Skip to main content
Log in

Automorphy for some l-adic lifts of automorphic mod l Galois representations

  • Published:
Publications mathématiques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We extend the methods of Wiles and of Taylor and Wiles from GL2 to higher rank unitary groups and establish the automorphy of suitable conjugate self-dual, regular (de Rham with distinct Hodge–Tate numbers), minimally ramified, l-adic lifts of certain automorphic mod l Galois representations of any dimension. We also make a conjecture about the structure of mod l automorphic forms on definite unitary groups, which would generalise a lemma of Ihara for GL2. Following Wiles’ method we show that this conjecture implies that our automorphy lifting theorem could be extended to cover lifts that are not minimally ramified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Arthur and L. Clozel, Simple Algebras, Base Change and the Advanced Theory of the Trace Formula, Ann. Math. Stud., vol. 120, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1989.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. I. N. Bernstein and A. V. Zelevinsky, Induced representations of reductive \(\mathfrak{p}\)-adic groups. I, Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér., IV. Sér., 10 (1977), 441–472.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. H. Carayol, Formes modulaires et représentations galoisiennes à valeurs dans un anneau local complet, in p-adic Monodromy and the Birch and Swinnerton–Dyer Conjecture, Contemp. Math., vol. 165, pp. 213–237, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. Clozel, On the cohomology of Kottwitz’s arithmetic varieties, Duke Math. J., 72 (1993), 757–795.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. L. Clozel and J.-P. Labesse, Changement de base pour les représentations cohomologiques des certaines groupes unitaires, appendix to “Cohomologie, stabilisation et changement de base”, Astérisque, 257 (1999), 120–132.

    Google Scholar 

  6. E. Cline, B. Parshall, and L. Scott, Cohomology of finite groups of Lie type I, Publ. Math., Inst. Hautes Étud. Sci., 45 (1975), 169–191.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. C. Curtis and I. Reiner, Methods of Representation Theory I, Wiley Interscience, New York, 1981.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. H. Darmon, F. Diamond, and R. Taylor, Fermat’s last theorem, in Current Developments in Mathematics, International Press, Cambridge, MA, 1994.

  9. F. Diamond, The Taylor–Wiles construction and multiplicity one, Invent. Math., 128 (1997), 379–391.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Dickinson, A criterion for existence of a universal deformation ring, appendix to “Deformations of Galois representations” by F. Gouvea, in Arithmetic Algebraic Geometry (Park City, UT, 1999), Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2001.

  11. F. Diamond and R. Taylor, Nonoptimal levels of mod l modular representations, Invent. Math., 115 (1994), 435–462.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. J.-M. Fontaine and G. Laffaille, Construction de représentations p-adiques, Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér., IV. Sér., 15 (1982), 547–608.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Harris and R. Taylor, The Geometry and Cohomology of Some Simple Shimura Varieties, Ann. Math. Stud., vol. 151, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2001.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Harris, N. Shepherd-Barron, and R. Taylor, A family of hypersurfaces and potential automorphy, to appear in Ann. Math.

  15. Y. Ihara, On modular curves over finite fields, in Discrete Subgroups of Lie Groups and Applications to Moduli, Oxford University Press, Bombay, 1975.

  16. H. Jacquet and J. Shalika, On Euler products and the classification of automorphic forms I, Amer. J. Math., 103 (1981), 499–558.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. H. Jacquet and J. Shalika, On Euler products and the classification of automorphic forms II, Amer. J. Math., 103 (1981), 777–815.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. H. Jacquet, I. Piatetski-Shapiro, and J. Shalika, Conducteur des représentations du groupe linéaire, Math. Ann., 256 (1981), 199–214.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. X. Lazarus, Module universel en caractéristique l>0 associé à un caractère de l’algèbre de Hecke de GL(n) sur un corps p-adique, avec \(l\ne p\), J. Algebra, 213 (1999), 662–686.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. H. Lenstra, Complete intersections and Gorenstein rings, in Elliptic Curves, Modular Forms and Fermat’s Last Theorem, International Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995.

  21. W. R. Mann, Local level-raising for GL n , PhD thesis, Harvard University (2001).

  22. W. R. Mann, Local level-raising on GL(n), partial preprint.

  23. D. Mauger, Algèbres de Hecke quasi-ordinaires universelles, Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér., IV. Sér., 37 (2004), 171–222.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. B. Mazur, An introduction to the deformation theory of Galois representations, in Modular Forms and Fermat’s Last Theorem (Boston, MA, 1995), Springer, New York, 1997.

  25. C. Moeglin and J.-L. Waldspurger, Le spectre résiduel de GL(n), Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér., IV. Sér., 22 (1989), 605–674.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. M. Nori, On subgroups of \(\text{GL}_n(\mathbb{F}_p)\), Invent. Math., 88 (1987), 257–275.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. J. Neukirch, A. Schmidt, and K. Wingberg, Cohomology of Number Fields, Grundl. Math. Wiss., vol. 323, Springer, Berlin, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  28. R. Ramakrishna, On a variation of Mazur’s deformation functor, Compos. Math., 87 (1993), 269–286.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. R. Ramakrishna, Deforming Galois representations and the conjectures of Serre and Fontaine–Mazur, Ann. Math., 156 (2002), 115–154.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. K. Ribet, Congruence relations between modular forms, in Proceedings of the Warsaw ICM, PWN, Warsaw, 1984.

  31. A. Roche, Types and Hecke algebras for principal series representations of split reductive p-adic groups, Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér., IV. Sér., 31 (1998), 361–413.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. J.-P. Serre, Abelian l-adic Representations and Elliptic Curves, Benjamin, New York, Amsterdam, 1968.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. J.-P. Serre, Sur la semi-simplicité des produits tensoriels de représentations de groupes, Invent. Math., 116 (1994), 513–530.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. T. Shintani, On an explicit formula for class-1 “Whittaker functions” on GL n over P-adic fields, Proc. Japan Acad., 52 (1976), 180–182.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. C. Skinner and A. Wiles, Base change and a problem of Serre, Duke Math. J., 107 (2001), 15–25.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. J. Tate, Number theoretic background, in A. Borel and W. Casselman Automorphic Forms, Representations and L-Functions, Proc. Symp. Pure Math., vol. 33(2), Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1979.

  37. R. Taylor, Automorphy for some l-adic lifts of automorphic mod l Galois representations. II, this volume.

  38. J. Tilouine, Deformations of Galois Representations and Hecke Algebras, Mehta Institute, New Dehli, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  39. R. Taylor and A. Wiles, Ring-theoretic properties of certain Hecke algebras, Ann. Math., 141 (1995), 553–572.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  40. M.-F. Vignéras, Représentations l-modulaires d’un groupe réductif p-adique avec \(l\ne p\), Progr. Math., vol. 137, Birkhäuser, Boston, MA, 1996.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. M.-F. Vignéras, Induced R-representations of p-adic reductive groups, Sel. Math., New Ser., 4 (1998), 549–623.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. A. Wiles, Modular elliptic curves and Fermat’s last theorem, Ann. Math., 141 (1995), 443–551.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Bibliography for Appendix B

  1. A. Arabia, Objets quasi-projectifs, Appendix to [V2] below.

  2. C. W. Curtis and I. Reiner, Methods of Representation Theory, vol. I, Wiley, New York, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J.-F. Dat, Types et inductions pour les représentations modulaires des groupes p-adiques, Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér., IV. Sér., 15 (1982), 45–115.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M.-F. Vignéras, Représentations modulaires d’un groupe réductif p-adique avec \(\ell\ne p\), Progr. Math., vol. 137, Birkhäuser, Boston, MA, 1996.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. M.-F. Vignéras, Induced R-representations of p-adic reductive groups, Sel. Math., New Ser., 4 (1998), 549–623.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. M.-F. Vignéras, Schur algebras of reductive p-adic groups I, Duke Math. J., 116 (2003), 35–75.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Taylor.

About this article

Cite this article

Clozel, L., Harris, M. & Taylor, R. Automorphy for some l-adic lifts of automorphic mod l Galois representations . Publ.math.IHES 108, 1–181 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10240-008-0016-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10240-008-0016-1

Keywords

Navigation