Evolutionary novelties are new traits or behaviors, or novel combinations of previously existing traits or behaviors, arising during the evolution of a lineage, and that perform a new function within the ecology of that lineage.
Massimo Pigliucci (2008, p. 890)
Abstract
Complex problems in evolutionary biology can be approached in two ways, top down using theoretical constructs and bottom up using empirical studies . Theoretical concepts predominate evolutionary interpretations of eusociality in a literature that is small relative to an enormous literature of natural history and basic research that is not synthesized into a conceptual whole. Here, I draw insights from this literature to show how paper wasps’ allomaternal non-reproductive worker phenotype originates in every colony cycle via confluence of multiple factors of paper wasp biology. These include behavior, development, nutrient dynamics, indirect genetic effects, sex ratio, and demography. A novel perspective on the colony cycle, based on individuals’ reproductive physiology, serves as context to examine of each of these. It will be shown that the allomaternal non-reproductive worker phenotype does not require relatedness among colony members to originate. Allomaternal care of non-relatives is frequent and can occur in at least twelve contexts. Life histories of living species as they will be presented here show that relatedness among colony members is not the target of selection in simple eusociality. However, the novel allomaternal non-reproductive worker phenotype had to be present at the ancestral origins of complex eusociality in which relatedness among colony members is essential.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
A fundamental issue that many evolutionary biologists have wrestled with, often termed the selection paradox, is that selection can only sort among existing variation but cannot create novel phenotypes (Pigliucci 2008). Creativity in evolution must come from elsewhere. Eusociality is perhaps the best-known example of a life history type that calls for evolutionary explanation, and presence of a non-reproducing worker phenotype is the essence of eusociality. The purpose of this review is to use empirical studies to unravel and understand factors foundational to the origin of the allomaternal non-reproducing worker phenotype of paper wasps. The central premise is that empirical factors alone can frame an hypothesis for that origin. The hypothesis asserts that the phenotype originates from a coming together of multiple aspects of paper wasp biology: nest architecture, larval development, maternal behavior, sign stimuli that release allomaternal care, energetic costs of allomaternal care, dynamics of relationships among adults, and demography. Nourishment flow among colony members sets the context for indirect genetic effects that shape the phenotype of every colony member. Relatedness between workers and the future reproductive larvae they care for plays no role.
The context that will frame the hypothesis is the annual colony cycle of paper wasps. Van Gestel and Tarnita (2017) offer a perspective on the origin of biological construction that, although focused on multicellularity, includes paper wasps in outlining a bottom-up dynamical account of how, starting from a solitary ancestor, groups originate and subsequently evolve the organizing principles that qualify them as new units. Their perspective stresses the paramount importance of the life cycle and highlights the crucial role of ecology and development of a solitary ancestor. They argue that unraveling the evolutionary trajectory of hierarchical transitions (e.g., solitary to eusocial) is only possible by evaluating groups in the context of their life cycle.
Batra (1966) coined the term “eusocial” to characterize only bees in subfamily Halictinae with subsocial (mother/daughter) colonies and no morphological differentiation among colony members: overlap of generations, cooperative brood care, and division of reproductive labor (i.e., reproductives and non-reproducing workers). In its broader application to wasps, bees, and ants, the term eusocial has been divided into two categories, with terminology that corresponds to those categories but differs among authors: eusocial (Batra 1966) and hypersocial (Batra 1995); primitive and advanced (Wilson 1971); behavioral and morphological (Kukuk 1994); simple and complex (Bourke 1999).
Paper wasps (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, five genera of Polistinae) have simple eusociality as characterized by Bourke (1999, p. 245): few or no morphological differences between reproductive individuals and workers, no physical caste polymorphism among the workers, and relatively simple nests and communication systems. In addition, individuals have reproductive flexibility, although there are boundaries to its expression. The word polistes comes from classical Greek and means founder of a city. Although extant colonies are sometimes initiated by multiple foundresses, the ancestral state of paper wasp eusociality is solitary founding. Paper wasp simple eusociality per se begins when the first female offspring emerge from pupation and engage in allomaternal care of nestmate larvae. The single foundress, which has now become queen, and her matrifilial colony can be easily observed and experimentally manipulated in both field and laboratory. Importantly, paper wasps have an annual life cycle, which facilitates experiments and observations focused on single elements of that life cycle.
The genus Polistes has become a model system (Reeve 1991; Turillazzi and West-Eberhard 1996; Jandt et al. 2013) such that, together with other genera, especially Mischocyttarus (e.g., Jeanne 1972; Hunt 1988; Fiocca et al. 2020; Cervo and Dani 1996) and Ropalidia (e.g., Gadagkar 1991, 2001), a substantial body of knowledge makes paper wasps ideally suited to seek to understand the relevant ecological factors foundational to the origin of an allomaternal non-reproducing worker as a novel phenotype. What follows here is a topical review in which each topic constitutes a brick in that foundation. It begins with an overview of Polistes life history placed in the context of its annual colony cycle, including a novel presentation based on reproductive physiology of individual females rather than state of the colony at a particular point in the cycle. Citations of empirical findings support each topic. Single elements of Polistes’ biology, when taken collectively, show how the allomaternal non-reproducing worker phenotype originates, even in the absence of intra-colony relatedness. A small number of theoretical models support the proposition that relatedness is not required for the novel phenotype to originate. The discussion begins by summarizing the body of the paper and continues with descriptions of how ideas drawn from the review can be placed into broader contexts.
Eusociality in paper wasps
Prerequisites
The matrifilial generational overlap in paper wasps was based on convergence of four aspects: nest architecture, larval provisioning behavior, larval development, and chemical communication. (1) The solitary mud-dauber wasp Sceliphron assimile, which is unrelated to paper wasps, constructs a nest cell, stocks it with spiders as food for the larva that will develop within, lays an egg, closes the cell, then initiates construction of another nest cell that need not be attached to the one just closed. In a demographic study, overall larval mortality was high, with 60% of deaths at the pupal stage caused by parasitoids or cleptoparasites (Hunt 1993). Other solitary wasps suffer similar losses (Cowan 1991). (2) A paper wasp foundress initiates new nest cells one at a time and attaches them to previously initiated cells. A newly initiated nest cell is a shallow cup into which the foundress lays an egg. Lengthening of nest cells and initiation of new cells continue synchronously, leading to an ever-enlarging nest. Nest cells are open, each containing a developmental stage from egg to fifth (last) instar larva. Paper wasps surmount the parasitoid problem by kneading prey items into an unrecognizable mass of tissue, thereby eliminating the possibility of introducing parasitoids into their larvae (Cowan 1991). Kneaded prey items would decay quickly, thus necessitating direct feeding to larvae. The foundress feeds larvae synchronously until each completes larval development, spins a silk cocoon, and encloses itself for metamorphosis. (3) Newly molted adults emerge serially, just as nest cells were initiated serially. Longitudinal folding of the forewings characterizes Vespidae (excluding Stenogastrinae, Euparagiinae, and most Masarinae) (Danforth and Michener 1988). The trait is so distinctive that Faltenwespen (fold wasp) is the German vernacular name for vespid wasps. However, when a paper wasp emerges from pupation in the tight confines of its nest cell, the wing cuticle is teneral (soft and unsclerotized: upper photo in right-hand column and adult phenotype photos in Fig. 3 of Hunt et al. 2007), and the longitudinal fold does not appear until 36 h post-emergence (Danforth and Michener 1988). In consequence, the wasp cannot fly for at least the first 36 h of adult life. (4) Newly emerged wasps lack the distinctive cuticular hydrocarbon (CHC) odor that they acquire from the nest paper (Singer and Espelie 1992) between two and three days following emergence (Panek et al. 2001) and that serves as an essential component of nestmate recognition and non-nestmate discrimination (Layton and Espelie 1995; Gamboa 2004; Mitra et al. 2014). Lacking a chemical identification label, newly emerged adults are not ejected from the colony by other adults, and as they acquire the colony odor they are accepted as colony members.
Life cycle
Paper wasp simple eusociality is established anew in every generation (Hunt 1991) (Fig. 1). A foundress is, de facto, a solitary wasp that initiates a nest and executes the complete module of maternal care behaviors. Independent founding is one criterion of paper wasp eusociality.
Female wasps, both solitary and social, in Hymenoptera’s suborder Apocrita emerge from pupation with undeveloped (synovigenic) ovaries that require nourishment for oocyte development. All wasps are “wasp waisted” and cannot ingest solids, therefore adults are restricted to liquids as nourishment sources. Larvae are grub-like (Fig. 3 of Hunt et al. 2007) and face no restriction, therefore they can feed on solids. Adult paper wasps feed on floral nectar (Domínguez et al. 1989; O'Donnell 1995; De Souza et al. 2008), extrafloral nectar (Beckmann and Stuckey 1981), hemolymph of prey items fed to their larvae (Hunt 1984) or extracted exclusively for self-nourishment (Hunt and Noonan 1979), and can derive additional nourishment from pollen (Hunt et al. 1991). When larvae eclose from eggs and begin larval growth, the foundress brings prey (generally caterpillars) to feed them. She kneads the prey item and extracts hemolymph (insects’ “blood”) prior to feeding the solid mass to larvae. She then regurgitates the hemolymph as a “second course,” although she retains a small portion that serves as a source of liquid nourishment (Hunt 1984). At times other than when feeding larvae, the foundress imbibes saliva that larvae copiously produce. Larvae are capable of gluconeogenesis (Ishay and Ikan 1968) and act as energy converters, ingesting proteinaceous caterpillar tissue and converting it into a nourishing liquid containing glucose (Hunt et al. 1987) and all 20 nutritive amino acids at a richness up to 50 times more than any floral nectar (Hunt et al. 1982). Initially, larvae may have secreted saliva to lubricate dry food morsels that resulted from extensive kneading and hemolymph extraction by the foundress (Hunt 1984), but it then evolved to its present-day copious production and nutritional richness as a food source that can forestall cannibalism by the foundress (Hunt 1988; Hunt, 1991).
Larvae grow and increase in number as a foundress’ nest expands, increasing her foraging energy costs (Weiner et al. 2012) and leading to ovary regression and a pause in oviposition (Haggard and Gamboa 1980; Hunt and Dove 2002). Most or all early offspring are females physiologically primed for reproduction (Bohm 1972) and have the capacity to found nests and lay eggs (Strassmann 1981; Itô and Yamane 1985; Itô 1986; Mead et al. 1995). During the flightless period following emergence, they encounter nestmate larvae producing saliva that, by virtue of its nutrient richness, can enable ovarian development. Once capable of flight, easy access to the copiously produced nourishing liquid induces them to return at the nest to obtain it. As they do so, stimulus cues from nestmate larvae needing to be fed release the module of maternal behaviors, minus oviposition, performed heterochronically and directed allomaternally toward larvae that are not their own. Allomaternal care is a response to the same sign stimuli that are releasers for maternal care by foundresses.
When allomaternal care begins, the foundress (now queen) ceases to forage and nourishes herself on larval saliva and on prey hemolymph and nectar taken from foragers. Her ovaries recrudesce, and she resumes oviposition at a higher level than as a foundress and with a concomitant higher rate of increase in colony size (Hunt and Dove 2002). Whereas the foundress initially faced only the energetic costs of maternal care of tiny first instar larvae, newly emerged females face energetic costs of allomaternal care of an existing and ever-increasing number of large larvae like those that caused the foundress’ ovaries to regress. Consequently, their synovigenic ovaries fail to fully develop, rendering them functionally non-reproductive.
Allomaternal workers care for nestmate larvae that will become adult females called gynes, which are the potential foundresses of the next generation (Fig. 1). Males emerge from pupation synchronously with gynes but play no role in social life beyond consuming nourishment at the nest. Gynes emerge with undeveloped synovigenic ovaries, but they neither engage in allomaternal care nor show ovarian development. Instead, they emerge in reproductive diapause with substantial stores of lipids and storage proteins (Hunt et al. 2003; Toth et al. 2009) that enable them to pass an unfavorable season (cold, hot and dry) in behavioral quiescence. At the start of the next favorable season, gynes emerge from quiescence to become foundresses with little or no remaining stored nourishment (West Eberhard 1969) and synovigenic ovaries in a pre-reproductive state. The next colony cycle begins.
Simple eusociality implies that all reproductive options are open to every wasp, but they are not. The queen dominates her daughters (Pardi 1948). A further dominance hierarchy exists among workers (Pardi 1948; O'Donnell 1998a) in which high ranking individuals secure more nourishment than lower ranking nestmates (Markiewicz and O'Donnell 2001; Fiocca et al. 2020). Dominance is a recurrent theme in sociality (West-Eberhard 1981), and in the critical period of early adulthood in insects with simple eusociality, dominance is likely to be an important environmental control that regulates behavior (van Doorn and Heringa 1986; Jandt et al. 2013; Smith et al. 2021). “[F]emales with elevated ovarian development, high juvenile hormone titers, and a trophic advantage due to social dominance (a set of consistently correlated traits) are able to maintain reproductive and social dominance over other females, who are consequently pushed to the opposite extremes in these traits” (West-Eberhard 2003, p. 301). Individuals low in the dominance hierarchy are the primary foragers, face high energy costs of foraging, never show ovary development, and therefore have de facto lifetime sterility as workers. With overlapping generations, collective brood care, and reproductive division of labor now present, all three definitional components of simple eusociality have been met.
Maternal manipulation
Alexander (1974) introduced the term “parental manipulation of progeny” to encapsulate his argument that offspring can be “treated by parents as parental investment and may not in fact be allowed to maximize their own reproduction or even to reproduce at all” (Alexander 1974, p. 337). Maternal manipulations of the first brood of paper wasp adults take place via both direct (aggression: West-Eberhard 1986; Tibbetts and Reeve 2000; dominance behaviors: Markiewicz and O'Donnell 2001; Keeping 2002; Tibbetts and Dale 2004) and indirect (visual: Tibbetts et al. 2010; pheromonal: Sledge et al. 2001) means. Also, Polistes fuscatus foundresses vibrate the nest by rapidly and forcefully beating their antennae on nest cell rims, a behavior called antennal drumming (Pratte and Jeanne 1984; Suryanarayanan et al. 2011a) that could be a mechanical stressor modulating developmental pathways thought to underlie diapause (Suryanarayanan et al. 2011b; Jandt et al. 2017), with stressed larvae during the gyne production phase of the colony cycle having characteristics of non-diapause workers.
Nourishment dynamics
Pioneering paper wasp researchers (Marchal 1897; Roubaud 1916) proposed that a significant component of worker/gyne differentiation in paper wasps occurs during larval development and is based on differences in nourishment. Those developmental differences, in turn, affect reproductive physiology of emerged wasps: future workers (fed by the foundress) receive less nourishment during development than larvae of future gynes (fed by multiple workers). Subsequent studies have shown that quantitative differences in larval nourishment do correspond to differences in development and reproductive physiology (Gadagkar et al. 1988, 1990, 1991; Karsai and Hunt 2002; Keeping 2002; Hunt et al. 2003; Judd et al. 2015; Toth et al. 2009).
Nourishment flow threads a web of interactions among all colony members (Fig. 2). Foundress-reared larvae have a net gain as they grow, but the foundress exploits their capability as energy converters when she takes saliva from them. When allomaternal workers emerge, the queen feeds not only on larval saliva but also on hemolymph of prey taken from foragers and liquids surrendered by workers during dominance interactions. The queen thereby has a substantial net gain. Larval gynes and males develop without a nutritional loss. Dominant workers gain in food transfers with subdominants. Workers experience a nutritional loss at every food transfer, which reinforces their inability to develop their ovaries, enhances and sustains the queen’s oviposition, enhances physiological characteristics that elevate gynes’ future reproduction potential, and supports males’ spermatogenesis, which occurs only during larval development (Machida 1934).
Indirect genetic effects
Indirect genetic effects (IGEs) are environmental influences on the phenotype of one individual due to the expression of genes in a different, conspecific individual (Wolf et al. 1998). IGEs are ubiquitous in social insects (Linksvayer 2015) and foundational to fitness values of every individual. Each dominance interaction, nourishment transfer, and bout of antennal drumming has an IGE (Fig. 3) in which one wasp’s reproductive potential is enhanced while diminishing another’s. IGEs change dynamically and continuously across the colony cycle. Related workers may gain an indirect fitness return (Fig. 3A), whereas unrelated workers cannot (Fig. 3B). A queens’ direct fitness is undiminished by unrelated allomaternal workers rearing her reproductive offspring, showing that “socially acting genes” and “sib-social care” occur independently of relatedness and are merely context-dependent expressions of maternal care genes and behavior.
Diapause ground plan
The ability of haplodiploid females to determine sex of their offspring is reflected in alternating sex ratios between the two generations of partially bivoltine solitary wasps and bees (Seger 1983; Brockmann and Grafen 1992). The first generation is male-biased and has passed developmental diapause as final instar larvae (prepupae) within closed nest cells until the start of the next favorable season, when they emerge to mate and lay eggs for the second generation. The second generation has a balanced sex ratio when it emerges, mates, and lays eggs for larvae that enter developmental diapause at the end of larval growth.
The Diapause Ground Plan Hypothesis (DGPH) (Hunt 2006) proposes that dichotomization of worker and gyne castes in eusocial Hymenoptera reflects the same ancestral physiological mechanisms and pattern of alternating non-diapause and diapause generations seen in bivoltine solitary wasps, but the physiological and developmental pattern occurs among adults within a single life cycle (Hunt and Amdam 2005). Sex ratios in the two generations also have changed. In Polistes, diapause is female-only and is passed in a state of behavioral quiescence. A post-diapause foundress/queen rears a female-biased brood of first offspring that pass development and emerge from pupation with pre-reproductive physiology and become allomaternal caregivers that then rear a queen’s balanced sex ratio second brood of males and gynes, with gynes in reproductive diapause (Hunt et al. 2007) (Fig. 1). Gynes in reproductive diapause pass an inclement season in behavioral quiescence prior to becoming foundresses in the following favorable season. Among paper wasps and in addition to Polistes, a female reproductive diapause phenotype occurs in some species of Belonogaster (Keeping 2002), Parapolybia (Saito-Morooka 2014), Mischocyttarus (Hunt et al. 1999), and Ropalidia (Saito and Kojima 2005). Several tropical species in locales with wet/dry seasonality have a diapause ethotype as in temperate zone species as part of the colony cycle (Hunt et al. 1999; González et al. 2005). Gobbi et al. (2006) describe “winter” aggregations and the same colony cycle in a sub-tropical Polistes. Colonies at all stages of development occur throughout the year in several tropical species of Mischocyttarus (Jeanne 1972; Litte 1981; O'Donnell and Joyce 2001) and Polistes canadensis (Southon et al. 2019), suggesting that diapause/non-diapause physiological dichotomy may not occur in lowland tropical locales, however diapause phenotypes do occur in Polistes canadensis near the end of the wet season (Giray et al. 2005).
Sex ratio
All Hymenoptera have haplodiploid sex determination in which diploids are female and haploids are male. At the time of oviposition, plasticity of fertilization as ova pass the duct to the spermatheca, where sperm are held, enables an ovipositing female to control the sex ratio of her offspring. Sex ratios vary widely across the order (parasitoids: Hardy 1994; solitary wasps: (Danks 1983; eusocial Hymenoptera: Gardner and Ross 2013). Paper wasps, indeed all eusocial wasps, are protogynous and produce female offspring prior to males. Females with reproductive or pre-reproductive physiology are the only paper wasps that engage in maternal or allomaternal larval care. A queen that includes males in her early brood would thereby reduce her prospects of producing a reproductive brood when compared to a queen with an initial all-female allomaternal brood that rears her larvae that become her direct fitness comprised of gynes and males produced later in the colony cycle.
Demography
At the population level, high colony loss is mitigated by a minuscule percentage of nests that reach a large size and produce large numbers of gynes (Wenzel 1989; Hunt 2007). In consequence of this, the main driver of paper wasp population dynamics is the role played by allomaternal workers to yield the highest possible number of gyne offspring at the end of the colony cycle, giving the queen the best possibility of a daughter surviving the gauntlet of ecological mortality factors to become one of the minuscule number of successful queens in the following generation. A foundress without allomaternal caregivers cannot rear gynes (West Eberhard 1969), therefore eusociality in paper wasps can be considered to be obligatory (O'Donnell 1998b; Seppä et al. 2012; Hunt and Toth 2017). Three minor exceptions have been noted. Fucini et al. (2009) documented inter-population life cycle variation in populations of Polistes biglumis in which two populations at high elevations with cold temperature regimes and heavy selection pressure from an interspecific cleptoparasite had only a single offspring generation, all with gyne-like characteristics, thus indicating the virtual absence of workers. In a population of Polistes aurifer in which 86% of nests have solitary foundresses, Liebert et al. (2005) found that due to foundress turnover and nest foundation in later parts of the season, many nests produced only one set of offspring, resulting in a loss of the eusocial nature in those nests. To be clear, the P. biglumis and P. aurifer examples represent only portions of populations of the same species that otherwise express simple eusociality. Ropalidia rufoplagiata has a social structure apparently unique among paper wasps (Sinha et al. 1993). Thirty-three of 46 identified females on a single colony in subtropical India were observed to oviposit from 1 to 17 times over a 45-day observation period. No predominant egg layer was detected, suggesting the absence of a permanent reproductive caste in this species.
Diversity of unrelated workers
Natural history studies of Polistes have documented at least twelve contexts in which allomaternal behavior is directed to larvae of an unrelated queen or other egg-laying member of the colony (Table 1). Although colony members were related at the ancestral dawn of the allomaternal non-reproductive worker phenotype, providing a quintessential relatedness structure for kin selection, allomaternal care by non-relatives in extant species suggests that workers were not the target for selection. Allomaternal caregiving daughters at the threshold of paper wasp eusociality could have been, in concept, substituted by unrelated allomaternal caregivers with no fitness consequence for the queen (Fig. 3). The paper wasp worker phenotype could have originated exclusively through allomaternal behavior of first emerged daughters in response to sign stimuli from nestmate larvae. This would have been accentuated by maternal manipulation via dominance by the foundress leading to enhanced nutritional exploitation of her reproductively competent daughters. At the origin of the allomaternal worker phenotype, fitness benefits accrued only to the queen.
Experimental validation
Experiments have validated aspects of Polistes development and life history described above. In natural environments, supplemental nourishment of foundress nests yielded first-emerging offspring with gyne-like physiological characteristics (Rossi and Hunt 1988). Supplementation for the full colony cycle yielded more female offspring during the colony phase of gyne production (Seal and Hunt 2004); lower oophagy, more rapid nest growth, more offspring, longer worker lifespan, and lower rates of larval cannibalism near the end of the colony cycle (Mead and Pratte 2002); and caste-related differences in nutrient levels (Judd et al. 2009). Simulated antennal drumming during the gyne production phase of the colony cycle yielded offspring with worker-like characteristics (Suryanarayanan et al. 2011b). Restricted foraging combined with simulated antennal drumming decreased colony growth due to larval disappearance (Jandt et al. 2017). Diminishment of larval saliva yielded extremely low colony survivorship, colony growth, and number of offspring produced (Hunt and Dove 2002). Individuals emerging onto nests without larvae, therefore without stimuli that elicit allomaternal care, showed signs of active reproduction and nest construction (Judd 2018). In the laboratory, augmented nourishment increased gyne-like characteristics (Karsai and Hunt 2002; Judd et al. 2015); restricted nourishment increased larval cannibalism by foundresses (Kudô and Shirai 2012); and exposure to cold revealed physiological and survival differences between workers and gynes (Strassmann et al. 1984; Karsai and Hunt 2002). Facial patterns of Polistes dominulus from colonies reared with supplemental nourishment signaled higher aspects of quality related to dominance (Tibbetts and Curtis 2007). Non-supplemented colonies of both P. dominulus and Polistes metricus in that same experiment produced smaller offspring than in supplemented colonies (Tibbetts and Curtis 2007). Restricted nourishment in a different experiment with P. metricus yielded smaller offspring (Karsai and Hunt 2002). P. metricus on a restricted nourishment treatment fed more on sugar, had lower aggression, and had a higher net loss of larvae than those on supplemented diets, which fed more on caterpillars, had higher aggression, and lower net loss of larvae (Walton and Toth 2021). Experimental transfer of paper wasp foundresses to pre-emergence nests of unrelated foundresses replicated characteristics of intra-specific facultative cleptoparasitism (Cervo and Turillazzi 1989). In combined field and laboratory studies of Mischocyttarus pallidipectus, workers with higher dominance indices spent more time on the nest, had a diet higher in animal-based sources, and had greater ovary development than workers with lower dominance indices (Fiocca et al. 2020).
Theoretical support
Kay et al. (2020) scrutinized formal evolutionary models of 119 papers that investigate dynamics of either genetic variants (alleles) or cultural variants (memes), with most concentrating on only two competing variants (one “altruistic” and one “selfish”). Criteria for the evolution of altruism were identified in 89 of the models and cooperation in 28. Kay et al. (2020) therefore infer that relatedness plays an implicit role in the models, even in those for which an explicit role for relatedness isn’t stated or even inferred by authors of the models. Bourke (2011, p. 38) asserts, “altruism cannot evolve when relatedness is zero, i.e., when the recipient [of altruistic aid] is unrelated.” However, even though allomaternal worker behavior typically arises in the context of social relatives, that does not mean that an underlying relatedness model is correct.
Using a quantitative genetics approach, Bijma and Wade (2008) developed models in which the trait value of an individual is modeled as the sum of a direct genetic effect to that individual and phenotype consequences caused by IGEs of other individuals interacting with the focal individual. Among other conclusions, they show that IGEs create the opportunity for the evolution [origin] of an altruism phenotype without the need for relatedness or multilevel selection.
Also using a quantitative genetics approach, Moore et al. (1997) present a family of models in which IGEs affect phenotypic evolution of traits expressed during interactions among unrelated conspecific social partners. In a model in which two interacting individuals express different traits affected by expression of the other trait, exemplified by dominance and subordinance, higher levels of dominant behavior in one actor increases the expression of subordinate behavior in the other actor and vice versa. Dominance interactions among related as well as unrelated Polistes individuals would be an empirical example that conforms to their model.
González-Forero and Gavrilets (2013) use techniques derived from the Price (1970) equation to investigate the evolution of manipulated behavior. Their hypothetical example addresses “the evolution of eusociality” via maternal manipulation as it would be present in a colony of paper wasps with two broods of offspring. Individuals exist in one of three states: manipulator (queen), manipulated (first brood offspring), and target of manipulation (second brood offspring). In the first brood, resistance is expressed as leaving the colony, thereby escaping manipulation. Acquiescing offspring remain and may expresses allomaternal care toward the second brood, thereby increasing fitness of the queen and her future reproductive offspring. They find that manipulated behavior can evolve [originate] and be maintained with zero relatedness between actors and recipients if resistance is costlier than acquiescence.
Discussion
The novel phenotype of paper wasp allomaternal non-reproductive workers is comprised of reproductively competent females with undeveloped synovigenic ovaries, initially constrained to remain at their natal nest by an inability to fly and induced to return to it by the attractiveness of larval saliva as nourishment source for potential ovary development. At the nest, they respond to sign stimuli from nestmate larvae that release the module of maternal behaviors directed allomaternally toward larvae that are not their own. The energetic costs of allomaternal care constrain their ovary development, rendering them functionally sterile.
This phenotype would have first appeared within matrifilial colonies, thus providing a framework for response to selection (Southon et al. 2019). However, the many ways in which allomaternal care is mis-directed to non-relatives with no alterations in performance indicates that relatedness between allomaternal workers and a queen’s fitness-yielding reproductive offspring was not the target of selection. Evolutionary processes at the ancestral dawn of the allomaternal worker phenotype, such as selection favoring protogeny and dominance behaviors, were driven by direct selection on the queen. Allomaternal worker daughters could, in concept, have been replaced by allomaternal workers unrelated to the queen with no diminishment of her fitness.
Allomaternal care of nestmate larvae in paper wasps has a social structure analogous to alloparental behavior of songbirds feeding a cuckoo nestling. When the songbirds’ offspring in their natal nest present sign stimuli of open mouths and food begging calls, the adults respond with parental care. If the nestling is that of a cuckoo, sign stimuli of an open mouth and food begging call stimulate the adults to respond with alloparental care. Just as in paper wasps, parental and alloparental care by songbirds are identical responses to sign stimuli that are independent of relatedness between caregiver and recipient. The fitness beneficiary in paper wasps is the individual that laid the egg, whether or not the allomaternal caregivers are related to her and her future reproductive daughters and sons. In cuckooed songbirds, the fitness beneficiary is the cuckoo that laid the egg that became the begging chick that received alloparental care. The analogy is such that interspecific Polistes cleptoparasites are sometimes called cuckoo paper wasps (Cervo and Turillazzi 1996).
Gyne paper wasps enter reproductive diapause at the same point in the life cycle every generation, a feature that indicates it to be an obligate feature of the life cycle (Hahn and Denlinger 2007). Indeed, natural history studies suggest that every lineage of Hymenoptera that contains eusocial species also contains solitary species that have developmental diapause (Brockmann 1984, Santos et al. 2019). Developmental physiology of bivoltine solitary vespid wasps, i.e., reproductive physiology of first-generation adults and developmental diapause of the second generation, has been hypothesized to be the same as that in paper wasps, in which first brood female workers have pre-reproductive physiology and gynes have reproductive diapause physiology (Hunt and Amdam 2005). Comparative physiological studies of bivoltine solitary wasps vs. wasps with simple sociality could be informative regarding the life cycle transition from prepupal diapause in solitary wasps to reproductive diapause in gyne paper wasps. Treanore et al. (2020) document a gradual change in physiology of bumble bee queens’ offspring from reproductively capable early in the colony cycle to diapause-like in later phases of the cycle. They opine that existing data and examples are sufficient to recommend that the diapause ground plan hypothesis warrants further direct investigation.
Boomsma and Gawne (2018) present a comprehensive review and analysis of an extensive literature addressing the diverse definitions and concepts of species with complex eusociality. They posit that hypersociality sensu Batra (1995) and obligate eusociality sensu Crespi and Yanega (1995) and Boomsma (2009) are functionally identical to superorganismality sensu Wheeler (1928). Superorganismal colonies are those that have crossed an irreversible major transition and are characterized by permanent morphological castes, distinct lifetime matedness difference between queens and workers, and queens domesticated by workers. Using those criteria, vespine wasps (yellowjackets and hornets), despite having solitary foundresses, are superorganismal. Boomsma and Gawne (2018) place paper wasps in the middle of their spectrum from cooperative breeding to eusocial. Characteristics that determine that placement are alpha queens that maintain dominance hierarchies and capability of all females to mate, thus they have not crossed a major transition to become superorganismal. There are apparent exceptions to paper wasps’ placement in the Boomsma and Gawne sociality spectrum. Although most paper wasps show a gradation of sizes without morphological castes (Haggard and Gamboa 1980), a handful of species have discrete worker/gyne caste dimorphism: Ropalidia ignobilis (Wenzel 1992), Belonogaster griseus (Pardi and Marino Piccoli 1981), Belonogaster peteolata (Keeping 2002), and Polistes olivaceous (Alam 1958; Kundu 1967). Crossing the divide from monomorphism to dimorphism can only have evolved via selection acting on colonies containing allomaternal workers related to the queen’s reproductive brood that they rear. These species may therefore have crossed the major transition threshold and become superorganismal.
Paper wasps with simple eusociality and vespines (hornets and yellow jackets) with complex eusociality share a common ancestor and are unrelated to social wasps in Stenogastrinae (Schmitz and Moritz 1998, 2000; Hines et al. 2007; Bank et al. 2017; Peters et al. 2017; Piekarski et al. 2018). Reproductive queen and worker differentiation appeared in the common ancestor (Piekarski et al. 2018), but the common ancestor would not have had morphological castes (contra speculations by Piekarski et al. 2018). The queen of a paper wasp colony is entirely dependent on allomaternal workers to rear her reproductive offspring, therefore paper wasps with simple eusociality also have obligate sociality (O'Donnell 1998b; Seppä et al. 2012; Hunt and Toth 2017). This is the case whether or not allomaternal workers are related to the queen or other colony members. Paper wasps’ obligate eusociality occurs in the absence of superorganismality. The evolutionary force that results in paper wasp obligate eusociality is direct selection acting on the foundress/queen. Solitary foundresses of hornets and yellow jackets have complex eusociality characterized by queen-worker dimorphism, which can only have evolved in colonies of relatives. As in paper wasps, a vespine queen’s reproductive success is entirely dependent on the presence of workers, therefore vespines’ eusociality obligate. However, occurrence of several species of obligate social parasites (Carpenter and Perera 2006) indicates that, as in paper wasps, relatedness between workers and the queen’s reproductive offspring is not required for a queen’s reproductive success.
New families of models could expand our understanding of simple eusociality dynamics regardless of relatedness between allomaternal and beneficiary colony members. The ability to specify directionality of IGEs (Fig. 3) is a novel addition to the Moore et al. (1997) IGE models. Fiocca et al. (2020) present a social network diagram (their Fig. 2) with quantified dominance pathways in a large colony of Mischocyttarus pallidipectus paper wasps. The diagram shows that it should be possible to use a combination of IGE and individual-based modeling to quantify variations in eusocial outcomes based on parameterized IGEs, at least in colonies with fewer individuals. A general individual-based model (Judson 1994) with variables drawn from the model in Fig. 3 could be combined with a model for the timing of reproduction in annual plants with two-stage life cycles (Schaal and Leverich 1981) to address the paper wasp population survivorship pattern conjectured by Hunt (2007, p. 128). In so doing it could test the proposition that allomaternal workers are essential to a queen’s fitness and that simple eusociality is indeed obligate.
Linksvayer and Wade (2005) hypothesized the presence of heterochrony genes that can modify the timing of expression of maternal care as part of a scenario for the evolutionary origin and elaboration of eusociality, i.e., the evolution of allomaternal workers. As has been outlined here, however, it is not necessary to invoke a special set of genes—or any genes—to explain the origin of the allomaternal non-reproductive worker phenotype.
Marshall (2016, p. 103) noted that “[c]ritiques of inclusive fitness have become increasingly mathematical in recent years, as have their defences.” This contest of theoretical ideas proceeded without heed to the insight of Thomas Kuhn, who pointed out that “[t]he competition between paradigms is not the sort of battle that can be resolved by proofs” (Kuhn 1962, p. 391). In a paper entitled, “What is inclusive fitness theory, and what is it for?”, Marshall (2016, p. 103) made reference to Kuhn and opined, “if the ongoing battle is to be ‘put to bed’ then the resolution will be conceptual, not mathematical.”
Pursuant to Hamilton’ influential publications (Hamilton 1964a, b) in which he introduced the concept of inclusive fitness, accepted wisdom is that eusocial insect workers altruistically sacrifice direct reproduction as a means to maximize their inclusive fitness. “In social groups, only a few individuals often monopolize actual reproduction. The others more or less voluntarily assume the role of helpers whose fitness is dependent on helping relatives, not on reproducing themselves” (Seppä, Queller and Strassmann 2012). When Wilson (1971) broadly disseminated Hamilton’s ¾ relatedness hypothesis for “the evolution of eusociality,” he commingled the origin of eusociality with its subsequent elaboration. The distinction is critical. Hamilton (1972) recognized that selection processes in eusocial origins may differ from those affecting its maintenance or elaboration. His insight on that point passed largely unnoticed, thereby facilitating decades of publication in which a distinction between the two has been blurred or, mostly, altogether missing. Pernu and Helanterä 2019, p.1) point out that, “[a]lthough reviewing the empirical evidence concerning the evolution of eusociality reveals that relatedness does not play a role in the initial appearance of helper phenotypes, this follows simply from the fact that natural selection—of which relatedness is a necessary component—does not play a causal role in the origin of any traits.” The paper wasp allomaternal non-reproductive worker phenotype did not evolve from a foundation of relatedness. Instead, it originated from a confluence of multiple proximate factors in paper wasp biology. However, the evolutionary elaboration of eusociality requires relatedness. In the history of eusociality, an allomaternal non-reproductive worker phenotype had to originate in a context of simple eusociality before the evolution of complex eusociality could begin.
Conclusion
Paper wasps’ allomaternal non-reproductive worker phenotype originated as a context-dependent expression of maternal behavior performed allomaternally and serving a new function within the ecology of paper wasps. The nexus of nest architecture, larval provisioning behavior, larval development, and reproductive and diapause physiology, in combination with IGEs arising from nourishment and social dynamics creates an “exaptation” (Gould and Vrba 1982) that gave rise to the novel phenotype. Relatedness between allomaternal non-reproductive workers and the larvae they care for played no role. A large literature, both natural history and experimental, has enabled insights and synthesis leading to this conclusion. Using paper wasps as a focal example demonstrates that empirical studies of factors that affect the origin of an allomaternal non-reproductive worker phenotype in simple eusociality can offer a new perspective on the foundation of complex eusociality, one of the most remarkable phenomena in evolution.
References
Alam SM (1958) Some interesting revelations about the nest of Polistes hebroeus Fabr. (Vespidae, Hymenoptera)—the common yellow wasp of India. Proc Zool Soc Calcutta 11:113–122
Alexander RD (1974) The evolution of social behavior. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 5:325–383
Bank S, Sann M, Mayer C, Meusemann K, Donath A, Podsiadlowski L et al (2017) Transcriptome and target DNA enrichment sequence data provide new insights into the phylogeny of vespid wasps (Hymenoptera: Aculeata: Vespidae). Mol Phylogenet Evol 116:213–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2017.08.020
Batra SWT (1966) Nests and social behavior of halictine bees of India. Indian J Entomol 28:375–393
Batra SWT (1995) The evolution of “eusocial” and the origin of “pollen bees.” Maryland Nat 39:1–4
Beckmann RLJ, Stuckey JM (1981) Extrafloral nectaries and plant guarding in Ipomoea pandurata (L.) G. F. W. Mey (Convolvulaceae). Am J Bot 68:72–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1981.tb06357.x
Bijma P, Wade MJ (2008) The joint effects of kin, multilevel selection and indirect genetic effects on response to genetic selection. J Evol Biol 21:1175–1188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01550.x
Bohm MK (1972) Effects of environment and juvenile hormone on ovaries of the wasp, Polistes metricus. J Insect Physiol 18:1875–1883. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1910(72)90158-8
Boomsma JJ (2009) Lifetime monogamy and the evolution of eusociality. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 364:3191–3207. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0101
Boomsma JJ, Gawne R (2018) Superorganismality and caste differentiation as points of no return: how the major evolutionary transitions were lost in translation. Biol Rev 93:28–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12330
Bourke AFG (1999) Colony size, social complexity and reproductive conflict in social insects. J Evol Biol 12:245–257. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.1999.00028.x
Bourke AFG (2011) Principles of social evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Brockmann HJ (1984) The evolution of social behaviour in insects. In: Krebs JR, Davies NBI (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach, 2nd edn. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, pp 340–361
Brockmann HJ, Grafen A (1992) Sex ratios and life-history patterns of a solitary wasp, Trypoxylon (Trypargilum) politum (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 30:7–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00168590
Carpenter JM, Perera WP (2006) Phylogenetic relationships among yellowjackets and the evolution of social parasitism (Hymenoptera: Vespidae, Vespinae). Am Mus Novitates 3507:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1206/0003-0082(2006)3507[1:PRAYAT]2.0.CO;2
Cervo R (1994) Morphological adaptations to the parasitic life in Polistes sulcifer and P. atrimandibularis (Hymenoptera Vespidae). Ethol Ecol Evol 6:supplement 1, Fifth conf Ital sec IUSSI. https://doi.org/10.1080/03949370.1994.10721975
Cervo R, Dani FR (1996) Social parasitism and its evolution in Polistes. In: Turillazzi S, West-Eberhard MJ (eds) Natural history and evolution of paper wasps. Oxford Univ Press, New York, pp 98–112
Cervo R, Turillazzi S (1989) Nest exchange experiments in Polistes gallicus (L) (Hymenoptera, Vespidae). Ethol Ecol Evol 1:185–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.1089.9525522
Cervo R, Turillazzi S (1996) Host nest preference and nest choice in the cuckoo paper wasp Polistes sulcifer (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). J Insect Behav 9:297–306
Choudhary M, Strassmann JE, Queller DC, Turillazzi S, Cervo R (1994) Social parasites in polistine wasps are monophyletic - implications for sympatric speciation. Proc Roy Lond B 257:31–35
Cowan DP (1991) The solitary and presocial Vespidae. In: Ross KG, Matthews RW (eds) The social biology of wasps. Comstock Publishing Associates, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp 33–73
Crespi BJ, Yanega D (1995) The definition of eusociality. Behav Ecol 6:109–115. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/6.1.109
Danforth BN, Michener CD (1988) Wing folding in the Hymenoptera. Ann Entomol Soc Am 81:342–349. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/81.2.342
Danks HV (1983) Differences between generations in the sex ratio of aculeate Hymenoptera. Evolution 32:414–416. https://doi.org/10.2307/2408349
De Souza A, Rodrigues IL, Rocha JVA, Reis WAA, Lopes J (2008) Foraging behavior and dominance hierarchy in colonies of the Neotropical social wasp Polistes ferreri (Hymenoptera, Vespidae) in different stages of development. Sociobiology 52:293–303
Domínguez CA, Dirzo R, Bullock SH (1989) On the function of floral nectar in Croton suberosus (Euphorbiacae). Oikos 56:109–114. https://doi.org/10.2307/3566093
Fiocca K, Capobianco K, Fanwick E, Mouynahan K, Congdon R et al (2020) Reproductive physiology corresponds to adult nutrition and task performance in a Neotropical paper wasp: a test of dominance-nutrition hypothesis predictions. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 74:114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-020-02898-x
Fucini S, Di Bona V, Mola F, Piccaluga C, Lorenzi MC (2009) Social wasps without workers: geographic variation of caste expression in the paper wasp Polistes biglumis. Insect Soc 56:347–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-009-0030-4
Gadagkar R (1991) Belonogaster, Mischocyttarus, Parapolybia, and independent-founding Ropalidia. In: Ross KG, Matthews RW (eds) The social biology of wasps. Comstock Publishing Associates, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp 149–190
Gadagkar R (2001) The social biology of Ropalidia marginata—toward understanding the evolution of eusociality. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Gadagkar R, Vinutha C, Shanubhogue A, Gore AP (1988) Pre-imaginal biasing of caste in a primitively eusocial insect. Proc R Soc Lond B 233:175–189. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1988.0017
Gadagkar R, Bhagavan S, Malpe R, Vinutha C (1990) On reconfirming the evidence for pre-imaginal caste bias in a primitively eusocial wasp. Proc Indian Acad Sci (Anim Sci) 99:141–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03186384
Gadagkar R, Bhagavan S, Chandrashekara K, Vinutha C (1991) The role of larval nutrition in pre-imaginal biasing of caste in the primitively eusocial wasp Ropalidia marginata (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Ecol Entomol 16:435–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.1991.tb00236.x
Gamboa GJ (2004) Kin recognition in eusocial wasps. Ann Zool Fenn 41:789–808
Gardner A, Ross L (2013) Haplodiploidy, sex-ratio adjustment, and eusociality. Am Nat 181:E60–E67. https://doi.org/10.1086/669147
Gestel JV, Tarnita CE (2017) On the origin of biological construction, with a focus on multicellularity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:11018–11026. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704631114
Giray T, Giovanetti M, West-Eberhard MJ (2005) Juvenile hormone, reproduction, and worker behavior in the neotropical social wasp Polistes canadensis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:3330–3335. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0409560102
Gobbi N, Noll FB, Penna MAH (2006) “Winter” aggregations, colony cycle, and seasonal penotypic change in the paper was Polistes versicolor in subtropical Brazil. Naturwissenschaften 93:487–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-006-0140-z
González-Forero M, Gavrilets S (2013) Evolution of manipulated behavior. Am Nat 182:439–451. https://doi.org/10.1086/671932
González JM, Piñango J, Blanco E, Matthews RW (2005) On the mass aggregations of Polistes versicolor (Oliver) (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) along the northern cordillera of Venezuela, South America. J Hymen Res 14:15–21
Gould SJ, Vrba ES (1982) Exaptation - a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology 8:4–15
Haggard CM, Gamboa GJ (1980) Seasonal variation in body size and reproductive condition of a paper wasp, Polistes metricus (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Can Entomol 112:239–248. https://doi.org/10.4039/ent112239-3
Hagiwara Y, Kojima J (2002) Reproductive options for first brood “workers” emerging in orphan nests of Polistes nipponensis (Hymenoptera, Vespidae). Insect Soc 49:191–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-002-8300-4
Hahn DA, Denlinger DL (2007) Meeting the energetic demands of insect diapause: nutrient storage and utilization. J Insect Physiol 53:760–773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2007.03.018
Hamilton WD (1964a) The genetical evolution of social behavior. I. J Theor Biol 7:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(64)90039-6
Hamilton WD (1964b) The genetical evolution of social behavior. II. J Theor Biol 7:17–52
Hamilton WD (1972) Altruism and related phenomena, mainly in social insects. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 3:193–232
Hardy ICW (1994) Sex-ratio and mating structure in the parasitoid Hymenoptera. Oikos 69:3–20
Hines HM, Hunt JH, O’Cconnor TK, Gillespie JJ, Cameron SA (2007) Multigene phylogeny reveals eusociality evolved twice in vespid wasps. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:3295–3299. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0610140101
Hunt JH (1984) Adult nourishment during larval provisioning in a primitively eusocial wasp, Polistes metricus Say. Insect Soc 31:452–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02223659
Hunt JH (1988) Lobe erection behavior and its possible social role in larvae of Mischocyttarus paper wasps. J Insect Behav 1:379–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01054500
Hunt JH (1991) Nourishment and the evolution of the social Vespidae. In: Ross KG, Matthews RW (eds) The social biology of wasps. Comstock Publishing Associates, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp 426–450
Hunt JH (1993) Survivorship, fecundity, and recruitment in a mud dauber wasp, Sceliphron assimile (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 86:51–59. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/86.1.51
Hunt JH (2006) Evolution of castes in Polistes. Ann Zool Fenn 43:407–422
Hunt JH (2007) The evolution of social wasps. Oxford University Press, New York
Hunt JH (2009) Interspecific adoption of orphaned nests by Polistes paper wasps (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). J Hym Res 18:136–139
Hunt JH, Amdam GV (2005) Bivoltinism as an antecedent to eusociality in the paper wasp genus Polistes. Science 308:264–267. https://doi.org/10.1126/science1109724
Hunt JH, Dove MA (2002) Nourishment affects colony demographics in the paper wasp Polistes metricus. Ecol Entomol 27:467–474. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2311.2002.00369.x
Hunt JH, Noonan KC (1979) Larval feeding by male Polistes fuscatus and Polistes metricus (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Insect Soc 26:247–251
Hunt JH, Toth AL (2017) Sociality in wasps. In: Rubenstein DR, Abbot P (eds) Comparative social evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 84–123
Hunt JH, Baker I, Baker HG (1982) Similarity of amino acids in nectar and larval saliva: the nutritional basis for trophallaxis in social wasps. Evolution 36:1318–1322. https://doi.org/10.2307/2408164
Hunt JH, Jeanne RL, Baker I, Grogan DE (1987) Nutrient dynamics of a swarm-founding social wasp species, Polybia occidentalis (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Ethology 75:291–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1987.tb00661.x
Hunt JH, Brown PA, Sago KM, Kerker JA (1991) Vespid wasps eat pollen (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). J Kans Entomol Soc 64:127–130
Hunt JH, Brodie RJ, Carithers TP, Goldstein PZ, Janzen DH (1999) Dry season migration by Costa Rican lowland paper wasps to high elevation cold dormancy sites. Biotropica 31:192–196. https://doi.org/10.2307/2663974
Hunt JH, Buck NA, Wheeeler DE (2003) Storage proteins in vespid wasps: characterization, developmental pattern, and occurrence in adults. J Insect Physiol 49:785–794. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1910(03)00115-X
Hunt JH, Kensinger BA, Kossuth J, Henshaw MT, Norberg K et al (2007) From casteless to castes – a diapause pathway underlies the gyne phenotype in Polistes paper wasps. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:14020–14025. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0705660104
Ishay J, Ikan R (1968) Gluconeogenesis in the oriental hornet, Vespa orientalis F. Ecology 49:169–171. https://doi.org/10.2307/1933578
Itô Y (1986) Social behaviour of Ropalidia fasciata (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) females on satellite nests and on a nest with multiple combs. J Ethol 4:73–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02348108
Itô Y, Yamane S (1985) Early male production in a subtropical paper wasp Ropalidia fasciata (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Insect Soc 32:403–410
Jandt JM, Tibbetts EA, Toth AL (2013) Polistes paper wasps: a model genus for the study of social dominance hierarchies. Insectes Soc 61:11–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-013-0328-0
Jandt JM, Suryanarayanan S, Hermanson JC, Jeanne RL, Toth AL (2017) Maternal and nourishment factors interact to influence offspring developmental trajectories in social wasps. Proc R Acad Sci 284:20170651. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbp.2017.0651
Jeanne RL (1972) Social biology of the neotropical wasp Mischocyttarus drewseni. Bull Mus Comp Zool Harvard Univ 144:63–150
Judd TM (2018) Effect of the presence of brood on the behavior and nutrient levels of emerging individuals in field colonies of Polistes metricus. Insect Soc 65:171–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-017-0599-y
Judd TM, Magnus RM, Fasnacht MP (2009) A nutritional profile of the social wasp Polistes metricus: differences in nutrient levels between castes and changes within castes during the annual life cycle. J Insect Physiol 56:42–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinspyss.2009.09.002
Judd TJ, Teal PEA, Hernandez EJ, Choudhury T, Hunt JH (2015) Quantitative differences in nourishment affect caste-related physiology and development in the paper wasp Polistes metricus. PLoS ONE 10:e0116199. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116199
Judson OP (1994) The rise of the individual-based model in ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 9:9–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(94)90225-9
Karsai I, Hunt JH (2002) Food quantity affects traits of offspring in the paper wasp Polistes metricus (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Env Entomol 31:99–106. https://doi.org/10.1603/0046-225X-31.1.99
Kasuya E (1981) Internidal drifting of workers in the Japanese paper wasp Polistes chinensis antennalis (Vespidae, Hymenoptera). Insect Soc 28:343–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02224191
Kay T, Keller L, Lehmann L (2020) The evolution of altruism and the serial rediscovery of the role of relatedness. PNAS 117:28894–28898. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2013596117
Keeping MG (2002) Reproductive and worker castes in the primitively eusocial wasp Belonogaster petiolata (DeGeer) (Hymenoptera: Vespidae): evidence for pre-imaginal differentiation. J Insect Physiol 48:867–879. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1910(02)00156-7
Klahn J (1988) Intraspecific comb usurpation in the social wasp Polistes fuscatus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 23:1–8
Klan J (1988) Intraspecific comb usurpation in the social wasp Polistes fuscatus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 23:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00303051
Kudô D, Shirai A (2012) Effect of food availability on larval cannibalism by foundresses of the paper wasp Polistes chinensis antennalis. Insect Soc 59:279–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-011-0217-3
Kuhn TS (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Kukuk PF (1994) Replacing the terms “primitive” and “advanced”: new modifiers for the term “eusocial.” Anim Behav 47:475–1478. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1994.1198
Kundu HL (1967) Observations on Polistes hebraeus (Hymenoptera). Birla Inst Technol Sci J (Pilani) 1:152–161
Layton JM, Espelie KE (1995) Effects of nest paper hydrocarbons on nest and nestmate recognition in colonies of Polistes metricus Say. J Insect Behav 8:103–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01990972
Leadbeater AE, Carruthers JM, Green JP, Rosser NS, Field J (2011) Nest inheritance is the missing source of direct fitness in a primitively eusocial insect. Science 333:874–876. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1205140
Liebert AE, Nonacs P, Wayne RK (2005) Solitary nesting and reproductive success in the paper wasp Polistes aurifer. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 57:445–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-004-0875-5
Liebert AE, Hui J, Nonacs P, Starks PT (2008) Extreme polygyny: multi-seasonal “hypergynous” nesting in the introduced paper wasp Polistes dominulus. J Insect Behav 21:72–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-007-9108-x
Linksvayer TA (2015) The molecular and evolutionary genetic implications of being truly social for the social insects. Adv Insect Physiol 48:271–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aiip.2014.12.003
Linksvayer TA, Wade MJ (2005) The evolutionary origin and elaboration of sociality in the aculeate Hymenoptera: maternal effects, sib-social effects, and heterochrony. Q Rev Biol 80:317–336. https://doi.org/10.1086/43226
Litte M (1981) Social biology of the polistine wasp Mischocyttarus labiatus: survival in a Colombian rain forest. Smithsonian Contrib Zool 327:1–27
Machida J (1934) The spermatogenesis of the three species of Polistes (Hymenoptera). Proc Imperial Acad (Dobutsugaku Zasshi) 46:515–518. https://doi.org/10.2183/pjab1912.10.515
Makino S, Sayama K (1991) Comparison of intraspecif nest usurpation between two haplometrtic paper wasp species (Hymenoptera: Vespidae: Polistes). J Ethol 9:121–128
Marchal P (1897) La castration nutriciale chez les Hyménoptères sociaux. C R Séances Soc Biol (Paris) 1897:556–557
Markiewicz DA, O’Donnell S (2001) Social dominance, task performance and nutrition: implications for reproduction in eusocial wasps. J Comp Physiol A 187:327–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003590100204
Marshall JAR (2016) What is inclusive fitness theory, and what is it for? Curr Opinion Behav Sci 12:103–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.09.015
Mead F, Pratte M (2002) Prey supplementation increases productivity in the social wasp Polistes dominulus Christ (Hymenoptera Vespidae). Ethol Ecol Evol 14:111–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.2002.9522750
Mead F, Gabouriaut D, Habersetzer C (1995) Nest-founding behavior induced in the first descendants of Polistes dominulus Christ (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) colonies. Insect Soc 42:385–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01242167
Mitra A, Ramachandran A, Gadkar R (2014) Nestmate discrimination in the social wasp Ropalidia marginata: chemical cues and chemosensory mechanism. Anim Behav 88:113–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.11.017
Moore AJ, Brodie ED, Wolf JB (1997) Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process: I. direct and indirect genetic effects of social interactions. Evolution 51:1352–1362. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb01458.x
O’Donnell S (1995) Division of labor in post-emergence colonies of the primitively eusocial wasp Polistes instabilis de Saussure (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Insect Soc 42:17–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01245696
O’Donnell S (1998) Dominance and polyethism in the eusocial wasp Mischocyttarus mastigophorus (Hymenoptera : Vespidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 43:327–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650050498
O’Donnell S (1998) Reproductive caste determination in eusocial wasps (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Ann Rev Entomol 43:323–346. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.43.1.323
O’Donnell S, Jeanne RL (1991) Interspecific occupation of a tropical social wasp colony (Hymenoptera: Vespidae: Polistes). J Insect Behav 4:397–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048286
O’Donnell S, Joyce FJ (2001) Seasonality and colony composition in a montane tropical eusocial wasp. Biotropica 33:727–732
Panek LM, Gamboa GJ, Espelie KE (2001) The effect of a wasp’s age on its cuticular hydrocarbon profile and its tolerance by nestmate and non-nestmate conspecifics. Ethology 107:55–63. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0310.2001.00633.x
Pardi L (1948) Dominance order in Polistes wasps. Physiol Zool 21:1–13
Pardi L, Marino Piccoli MT (1981) Studies on the biology of Belonogaster (Hymenoptera Vespidae). 4. On caste differences in Belonogaster griseus (Fab.) and the position of this genus among social wasps. Monit Zool Ital (N S) 14:131–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/03749444.1981.10736617
Pernu TK, Helanterä H (2019) Genetic relatedness and its causal role in the evolution of insect societies. J Biosci 44:107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12038-091-9894-2
Peters RK, Krogmann L, Mayer C, Donath A, Gunkel S et al (2017) Evolutionary history of the Hymenoptera. Curr Biol 27:1013–1018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.01.027
Piekarski PK, Carpenter JM, Lemmon AR, Lemmon EM, Sharanowski BJ (2018) Phylogenomic evidence overturns current conceptions of social evolution in wasps (Vespidae). Mol Biol Evol 35:2097–2109. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy124
Pigliucci M (2008) What, if anything, is an evolutionary novelty? Philos Sci 75:887–898. https://doi.org/10.1086/594532
Pratte M, Jeanne RL (1984) Antennal drumming behavior in Polistes wasps (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Z Tierpsychol 66:177–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/k/1439-0310.1984.tb01364.x
Price GR (1970) Selection and covariance. Nature 227:520–521. https://doi.org/10.1038/227520a0
Queller DC, Zacchi F, Cervo R, Turillazzi S, Henshaw MT, Santorelli LA, Strassmann JE (2000) Unrelated helpers in a social insect. Nature 405:784–787. https://doi.org/10.1038/35015552
Reeve HK (1991) Polistes. In: Ross KG, Matthews RW (eds) The social biology of wasps. Comstock Publishing Associates, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp 99–148
Rossi AM, Hunt JH (1988) Honey supplementation and its developmental consequences: evidence for food limitation in a paper wasp, Polistes metricus. Ecol Entomol 13:437–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.1988.tb00376.x
Roubaud E (1916) Recherches biologiques sur les guêpes solitaires et sociales d'Afrique. La genèse de la vie sociale et l'évolution de l'instinct maternel chez les vespides. Ann Sci Natur, 10e série: Zool 1:1–160. Also in book format, Masson et cie
Saito-Morooka F (2014) The prevalence of the parasitic nematode Sphaerularia sp. in the ovrwintering gynes of Parapolybia spp. (Hymenoptera, Polistinae). J Hymen Res 38:37–43
Saito F, Kojima J-I (2005) Colony cycle in the south-eastern coastal populations of Ropalidia plebeiana, the only Ropalidia wasp occurring in temperate Australia. Entomol Sci 8:263–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-8298.2005.00125.x
Santos KF, Arias MC, Kapheim KM (2019) Loss of developmental diapause as prerequisite for social evolution in bees. Biol Lett 15:20190398. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2019.0398
Schaal BA, Leverich WJ (1981) The demographic consequences of two-stage life cycles: survivorship and the time of reproduction. Am Nat 118:135–138. https://doi.org/10.1086/283809
Schmitz J, Moritz RFA (1998) Molecular phylogeny of Vespidae (Hymenoptera) and the evolution of sociality in wasps. Mol Phylo Evol 9:183–191. https://doi.org/10.1006/mpev.1997.0460
Schmitz J, Moritz RFA (2000) Molecular evolution in social wasps. In: Austin AD, Dowton M (eds) Hymenoptera: evolution, biodiversity and biological control. CSIRO, Collingwood, pp 84–89
Seal JN, Hunt JH (2004) Food supplementation affects colony-level life history traits in the annual social wasp Polistes metricus. Insect Soc 51:239–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-004-0733-5
Seger J (1983) Partial bivoltinism may cause alternating sex-ratio biases that favour eusociality. Nature 301:59–62. https://doi.org/10.1038/301059a0
Seppä P, Queller DC, Strassmann JE (2012) Why wasp foundresses change nests: relatedness, dominance, and nest quality. PLoS ONE 7(9):e45386. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045386
Singer TL, Espelie KE (1992) Social wasps use nest paper hydrocarbons for nestmate recognition. Anim Behav 44:63–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02208974
Sinha A, Premnath S, Chandrashekara K, Gagkar R (1993) Ropalidia rufoplagiata: a polistine wasp society probably lacking a permanent reproductive division of labor. Insect Soc 40:69–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01338833
Sledge MF, Boscaro F, Turillazzi S (2001) Cuticular hydrocarbons and reproductive status in the social wasp Polistes dominulus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49:401–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650000311
Smith AR, O'Donnell S, Jeanne RL (2001) Correlated evolution of colony defence and social structure: a comparative analysis in eusocial wasps (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Ecol Evol Res 3:331–344
Southon RJ, Bell EF, Grastock P, Wyatt CDR, Radford AN et al (2019) High indirect fitness benefits for helpers across the nesting cycle in the tropical paper wasp Polistes canadensis. Mol Ecol 28:3271–3284. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15137
Starks PT (1998) A novel ‘sit and wait’ reproductive strategy in social wasps. Proc R Soc B 265:1407–1410. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1998.0449
Strassmann JE (1981) Evolutionary implications of early male and satellite nest production in Polistes exclamans colony cycles. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 8:55–64
Strassmann JE, Lee RE, Rojas RR, Baust JG (1984) Caste and sex differences in cold-hardiness in the social wasps, Polistes annularis and Polistes exclamans (Hymenoptera, Vespidae). Insect Soc 31:291–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02223613
Suryanarayanan S, Hermanson JC, Jeanne RL (2011a) A mechanical signal biases caste development in a social wasp. Curr Biol 21:231–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.01.003
Suryanarayanan S, Hantschel AE, Torres CG, Jeanne RL (2011b) Changes in the temporal pattern of antennal drumming behavior across the Polistes fuscatus colony cycle. Insect Soc 58:97–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-010-0122-1
Tibbetts EA, Curtis TR (2007) Rearing conditions infoluence quality signals but not identity signals in Polistes wasps. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:602–607
Tibbetts EA, Dale J (2004) A socially enforced signal of quality in a paper wasp. Nature 432:218–222. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02949
Tibbetts EA, Reeve HK (2000) Aggression and resource sharing among foundresses in the social wasp Polistes dominulus: testing transactional theories of conflict. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 48:344–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650000240
Tibbetts EA, Mettler A, Levy S (2010) Mutual assessment via visual status signals in Polistes dominulus wasps. Biol Lett 6:10–13. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2009.0420
Toth AL, Bilof KBJ, Henshaw MT, Hunt JH, Robinson GE (2009) Lipid stores, ovary development, and brain gene expression in Polistes females. Insect Soc 56:77–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-008-1041-2
Treanore ED, Kiner JM, Kerner ME, Amsalem E (2020) Shift in worker physiology and gene expression pattern from reproductive to diapause-like with colony age in the bumble bee Bombus impatiens. J Exp Biol 223: jeb218768. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.218768
Turillazzi S, West-Eberhard MJ (eds) (1996) Natural history and evolution of paper-wasps. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Van Doorn A, Heringa J (1986) The ontogeny of a dominance hierarchy in colonies of the bumblebee Bombus terrestris (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Insect Soc 33:3–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02224031
Walton A, Toth AL (2021) Resource limitation, intragroup aggression, and brain neuropeptide expression in a social wasp. Function Ecol 00:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13895
Weiner SA, Noble K, Upton CT, Flynn G, Woods WAJ et al (2012) The cost of flight: a role in the Polistes dominulus invasion. Insect Soc 59:81–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-011-0191-9
Wenzel JW (1989) Endogenous factors, external cues, and eccentric construction in Polistes annularis (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). J Insect Behav 2:679–699. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065768
Wenzel JW (1992) Extreme queen-worker dimorphism in Ropalidia ignobilis, a small-colony wasp (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Insect Soc 39:31–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01240529
West-Eberhard MJ (1981) Intragroup selection and the evolution of insect societies. In: Alexander RD, Tinkle DW (eds) Natural selection and social behavior. Chiron Press, New York, Concord, pp 3–17
West-Eberhard MJ (1986) Dominance relations in Polistes canadensis (L.), a tropical social wasp. Monit Zool Ital 20:263–281
West Eberhard MJ (1969) The social biology of polistine wasps. Misc Pub, Museum Zool, Univ Michigan, 140:1–101. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/56384/MP140.pdf?sequence=1
West-Eberhard MJ (2003) Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford University Press, New York
Wheeler WM (1928) The social insects. Kegan Paul, Trench Trubner & Co. Ltd, London
Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Wolf JB, Brodie ED, Cheverud JM, Moore AJ, Wade MJ (1998) Evolutionary consequences of indirect genetic effects. Trends Ecol Evol 13:64–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01233-0
Acknowledgements
For reviewing drafts of the manuscript at earlier stages of its development and offering suggestions and criticisms that improved it over its long gestation period, I thank Jennifer M. Jandt, Timothy M. Judd, Karen M. Kapheim, Armin Moczek, Allen J. Moore, Sean O’Donnell, Christopher K. Starr, Amy L. Toth, Michael J. Wade, Diana E. Wheeler, two anonymous reviewers, and a Drexel University discussion group comprised of Stefan Bonestroo, Christian Cabuslay, Virginia Caponera, Melissa Carpenter, and Karmi Oxman. For particularly helpful review of the submitted manuscript, I thank Peter Nonacs and three anonymous reviewers. I dedicate this paper to Vija Sherman and thank her for her steadfast support and invaluable editorial acumen.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Hunt, J.H. Origin of an evolutionary novelty: the worker phenotype of eusocial wasps. Insect. Soc. 68, 303–318 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-021-00834-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-021-00834-4