Abstract
The Monte Carlo method was used for quantitative structure–activity relationships modeling of 36 quinoline/isoquinoline derivatives acting as dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors. Quantitative structure–activity relationships models were calculated with the representation of the molecular structure by the simplified molecular input-line entry system with one random split into the training and the test set. The statistical quality of the developed model was good. The best calculated quantitative structure–activity relationships model had the following statistical parameters: r 2 = 0.9573 for the training set and r 2 = 0.9079 for the test set. Structural indicators defined as molecular fragments responsible for increases and decreases in the inhibition activity were calculated. The computer-aided design of new compounds as potential dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors with the application of defined structural alerts was presented.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Al-masri IM, Mohammad MK, Taha MO (2008) Discovery of DPP IV inhibitors by pharmacophore modeling and QSAR analysis followed by in silico screening. Chem Med Chem 3:1763–1779
Cherkasov A, Muratov EN, Fourches D, Varnek A, Baskin II, Cronin M, Dearden J, Gramatica P, Martin YC, Todeschini R, Consonni V, Kuz’Min VE, Cramer R, Benigni R, Yang C, Rathman J, Terfloth L, Gasteiger J, Richard A, Tropsha A (2014) QSAR modeling: where have you been? Where are you going to?. J Med Chem 57:4977–5010
Colberg SR, Sigal RJ, Fernhall B, Regensteiner JG, Blissmer BJ, Rubin RR, Chasan-Taber L, Albright AL, Braun B (2010) Exercise and type 2 diabetes: The American College Of Sports Medicine and The American Diabetes Association: joint position statement executive summary. Diabetes Care 33:2692–2696
Drucker DJ (2003) Glucagon-like peptide-1 and the Islet β-cell: augmentation of cell proliferation and inhibition of apoptosis. Endocrinology 144:5145–5148
Duchowicz PR, Comelli NC, Ortiz EV, Castro EA (2012) QSAR study for carcinogenicity in a large set of organic compounds. Curr Drug Saf 7:282–288
Fowler MJ (2007) Diabetes treatment, part 1: diet and exercise. Clin Diabetes 25:105–109
Gorrell MD, Gysbers V, McCaughan GW (2001) CD26: a multifunctional integral membrane and secreted protein of activated lymphocytes. Scand J Immunol 54:249–264
Gramatica P (2007) Principles of QSAR models validation: Internal and external. QSAR Comb Sci 26:694–701
Green J, Feinglos M (2007) Update on type 2 diabetes mellitus: understanding changes in the diabetes treatment paradigm. Int J Clin Pract 61:3–11
Hansch C, Hoekman D, Gao H (1996) Comparative QSAR: toward a deeper understanding of chemicobiological interactions. Chem Rev 96:1045–1076
Huang J, Liu G, Li J et al. (2012) Synthesis, structure–activity relationship, and pharmacophore modeling studies of pyrazole-3-carbohydrazone derivatives as dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors. Chem Biol Drug Des 79:897–906
Jessen N, Goodyear LJ (2010) Diabetes: exercise and type 2 diabetes mellitus good for body and mind?. Nat Rev Endocrinol 6:303–304
Jiang C, Han S, Chen T, Chen J (2012) 3D-QSAR and docking studies of arylmethylamine-based DPP IV inhibitors. Acta Pharm Sin B 2:411–420
Jiang Y-K (2010) Molecular docking and 3D-QSAR studies on betaphenylalanine derivatives as dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors. J Mol Model 16:1239–1249
Kuhn B, Hennig M, Mattei P (2007) Molecular recognition of ligands in dipeptidyl peptidase IV. Curr Top Med Chem 7:609–619
Lankas GR, Leiting B, Roy RS, Eiermann GJ et al. (2005) Dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibition for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: potential importance of selectivity over dipeptidyl peptidases 8 and 9. Diabetes 54:2988–2994
Maezaki H, Banno Y, Miyamoto Y, Moritou Y, Asakawa T, Kataoka O et al. (2011) Discovery of potent, selective, and orally bioavailable quinoline-based dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors targeting Lys554. Bioorg Med Chem 19:4482–4498
Murphy KG, Dhillo WS, Bloom SR (2006) Gut peptides in the regulation of food intake and energy homeostasis. Endocr Rev 27:719–727
Murugesan V, Sethi N, Prabhakar YS, Katti SB (2011) CoMFA and CoMSIA of diverse pyrrolidine analogues as dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors: active site requirements. Mol Divers 15:457–466
Ojha PK, Mitra I, Das R, Roy K (2011) Further exploring rm2 metrics for validation of QSPR models. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 107:194–205
Ojha PK, Roy K (2011a) Comparative QSARs for antimalarial endochins: importance of descriptor-thinning and noise reduction prior to feature selection. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 109:146–161
Ojha PK, Roy K (2011b) Comparative QSARs for antimalarial endochins: importance of descriptor-thinning and noise reduction prior to feature selection. Chemom Intell Lab 109:146–161
Patel BD, Ghate MD (2014) Recent approaches to medicinal chemistry and therapeutic potential of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors. Eur J Med Chem 74:574–605
Patel BD, Ghate MD (2015) 3D-QSAR studies of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors using various alignment methods. Med Chem Res 24:1060–1069
Pissurlenkar RRS, Shaikh MS, Coutinho EC (2007) 3D-QSAR studies of dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors using a docking based alignment. J Mol Model 13:1047–1071
Pospisilik JA, Stafford SG, Demuth H-U, Brownsey R, Parkhouse H et al. (2002) Long-term treatment with the dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor P32/98 causes sustained improvements in glucose tolerance, insulin sensitivity, hyperinsulinemia, and b-cell glucose responsiveness in VDF (fa/fa) zucker rats. Diabetes 51:943–950
Rosenbloom AL, Joe JR, Young RS, Winter WE (1999) Emerging epidemic of type 2 diabetes in youth. Diabetes Care 22:345–354
Rosenblum JS, Kozarich JW (2003) Prolyl peptidases: a serine protease subfamily with high potential for drug discovery. Curr Opin Chem Biol 7:496–504
Roy K (2007) On some aspects of validation of predictive quantitative structure activity relationship models. Expert Opin Drug Dis 2:1567–1577
Roy K, Das RN, Ambure P, Aher RB (2016) Be aware of error measures. Further studies on validation of predictive QSAR models. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 152:18–33
Roy K, Mitra I, Kar S, Ojha PK, Das RN, Kabir H (2012) Comparative studies on some metrics for external validation of QSPR models. J Chem Inf Model 52:396–408
Roy PP, Leonard JT, Roy K (2008) Exploring the impact of the size of training sets for the development of predictive QSAR models. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 90:31–42
Saqib U, Siddiqi MI (2009) 3D-QSAR studies on triazolopiperazine amide inhibitors of dipeptidyl peptidase-IV as anti-diabetic agents. SAR QSAR Environ Res 20:519–535
Sigal RJ, Kenny GP, Wasserman DH, Castaneda-Sceppa C, White RD (2006) Physical activity/exercise and type 2 diabetes: a consensus statement from the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 29:1433–1438
Talevi A, Bellera CL, Ianni MD, Duchowicz PR, Bruno-Blanch LE, Castro EA (2012) An integrated drug development approach applying topological descriptors. Curr Comput Aided Drug Des 8:172–181
Thorens B (1995) Glucagon like peptide-1 and control of insulin secretion. Diabetes Metab 21:311–318
Toropov AA, Toropova AP, Lombardo A, Roncaglioni A, Benfenati E, Gini G (2011) CORAL: building up the model for bioconcentration factor and defining it’s applicability domain. Eur J Med Chem 46:1400–1403
Toropov AA, Toropova AP, Puzyn T, Benfenati E, Gini G, Leszczynska D, Leszczynski J (2013) QSAR as a random event: modeling of nanoparticles uptake in PaCa2 cancer cells. Chemosphere 92:31–37
Tropsha A, Golbraikh A (2007) Predictive QSAR modeling workflow, model applicability domains, and virtual screening. Curr Pharm Des 13:3494–3504
Veselinović AM, Veselinović JB, Živković JV, Nikolić GM (2015) Application of SMILES notation based optimal descriptors in drug discovery and design. Curr Top Med Chem 15:1768–1779
Weininger D (1988) SMILES, a chemical language and information system. 1. Introduction to methodology and encoding rules. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 28:31–36
Weininger D (1990) SMILES. 3. Depict. Graphical depiction of chemical structures. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 30:237–243
Weininger D, Weininger A, Weininger JL (1989) SMILES. 2. Algorithm for generation of unique SMILES notation. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 29:97–101
Wu S-Y, Lu I-L, Tsai K-C, Chiang Y-K, Jiaang W-T, Wu S-H (2008) A three-dimensional pharmacophore model for dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors. Eur J Med Chem 43:1603–1611
Yang X, Li M, Su Q, Wu M, Gu T, Lu W (2013) QSAR studies on pyrrolidine amides derivatives as DPP-IV inhibitors for type-2 diabetes. Med Chem Res 22:5274–5283
Zeng J, Liu G, Tang Y, Jiang HD (2007) QSAR studies on fluoropyrrolidine amides as dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors by CoMFA and CoMSIA. J Mol Model 13:993–1000
Acknowledgments
This work has been supported by the Ministry of Education and Science, the Republic of Serbia, under Project Number 43012.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sokolović, D., Ranković, J., Stanković, V. et al. QSAR study of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors based on the Monte Carlo method. Med Chem Res 26, 796–804 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00044-017-1792-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00044-017-1792-2