Selecta Mathematica

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 1205–1234 | Cite as

On the \(\mathrm {GL}_n\)-eigenvariety and a conjecture of Venkatesh

Open Access
Article
  • 256 Downloads

Abstract

Let \(\pi \) be a cuspidal, cohomological automorphic representation of \(\mathrm {GL}_n({\mathbb A})\). Venkatesh has suggested that there should exist a natural action of the exterior algebra of a certain motivic cohomology group on the \(\pi \)-part of the Betti cohomology (with rational coefficients) of the \(\mathrm {GL}_n({\mathbb Q})\)-arithmetic locally symmetric space. Venkatesh has given evidence for this conjecture by showing that its ‘l-adic realization’ is a consequence of the Taylor–Wiles formalism. We show that its ‘p-adic realization’ is related to the properties of eigenvarieties.

Mathematics Subject Classification

Primary 11F75 Secondary 11F85 

References

  1. 1.
    Ash, A., Grayson, D., Green, P.: Computations of cuspidal cohomology of congruence subgroups of \({\text{ SL }}(3, {{\bf Z}})\). J. Number Theory 19(3), 412–436 (1984)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ash, A., Pollack, D., Stevens, G.: Rigidity of \(p\)-adic cohomology classes of congruence subgroups of GL\((n,{\mathbb{Z}})\). Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 96(2), 367–388 (2008)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ash, A., Stevens, G.: \(p\)-Adic Deformations of Arithmetic Cohomology. Preprint. http://math.bu.edu/people/ghs/preprints/Ash-Stevens-02-08.pdf
  4. 4.
    Bellaïche, J., Chenevier, G.: Families of Galois representations and Selmer groups. Astérisque 324, xii+314 (2009)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bellaïche, J.: Critical \(p\)-adic \(L\)-functions. Invent. Math. 189(1), 1–60 (2012)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Berger, L.: Représentations \(p\)-adiques et équations différentielles. Invent. Math. 148(2), 219–284 (2002)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bosch, S., Güntzer, U., Remmert, R.: Non-Archimedean Analysis, Volume 261 of Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences]. Springer, Berlin (1984). (A systematic approach to rigid analytic geometry)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Balasubramanyam, B., Raghuram, A.: Special Values of Adjoint \(L\)-Functions and Congruences for Automorphic Forms on \(\rm GL(n)\) Over a Number Field. Preprint. arXiv:1408.3896
  9. 9.
    Buzzard, K.: Eigenvarieties. In: Burns, D., Buzzard, K., Nekovár, J. (eds.) \(L\)-functions and Galois representations. London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 320, pp. 59–120. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Borel, A., Wallach, N.: Continuous Cohomology, Discrete Subgroups, and Representations of Reductive Groups, Volume 67 of Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 2nd edn. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2000)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cartan, H., Eilenberg, S.: Homological algebra. Princeton Landmarks in Mathematics. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1999). (With an appendix by David A. Buchsbaum, Reprint of the 1956 original)MATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chenevier, G.: Familles \(p\)-adiques de formes automorphes pour \({{\rm GL}}_n\). J. Reine Angew. Math. 570, 143–217 (2004)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chenevier, G.: On the infinite fern of Galois representations of unitary type. Ann. Sci. École Norm. Supér. (4) 44(6), 963–1019 (2011)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Clozel, L., Harris, M., Taylor, R.: Automorphy for some \(l\)-adic lifts of automorphic mod \(l\) Galois representations. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 108, 1–181 (2008). (With Appendix A, summarizing unpublished work of Russ Mann, and Appendix B by Marie–France Vignéras)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Caraiani, A., Hung, B.V.L.: On the Image of Complex Conjugation in Certain Galois Representations. Preprint. arXiv:1409.2158
  16. 16.
    Clozel, L.: Motifs et formes automorphes: applications du principe de fonctorialité. In: Clozel, L., Milne, J.S. (eds.) Automorphic Forms, Shimura Varieties, and \(L\)-Functions, vol. I (Ann Arbor, MI, 1988), Volume 10 of Perspectives in Mathematics, pp. 77–159. Academic Press, Boston, (1990)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Coleman, R., Mazur, B.: The eigencurve. In: Scholl, A.J., Taylor, R.L. (eds.) Galois Representations in Arithmetic Algebraic Geometry (Durham, 1996), Volume 254 of London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, pp. 1–113. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Coleman, R.F.: Classical and overconvergent modular forms. Invent. Math. 124(1–3), 215–241 (1996)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Coleman, R.F.: \(p\)-Adic Banach spaces and families of modular forms. Invent. Math. 127(3), 417–479 (1997)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Clozel, L., Thorne, J.A.: Level-raising and symmetric power functoriality, I. Compos. Math. 150(5), 729–748 (2014)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Emerton, M.: On the interpolation of systems of eigenvalues attached to automorphic Hecke eigenforms. Invent. Math. 164(1), 1–84 (2006)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fontaine, J.-M.: Valeurs spéciales des fonctions \(L\) des motifs. Astérisque, (206): Exp. No. 751, 4, 205–249 (1992). Séminaire Bourbaki, vols. 1991/92Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Périodes \(p\)-adiques. Société Mathématique de France, Paris, : Papers from the seminar held in Bures-sur-Yvette, 1988, Astérisque No. 223 (1994)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Franke, J., Schwermer, J.: A decomposition of spaces of automorphic forms, and the Eisenstein cohomology of arithmetic groups. Math. Ann. 311(4), 765–790 (1998)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Galatius, S., Venkatesh, A.: Derived Galois deformation rings. PreprintGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hansen, D.: Minimal modularity lifting for \({{\rm GL}}_2\) over an arbitrary number field. To appear in Math. Res. LettGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hansen, D.: Universal eigenvarieties, trianguline Galois representations, and \(p\)-adic Langlands functoriality. To appear in Crelle’s JGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hida, H.: Iwasawa modules attached to congruences of cusp forms. Ann. Sci. École Norm. Super. (4) 19(2), 231–273 (1986)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hida, H.: Automorphic induction and Leopoldt type conjectures for \({{\rm GL}}(n)\). Asian J. Math. 2(4), 667–710 (1998). Mikio Sato: a great Japanese mathematician of the twentieth centuryCrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Harris, M., Lan, K.-W., Taylor, R., Thorne, J.: On the Rigid Cohomology of Certain Shimura Varieties. Preprint. arXiv:1411.6717
  31. 31.
    Jannsen, U.: On the \(l\)-adic cohomology of varieties over number fields and its Galois cohomology. In: Ihara, Y., Ribet, K., Serre, J.-P. (eds.) Galois Groups Over \({\bf Q}\) (Berkeley, CA, 1987), Volume 16 of Mathematical Sciences Research Institute Publications, pp. 315–360. Springer, New York (1989)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kisin, M.: Overconvergent modular forms and the Fontaine–Mazur conjecture. Invent. Math. 153(2), 373–454 (2003)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kedlaya, K.S., Pottharst, J., Xiao, L.: Cohomology of arithmetic families of \((\varphi,\Gamma )\)-modules. J. Am. Math. Soc. 27(4), 1043–1115 (2014)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Khare, C., Thorne, J.A.: Potential automorphy and the Leopoldt conjecture. PreprintGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mazur, B.: Deforming Galois representations. In: Ihara, Y., Ribet, K., Serre, J.-P. (eds.) Galois Groups Over \({\bf Q}\) (Berkeley, CA, 1987), Volume 16 of Mathematical Sciences Research Institute Publications, pp. 385–437. Springer, New York (1989)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mazur, B.: An introduction to the deformation theory of Galois representations. In: Cornell, G., Silverman, J.H., Stevens, G. (eds.) Modular forms and Fermat’s last theorem (Boston. MA, 1995), pp. 243–311. Springer, New York (1997)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Nekovář, J.: Beĭlinson’s conjectures. In Motives (Seattle, WA, 1991), Volume 55 of Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, pp. 537–570. American Mathematical Society, Providence (1994)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Newton, J., Thorne, J.A.: Torsion Galois Representations Over CM Fields and Hecke Algebras in the Derived Category. Preprint. http://math.harvard.edu/~thorne/combined.pdf
  39. 39.
    Prasanna, K., Venkatesh, A.: Automorphic cohomology, motivic cohomology, and the adjoint \(L\)-function. PreprintGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Scholze, P.: On torsion in the cohomology of locally symmetric varieties. To appear in Ann. MathGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Scholl, A.J.: Motives for modular forms. Invent. Math. 100(2), 419–430 (1990)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Taylor, R., Yoshida, T.: Compatibility of local and global Langlands correspondences. J. Am. Math. Soc. 20(2), 467–493 (2007)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Urban, E.: Eigenvarieties for reductive groups. Ann. of Math. (2) 174(3), 1685–1784 (2011)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Venkatesh, A.: Derived Hecke algebra and cohomology of arithmetic groups. PreprintGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Venkatesh, A.: The Exterior Algebra in the Cohomology of an Arithmetic Group. Lecture at MSRI (2014) http://www.msri.org/workshops/719/schedules/19229

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Pure Mathematics and Mathematical StatisticsUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations