Skip to main content
Log in

Definitive radiotherapy vs. postoperative radiotherapy for lower gingival carcinomas of the mandible

A single-center report about outcome and toxicity

Definitive Radiotherapie vs. postoperative Radiotherapie von Gingivakarzinomen im Bereich des Unterkieferknochens

Einzelzentrumanalyse des Gesamtüberlebens und der posttherapeutischen Toxizität

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To assess radiotherapy (RT) outcomes in patients with gingival carcinoma and growth up to or involvement of the lower jaw bone.

Methods

This was a retrospective analysis of 51 patients with squamous cell carcinomas of the gingiva. Patients received definitive (group 1, 31.4%) or postoperative (group 2, 66.7%) RT between 2005 and 2017 at the Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) in both treatment groups. Other endpoints were local-disease-free survival (LDFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and treatment-related toxicity (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, CTCAE, Version 4.03).

Results

Median age at first diagnosis was 63 years. All patients had a local advanced disease (American Joint Commission on Cancer [AJCC] stage III–IV). After a median follow-up of 22 months (range 3–145 months), 20 patients (39.2%) were still alive. At 5 years, OS rate was 36.6%. No significant differences in OS (p = 0.773), PFS (p = 0.350) and LDFS (p = 0.399) were observed between the two groups. Most common higher-grade acute RT-related complications (≥ grade 3) were dermatitis (78.2%), oral mucositis (61.7%), xerostomia (51.5%), and loss of taste (74.6%). Three cases (5.8%) of osteoradionecrosis (ORN) of the lower jaw were detected after 15–31 months.

Conclusions

Definitive and postoperative RT have similar treatment outcomes for patients with lower gingiva carcinomas of the lower jaw. The most common acute complications (grade ≥3) were dermatitis, oral mucositis, xerostomia and loss of taste.

Zusammenfassung

Zielsetzung

Ziel war die Analyse von Effektivität, Nebenwirkungen sowie Rezidivwahrscheinlichkeit nach Radiotherapie (RT) von Patienten mit Gingivakarzinomen mit Wachstum in Richtung des Unterkieferknochens oder Infiltration desselben.

Methoden

Es erfolgte eine retrospektive Auswertung von 51 Patienten mit Plattenepithelkarzinomen des Zahnfleisches. Patienten erhielten entweder eine definitive (Gruppe 1; 31,4%) oder postoperative (Gruppe 2; 66,7%) RT im Zeitraum von 2005 bis 2017 in der Abteilung für Strahlentherapie des Universitätsklinikums Heidelberg. Der primäre Endpunkt war die Analyse des Gesamtüberlebens (OS) in beiden Behandlungsgruppen. Weitere Endpunkte waren das lokalrezidivfreie Überleben (LDFS), das progressionsfreie Überleben (PFS) sowie die Erfassung von behandlungsassoziierten Nebenwirkungen (gemäß Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, CTCAE, Version 4.03).

Ergebnisse

Das mediane Patientenalter bei Erstdiagnose war 63 Jahre. Alle Patienten wiesen ein lokal fortgeschrittenes Karzinom auf (Stadium III–IV nach AJCC, American Joint Commission on Cancer). Nach einem medianen Follow-up von 22 Monaten (min. 3 Monate, max. 145 Monate) lebten noch 20 Patienten (39,2%). Das 5‑Jahres-Überleben betrug 36,6%. Es zeigte sich im gesamten Kollektiv kein signifikanter Überlebensvorteil bezüglich OS (p = 0,773), PFS (p = 0,350) und LDFS (p = 0,399). Die meisten akuten Toxizitäten (Grad 3–4) zeigten sich als Radiodermatitis (78,2%), Mukositis (61,7%), Mundtrockenheit (51,5%) und Geschmacksverlust (74,6%). Bei 3 Patienten (5,8%) entwickelte sich eine Osteoradionekrose des Unterkiefers in einem Zeitraum von 15–31 Monaten nach RT.

Schlussfolgerung

Sowohl die definitive als auch adjuvante RT von Gingivakarzinomen des Unterkiefers zeigen vergleichbare Ergebnisse bezüglich Gesamtüberleben, lokaler Kontrolle und Toxizität. Die häufigsten akuten Nebenwirkungen (≥ Grad 3) umfassten Radiodermatitis, Mukositis, Mundtrockenheit und Geschmacksverlust.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dhanuthai K et al (2018) Oral cancer: A multicenter study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 23(1):e23–e29

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Furness S et al (2011) Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: Chemotherapy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD6386

    Google Scholar 

  3. Parkin DM (2001) Global cancer statistics in the year 2000. Lancet Oncol 2(9):533–543

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chinn SB, Myers JN (2015) Oral cavity carcinoma: Current management, controversies, and future directions. J Clin Oncol 33(29):3269–3276

