accelerated radiotherapy with concomitant boost technique for head and neck carcinomas. Head Neck 27:182–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.20139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Duprez F, Madani I, Bonte K et al (2009) Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for recurrent and second primary head and neck cancer in previously irradiated territory. Radiother Oncol 93:563–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2009.10.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Riaz N, Hong JC, Sherman EJ et al (2014) A nomogram to predict loco-regional control after re-irradiation for head and neck cancer. Radiother Oncol 111:382–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2014.06.003

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. McDonald MW, Moore MG, Johnstone PAS (2012) Risk of carotid blowout after reirradiation of the head and neck: a systematic review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 82:1083–1089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.08.029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu S, Lu T, Zhao C et al (2014) Temporal lobe injury after re-irradiation of locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma using intensity modulated radiotherapy: clinical characteristics and prognostic factors. J Neurooncol 119:421–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-014-1513-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Seidensaal K, Harrabi SB, Uhl M, Debus J (2020) Re-irradiation with protons or heavy ions with focus on head and neck, skull base and brain malignancies. BJR 93:20190516. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20190516

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Romesser PB, Cahlon O, Scher E et al (2016) Proton beam radiation therapy results in significantly reduced toxicity compared with intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head and neck tumors that require ipsilateral radiation. Radiother Oncol 118:286–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2015.12.008

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Ward MC, Koyfman SA, Bakst RL et al (2022) Retreatment of recurrent or second primary head and neck cancer after prior radiation: executive summary of the American radium society® (ARS) appropriate use criteria (AUC): expert panel on radiation oncology—head and neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.03.034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Beddok A, Calugaru V, de Marzi L et al. (2022) Clinical and technical challenges of cancer reirradiation: Words of wisdom. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology 174:103655

  14. Dionisi F, Fiorica F, D’Angelo E et al (2019) Organs at risk’s tolerance and dose limits for head and neck cancer re-irradiation: a literature review. Oral Oncol 98:35–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.08.017

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ward MC, Riaz N, Caudell JJ et al (2018) Refining patient selection for reirradiation of head and neck squamous carcinoma in the IMRT era: a multi-institution cohort study by the MIRI collaborative. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 100:586–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.06.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Beddok A, Saint-Martin C, Krhili S (2022) et al. Curative high-dose reirradiation for patients with recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma using IMRT or proton therapy: Outcomes and analysis of patterns of failure. Head Neck

  17. Sulman EP, Schwartz DL, Le TT et al (2009) IMRT reirradiation of head and neck cancer—disease control and morbidity outcomes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 73:399–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.04.021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Brouwer CL, Steenbakkers RJHM, Bourhis J et al (2015) CT-based delineation of organs at risk in the head and neck region: DAHANCA, EORTC, GORTEC, HKNPCSG, NCIC CTG, NCRI, NRG oncology and TROG consensus guidelines. Radiother Oncol 117:83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2015.07.041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Noël G, Antoni D (2022) Organs at risk radiation dose constraints. Cancer/Radiothérapie 26:59–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canrad.2021.11.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Schemper M, Smith TL (1996) A note on quantifying follow-up in studies of failure time. Control Clin Trials 17:343–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(96)00075-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. R Core Team (2020) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria

    Google Scholar 

  22. Robin X, Turck N, Hainard A et al (2011) pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinformatics 12:77. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-77

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Ward MC, Lee NY, Caudell JJ et al (2019) A competing risk nomogram to predict severe late toxicity after modern re-irradiation for squamous carcinoma of the head and neck. Oral Oncol 90:80–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.01.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Margalit DN, Schoenfeld JD, Rawal B et al (2017) Patient-oriented toxicity endpoints after head and neck reirradiation with intensity modulated radiation therapy. Oral Oncol 73:160–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.08.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Chan OSH, Sze HCK, Lee MCH et al (2017) Reirradiation with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for locally recurrent T3 to T4 nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Head Neck 39:533–540. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.24645

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee JY, Suresh K, Nguyen R et al (2016) Predictors of severe long-term toxicity after re-irradiation for head and neck cancer. Oral Oncol 60:32–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2016.06.017

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nieder C, Grosu AL, Andratschke NH, Molls M (2006) Update of human spinal cord reirradiation tolerance based on additional data from 38 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 66:1446–1449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.07.1383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Phan J, Sio TT, Nguyen TP et al (2016) Reirradiation of head and neck cancers with proton therapy: outcomes and analyses. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 96:30–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.03.053

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bots WTC, van den Bosch S, Zwijnenburg EM et al (2017) Reirradiation of head and neck cancer: long-term disease control and toxicity. Head Neck 39:1122–1130. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.24733

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Embring A, Onjukka E, Mercke C et al (2021) Re-irradiation for head and neck cancer: cumulative dose to organs at risk and late side effects. Cancers (Basel) 13:3173. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13133173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Garg S, Kilburn JM, Lucas JT et al (2016) Reirradiation for second primary or recurrent cancers of the head and neck: dosimetric and outcome analysis: head and neck reirradiation dosimetry. Head Neck 38:E961–E969. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.24136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. De Felice F, de Vincentiis M, Luzzi V et al (2018) Late radiation-associated dysphagia in head and neck cancer patients: evidence, research and management. Oral Oncol 77:125–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.12.021

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Nutting CM, Morden JP, Harrington KJ et al (2011) Parotid-sparing intensity modulated versus conventional radiotherapy in head and neck cancer (PARSPORT): a phase 3 multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 12:127–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70290-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arnaud Beddok MD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

A. Beddok, X. Maynadier, S. Krhili, C.A. Eddine, L. Champion, A. Chilles, F. Goudjil, S. Zefkili, M. Amessis, O. Choussy, C.L. Tourneau, I. Buvat, G. Créhange, M. Carton and V. Calugaru declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Author responsible for statistical analysis: Matthieu Carton.

Data availability statement

All data generated and analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its supplementary information files).

Supplementary Information

66_2023_2080_MOESM1_ESM.docx

Sup. Data 1: Patient and Treatment Characteristics. Sup. Data 2: Impairments before the onset of the reirradiation in relation to the final late toxicity. Sup. Data 3: Time between the two courses of irradiations and risk of toxicity. Sup. Data 4: Volume of PTV (cc) and risk of late toxicity. Sup data 5: Comparison of late toxicity between IMRT and PT groups based on Kaplan Meier curves

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beddok, A., Maynadier, X., Krhili, S. et al. Predictors of toxicity after curative reirradiation with intensity modulated radiotherapy or proton therapy for recurrent head and neck carcinoma: new dose constraints for pharyngeal constrictors muscles and oral cavity. Strahlenther Onkol 199, 901–909 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-023-02080-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-023-02080-y

Keywords

Navigation