PURPOSE
The aim of this study was to determine whether denervation of the sigmoid colon during low anterior resection contributes to the postoperative motility characteristics of the neorectum and to the defecatory function of patients.
METHODS
Sixty-seven patients who underwent either low or ultralow anterior resection for rectal cancer were evaluated. In accordance with the length of denervated neorectum, each patient was assigned to either the short-denervation or long-denervation group, determined by whether the inferior mesenteric artery was divided. Colonic propagated contraction was then measured by means of intraluminal pressure monitoring. Transit time was calculated with orally administered radiopaque markers.
RESULTS
Propagated contraction down to the neorectum was significantly less common in the long-denervation group (14/36) than in the short group (12/15, P < 0.05), whereas spastic minor contraction at the neorectum was significantly more common in the long-denervation group (21/36) than the in short group (3/15, P < 0.05). Colonic transit time below the sigmoid colon was significantly longer in long group (6.4 hours) than in the short group (3.4 hours, P < 0.01). Although motility disorder of the neorectum was correlated with clinical defecatory malfunctions, including multiple evacuations, urgency, and soiling, no significant correlation was noted between the length of the denervated neorectum and the defecatory disorders.
CONCLUSIONS
Motility of the neorectum following low anterior resection appears degraded by intraoperative maneuvers that cause denervation of the remnant sigmoid colon. Motility disorder of the neorectum, but not the length of the denervated neorectum causing the disorder, correlates well with several defecatory malfunctions. This finding suggests that postoperative defecatory disorder as a result of low anterior resection is caused by many factors in addition to denervation of the neorectum.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Netter FH. The Netter collection of medical illustrations, vol. 3. Digestive system; part II, lower digestive tract. New York: Hoechstetter Printing Company, Inc., 2000.
JM Jorge SD Wexner (1993) ArticleTitleEtiology and management of fecal incontinence Dis Colon Rectum 36 77–97 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyC3crnsVw%3D Occurrence Handle8416784
P Arhan G Devroede B Jehannin et al. (1981) ArticleTitleSegmental colonic transit time Dis Colon Rectum 24 625–9
AS Miller WG Lewis ME Willamson PJ Holdsworth D Johnson PJ Finan (1995) ArticleTitleFactors that influence functional outcome after coloanal anastomosis for carcinoma of the rectum Br J Surg 82 1327–30
S Nakahara H Itoh R Mibu et al. (1988) ArticleTitleClinical and manometric evaluation of anorectal function following low anterior resection with low anastomotic line using an EEA stapler for rectal cancer Dis Colon Rectum 31 762–6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiaD3cvjvFc%3D Occurrence Handle3168661
IC Otto K Ito C Ye et al. (1996) ArticleTitleCauses of rectal incontinence after sphincter-preserving operations for rectal cancer Dis Colon Rectum 39 1423–7 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiC38vltVQ%3D Occurrence Handle8969670
PG Horgan PR O’Connel CA Shinkwin WO Kirwan (1989) ArticleTitleEffect of anterior resection on anal sphincter function Br J Surg 76 783–6
EC Jehle T Haehnel MJ Starlinger HD Becker (1995) ArticleTitleLevel of the anastomosis does not influence functional outcome after anterior rectal resection for rectal cancer Am J Surg 169 147–53
A Carlstedt S Nordgren S Fasth L Appelgren L Hulten (1988) ArticleTitleSympathetic nervous influence on the internal anal sphincter and rectum in man Int J Colorectal Dis 3 90–5
G Batignani I Monaci F Ficari F Tonelli (1991) ArticleTitleWhat affects continence after anterior resection of the rectum Dis Colon Rectum 34 329–35 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By6C2snotFc%3D Occurrence Handle2007350
ME Williamson WG Lewis PJ Finan AS Miller PJ Holds-worth D Johnston (1995) ArticleTitleRecovery of physiologic and clinical function after low anterior resection of the rectum for carcinoma: myth or reality? Dis Colon Rectum 38 411–8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqB3snoslU%3D Occurrence Handle7720451
JS Vassilakis G Pechlivanides OJ Zoras et al. (1995) ArticleTitleAnorectal function after low anterior resection of the rectum Int J Colorectal Dis 10 101–6
T Yagyu T Yamamoto H Mochizuki (2002) ArticleTitleNew predictor for the defecatory function after sphincter-preserving operation: lumen score World J Surg 26 54–8
M Oya Y Sugamata J Komatsu H Ishikawa M Nozaki (2002) ArticleTitlePoor neorectal evacuation as a cause of impaired defecatory function after low anterior resection: a study using scintigraphic assessment Surg Today 32 111–7
K Seike K Koda N Takiguchi et al. (2003) ArticleTitleConstipated patients following low anterior resection for rectal cancer have a high level of left colon gas volume Dis Colon Rectum 46 661–6
A Shafik I Ahmed (2001) ArticleTitleThe “uninhibited rectum”: a cause of fecal incontinence J Spinal Cord Med 24 159–63
A Shafik I Ahmed (2002) ArticleTitleStudy of the motile activity of the colon in rectal inertia constipation J Gastroenterol Hepatol 17 270–5
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
© The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons
Published online: 28 January 2005.
About this article
Cite this article
Koda, K., Saito, N., Seike, K. et al. Denervation of the Neorectum as a Potential Cause of Defecatory Disorder Following Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 48, 210–217 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0814-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0814-6