Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Il pavimento pelvico non esiste – transanale Verfahren in der Behandlung des obstruktiven Defäkationssyndroms und Descensus perinei

Il pavimento pelvico non esiste—transanal procedures in the treatment of obstructed defecation syndrome and descending perineum

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
coloproctology Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Seit 25 Jahren werden geklammerte transanale Resektionsverfahren angewandt. Um die Jahrtausendwende haben sich transanale Operationen bei obstruktiven Stuhlentleerungsstörungen etabliert. Ausgehend von der Mukosaresektion in Staplertechnik, entwickelte sich zunächst ein Doppelstaplerverfahren, und schließlich wurden mannigfaltige transanale Resektionsverfahren vorgestellt und etabliert. Anfänglich wurden sehr gute Ergebnisse mit deutlichen Verbesserungen der Stuhlentleerungsstörungen beschrieben. Schon bald aber häuften sich die Publikationen über Komplikationen und den mangelnden Benefit der Operation. Das nur schwer eindeutig kategorisierbare obstruktive Defäkationssyndrom als solches wurde in der Folge für die mangelnden operativen Verbesserungen ausgemacht. Es war vom Eisbergsyndrom die Rede, bei dem es neben objektivierbaren auch eine Menge an verborgenen Ätiologien für das Krankheitsbild gibt. Erfolgreich therapierbar mit alleiniger transanaler Rektumresektion erscheinen aber allenfalls ganz isolierte Rektozelen und Intussuszeptionen bei sonst erhaltener Beckenbodenstabilität. Ist aber die Rektozele mit einem Genitalprolaps vergesellschaftet, was überwiegend der Fall ist, kann die obstruktive Entleerungsstörung nicht allein mit transanaler Resektion therapiert werden. Vielmehr stehen reponierende, suspendierende Verfahren im Vordergrund. Antonio Longo hat 2012 eine laparoskopische Operation etabliert, bei der die Ligamenta cadinalia des Uterus seitlich netzverstärkt werden, die sog. „pelvic organ prolapse suspension“. Die Zusammenarbeit mit den behandelnden Gynäkologen ist für eine erfolgreiche Behandlung essenziell, außerdem eine gute Patientenbegleitung, der rechtzeitige Beginn mit konservativen und operativen Maßnahmen und eine sorgfältige und eher zurückhaltende Indikationsstellung.

Abstract

Stapled transanal resection methods have been used for 25 years. Transanal operations for obstructed stool emptying disorders were established at the turn of the millennium. Starting from the mucosal resection using the stapling technique, a double stapling procedure was initially developed and finally a multitude of transanal resection procedures were presented and established. Initially, very good results with significant improvement of the stool emptying disorders were described. Soon, however, publications abounded about complications and the lack of benefits of the operation. The obstructed defecation syndrome as such, which is difficult to clearly categorize, was subsequently identified as the reason for the lack of surgical improvements. There was talk of the iceberg syndrome, in which there are not only objectifiable etiologies but also a large number of hidden etiologies for the disease picture. Successfully treatable with transanal rectal resection alone, however, appear to be at best completely isolated rectoceles and intussusceptions in otherwise preserved pelvic floor stability; however, if the rectocele is associated with a genital prolapse, and this is predominantly the case, the obstructed emptying disorder cannot be treated with transanal resection alone. The focus is more on repositioning and suspending procedures. Antonio Longo established a laparoscopic operation in 2012, in which the cardinal ligaments of the uterus are laterally strengthened with meshes, so-called pelvic organ prolapse suspension. The cooperation with the treating gynecologists is essential for a successful treatment as well as a good patient accompaniment, the timely initiation of conservative and operative measures and an extremely careful and relatively cautious assessment of the indications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5

Literatur

  1. Adams K, Papagrigoriadis S (2013) Stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) for obstructive defaecation syndrome: patients with previous pelvic floor surgery have poorer long-term outcome. Colorectal Dis 15:477–480

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J et al (1996) A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum 39:681–685

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Aumann G (2011) One step Transtar and dorsal Colporraphy to avoid dyspareunia and discomfort after resection of large rectoceles. In: 4. World Congress of Coloproctology and pelvic diseases Rome

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aumann G, Petersen S, Pollack T et al (2004) Severe intra-abdominal bleeding following stapled mucosectomy due to enterocele: report of a case. Tech Coloproctol 8:41–43

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bloemendaal AL, De Schepper M, Mishra A et al (2016) Trans-anal endoscopic microsurgery for internal rectal prolapse. Tech Coloproctol 20:129–133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Roviaro G (2011) What is the benefit of a new stapler device in the surgical treatment of obstructed defecation? Three-year outcomes from a randomized controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 54:77–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Stuto A et al (2004) Stapled transanal rectal resection for outlet obstruction: a prospective, multicenter trial. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1285–1296 (discussion 1296–1287)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Boenicke L, Kim M, Reibetanz J et al (2012) Stapled transanal rectal resection and sacral nerve stimulation—impact on faecal incontinence and quality of life. Colorectal Dis 14:480–489

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Burgio KL, Borello-France D, Richter HE et al (2007) Risk factors for fecal and urinary incontinence after childbirth: the childbirth and pelvic symptoms study. Am J Gastroenterol 102:1998–2004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Corman ML, Carriero A, Hager T et al (2006) Consensus conference on the stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) for disordered defaecation. Colorectal Dis 8:98–101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. De La Portilla F, Rada R, Vega J et al (2010) Transanal rectocele repair using linear stapler and bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement material: short-term results of a prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 53:88–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dodi G, Pietroletti R, Milito G et al (2003) Bleeding, incontinence, pain and constipation after STARR transanal double stapling rectotomy for obstructed defecation. Tech Coloproctol 7:148–153

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ellis CN, Essani R (2012) Treatment of obstructed defecation. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 25:24–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gagliardi G, Pescatori M, Altomare DF et al (2008) Results, outcome predictors, and complications after stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation. Dis Colon Rectum 51:186–195 (discussion 195)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Köhler K, Stelzner S, Hellmich G et al (2012) Results in the long-term course after stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR). Langenbecks Arch Surg 397:771–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lenisa L, Schwandner O, Stuto A et al (2009) STARR with contour transtar: prospective multicentre European study. Colorectal Dis 11:821–827

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu WC, Wan SL, Yaseen SM et al (2016) Transanal surgery for obstructed defecation syndrome: literature review and a single-center experience. World J Gastroenterol 22:7983–7998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Longo A, Crafa F, Boller B et al (2012) STARR-Longo’s original technique to correct multiorgan pelvic prolapses—perspective trial—preliminary results. In: 23rd Annual International Colorectal Disease Symposium Fort Lauderdale

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mari FS, Gasparrini M, Cosenza UM et al (2013) Feasibility and safety study of day-case Transtar procedure. Surgeon 11(Suppl 1):S6–S9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Masoni L, Mari FS, Favi F et al (2013) Stapled transanal rectal resection with contour transtar for obstructed defecation syndrome: lessons learned after more than 3 years of single-center activity. Dis Colon Rectum 56:113–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Naldini G, Martellucci J, Rea R et al (2014) Tailored prolapse surgery for the treatment of haemorrhoids and obstructed defecation syndrome with a new dedicated device: TST STARR Plus. Int J Colorectal Dis 29:623–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pescatori M, Dodi G, Salafia C et al (2005) Rectovaginal fistula after double-stapled transanal rectotomy (STARR) for obstructed defaecation. Int J Colorectal Dis 20:83–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pescatori M, Gagliardi G (2008) Postoperative complications after procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedures. Tech Coloproctol 12:7–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Pescatori M, Spyrou M, Pulvirenti D’urso A (2006) A prospective evaluation of occult disorders in obstructed defecation using the „iceberg diagram“. Colorectal Dis 8:785–789

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pescatori M, Zbar AP (2009) Reinterventions after complicated or failed STARR procedure. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:87–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Petersen S, Sterzing D, Ommer A et al (2016) TST36 stapling for rectocele and hemorrhoidal prolapse—early results of the prospective German multicenter study. Ger Med Sci 14:Doc14

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Piloni V, Bergamasco M, Melara G et al (2018) The clinical value of magnetic resonance defecography in males with obstructed defecation syndrome. Tech Coloproctol 22:179–190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Podzemny V, Pescatori LC, Pescatori M (2015) Management of obstructed defecation. World J Gastroenterol 21:1053–1060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Regadas FS, Regadas SM, Rodrigues LV et al (2005) Transanal repair of rectocele and full rectal mucosectomy with one circular stapler: a novel surgical technique. Tech Coloproctol 9:63–66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Renzi A, Brillantino A, Di Sarno G et al (2011) Improved clinical outcomes with a new contour-curved stapler in the surgical treatment of obstructed defecation syndrome: a mid-term randomized controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 54:736–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ribaric G, D’hoore A, Schiffhorst G et al (2014) STARR with CONTOUR(R) TRANSTAR device for obstructed defecation syndrome: one-year real-world outcomes of the European TRANSTAR registry. Int J Colorectal Dis 29:611–622

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Riss S, Stift A (2015) Surgery for obstructed defecation syndrome—is there an ideal technique. World J Gastroenterol 21:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rotholtz NA, Efron JE, Weiss EG et al (2002) Anal manometric predictors of significant rectocele in constipated patients. Tech Coloproctol 6:73–76 (discussion 76–77)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Schwandner O, Fürst A (2007) Deutsches STARR-Register – Erste Ergebnisse der prospektiven, multizentrischen Beobachtungsstudie. Coloproctol 29:13–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wadhawan H, Shorthouse AJ, Brown SR (2010) Surgery for obstructed defaecation: does the use of the Contour device (Trans-STARR) improve results? Colorectal Dis 12:885–890

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Wallace SL, Miller LD, Mishra K (2019) Pelvic floor physical therapy in the treatment of pelvic floor dysfunction in women. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 31:485–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Yao L, Zhong Y, Xu J et al (2006) Rectal stenosis after procedures for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH)—a report from China. World J Surg 30:1311–1315

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georg Aumann.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

G. Aumann und A. Longo geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Für diesen Beitrag wurden von den Autoren keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.

Additional information

figure qr

QR-Code scannen & Beitrag online lesen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aumann, G., Longo, A. Il pavimento pelvico non esiste – transanale Verfahren in der Behandlung des obstruktiven Defäkationssyndroms und Descensus perinei. coloproctology 43, 338–344 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00053-021-00557-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00053-021-00557-x

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation