Skip to main content
Log in

Generic scarring for minimal hypersurfaces along stable hypersurfaces

  • Published:
Geometric and Functional Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Let \(M^{n+1}\) be a closed manifold of dimension \(3\le n+1\le 7\). We show that for a \(C^\infty \)-generic metric g on M, to any connected, closed, embedded, 2-sided, stable, minimal hypersurface \(S\subset (M,g)\) corresponds a sequence of closed, embedded, minimal hypersurfaces \(\{\Sigma _k\}\) scarring along S, in the sense that the area and Morse index of \(\Sigma _k\) both diverge to infinity and, when properly renormalized, \(\Sigma _k\) converges to S as varifolds. We also show that scarring of immersed minimal surfaces along stable surfaces occurs in most closed Riemannian 3-manifods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. I. Agol. The virtual Haken conjecture. Doc. Math., 18 (2013), 1045–1087

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. W.K. Allard. On the first variation of a varifold. Ann. Math. (95), 95 (1972), 417–491

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. F.J. Almgren, Jr. The homotopy groups of the integral cycle groups. Topology, 1 (1962), 257–299

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. F.J. Almgren, Jr. The theory of varifolds. Mimeographed notes, Princeton (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  5. V.G. Avakumović. Über die Eigenfunktionen auf geschlossenen Riemannschen Mannigfaltigkeiten. Math. Z., 65 (1956), 327–344

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. V.M. Babič and V.F. Lazutkin. The eigenfunctions which are concentrated near a closed geodesic. In: Problems of Mathematical Physics, No. 2, Spectral Theory, Diffraction Problems (Russian). Izdat. Leningrad. Univ., Leningrad (1967), pp. 15–25

  7. L. Bessières, G. Besson, S. Maillot, M. Boileau, and J. Porti. Geometrisation of 3-manifolds, volume 13 of EMS Tracts in Mathematics. European Mathematical Society (EMS), Zürich (2010)

  8. D. Calegari, F.C. Marques, and A. Neves. Counting minimal surfaces in negatively curved \(3\)-manifolds. arXiv:2002.01062v1 (2020)

  9. O. Chodosh, D. Ketover, and D. Maximo. Minimal hypersurfaces with bounded index. Invent. Math., (3)209 (2017), 617–664

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. O. Chodosh and C. Mantoulidis. Minimal surfaces and the Allen-Cahn equation on 3-manifolds: index, multiplicity, and curvature estimates. Ann. Math. (2), (1)191 (2020), 213–328

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. T.H. Colding and C. De Lellis. Singular limit laminations, Morse index, and positive scalar curvature. Topology, (1)44 (2005), 25–45

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Y. Colin de Verdière. Ergodicité et fonctions propres du laplacien. In Bony-Sjöstrand-Meyer seminar, 1984–1985, pages Exp. No. 13, 8. École Polytech., Palaiseau (1985)

  13. Y.C. Colin de Verdière. Modes and quasi-modes on surfaces: variation on an idea of Andrew Hassell. arXiv:0902.2095 (2009)

  14. P. Collin, L. Hauswirth, L. Mazet, and H. Rosenberg. Corrigendum to “Minimal surfaces in finite volume noncompact hyperbolic 3-manifolds”. Trans. Am. Math. Soc., (10)372 (2019), 7521–7524

  15. F. Faure, S. Nonnenmacher, and S. De Bièvre. Scarred eigenstates for quantum cat maps of minimal periods. Commun. Math. Phys. (3)239 (2003), 449–492

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. M. Gromov. Dimension, nonlinear spectra and width. In: Geometric Aspects of Functional Analysis (1986/87), volume 1317 of Lecture Notes in Math.. Springer, Berlin (1988), pp. 132–184

  17. L. Guth. Minimax problems related to cup powers and Steenrod squares. Geom. Funct. Anal., (6)18 (2009), 1917–1987

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. A. Hassell. Ergodic billiards that are not quantum unique ergodic. Ann. Math. (2) (1)171 (2010), 605–619. With an appendix by the author and Luc Hillairet.

  19. A. Hassell. What is quantum unique ergodicity? Austral. Math. Soc. Gaz. (3)38 (2011), 158–167

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. K. Irie, F.C. Marques, and A. Neves. Density of minimal hypersurfaces for generic metrics. Ann. Math. (2), (3)187 (2018), 963–972

  21. J. Kahn and V. Marković. Counting essential surfaces in a closed hyperbolic three-manifold. Geom. Topol., (1)16 (2012), 601–624

  22. J. Kahn and V. Marković. Immersing almost geodesic surfaces in a closed hyperbolic three manifold. Ann. Math. (2), (3)175 (2012), 1127–1190

  23. N. Kapouleas and S.-D. Yang. Minimal surfaces in the three-sphere by doubling the Clifford torus. Am. J. Math., (2)132 (2010), 257–295

  24. B. Kleiner and J. Lott. Notes on Perelman’s papers. Geom. Topol., (5)12 (2008), 2587–2855

  25. H.B. Lawson, Jr. Complete minimal surfaces in \(S^{3}\). Ann. Math. (2), 92 (1970), 335–374

  26. M.M. Li and X. Zhou. Min–max theory for free boundary minimal hypersurfaces i-regularity theory. to appear in J. Differential Geom.arXiv:1611.02612 (2016)

  27. Y. Li. On the existence of minimal hypersurfaces with arbitrarily large area and morse index. arXiv:2001.07689 (2020)

  28. Y. Liokumovich, F.C. Marques, and A. Neves. Weyl law for the volume spectrum. Ann. Math. (2), (3)187 (2018), 933–961

  29. F.C. Marques, R. Montezuma, and A. Neves. Morse inequalities for the area functional. to appear in J. Differential Geometry. arXiv:2003.01301 (2020)

  30. F.C. Marques and A. Neves. Min–max theory and the Willmore conjecture. Ann. Math. (2), (2)179 (2014), 683–782

  31. F.C. Marques and A. Neves. Morse index and multiplicity of min–max minimal hypersurfaces. Camb. J. Math., (4)4 (2016), 463–511

  32. F.C. Marques and A. Neves. Existence of infinitely many minimal hypersurfaces in positive Ricci curvature. Invent. Math., (2)209 (2017), 577–616

  33. F.C. Marques and A. Neves. Morse index of multiplicity one min-max minimal hypersurfaces. Adv. Math., 378 (2021), 107527, 58

  34. F.C. Marques, A. Neves, and A. Song. Equidistribution of minimal hypersurfaces for generic metrics. Invent. Math., 216(2) (2019), 421–443

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. S. Matsumoto. Lifting \(\pi _1\)-injective surfaces immersed in 3-manifolds: a brief survey. Number 1272. Low-dimensional topology of tomorrow (Japanese) (Kyoto, 2002), pp. 1–11. (2002)

  36. W. Meeks, III, L. Simon, and S.T. Yau. Embedded minimal surfaces, exotic spheres, and manifolds with positive Ricci curvature. Ann. Math. (2), (3)116 (1982), 621–659

  37. J. Morgan and G. Tian. The Geometrization COnjecture, volume 5 of Clay Mathematics Monographs. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI; Clay Mathematics Institute, Cambridge, MA (2014)

  38. J.W. Morgan and F.T.-H. Fong. Ricci Flow and geometrization of 3-Manifolds, volume 53 of University Lecture Series. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI (2010)

  39. G. Perelman. Ricci flow with surgery on three-manifolds. arXiv:math/0303109v1 (2003)

  40. J. Pitts. Existence and Regularity of Minimal Surfaces on Riemannian Manifolds, volume 27 of Mathematical Notes. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1981)

  41. J.V. Ralston. Correction: “Approximate eigenfunctions of the Laplacian” [J. Differential Geom. (1)12 (1977), 87–100; MR 57, #10741]. J. Differ. Geom., (3)14 (1979), 487 (1980)

  42. Z. Rudnick and P. Sarnak. The behaviour of eigenstates of arithmetic hyperbolic manifolds. Commun. Math. Phys., (1)161 (1994), 195–213

  43. J. Sacks and K. Uhlenbeck. Minimal immersions of closed Riemann surfaces. Trans. Am. Math. Soc., (2)271 (1982), 639–652

  44. P. Sarnak. Arithmetic quantum chaos. In The Schur lectures (1992) (Tel Aviv), volume 8 of Israel Math. Conf. Proc., pp. 183–236. Bar-Ilan Univ., Ramat Gan (1995)

  45. R. Schoen and L. Simon. Regularity of stable minimal hypersurfaces. Commun. Pure Appl. Math., (6)34 (1981), 741–797

  46. R. Schoen and S.T. Yau. Existence of incompressible minimal surfaces and the topology of three-dimensional manifolds with nonnegative scalar curvature. Ann. Math. (2), (1)110 (1979), 127–142

  47. B. Sharp. Compactness of minimal hypersurfaces with bounded index. J. Differ. Geom., (2)106 (2017), 317–339

  48. L. Simon. Lectures on Geometric Measure Theory, volume 3 of Proceedings of the Centre for Mathematical Analysis, Australian National University. Australian National University, Centre for Mathematical Analysis, Canberra (1983)

  49. S. Smale. An infinite dimensional version of Sard’s theorem. Am. J. Math., 87 (1965), 861–866

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  50. A.I. Šnirel’man. Ergodic properties of eigenfunctions. Uspehi Mat. Nauk, (6(180))29 (1974), 181–182

  51. A. Song. Existence of infinitely many minimal hypersurfaces in closed manifolds. arXiv:1806.08816v1 (2018)

  52. A. Song. Morse index, Betti numbers and singular set of bounded area minimal hypersurfaces. arXiv:1911.09166 (2019)

  53. A. Song. A dichotomy for minimal hypersurfaces in manifolds thick at infinity. arXiv: 1902.06767 (2020)

  54. K. Uhlenbeck. Generic properties of eigenfunctions. Am. J. Math., (4)98 (1976), 1059–1078

  55. B. White. The space of minimal submanifolds for varying Riemannian metrics. Indiana Univ. Math. J., (1)40 (1991), 161–200

  56. B. White. On the bumpy metrics theorem for minimal submanifolds. Am. J. Math., (4)139 (2017), 1149–1155

  57. B. White. Generic transversality of minimal submanifolds and generic regularity of two-dimensional area-minimizing integral currents. arXiv:1901.05148 (2019)

  58. D. Wiygul. Minimal surfaces in the \(3\)-sphere by stacking Clifford tori. J. Differ. Geom., (3)114 (2020), 467–549

  59. S. Zelditch. Eigenfunctions of the Laplacian on a Riemannian Manifold, volume 125 of CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics. Published for the Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences, Washington, DC; by the American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI (2017)

  60. S. Zelditch. Uniform distribution of eigenfunctions on compact hyperbolic surfaces. Duke Math. J., (4)55 (1987), 919–941

  61. X. Zhou. On the multiplicity One conjecture in min–max theory. Ann. Math. (2), (3)192 (2020), 767–820

  62. X. Zhou and J. Zhu. Existence of hypersurfaces with prescribed mean curvature I—generic min–max. Camb. J. Math., (2)8 (2020), 311–362

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was partially conducted during the period A.S. served as a Clay Research Fellow. X.Z. is partially supported by NSF Grants DMS-1811293, DMS-1945178, and an Alfred P. Sloan Research Fellowship. We would like to thank Peter Sarnak for discussions and for pointing out [BL67, Ral80].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xin Zhou.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix A. Differentiability of the first eigenvalue

Appendix A. Differentiability of the first eigenvalue

For the reader’s convenience, we give a proof of the known fact that the first eigenvalue of a self-adjoint elliptic operator depends in a differentiable way on the coefficients; (see [Uhl76] for related results). Let \(\Sigma \) be a smooth closed n-manifold. Fix two integers \(r\ge 2\), \(k\ge 1\). Let U be a smooth Banach manifold and let \(\Phi {:}\, U \rightarrow \big (C^r(\Sigma )\big )^{n^2+n+1} \) be a \(C^k\) map which associates to any \(\gamma \in U\) a triple \(\Phi (\gamma ) = \big ((a^{ij})_{1\le i, j \le n}, (b^i)_{1\le i\le n}, c\big )\), where \(a^{ij}, b^i, c\in C^r(\Sigma )\), such that \((a^{ij})>0\) is positive definite and such that the following elliptic operator

$$\begin{aligned} L_{\gamma }u := a^{ij}u_{ij} + b^i u_i + cu \end{aligned}$$

is self-adjoint with respect to a volume measure depending on \(\gamma \in U\).

A number \(\lambda _1(\gamma )\) is the first eigenvalue of \(L_{\gamma }\) if and only if

$$\begin{aligned} L_{\gamma } \varphi _1 = -\lambda _1(\gamma ) \varphi _1 \end{aligned}$$

for some \(\varphi _1 \in H^{1}(\Sigma )\cap C^0(\Sigma )\) with \(\varphi _1>0\). The eigenfunctions of \(L_{\gamma }\) span \(L^2(\Sigma )\) and are in \(C^r(\Sigma )\).

Lemma A.1

\(\lambda _1(\gamma )\) is a \(C^k\) function of \(\gamma \in U\).

Proof

Fix a metric \(g_0\) on \(\Sigma \) and let \(S^{r}(\Sigma )\) be the space of functions \(u\in H^{r}(\Sigma )\) with \(\Vert u\Vert _{L^2(\Sigma ,g_0)}=1\), where the \(L^2\)-norm is computed with \(g_0\). Note that \(H^{r}(\Sigma )\) does not depend on the metric. Consider the operator \(T{:}\, U\times \mathbb {R}\times S^{r}(\Sigma ) \rightarrow H^{r-2}(\Sigma )\) defined by

$$\begin{aligned} T\big (\gamma , \mu , u\big ) = L_{\gamma }u + \mu u. \end{aligned}$$

Since \(\Phi {:}\,U \rightarrow \big (C^r(\Sigma )\big )^{n^2+n+1}\) is a \(C^k\) map by assumption, T is also \(C^k\)-differentiable in its variables. We have \(T\big (\gamma , \lambda , \varphi \big )=0\) if and only if \(\lambda \) is an eigenvalue of \(L_{\gamma }\) and \(\varphi \) is an associated normalized eigenfunction. An eigenvalue is simple if the associated eigenspace is one dimensional. It is known that the first eigenvalue of \(L_{\gamma }\) is always simple. Given \(\gamma _1 \in U\), consider the first eigenvalue \(\lambda _1\) of \(L_{\gamma _1}\) and a normalized positive first eigenfunction \(\varphi _1\in S^{r}(\Sigma )\), and then consider the following differential

$$\begin{aligned} D_{(\mu , u)} T|_{(\gamma _1, \lambda _1, \varphi _1)}(s, v) = L_{\gamma _1}v + \lambda _1 v + s \varphi _1, \end{aligned}$$

where \(s\in \mathbb R\), \(v\in \text {span}\{\varphi _1\}^{\perp _{g_0}} = \{ u\in H^{r}(\Sigma ), \int _{\Sigma } u \varphi _1d\text {vol}_{g_0}=0\}\). We know that the null space of \(L_{\gamma _1}+\lambda _1\) is \(\text {span}\{\varphi _1\}\). Moreover since \(L_{\gamma _1} +\lambda _1\) is self adjoint for a volume measure \(\nu \), and since \(\lambda _1\) is simple, the image of \(\text {span}\{\varphi _1\}^{\perp _{g_0}}\) by this operator is \(\{ u\in H^{r-2}(\Sigma ), \int _{\Sigma } u \varphi _1 d\nu =0\}\). Hence

$$\begin{aligned} D_{(\mu , u)} T|_{(\gamma _1, \lambda _1, \varphi _1)}: \mathbb R\times \text {span}\{\varphi _1\}^{\perp _{g_0}} \rightarrow H^{r-2}(\Sigma ) \end{aligned}$$

is an isomorphism. By the Implicit Function Theorem, near \(\gamma _1\), there exist \(C^k\) maps:

$$\begin{aligned} \gamma \rightarrow \lambda (\gamma )\in \mathbb {R}\quad \text {and} \quad \gamma \rightarrow \varphi (\gamma ) \in H^{r}(\Sigma ) \end{aligned}$$

with

$$\begin{aligned} \lambda (\gamma _1)=\lambda _1 \quad \text {and} \quad \varphi (\gamma _1)= \varphi _1, \end{aligned}$$

such that \(L_{\gamma }\varphi (\gamma ) = -\lambda (\gamma )\varphi (\gamma )\). Note that \(\varphi (\gamma )\) is also positive when \(\gamma \) is close enough to \(\gamma _1\), so \(\lambda (\gamma )\) is indeed the first eigenvalue of \(L_\gamma \). The conclusion then follows.\(\square \)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, A., Zhou, X. Generic scarring for minimal hypersurfaces along stable hypersurfaces. Geom. Funct. Anal. 31, 948–980 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00039-021-00571-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00039-021-00571-7

Navigation