Abstract
An advective Cahn–Hilliard model motivated by thin film formation is studied in this paper. The one-dimensional evolution equation under consideration includes a transport term, whose presence prevents from identifying a gradient flow structure. Existence and uniqueness of solutions, together with continuous dependence on the initial data and an energy equality are proved by combining a minimizing movement scheme with a fixed point argument. Finally, it is shown that, when the contribution of the transport term is small, the equation possesses a global attractor and converges, as the transport term tends to zero, to a purely diffusive Cahn–Hilliard equation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abels, H., Depner, D., Garcke, H.: On an incompressible Navier–Stokes/Cahn–Hilliard system with degenerate mobility. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 30, 1175–1190 (2013)
Abels, H., Röger, M.: Existence of weak solutions for a non-classical sharp interface model for a two-phase flow of viscous, incompressible fluids. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 26, 2403–2424 (2009)
Akagi, G.: Global attractors for doubly nonlinear evolution equations with non-monotone perturbations. J. Differ. Equ. 250, 1850–1875 (2011)
Ambrosio, L.: Minimizing movements. Rend. Accad. Naz. Sci. XL Mem. Mat. Appl. 19(5), 191–246 (1995)
Ambrosio, L., Gigli, N., Savaré, G.: Gradient Flows in Metric Spaces and in the Space of Probability Measures. Lectures in Mathematics ETH Zürich. Birkhäuser, New York (2000)
Barbu, V.: Analysis and Control of Nonlinear Infinite-Dimensional Systems. Mathematics in Science and Engineering, vol. 190. Academic Press Inc, Boston (1993)
Blodgett, K.B.: Films built by depositing successive monomolecular layers on a solid surface. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 57(6), 1007–1022 (1935)
Boyer, F.: Nonhomogeneous Cahn–Hilliard fluids. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 18, 225–259 (2001)
Cahn, J.W., Hilliard, J.: Free energy of a nonuniform system. I. Interfacial free energy. J. Chem. Phys. 28, 258–267 (1958)
Chen, X.D., Lenhert, S., Hirtz, M., Lu, N., Fuchs, H., Chi, L.F.: Langmuir–Blodgett patterning: a bottom-up way to build mesostructures over large areas. Acc. Chem. Res. 40, 393–401 (2007)
Cherfils, L., Miranville, A., Zelik, S.: The Cahn–Hilliard equation with logarithmic potentials. Milan J. Math. 79, 561–596 (2011)
Colli, P., Krejc̆í, P., Rocca, E., Sprekels, J.: Nonlinear evolution inclusions arising from phase change models. Czechoslovak Math. J. 57(132), 1067–1098 (2007)
Colli, P., Gilardi, G., Sprekels, J.: On an application of Tikhonov?s fixed point theorem to a nonlocal Cahn–Hilliard type system modeling phase separation. J. Differ. Equ. 260, 7940–7964 (2016)
Colli, P., Gilardi, G., Sprekels, J.: On a Cahn–Hilliard system with convection and dynamic boundary conditions. Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 197, 1445–1475 (2018)
Della Porta, F., Grasselli, M.: Convective nonlocal Cahn–Hilliard equations with reaction terms. Discret. Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B 20, 1529–1553 (2015)
Della Porta, F., Grasselli, M.: On the nonlocal Cahn–Hilliard–Brinkman and Cahn–Hilliard–Hele–Shaw systems. Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 15, 299–317 (2016)
Eden, A., Kalantarov, V.K., Zelik, S.V.: Global solvability and blow up for the convective Cahn–Hilliard equations with concave potentials. J. Math. Phys. 54, 041502 (2013)
Ei, S.-I.: The effect of nonlocal convection on reaction–diffusion equations. Hiroshima Math. J. 17, 281–307 (1987)
Fonseca, I., Leoni, G.: Modern Methods in the Calculus of Variations: \(L^p\) Spaces. Springer, New York (2007)
Frank, F., Liu, C., Alpak, F.O., Riviere, B.: A finite volume/discontinuous Galerkin method for the advective Cahn–Hilliard equation with degenerate mobility on porous domains stemming from micro-CT imaging. Comput. Geosci. 22, 543–563 (2018)
Frigeri, S., Grasselli, M.: Global and trajectory attractors for a nonlocal Cahn–Hilliard–Navier–Stokes system. J. Dyn. Differ. Equ. 24, 827–856 (2012)
Frigeri, S., Grasselli, M., Rocca, E.: A diffuse interface model for two-phase incompressible flows with non-local interactions and non-constant mobility. Nonlinearity 28, 1257–1293 (2015)
Gal, C.G., Grasselli, M.: Asymptotic behavior of a Cahn–Hilliard–Navier–Stokes system in 2D. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 27, 401–436 (2010)
Gal, C.G., Grasselli, M.: Longtime behavior of nonlocal Cahn–Hilliard equations. Discret. Contin. Dyn. Syst. 34, 145–179 (2014)
Grasselli, M., Miranville, A., Rossi, R., Schimperna, G.: Analysis of the Cahn–Hilliard equation with a chemical potential dependent mobility. Commun. Partial Differ. Equ. 36, 1193–1238 (2011)
Hale, J.K.: Asymptotic Behavior of Dissipative Systems. Amer. Math. Soc, Providence, RI (1988)
Ignat, L.I., Rossi, J.D.: A nonlocal convection–diffusion equation. J. Funct. Anal. 251, 399–437 (2007)
Iuorio, A., Melchionna, S.: Long-time behavior of a nonlocal Cahn–Hilliard equation with reaction. Discret. Contin. Dyn. Syst. 38, 3765–3788 (2018)
Köpf, M.H., Gurevich, S.V., Friedrich, R., Thiele, U.: Substrate-mediated pattern formation in monolayer transfer: a reduced model. New J. Phys. 142, 023016 (2012)
Köpf, M.H., Gurevich, S.V., Friedrich, R., Chi, L.: Pattern formation in monolayer transfer systems with substrate-mediated condensation. Langmuir 26(13), 10444–10447 (2010)
Köpf, M.H., Thiele, U.: Emergence of the bifurcation structure of a Langmuir–Blodgett transfer model. Nonlinearity 27(11), 2711–2734 (2014)
Ladyzhenskaya, O.: Attractors for Semigroups and Evolution Equations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1991)
Langmuir, I.: The constitution and fundamental properties of solids and liquids. II. Liquids. 1. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 39(9), 1848–1906 (1917)
Leoni, G.: A First Course in Sobolev Spaces, 2nd edn. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI (2017)
Liu, W., Bertozzi, A., Kolokolnikov, T.: Diffuse interface surface tension models in an expanding flow. Commun. Math. Sci. 10, 387–418 (2012)
Liu, J., Dedé, L., Evans, J.A., Borden, M.J., Hughes, T.J.R.: Isogeometric analysis of the advective Cahn–Hilliard equation: spinodal decomposition under shear flow. J. Comput. Phys. 242, 321–350 (2013)
Miranville, A., Schimperna, G.: On a doubly nonlinear Cahn–Hilliard–Gurtin system. Discret. Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B 14, 675–697 (2010)
Novick-Cohen, A.: The Cahn–Hilliard equation. Handbook of differential equations: evolutionary equations. Vol. IV, 201–228, Handb. Differ. Equ., Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam, (2008)
Ó Náraigh, L.: The role of advection in phase-separating binary liquids. Ph.D. thesis, (2008)
Oliveira Jr., O.L.: Langmuir–Blodgett films—properties and possible applications. Braz. J. Phys. 22(2), 60–69 (1992)
Purrucker, O., Förtig, A., Lüdtke, K., Jordan, R., Tanaka, M.: Confinement of transmembrane cell receptors in tunable stripe micropatterns. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 1258–1264 (2005)
Rocca, E., Sprekels, J.: Optimal distributed control of a nonlocal convective Cahn–Hilliard equation by the velocity in three dimensions. SIAM J. Control Optim. 53, 1654–1680 (2015)
Roberts, G. (ed.): Langmuir–Blodgett Films. Springer, New York (1990)
Schimperna, G.: Global attractors for Cahn–Hilliard equations with nonconstant mobility. Nonlinearity 20, 2365–2387 (2007)
Watson, S.J., Otto, F., Rubinstein, B.Y., Davis, S.H.: Coarsening dynamics of the convective Cahn–Hilliard equation. Phys. D 178, 127–148 (2003)
Wilczek, M., Gurevich, S.V.: Locking of periodic patterns in Cahn–Hilliard models for Langmuir–Blodgett transfer. Phys. Rev. E 90, 042926 (2014)
Zasadzinski, J.A., Viswanathan, R., Madsen, L., Garnaes, J., Schwartz, D.K.: Langmuir–Blodgett films. Science 263, 1726–1733 (1994)
Zhu, J., Wilczek, M., Hirtz, M., Hao, J., Wang, W., Fuchs, H., Gurevich, S.V., Chi, L.: Branch suppression and orientation control of Langmuir–Blodgett patterning on prestructured surfaces. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 3, 1600478 (2016)
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the hospitality of the departments of mathematics of the universities of Heidelberg and Vienna, of SISSA, and of the E. Schrödinger Institute in Vienna, where this research was developed. The authors are members of the GNAMPA group of INdAM. This work was partially supported by the 2015 GNAMPA project Fenomeni Critici nella Meccanica dei Materiali: un Approccio Variazionale. E.D. acknowledges the support of the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) project P 27052 and of the SFB project F65 Taming complexity in partial differential systems. The research of M.M. was partially supported by grant FCT-UTA_CMU/MAT/0005/2009 Thin Structures, Homogenization, and Multiphase Problems, by the ERC Advanced grant Quasistatic and Dynamic Evolution Problems in Plasticity and Fracture (Grant agreement no.: 290888), by the ERC Starting grant High-Dimensional Sparse Optimal Control (Grant agreement no.: 306274), and by the DFG Project Identifikation von Energien durch Beobachtung der zeitlichen Entwicklung von Systemen (FO 767/7). Finally, the authors thank Stefano Melchionna for fruitful discussions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix A
Appendix A
We collect here a few results of technical nature which are needed throughout the paper. The following lemma will be instrumental in the proof of Proposition 4.4.
Lemma A.1
Let \(q\in L^2(0,T;V)\) and let \(\tau :=\frac{T}{N}\) for \(N\in {\mathbb {N}}\). Then, as \(\tau \rightarrow 0\),
Proof
We set
We can estimate
so that by integrating on \((0,L)\times (0,T)\) we obtain
This implies that, up to subsequences, \(g_\tau \rightharpoonup g\) weakly in \(L^2((0,L)\times (0,T))\).
We shall now show that \(g=0\). The estimate
implies that \(\Vert g_\tau (t)\Vert _{L^2(0,L)}\rightarrow 0\) for almost every \(t\in (0,T)\) by [34, Theorem 8.19]; in turn, given \(\varepsilon >0\), by Egorov’s Theorem we can find a set \(A_\varepsilon \subset (0,T)\) with measure smaller than \(\varepsilon \) such that \(\Vert g_\tau (t)\Vert _{L^2(0,L)}\rightarrow 0\) uniformly on \((0,T)\setminus A_\varepsilon \). Therefore for any test function \(\varphi \in L^2((0,L)\times (0,T))\) we have
and the right-hand side can be made arbitrarily small as \(\varepsilon \rightarrow 0\). This shows that \(g_\tau \rightharpoonup 0\) weakly in \(L^2((0,L)\times (0,T))\) and (A.1) holds. \(\square \)
We discuss in the following two lemmas the dependence on t of the function \(z_{\varphi (t)}\) introduced in (2.10), when \(\varphi \) depends on t.
Lemma A.2
Let \(q\in L^2(0,T;V')\) and let \(z_{q(t)}\) be defined by (2.10). Then the map \(t\mapsto z_{q(t)}\) belongs to \(L^2(0,T;V)\).
Proof
For every \(\varphi \in V'\) the map
is measurable thanks to the assumption \(q\in L^2(0,T;V')\). Hence the map \(t\mapsto z_{q(t)}\) is weakly measurable from (0, T) to V and in turn strongly measurable, by Pettis Theorem (see [34, Theorem 8.3]) and the separability of V. Moreover, by (2.10) we have
since \(q\in L^2(0,T;V')\), which shows that the map \(t\mapsto z_{q(t)}\) is Bochner integrable and belongs to \(L^2(0,T;V)\). \(\square \)
Notice that, if \(q\in L^2(0,T;L^2(0,L))\), then by (2.15) we have \(q\in L^2(0,T;V')\). Hence we can apply the previous lemma to deduce that also in this case \(z_{q(t)}\in L^2(0,T;V)\).
Lemma A.3
Let \(u\in H^1(0,T;V')\) and let \(z_{u(t)}\) be defined by (2.10). Then the map \(\psi (t) :=z_{u(t)}\) is in \(H^1(0,T;V)\), and
Proof
We first observe that \(\psi \in L^2(0,T;V)\), thanks to Lemma A.2. Similarly, the map \(t\mapsto z_{{\dot{u}}(t)}\) is in \(L^2(0,T;V)\), thanks to the same lemma applied to \(q={\dot{u}}\in L^2(0,T;V')\).
We now show equality (A.2), which will complete the proof of the lemma. By definition of weak derivative, (A.2) is equivalent to show
for every \(\varphi \in C^1_{\mathrm c}(0,T)\), where (A.3) is an equality between elements of V. For every \(\eta \in V\) we have
In the previous chain of equalities we used several times the property that the Bochner integral commutes with linear operators, see for instance [34, Theorem 8.13]. This proves claim (A.3). \(\square \)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bonacini, M., Davoli, E. & Morandotti, M. Analysis of a perturbed Cahn–Hilliard model for Langmuir–Blodgett films. Nonlinear Differ. Equ. Appl. 26, 36 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00030-019-0583-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00030-019-0583-5
Keywords
- Evolution equations
- Cahn–Hilliard equation
- Langmuir–Blodgett transfer
- Minimizing movements
- Fixed point theorem
- Thin films
- Global attractor