Abstract
Background and purpose
Linac-based patient imaging is possible with a variety of techniques using different photon energies. The purpose of this work is to compare three imaging systems operating at 6 MV, flattening free filter (FFF) 1 MV, and 121 kV.
Patients and methods
The dose distributions of all pretreatment set-up images (over 1,000) were retrospectively calculated on the planning computed tomography (CT) images for all patients with prostate and head-and-neck cancer treated at our institution in 2013. We analyzed the dose distribution and the dose to organs at risk.
Results
For head-and-neck cancer patients, the imaging dose from 6-MV cone beam CT (CBCT) reached maximum values at around 8 cGy. The 1-MV CBCT dose was about 63–79 % of the 6-MV CBCT dose for all organs at risk. Planar imaging reduced the imaging dose from CBCT to 30–40 % for both megavoltage modalities. The dose from the kilovoltage CBCT was 4–10 % of the 6-MV CBCT dose. For prostate cancer patients, the maximum dose from 6-MV CBCT reached 13–15 cGy, and was reduced to 66–73 % for 1 MV. Planar imaging reduces the MV CBCT dose to 10–20 %. The kV CBCT dose is 15–20 % of the 6-MV CBCT dose, slightly higher than the dose from MV axes. The dose distributions differ markedly in response to the different beam profiles and dose–depth characteristics.
Zusammenfassung
Hintergrund und Ziel
Linac-basierte Bildgebung zur Patientenlagerung ist mit einer Vielzahl von Techniken unterschiedlicher Photonenenergien möglich. Ziel dieser Arbeit ist der Vergleich dreier Bildgebungssysteme mit 6 MV (Megavolt), FFF 1 MV, und 121 kV (Kilovolt).
Patienten und Methoden
Für alle im Jahr 2013 an unserer Klinik behandelten Prostata- und HNO-Patienten wurden retrospektiv die Dosisverteilungen aller Verifikationsaufnahmen (über 1000 insgesamt) auf der Planungs-Computertomographie (CT) berechnet. Wir analysierten die Dosisverteilung und die Dosis an den Risikoorganen.
Ergebnisse
Bei HNO-Patienten erreichte die Dosis von 6 MV „Cone-beam“-CT (CBCT)Maximalwerte um 8 cGy. Mit 1 MV wird die Dosis auf 63–79 % des 6 MV-Werts reduziert. Planare Bildgebung reduzierte die Bildgebungsdosis von CBCT für beide MV-Bildgebungen auf 30–40 %. Die Dosis von kV-CBCT betrug etwa 4–10 % der Dosis von 6 MV CBCT. Für Prostatapatienten erreichte die Bildgebungsdosis von 6 MV CBCT-Werte von 13–15 cGy, was durch Anwendung der 1-MV-Energie auf 66–73 % reduziert wurde. Planare Bildgebung reduzierte diesen Wert auf 10–20 %. Die Dosis von kV-CBCT lag bei 15–20 % der 6-MV-CBCT-Dosis, etwas höher als die Dosis von MV-Achsen. Die Dosisverteilungen unterschieden sich aufgrund der verschiedenen Strahlprofile und Tiefendosiskurven.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akino Y, Koizumi M, Sumida I, Takahashi Y, Ogata T, Ota S, Isohashi F, Konishi K, Yoshioka Y (2012) Megavoltage cone beam computed tomography dose and the necessity of reoptimization for imaging dose-integrated intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 82:1715–1722
Alaei P, Spezi E (2012) Commissioning kilovoltage cone-beam CT beams in a radiation therapy treatment planning system. J App Clin Med Phys 13:19–33
Alaei P, Ding G, Guan H (2012) Inclusion of the dose from kilovoltage cone beam CT in the radiation therapy treatment plans. Med Phys 37:244–248
Amer A, Marchant T, Sykes J, Czajka J, Moore C (2007) Imaging doses from the Elekta Synergy X-ray cone beam CT system. Brit J Radiol 80:476–482
Beltran Ch, Lukose R, Gangadharan B, Bani-Hashemi A, Faddegon BA (2009) Image quality & dosimetric property of an investigational imaging beam line MV-CBCT. J App Clin Med Phys 10:3023
Breitbach EK, Maltz JS, Gangadharan B, Ban-Hashemi A, Anderson CM, Bhatia SK, Stiles J, Edwards DS, Flynn RT (2011) Image quality improvement in megavoltage cone beam CT using an imaging beam line and sintered pixelated array systems. Med Phys 38:5969–5979
Chan MF, Yang J, Song Y, Burman C, Chan P, Li S (2011) Evaluation of imaging performance of major image guidance systems. Biomed Imaging Interv J 7:e11
Ding GX, Coffey ChW (2009) Radiation dose from kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography in an image-guided radiotherapy procedure. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 73:610–617
Ding GX, Munro P, Pawlowski J, Malcolm A, Coffey ChW (2010) Reducing radiation exposure to patients from kV-CBCT imaging. Radiother Oncol 97:585–592
Dzierma Y, Nuesken FG, Licht NP, Rübe CH (2013) Dosimetric properties and commissioning of cone-beam CT image beam line with a carbon target. Strahlenther Onkol 189:566–572
Dzierma Y, Nuesken F, Otto W, Alaei P, Licht N, Rübe CH (2014) Dosimetry of an in-line kilovoltage imaging system and implementation in treatment planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 88:913–919
Faddegon BA, Wu V, Pouliot J, Gangadharan B, Bani-Hashemi A (2008) Low dose megavoltage cone beam computed tomography with an unflattened 4 MV beam from a carbon target. Med Phys 35:5777–5786
Faddegon BA, Alubin M, Bani-Hashemi A, Gangadharan B, Gottschalk AR, Morin O, Sawkey D, Wu V, Yom SS (2010) Comparison of patient megavoltage cone beam CT images acquired with an unflattened beam from a carbon target and a flattened treatment beam. Med Phys 37:1737–1741
Fast MF, Krauss A, Oelfke U, Nill S (2012a) Position detection accuracy of a novel linac-mounted intrafractional x-ray imaging system. Med Phys 39:109–118
Fast MF, Koenig T, Oelfke U, Nill S (2012b) Performance characteristics of a novel megavoltage cone-beam-computed tomography device. Phys Med Biol 57:N15–N24
Gayou O, Parda DS, Johnson M, Miften M (2007) Patient dose and image quality from mega-voltage cone beam computed tomography imaging. Med Phys 34:499–506
Islam MK, Purdie THG, Norrlinger BD, Alasti H, Moseley DJ, Sharpe MB, Siewerdsen JH, Jaffray DA (2006) Patient dose from kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography imaging in radiation therapy. Med Phys 33:1573–1582
Jaffray DA, Drake DG, Moreau M, Martinez AA, Wong JW (1999) A radiographic and tomographic imaging system integrated into a medical linear accelerator for localization of bone and soft-tissue targets. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 45:773–789
Jaffray DA, Siewerdsen JH, Wong JW, Martinez AA (2002) Flat-panel cone-beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 53:1337–1349
Miften M, Gayou O, Reitz B, Fuhrer R, Leicher B, Parda DS (2007) IMRT planning and delivery incorporating daily dose from mega-voltage cone-beam computed tomography imaging. Med Phys 34:3760–3767
Morin O, Gillis A, Chen J, Aubin M, Bucci MK, Roach III M, Pouliot J (2006) Megavoltage cone-beam CT: system description and clinical applications. Med Dosim 31:51–61
Morin O, Gillis A, Descovich M, Chen J, Aubin M, Aubry J-F, Chen H, Gottschalk AG, Xia P, Pouliot J (2007) Patient dose considerations for routine megavoltage cone-beam CT imaging. Med Phys 34:1819–1827
Ostapiak OZ, O’Brien PF, Faddegon BA (1998) Megavoltage imaging with low Z targets: implementation and characterization of an investigational system. Med Phys 25:1910–1918
Pouliot J, Bani-Hashemi A, Chen J et al (2005) Low-dose megavoltage cone-beam CT for radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 61:552–560
Robar JL, Connell T, Huang W, Kelly RG (2009) Megavoltage planar and cone-beam imaging with low-Z targets: dependence of image quality improvement on beam energy and patient separation. Med Phys 36:3955–3963
Schiller K, Petrucci A, Geinitz H, Schuster T, Specht H, Kampfer S, Duma MN (2014) Impact of different setup approaches in image-guided radiotherapy as primary treatment for prostate cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 190:722–726
Song WY, Kamath S, Ozawa S, Ani SA, Chvetsov A, Bhandare N, Palta JR, Liu C, Li JG (2008) A dose comparison study between XVI and OBI CBCT systems. Med Phys 35:480–486
Spezi E, Downes P, Jarvis R, Radu E, Staffurth J (2012) Patient-Specific three-dimensional concomitant dose from cone beam computed tomography exposure in image-guided radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 83:419–426
Stützel J, Oelfke U, Nill S (2008) A quantitative image quality comparison of four different image guided radiotherapy devices. Radiother Oncol 86:20–24
Van Herk M (2007) Different styles of image-guided radiotherapy. Semin Radiat Oncol 17:258–267
Zhang Y, Yan Y, Nath R, Bao SH, Deng J (2012) Personalized assessment of kV cone beam computed tomography doses in image-guided radiotherapy of pediatric cancer patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 83:1649–1654
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Y. Dzierma, E. Ames, F. Nuesken, J. Palm, N. Licht, and C. Rübe state that there are no conflicts of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dzierma, Y., Ames, E., Nuesken, F. et al. Image quality and dose distributions of three linac-based imaging modalities. Strahlenther Onkol 191, 365–374 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-014-0798-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-014-0798-7