Skip to main content
Download PDF

Modeling the Optimal Transportation for Acute Stroke Treatment

Impact of Diurnal Variations in Traffic Rate

Clinical Neuroradiology volume 31, pages 729–736 (2021)Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose

Prolonged transfer times between the primary stroke center (PSC) and the comprehensive stroke center (CSC) are one of the major causes of treatment delay for endovascular stroke treatment. We aimed to analyze the effect of the diurnal variations in traffic rates at weekdays and weekends on the catchment area size of three transportation paradigms, i.e. mothership, drip-and-ship (DS) and drip-and-drive (DD).

Methods

A conditional probability model that predicts the probability of good outcome for patients with suspected large vessel occlusion was used to analyze the prehospital stroke triage in northwest Germany and produce catchment area maps. Transportation times were calculated during each hour of a weekday and a Sunday using Google Maps. For comparison, real DD transportation times from our CSC in Hamburg-Eppendorf (blinded for review) to a PSC in Lüneburg were prospectively recorded.

Result

On weekdays, the mothership catchment area was the largest (≥40,000 km2, 63%) except for a decrease during morning rush hours, when the DD catchment area was highest (30,879 km2, 48%). The DS catchment area was higher than the DD catchment area during the afternoon rush hours both during the week as well as on Sundays.

Conclusion

Our study showed a considerable impact of the diurnal variations in traffic rate and direction of travel on optimal stroke transportation. Stroke systems of care should take real time traffic information into account.

Introduction

Treatment options for patients with acute ischemic stroke include intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and endovascular therapy (EVT). As the treatment effects of both IVT and EVT diminish over time[1, 2], stroke systems of care across the globe are currently faced with the challenge of determining the optimal transport destination for patients with suspected stroke.

Three triage strategies for patients with suspected large vessel occlusion (LVO) have been proposed: (1) the drip-and-ship (DS) paradigm, where patients are first transported to the nearest primary stroke center (PSC) to minimize time to IVT and then transferred to the nearest comprehensive stroke center (CSC) if they are a candidate for EVT, (2) the mothership paradigm, where patients are transported directly to a CSC, potentially bypassing a closer PSC and (3) the drip-and-drive (DD) paradigm, where the neurointerventionalist capable of performing EVT is transported to the stroke patient with proven LVO in the PSC. While there has been much prior discussion surrounding optimization of within hospital work flow,[3,4,5,6] one of the major causes of treatment delay is the prolonged transport times of stroke patients to and between hospitals [7,8,9,10,11].

Previously, conditional probability modeling was used to determine under what conditions the DD paradigm would predict the greatest probability of good outcomes for patients with suspected ischemic stroke due to LVO [12]. This model took into consideration the probability of an underlying LVO, the distance to the nearest PSC or CSC and the transfer time; however, the effect of changing traffic activity over the course of the day on the best transport option has yet to be modeled.

We aimed to model the effect of the diurnal variations in traffic patterns on weekdays and weekends on the catchment area size of the three transportation paradigms. Moreover, we present the number of emergency operations as well as transportation times across the day on weekdays and weekends for a DD cooperation between our CSC and a PSC with a transfer distance of 68 km.

Material and Methods

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Terminology

For the purposes of this study, a PSC is a hospital that provides IVT 24 h a day, 7 days per week and has in-house angiosuite staff and the necessary equipment to provide EVT but does not have a neurointerventionalist capable of EVT locally available. Radiologists and technicians at the PSC are trained in advanced procedures and materials used during emergency operations.

A CSC is a hospital that provides both IVT and EVT 24 h a day, 7 days per week. A CSC+ is a university hospital where >200 EVTs and >400 other neurointerventions are performed annually. It is adequately staffed to allow one of the neurointerventionalists capable of EVT to drive to the PSC to perform emergency operations in the DD paradigm. The car of the neurointerventionalist is equipped with flashing warning lights and sirens and can break traffic laws (such as going through red lights) as if it were an ambulance. The neurointerventionalists covering the on-call service for emergency operations performed at the PSC are familiar with the angiography suites of the PSC, as well as with the teams of the radiology, anesthesiology, and neurology departments.

Real Times

A formal collaboration with our university hospital CSC+ in Hamburg-Eppendorf (blinded for review) was established to provide emergency operations at a PSC in Lüneburg which is 68 km away. All consecutive patients admitted between April 2016 and January 2020 to the PSC in Lüneburg with acute ischemic stroke due to LVO who were treated with EVT were included in this analysis. The time from the initial alert of the CSC+ about the patient to the arrival of the neurointerventionalist at the angiosuite of the PSC in Lüneburg (transfer time) and the date were prospectively recorded.

Models

A previously published conditional probability model which predicts the probability of good outcome (modified Rankin scale score of 0–1 at 90 days post-stroke) for patients with suspected LVO was used [12, 13]. The model is based on the decrease in good outcome rates in EVT and IVT over time and also incorporates the geography, the probability of LVO, hospital efficiency and the time from onset to treatment to predict the probability of good outcome in the mothership, DS and DD paradigms. Details on model components have been previously published [12].

Territory

Prehospital stroke triage was analyzed in the federal states of Hamburg, Schleswig-Holstein, and Lower Saxony in northwest Germany. The area covers 64,065 km2 with 21 PSCs, 23 CSCs, and 5 CSC+. This area has a population of 12,703,561 people (2017), 21.5% of whom are older than 65 years of age. In this region, the average distance between PSC and CSC/CSC+ (for DS transport) is 44 km and the average distance between CSC+ and PSC (for DD transport) is 67 km.

Modeling Scenarios

The assumed baseline patient population had a score of ≥5 on the Rapid Arterial oCclusion Evaluation (RACE) scale and would thus screen positive for a probable LVO [14].

We assumed that 90% of LVO patients would be treated with EVT and that 80% of patients with LVO or non-LVO occlusions with onset-to-treatment times <4.5 h would receive IVT.

Based on proposed quality measures [3, 4, 15] and on our own experience the following time parameters were used: onset to first medical response time: 30 min, ambulance on scene time: 30 min, door to needle time at PSC: 30 min, needle to door time at PSC: 20 min and door to needle time at CSC and CSC+: 30 min. Door to groin puncture time at CSC/CSC+ was 60 min; however, if a transferred (drip and ship) patient arrived at the CSC/CSC+ within 90 min of first imaging at the PSC, it was assumed that the patient did not require reimaging and was transferred directly to the angiosuite, thus door to groin puncture time was only 30 min. Based on our own experience in the DD paradigm the time from IVT start (at the PSC) to the interventionalist leaving the CSC+ (needle to neurointerventionalist leave time) was 10 min and the time from neurointerventionalist arrival at the PSC to groin puncture was 20 min.

In previously published modelling work from this region [12] all modelling scenarios were based on the traffic conditions at 3 o’clock in the morning in order to simulate low traffic scenarios and ambulance right of way.

In this study, to simulate the traffic patterns across the day from the urban to the suburban area, we calculated the mean transportation time from our CSC+ in Hamburg-Eppendorf (blinded for review) to the PSC in Lüneburg (68 km distance) hourly over a 24 h period on a Tuesday and a Sunday to simulate traffic patterns on weekdays and weekends, respectively, using Google Maps (Google, Mountain View, CA, USA). The differences between these hourly drive times and those at 3 o’clock in the morning were calculated to determine the magnitude of the delay or acceleration in transport time across the day (Figure I in the online only data supplement). The differences found for this 68 km transport were generalized to all suburban to urban area transports.

For DD transport, the difference in transport time was added to the neurointerventionalist arrival to groin puncture time of 20 min to simulate a delay or acceleration in the arrival of the neurointerventionalist to the PSC. For DS transport, the difference in transport time was added to the door to groin puncture time at the CSC/CSC+ to simulate a delay or acceleration in the arrival of the patient to the CSC/CSC+. For mothership transport the difference in transport time was added to both the door to needle and door to groin puncture time at the CSC and CSC+ to simulate a delay or acceleration in the patient arriving at the CSC/CSC+.

Map Generation

Study results were visualized using DESTINE mapping software (DESTINE Health Inc., Calgary, AB, Canada). To indicate which transport option predicts the best probability of good outcome the maps are color coded: red areas indicate DS predicts the best probability of good outcome, green areas indicate mothership predicts the best probability of good outcome, and purple indicates DD predicts the best probability of good outcome. Areas with no road infrastructure are marked gray. All PSCs are depicted as yellow pinpoints, all CSCs are depicted as light blue pinpoints, and all CSC+ as dark blue pinpoints.

Ethics Statement

As no patient data were used for this study, institutional review board approval was not sought.

Results

Mean transportation times and the catchment areas of the three paradigms during weekdays are shown in Fig. 1 and on the weekend in Fig. 2.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Mean transportation time (upper panel) and catchment areas (lower panel) of paradigms on weekdays. Shown is the diurnal mean transportation time and the catchment area in km2 of the 3 paradigms weekdays given a total area of 64,065 km2

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Mean transportation times (upper panel) and Catchment areas (lower panel) of paradigms on the weekend. Shown is the diurnal mean transportation time and the catchment area in km2 of the 3 paradigms on the weekend given a total area of 64,065 km2

Full size image

Diurnal modeled transportation option maps in northwest Germany during weekdays are shown in Fig. 3 and on the weekend in Fig. 4 and can be viewed as a diurnal movie in the online only data supplement.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Diurnal modeled transportation option maps in northwest Germany at weekdays. Red areas indicate drip-and-ship paradigm predicts the best probability of good outcome, green areas indicate mothership paradigm predicts the best probability of good outcome, and purple indicates drip-and-drive paradigm predicts the best probability of good outcome

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Diurnal modeled transportation option maps in northwest Germany on the weekend. Red areas indicate drip-and-ship paradigm predicts the best probability of good outcome, green areas indicate mothership paradigm predicts the best probability of good outcome, and purple indicates drip-and-drive paradigm predicts the best probability of good outcome

Full size image

On weekdays, the mean transportation time from the urban to the suburban area was 66 min. It was less or equal to 66 min from 7 p.m. to 11 a.m. Peak traffic period occurred from 3 a.m. to 5 p.m. with a maximum of 93 min at 4 p.m. The mean transportation time from the suburban to the urban area was 65 min. It was less or equal to 65 min from 6 p.m. to 5 a.m. Two peak traffic periods occurred from 6 a.m. to 9 a.m. with a maximum of 90 min at 7 a.m. and from 3 p.m. to 5 p.m. with a maximum of 78 min at 4 p.m. Mothership predicted the best outcomes in the majority of the region (≥40,000 km2, 63%) during the entirety of the weekday with exception of the morning rush hour at 7 a.m. where the mothership catchment area decreased to 25,467 km2, (40%). The DD catchment area peaked at 7 a.m. (30,879 km2, 48%) and was lowest from 3 p.m. to 6 p.m. having a catchment area of only 3–5%. The DS catchment area peaked with 31% at 4 p.m.

On weekends, the mean transportation time from the urban to the suburban area was 57 min. It was less or equal to 57 min from 8 p.m. to 9 a.m. It showed a maximum of 65 min from 12 p.m. to 3 p.m. The mean transportation time from the suburban to the urban area was 57 min. It was less or equal to 57 min from 7 p.m. to 10 a.m. It showed a maximum of 60 min from 11 a.m. to 6 p.m. Mothership predicted the best outcomes in the majority of the region (≥47,200 km2, 74%) during the entirety of the weekend but was lowest from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. From 1 a.m. to 10 a.m. the DD and DS catchment areas were approximately 5205 km2 (8%) and 8376 km2 (13%) respectively with some hour over hour variation. From 9 a.m. to 11 p.m. the DS catchment area (11–15%) was larger than the DD catchment area (10–13%).

The number of EVT procedures performed by hour at the PSC Lüneburg are shown in online figure II in the online only data supplement. From 2016 to 2020, 128 emergency operations were performed, 106 (83%) on weekdays, 22 (17%) on weekends. The mean and median neurointerventionalist transportation time was 82 min both on weekdays and weekends. On weekdays, 69 (53%) emergency operations were performed between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. Only 8 (6%) operations were performed from 12 p.m. to 7 a.m. There were no operations between 2 a.m. and 4 a.m. The maximum was performed at 10 a.m. with 15 (12%) operations. The transportation time was longest at 3 p.m. with a median of 102 min. On weekends, no operations were performed between 3 a.m. and 7 a.m., between 2 p.m. and 4 p.m., and at 8 p.m. The maximum was performed at 5 p.m. with 3 operations. Weekend transportation time was longest on a Saturday at 11 p.m. with a median of 95 min.

Discussion

We have shown considerable variation of the catchment area for the different transportation paradigms for stroke patients across the course of the day both on weekdays and weekend. The findings are especially pronounced on weekdays. The mothership paradigm had the largest catchment area in northwest Germany 24h a day, 7 days a week with exception of the morning rush hour on weekdays. These results are consistent with previous modelling studies showing that PSCs in close proximity to an efficient CSC/CSC+ have to maintain short door to needle times to assure a comparable probability of good outcome [12, 13, 16, 17].

On weekdays, the predicted probability of good outcomes with the DD paradigm peaked at 7 a.m. and declined during the afternoon rush hour between 3 p.m. and 6 p.m. This can be explained by the fact that during morning rush hour the neurointerventionalist would be travelling in the opposite direction of the regular commuting traffic, and therefore encounters less road traffic congestion; however, during afternoon rush hour the neurointerventionalist is travelling in the same direction as the majority of commuters to the suburban areas during peak driving times, making the DD paradigm less advantageous; however, in the analysis of the data we found that the majority of EVT procedures performed at the PSC in Lüneberg occurred between 10 a.m. and 9 p.m., when travel time would be relatively low.

The DS paradigm was most advantageous during peak driving times on weekday afternoons. Similarly, the geographic context here is that the ambulance would be travelling from the suburban PSC to the urban CSC/CSC+ in the opposite direction of the regular commuting traffic during afternoon.

On Sundays, the mean transportation times from the urban CSC+ to the PSC and in the opposite direction were lower compared to weekdays and slightly increased in the afternoon, but did not show peak traffic periods.

The considerable impact of the diurnal variation in traffic rate and direction of travel found in this study provide compelling evidence that stroke systems of care should take time of day and real time traffic information into account when designing prehospital transport protocols. Including these estimated transportation times, could improve prehospital triage decisions and decrease treatment delay thereby improving clinical outcomes. This information could be implemented in mobile applications guiding the emergency medical services personnel to the right hospital.

Our observed mean neurointerventionalist transportation time of 82 min was longer than the predicted mean transportation time from the urban to the suburban area calculated with Google Maps (varying between 57–66 min). This is due to the fact that in our observational study the entire time from activation of the neurointerventionalist at the CSC+ at the CSC+ to arrival at the angiosuite of the PSC and not just their drive time. Recent studies have shown significantly shorter transfer times moving the neurointerventionalist from the CSC+ to the PSC in comparison with transporting the patient from the PSC to the CSC which resulted in shorter onset to EVT times [11, 18]. Moreover, the advantages of parallel processing in the DD paradigm have to be considered. During transfer of the neurointerventionalist from the CSC+ to the PSC, the patient can be transported to the angiography suite, prepared for the intervention, and intubated if necessary. The EVT times could be further reduced if local members of the radiology department started the intervention by placing the catheter sheath or even the guide catheter in the cervical arteries. As has been shown previously, DS and DD increase in favorability if treatment times are long at the CSC [12]. The DD paradigm enables sharing the workload and associated costs and hospital income between PSC and CSC+. The spread of procedure volume across multiple hospitals optimizes the use of beds for stroke patients throughout a region and allows adequate workload to maintain skill sets.

Limitations

This work is not without limitations.

Firstly, the results of our model may not generalize to other cities. In areas where employment options tend to follow a more decentralized or polycentric model, there are more vehicles in the morning peak traffic period heading from downtown to the suburban area. Transportation times were calculated using Google Maps. Emergency medical services transportation times would be different, although it would not significantly influence the catchment areas, as all three paradigms would be affected in the same way; however, for the implementation of stroke treatment cooperation between CSC, CSC+ and PSC the local emergency medical services transportation times with diurnal variations in traffic rate and direction of travel should be assessed and considered.

Secondly, decay curves used in our model were derived from clinical trials containing highly selected patients in Europe and North America and might not be completely translatable to the general German population. Moreover, the percentage of patients treated with IVT or EVT influences the modeled results and might be different in other countries. The distance used for calculating the traffic time between the PSC and CSC+ was 68 km which is based on one PSC/CSC+ partnership in our system. While this is representative of the average distance between PSC and CSC+ in our system of 67 km, it likely overestimates travel time between PSC and CSC for DS (average distance of 44 km in our system). The generalization of the differences found for this 68 km transport were probably the least realistic for the mothership scenario as the majority of stroke patients are much closer to the CSC/CSC+.

Thirdly, several prehospital stroke severity scales have been developed to identify patients with LVO [19, 20]. In our model, we chose a score of ≥5 on the rapid arterial occlusion evaluation scale for the selection of the patient population. As has been shown before, catchment areas were similar using different screening tools [12], such as the Los Angeles motor scale [21] or the Cincinnati stroke triage assessment tool [22]; however, the results would be different with the development of a more accurate screening tool for LVO.

Finally, we did not consider air transport or mobile stroke units and effects of seasonality nor did we take into account out of the ordinary congestion, which can be the result of inclement weather, an accident, construction, or long holiday weekends.

Conclusion

Using conditional probability modeling, our study showed a considerable impact of the diurnal variations in traffic rate and direction of travel on optimal stroke transportation. On weekdays, the mothership method had the largest catchment area except during morning rush hours, when the DD catchment area was highest. The DS catchment area was higher than the DD catchment area during the afternoon rush hours both during the week as well as on the weekend.

References

  1. Emberson J, Lees KR, Lyden P, Blackwell L, Albers G, Bluhmki E, Brott T, Cohen G, Davis S, Donnan G, Grotta J, Howard G, Kaste M, Koga M, von Kummer R, Lansberg M, Lindley RI, Murray G, Olivot JM, Parsons M, Tilley B, Toni D, Toyoda K, Wahlgren N, Wardlaw J, Whiteley W, del Zoppo GJ, Baigent C, Sandercock P, Hacke W; Stroke Thrombolysis Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Effect of treatment delay, age, and stroke severity on the effects of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. Version 2. Lancet. 2014;384:1929–35.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Saver JL, Goyal M, van der Lugt A, Menon BK, Majoie CB, Dippel DW, Campbell BC, Nogueira RG, Demchuk AM, Tomasello A, Cardona P, Devlin TG, Frei DF, du Mesnil de Rochemont R, Berkhemer OA, Jovin TG, Siddiqui AH, van Zwam WH, Davis SM, Castaño C, Sapkota BL, Fransen PS, Molina C, van Oostenbrugge RJ, Chamorro Á, Lingsma H, Silver FL, Donnan GA, Shuaib A, Brown S, Stouch B, Mitchell PJ, Davalos A, Roos YB, Hill MD; HERMES Collaborators. Time to Treatment With Endovascular Thrombectomy and Outcomes From Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-analysis. JAMA. 2016;316:1279–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kamal N, Holodinsky JK, Stephenson C, Kashayp D, Demchuk AM, Hill MD, Vilneff RL, Bugbee E, Zerna C, Newcommon N, Lang E, Knox D, Smith EE. Improving Door-to-Needle Times for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Effect of Rapid Patient Registration, Moving Directly to Computed Tomography, and Giving Alteplase at the Computed Tomography Scanner. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017;10:e003242.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kamal N, Smith EE, Jeerakathil T, Hill MD. Thrombolysis: improving door-to-needle times for ischemic stroke treatment—a narrative review. Int J Stroke. 2018;13:268–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Psychogios MN, Behme D, Schregel K, Tsogkas I, Maier IL, Leyhe JR, Zapf A, Tran J, Bähr M, Liman J, Knauth M. One-Stop Management of Acute Stroke Patients: Minimizing Door-to-Reperfusion Times. Stroke. 2017;48:3152–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Psychogios MN, Maier IL, Tsogkas I, Hesse AC, Brehm A, Behme D, Schnieder M, Schregel K, Papageorgiou I, Liebeskind DS, Goyal M, Bähr M, Knauth M, Liman J. One-Stop Management of 230 Consecutive Acute Stroke Patients: Report of Procedural Times and Clinical Outcome. J Clin Med. 2019;8:2185.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Froehler MT, Saver JL, Zaidat OO, Jahan R, Aziz-Sultan MA, Klucznik RP, Haussen DC, Hellinger FR Jr, Yavagal DR, Yao TL, Liebeskind DS, Jadhav AP, Gupta R, Hassan AE, Martin CO, Bozorgchami H, Kaushal R, Nogueira RG, Gandhi RH, Peterson EC, Dashti SR, Given CA 2nd, Mehta BP, Deshmukh V, Starkman S, Linfante I, McPherson SH, Kvamme P, Grobelny TJ, Hussain MS, Thacker I, Vora N, Chen PR, Monteith SJ, Ecker RD, Schirmer CM, Sauvageau E, Abou-Chebl A, Derdeyn CP, Maidan L, Badruddin A, Siddiqui AH, Dumont TM, Alhajeri A, Taqi MA, Asi K, Carpenter J, Boulos A, Jindal G, Puri AS, Chitale R, Deshaies EM, Robinson DH, Kallmes DF, Baxter BW, Jumaa MA, Sunenshine P, Majjhoo A, English JD, Suzuki S, Fessler RD, Delgado Almandoz JE, Martin JC, Mueller-Kronast NH; STRATIS Investigators. Interhospital Transfer Before Thrombectomy Is Associated With Delayed Treatment and Worse Outcome in the STRATIS Registry (Systematic Evaluation of Patients Treated With Neurothrombectomy Devices for Acute Ischemic Stroke). Circulation. 2017;136:2311–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Venema E, Boodt N, Berkhemer OA, Rood PPM, van Zwam WH, van Oostenbrugge RJ, van der Lugt A, Roos YBWEM, Majoie CBLM, Lingsma HF, Dippel DWJ; MR CLEAN investigators. Workflow and factors associated with delay in the delivery of intra-arterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke in the MR CLEAN trial. J Neurointerv Surg. 2018;10:424–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Goyal M, Jadhav AP, Bonafe A, Diener H, Mendes Pereira V, Levy E, Baxter B, Jovin T, Jahan R, Menon BK, Saver JL; SWIFT PRIME investigators. Analysis of Workflow and Time to Treatment and the Effects on Outcome in Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke: Results from the SWIFT PRIME Randomized Controlled Trial. Radiology. 2016;279:888–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Menon BK, Almekhlafi MA, Pereira VM, Gralla J, Bonafe A, Davalos A, Chapot R, Goyal M; STAR Study Investigators. Optimal workflow and process-based performance measures for endovascular therapy in acute ischemic stroke: analysis of the Solitaire FR thrombectomy for acute revascularization study. Stroke. 2014;45:2024–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brekenfeld C, Goebell E, Schmidt H, Henningsen H, Kraemer C, Tebben J, Flottmann F, Thomalla G, Fiehler J. Drip-and-drive: shipping the neurointerventionalist to provide mechanical thrombectomy in primary stroke centers. J Neurointerv Surg. 2018;10:932–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ernst M, Schlemm E, Holodinsky JK, Kamal N, Thomalla G, Fiehler J, Brekenfeld C. Modeling the Optimal Transportation for Acute Stroke Treatment: The Impact of the Drip-and-Drive Paradigm. Stroke. 2020;51:275–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Holodinsky JK, Williamson TS, Demchuk AM, Zhao H, Zhu L, Francis MJ, Goyal M, Hill MD, Kamal N. Modeling Stroke Patient Transport for All Patients With Suspected Large-Vessel Occlusion. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75:1477–86.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Pérez de la Ossa N, Carrera D, Gorchs M, Querol M, Millán M, Gomis M, Dorado L, López-Cancio E, Hernández-Pérez M, Chicharro V, Escalada X, Jiménez X, Dávalos A. Design and validation of a prehospital stroke scale to predict large arterial occlusion: the rapid arterial occlusion evaluation scale. Stroke. 2014;45:87–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ormseth CH, Sheth KN, Saver JL, Fonarow GC, Schwamm LH. The American heart association’s get with the guidelines (GWTG)-stroke development and impact on stroke care. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2017;2:94–105.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Holodinsky JK, Williamson TS, Kamal N, Mayank D, Hill MD, Goyal M. Drip and ship versus direct to comprehensive stroke center: conditional probability modeling. Stroke. 2017;48:233–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Milne MS, Holodinsky JK, Hill MD, Nygren A, Qiu C, Goyal M, Kamal N. Drip ’n Ship Versus Mothership for Endovascular Treatment: Modeling the Best Transportation Options for Optimal Outcomes. Stroke. 2017;48:791–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wei D, Oxley TJ, Nistal DA, Mascitelli JR, Wilson N, Stein L, Liang J, Turkheimer LM, Morey JR, Schwegel C, Awad AJ, Shoirah H, Kellner CP, De Leacy RA, Mayer SA, Tuhrim S, Paramasivam S, Mocco J, Fifi JT. Mobile Interventional Stroke Teams Lead to Faster Treatment Times for Thrombectomy in Large Vessel Occlusion. Stroke. 2017;48:3295–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Heldner MR, Hsieh K, Broeg-Morvay A, Mordasini P, Bühlmann M, Jung S, Arnold M, Mattle HP, Gralla J, Fischer U. Clinical prediction of large vessel occlusion in anterior circulation stroke: mission impossible? J Neurol. 2016;263:1633–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pride GL, Fraser JF, Gupta R, Alberts MJ, Rutledge JN, Fowler R, Ansari SA, Abruzzo T, Albani B, Arthur A, Baxter B, Bulsara KR, Chen M, Delgado Almandoz JE, Gandhi CD, Heck D, Hetts SW, Hirsch JA, Hussain MS, Klucznik R, Lee SK, Mack WJ, Leslie-Mazwi T, McTaggart RA, Meyers PM, Mocco J, Prestigiacomo C, Patsalides A, Rasmussen P, Starke RM, Sunenshine P, Frei D, Jayaraman MV; Standards and Guidelines Committee of the Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery (SNIS). Prehospital care delivery and triage of stroke with emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO): report of the Standards and Guidelines Committee of the Society of Neurointerventional Surgery. J Neurointerv Surg. 2017;9:802–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Llanes JN, Kidwell CS, Starkman S, Leary MC, Eckstein M, Saver JL. The Los Angeles motor scale (LAMS): a new measure to characterize stroke severity in the field. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2004;8:46–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Katz BS, McMullan JT, Sucharew H, Adeoye O, Broderick JP. Design and validation of a prehospital scale to predict stroke severity: cincinnati prehospital stroke severity scale. Stroke. 2015;46:1508–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Open Access funding provided by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Haus Ost 22 (O 22), Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany

    Marielle Ernst, Jens Fiehler & Caspar Brekenfeld

  2. Department of Neuroradiology, Clinic for Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland

    Marios-Nikos Psychogios

  3. Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany

    Eckhard Schlemm & Götz Thomalla

  4. Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    Jessalyn K. Holodinsky

  5. Department of Industrial Engineering, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada

    Noreen Kamal

  6. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany

    Thomas Rodt

  7. Department of Neurology, Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany

    Henning Henningsen & Christoffer Kraemer

Authors
  1. Marielle Ernst
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marios-Nikos Psychogios
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Eckhard Schlemm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jessalyn K. Holodinsky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Noreen Kamal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Thomas Rodt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Henning Henningsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Christoffer Kraemer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Götz Thomalla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Jens Fiehler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Caspar Brekenfeld
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, ME, JH, NK, JF and CB; data curation, ME, TR, HH, CK and CB; formal analysis, MP, ES, GT and JF; methodology, ME; software, JH and NK; visualization, ME; writing original draft, ME and CB; writing, review and editing, MP, ES, JH, NK, TR, HH, GT, JF and CB.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marielle Ernst.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

J.K. Holodinsky and N. Kamal report equity ownership in DESTINE Health Inc. J. Fiehler is the Chief Executive Officer of Eppdata and reports general research support outside the submitted work by the German Ministry of Science and Education, German Ministry of Economy and Innovation, German Research Foundation, European Union, Hamburgische Investitions- und Förderbank, Medtronic, Microvention, Philips, and Stryker and consultancy fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Acandis, Cerenovus, Covidien, Evasc Neurovascular, MD Clinicals, Medtronic, Medina, Microvention, Penumbra, Route92, Stryker, and Transverse Medical. G. Thomalla reports receiving consulting fees from Acandis; lecture fees from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer, and Daiichi Sankyo and consulting fees and lecture fees from Stryker. M. Ernst, M.-N. Psychogios, E. Schlemm, T. Rodt, H. Henningsen, C. Kraemer and C. Brekenfeld declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Availability of data and material

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Caption Electronic Supplementary Material

Movie 1. Diurnal transportation option maps in northwest Germany during weekdays. Red areas indicate drip-and-ship paradigm predicts the best probability of good outcome, green areas indicate mothership paradigm predicts the best probability of good outcome, and purple indicates drip-and-drive paradigm predicts the best probability of good outcome. The time of day is shown in the left upper corner.

Movie 2. Diurnal transportation option maps in Northwestern Germany during weekends. Red areas indicate drip-and-ship paradigm predicts the best probability of good outcome, green areas indicate mothership paradigm predicts the best probability of good outcome, and purple indicates drip-and-drive paradigm predicts the best probability of good outcome. The time of day is shown in the left upper corner.

62_2020_933_MOESM1_ESM.tif

Online figure I: simulation of a delay or acceleration in transport time across the day for mothership, drip-and-ship, and drip-and-drive paradigms.

62_2020_933_MOESM4_ESM.tif

Online figure II: number of diurnal emergency operations performed by CSC+ Hamburg-Eppendorf for PSC Lüneburg weekdays and on weekends.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ernst, M., Psychogios, MN., Schlemm, E. et al. Modeling the Optimal Transportation for Acute Stroke Treatment. Clin Neuroradiol 31, 729–736 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-020-00933-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-020-00933-y

Keywords

  • Stroke management
  • Endovascular therapy
  • Treatment effectiveness
  • Transportation time
  • Catchment area