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mehanna H et al (2011) Head and neck cancer. Part 1: Epidemiology, presentation, and preservation. Clin Otolaryngol 36(1):65–68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Freedman ND et al (2007) Prospective investigation of the cigarette smoking-head and neck cancer association by sex. Cancer 110(7):1593–1601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Parkin DM et al (2005) Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 55(2):74–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Warnakulasuriya S (2009) Global epidemiology of oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Oral Oncol 45(4/5):309–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ferlay J et al (2015) Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 136(5):E359–E386

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Soo KC et al (2005) Surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy vs concurrent chemoradiotherapy in stage III/IV nonmetastatic squamous cell head and neck cancer: A randomised comparison. Br J Cancer 93(3):279–286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gore SM et al (2015) Concurrent chemoradiotherapy compared with surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 37(4):518–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Noguti J et al (2012) Metastasis from oral cancer: An overview. Cancer Genomics Proteomics 9(5):329–335

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pentenero M, Gandolfo S, Carrozzo M (2005) Importance of tumor thickness and depth of invasion in nodal involvement and prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma: A review of the literature. Head Neck 27(12):1080–1091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program, National Cancer Institute Surveillance Research Program, based on November 2006 submission of SEER series 9 (1996–2003)

  15. Myers JN et al (2001) Extracapsular spread. A significant predictor of treatment failure in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue. Cancer 92(12):3030–3036

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ferlito A et al (2013) The changing role of surgery in the current era of head and neck oncology. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270(7):1971–1973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shaha AR (2008) Training in head and neck surgery and oncology. J Surg Oncol 97(8):717–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. NCCN practice guidelines in oncology: head and neck cancers. National Comprehensive Cancer Network 2016

  19. Lundahl RE et al (1998) Combined neck dissection and postoperative radiation therapy in the management of the high-risk neck: A matched-pair analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 40(3):529–534

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Suh Y et al (2014) Clinical update on cancer: Molecular oncology of head and neck cancer. Cell Death Dis 5(1):e1018

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bernier J, Cooper JS (2005) Chemoradiation after surgery for high-risk head and neck cancer patients: How strong is the evidence? Oncologist 10(3):215–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Buglione M et al (2016) Oral toxicity management in head and neck cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and radiation: Xerostomia and trismus (Part 2). Literature review and consensus statement. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 102:47–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wygoda A et al (2012) Acute mucosal radiation reactions in patients with head and neck cancer. Patterns of mucosal healing on the basis of daily examinations. Strahlenther Onkol 188(8):686–691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-012-0146-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pederson AW et al (2011) Concurrent chemotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for organ preservation of locoregionally advanced oral cavity cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 34(4):356–361

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Loree TR, Strong EW (1990) Significance of positive margins in oral cavity squamous carcinoma. Am J Surg 160(4):410–414

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bedwinek JM et al (1976) Osteonecrosis in patients treated with definitive radiotherapy for squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity and naso-and oropharynx. Radiology 119(3):665–667

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Buglione M et al (2016) Oral toxicity management in head and neck cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and radiation: Dental pathologies and osteoradionecrosis (Part 1). Literature review and consensus statement. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 97:131–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shah JP, Gil Z (2009) Current concepts in management of oral cancer—surgery. Oral Oncol 45(4/5):394–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Huang SH, O’Sullivan B (2013) Oral cancer: Current role of radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 18(2):e233–e240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kessel KA et al (2014) Five-year experience with setup and implementation of an integrated database system for clinical documentation and research. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 114(2):206–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lydiatt WM et al (2017) Head and neck cancers-major changes in the American Joint Committee on cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. CA Cancer J Clin 67(2):122–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Gregoire V et al (2018) Delineation of the primary tumour clinical target volumes (CTV-P) in laryngeal, hypopharyngeal, oropharyngeal and oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: AIRO, CACA, DAHANCA, EORTC, GEORCC, GORTEC, HKNPCSG, HNCIG, IAG-KHT, LPRHHT, NCIC CTG, NCRI, NRG Oncology, PHNS, SBRT, SOMERA, SRO, SSHNO, TROG consensus guidelines. Radiother Oncol 126(1):3–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Grégoire V, Daisne JF, Geets X, Levendag P (2003) Selection and delineation of target volumes in head and neck tumours: Beyond ICRU definition. Rays 28(3):217–224

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Grégoire V, Ang K, Budach W, Grau C, Hamoir M, Langendijk JA et al (2014) Delineation of the neck node levels for head and neck tumours: A 2013 update. DAHANCA, EORTC, HKNPCSG, NCIC CTG, NCRI, RTOG, TROG consensus guidelines. Radiother Oncol 110:172–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Eisbruch A, Foote RL, O’Sullivan B, Beitler JJ, Vikram B (2002) Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head and neck cancer: Emphasis on the selection and delineation of the targets. Semin Radiat Oncol 12(3):238–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lapeyre M, Toledano I, Bourry N, Bailly C, Cachin F (2011) Target volume delineation for head and neck cancer intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Cancer Radiother 15:466–472

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Bernier J et al (2005) Defining risk levels in locally advanced head and neck cancers: A comparative analysis of concurrent postoperative radiation plus chemotherapy trials of the EORTC (#22931) and RTOG (#9501). Head Neck 27(10):843–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Cohen EE et al (2009) Efficacy and safety of treating T4 oral cavity tumors with primary chemoradiotherapy. Head Neck 31(8):1013–1021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ang KK et al (2001) Randomized trial addressing risk features and time factors of surgery plus radiotherapy in advanced head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 51(3):571–578

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Zelefsky MJ et al (1990) Postoperative radiotherapy for oral cavity cancers: Impact of anatomic subsite on treatment outcome. Head Neck 12(6):470–475

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Stenson KM et al (2010) Chemoradiation for patients with advanced oral cavity cancer. Laryngoscope 120(1):93–99

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Liao CT, Chang JT, Wang HM et al (2006) Surgical outcome of T4a and resected T4b oral cavity cancer. Cancer 107:337–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Sha JP, Gil Z (2009) Current concepts in management of oral cancer—surgery. Oral Oncol 45(4/5):394–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Murthy V, Agarwal JP, Laskar SG, Gupta T, Budrukkar A, Pai P (2010) Analysis of prognostic factors in 1180 patients with oral cavity primary cancer treated with definitive or adjuvant radiotherapy. J Cancer Res Ther 6:282–289

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Kerr P et al (2015) Prospective functional outcomes in sequential population based cohorts of stage III/IV oropharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with 3D conformal vs. intensity modulated radiotherapy. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 44:17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Blanchard P et al (2011) Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): A comprehensive analysis by tumour site. Radiother Oncol 100(1):33–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Pignon JP et al (2009) Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): An update on 93 randomised trials and 17,346 patients. Radiother Oncol 92(1):4–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Daly ME et al (2011) Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: Patterns of failure and predictors of local control. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 80(5):1412–1422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Asikainen PJ et al (2018) A phd completed. The effect of radiotherapy on oral mucosa cell morphology. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd 125(3):169–171 (Article in Dutch)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Chronopoulos A et al (2018) Osteoradionecrosis of the jaws: Definition, epidemiology, staging and clinical and radiological findings. A concise review. Int Dent J 68(1):22–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Caparrotti F et al (2017) Osteoradionecrosis of the mandible in patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Cancer 123(19):3691–3700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Studer G, Bredell M, Studer S et al (2016) Risk profile for osteoradionecrosis of the mandible in the IMRT era. Strahlenther Onkol 192:32–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-015-0875-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Studer G, Gratz KW, Glanzmann C (2004) Osteoradionecrosis of the mandibula in patients treated with different fractionations. Strahlenther Onkol 180:233–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-004-1171-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Gomez DR et al (2011) Correlation of osteoradionecrosis and dental events with dosimetric parameters in intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 81(4):e207–e213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Thariat J et al (2012) Response to “The correlation of osteoradionecrosis and dental events with dosimetric parameters in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for head-and-neck cancer.” (Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011;81:e207–e213.). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 82(2):520 (author reply on p. 520)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Tsai CJ et al (2013) Osteoradionecrosis and radiation dose to the mandible in patients with oropharyngeal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 85(2):415–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Reuther T et al (2003) Osteoradionecrosis of the jaws as a side effect of radiotherapy of head and neck tumour patients—A report of a thirty year retrospective review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 32(3):289–295

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Abstrakta DEGRO 2018. Strahlenther Onkol. 2018;194(Suppl 1):1–222. No authors listed.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank our Head and Neck Cancer Research Group members for their great effort. Additionally, we thank the NCT Cancer Registry for providing basic patient and treatment data and the HIRO Research Database team for data management support. The data were presented in part at the 24th Annual Meeting of the German Society of Radiation Oncology; June 21-24, 2018, Leipzig, Germany. The poster’s abstract has been published [58].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KL and SA developed and planned the retrospective analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastian Adeberg MD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

K. Lang, S. Akbaba, T. Held, S. Kargus, D. Horn, N. Bougatf, D. Bernhardt, K. Freier, S. Rieken, J. Debus and S. Adeberg declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical standards

The Heidelberg Ethics Committee approved this study. Because of the retrospective design, informed consent was not required.

Additional information

Availability of data and materials

The data used in this analysis are from publications available in the public domain.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lang, K., Akbaba, S., Held, T. et al. Definitive radiotherapy vs. postoperative radiotherapy for lower gingival carcinomas of the mandible. Strahlenther Onkol 195, 819–829 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-019-01484-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-019-01484-z

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation