Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical characteristics and risk factors of pericardial effusion complicating radiofrequency catheter ablation in Chinese Han patients with tachyarrhythmias

Klinische Merkmale und Risikofaktoren des Perikardergusses als Komplikation der Radiofrequenz-Katheterablation bei Han-Chinesen mit Tachyarrhythmie

  • e-Herz: Original article
  • Published:
Herz Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The clinical features and risk factors of pericardial effusion complicating radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) in a large sample of Chinese Han patients with tachyarrhythmias have rarely been reported.

Methods

We summarized the clinical characteristics and analyzed the risk factors of pericardial effusion complicating RFCA in 1,756 Chinese Han patients with tachyarrhythmias.

Results

There were 27 patients with pericardial effusion after RFCA. Of these patients, 10 developed cardiac tamponade; the symptoms of 9 patients were relieved after pericardiocentesis and drainage, while 1 patient was discharged after emergency surgical repair. The rate of pericardial effusion in patients with atrial fibrillation was significantly higher than in those with other tachyarrhythmias (P < 0.001). The proportion of female patients, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, coronary heart disease, age, left atrial size, and length of hospitalization in the pericardial effusion group was significantly increased compared with the non-pericardial effusion group (P < 0.01). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that female sex and atrial fibrillation were independent risk factors of complications by pericardial effusion after RFCA in patients with tachyarrhythmias. Age and left atrial size in female patients and those with atrial fibrillation were significantly higher than in male patients and patients without atrial fibrillation.

Conclusion

Pericardial effusion complicating RFCA is not rare in patients with tachyarrhythmias, and it tends to develop into cardiac tamponade. Emergency pericardiocentesis and drainage are the most effective therapy. Female sex and atrial fibrillation may be independent risk factors of pericardial effusion after RFCA in patients with tachyarrhythmias.

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Selten wird über die klinischen Merkmale und Risikofaktoren des Perikardergusses als Komplikation einer Radiofrequenz-Katheterablation (RFCA) in größeren Stichproben von Han-Chinesen mit Tachyarrhythmie berichtet.

Methoden

In der vorliegenden Studie wurden die klinischen Merkmale von 1756 Han-Chinesen mit Tachyarrhythmie zusammengefasst und deren Risikofaktoren für einen Perikarderguss als Komplikation einer RFCA ausgewertet.

Ergebnisse

Nach RFCA trat in 27 Fällen ein Perikarderguss auf, bei 10 Fällen davon entwickelte sich eine Herzbeuteltamponade, in 9 Fällen besserten sich die Symptome nach Perikardpunktion und -drainage, während ein Fall nach einer Notfalloperation entlassen wurde. Die Rate an Perikardergüssen war bei Patienten mit Vorhofflimmern signifikant höher als bei Patienten mit anderen Tachyarrhythmien (p < 0,001). Bei der Gruppe mit Perikarderguss waren gegenüber der Gruppe ohne Perikarderguss Frauen, Hypertonie, Diabetes mellitus und koronare Herzkrankheit signifikant häufiger, Alter, Größe des linken Vorhofs und Verweildauer signifikant erhöht (p < 0,01). Die multivariate logistische Regressionsanalyse zeigte, dass weibliches Geschlecht und Vorhofflimmern unabhängige Risikofaktoren für die Komplikation eines Perikardergusses nach RFCA bei Tachyarrhythmiepatienten waren. Alter und Größe des linken Vorhofs waren bei Frauen und Patienten mit Vorhofflimmern signifikant höher als bei Männern und Patienten ohne Vorhofflimmern.

Schlussfolgerung

Ein Perikarderguss als Komplikation einer RFCA ist bei Tachyarrhythmiepatienten nicht selten und neigt zur Entwicklung einer Herzbeuteltamponade. Die wirksamste Therapie besteht in der notfallmäßigen Perikardpunktion und -drainage. Weibliches Geschlecht und Vorhofflimmern sind möglicherweise die unabhängigen Risikofaktoren für einen Perikarderguss nach RFCA bei Patienten mit Tachyarrhythmie.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Scheinman MM, Huang S (2000) The 1998 NASPE prospective catheter ablation registry. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 23(6):1020–1028

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cappato R, Calkins H, Chen SA et al (2010) Updated worldwide survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety of catheter ablation for human atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 3(1):32–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cappato R, Calkins H, Chen SA et al (2005) Worldwide survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety of catheter ablation for human atrial fibrillation. Circulation 111(9):1100–1105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ma W, Liu J, Zeng Y et al (2012) Causes of moderate to large pericardial effusion requiring pericardiocentesis in 140 Han Chinese patients. Herz 372(2):183–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bunch TJ, Asirvatham SJ, Friedman PA et al (2005) Outcomes after cardiac perforation during radiofrequency ablation of the atrium. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 16(11):1172–1179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schaer BA, Maurer A, Sticherling C et al (2009) Routine echocardiography after radiofrequency ablation: to flog a dead horse? Europace 11(2):155–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Abhishek F, Heist EK, Barrett C et al (2011) Effectiveness of a strategy to reduce major vascular complications from catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 30(3):211–215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen SW, Liu SW, Lin JX (2008) Incidence, risk factors and management of pericardial effusion post radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillations (in Chinese). Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi 36(9):801–806

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Juneja R, O Callaghan P, Rowland E (2001) Tissue rupture and bubble formation during radiofrequency catheter ablation: “echoes of a pop”. Circulation 103(9):1333–1334

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Vakili BA, Kaplan RC, Brown DL (2001) Sex-based differences in early mortality of patients undergoing primary angioplasty for first acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 104(25):3034–3038

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Marso SP, Gowda M, O’Keefe JH et al (2003) Improving in-hospital mortality in the setting of an increasing risk profile among patients undergoing catheter-based reperfusion for an acute myocardial infarction without cardiogenic shock. J Invasive Cardiol 15(12):711–716

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ellis SG, Ajluni S, Arnold AZ et al (1994) Increased coronary perforation in the new device era. Incidence, classification, management and outcome. Circulation 90(6):2725–2730

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yip HK, Wu CJ, Chang HW et al (2003) Cardiac rupture complicating acute myocardial infarction in the direct percutaneous coronary intervention reperfusion era. Chest 124(2):565–571

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Locati EH, Zareba W, Moss AJ et al (1998) Age and sex-related differences in clinical manifestations in patients with congenital long-QT syndrome: findings from the International LQTS registry. Circulation 97(22):2237–2244

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Racine M, Tousignant-Laflamme Y, Kloda LA et al (2012) A systematic literature review of 10 years of research on sex/gender and pain perception – part 2: do biopsychosocial factors alter pain sensitivity differently in women and men? Pain 153(3):619–635

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Racine M, Tousignant-Laflamme Y, Kloda LA et al (2012) A systematic literature review of 10 years of research on sex/gender and experimental pain perception – part 1: are there really differences between women and men? Pain 153(3):602–618

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fuster V, Rydén LE, Cannom DS et al (2011) 2011 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused updates incorporated into the ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines developed in partnership with the European Society of Cardiology and in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol 57(11):e101–e198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. European Heart Rhythm Association, European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Camm AJ et al (2010) Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: the Task Force for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 31(19):2369–2429

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by a grant for scientific research from the Chinese Ministry of Education.

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there are no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Q.-G. Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lan, L., Zeng, Y., Wang, WR. et al. Clinical characteristics and risk factors of pericardial effusion complicating radiofrequency catheter ablation in Chinese Han patients with tachyarrhythmias. Herz 38, 909–914 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-013-3762-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-013-3762-x

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation