Literatur
Zeng J, Su G (2018) High ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery during sigmoid colon and rectal cancer surgery increases the risk of anastomotic leakage: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 16(1):157
Fan YC, Ning FL, Zhang CD, Dai DQ (2018) Preservation versus non-preservation of left colic artery in sigmoid and rectal cancer surgery: a meta-analysis. Int J Surg 52:269–277
Si MB, Yan PJ, Du ZY, Li LY, Tian HW, Jiang WJ et al (2019) Lymph node yield, survival benefit, and safety of high and low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in colorectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 34(6):947–962
Koda K, Saito N, Seike K, Shimizu K, Kosugi C, Miyazaki M (2005) Denervation of the neorectum as a potential cause of defecatory disorder following low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 48(2):210–217
Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J, Reissman P, Wexner SD (1996) A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum 39(6):681–685
Kang J, Jang SM, Baek JH, Lee WS, Cho TH (2012) Short-term results and long-term oncologic outcomes between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant postoperative chemoradiotherapy for stage III rectal cancer: a case-matched study. Ann Surg Oncol 19(8):2494–2499
Singh D, Luo J, Liu XT, Ma Z, Cheng H, Yu Y et al (2017) The long-term survival benefits of high and low ligation of inferior mesenteric artery in colorectal cancer surgery: a review and meta-analysis. Medicine 96(47):e8520
Wang XJ, Chi P, Lin HM, Lu XR, Huang Y, Xu ZB et al (2014) A scoring system to predict inferior mesenteric artery lymph node metastasis and prognostic value of its involvement in rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 29(3):293–300
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Interessenkonflikt
A. Rink gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rink, A. „High-tie“ der A. mesenterica inferior verschlechtert das funktionelle Ergebnis nach onkologischer Sigmaresektion. coloproctology 42, 507–508 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00053-020-00496-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00053-020-00496-z