Skip to main content
Log in

A Comparative Study of Viscoelastic Rheological Models Using Finite-Difference Method and an Evaluation of the Seismic Attenuation in the Búzios Field Data

  • Published:
Pure and Applied Geophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Viscoelastic seismic modeling is essential to incorporate intrinsic attenuation effects in the wave propagation. Attenuation and dispersion can be quantified in terms of the quality factor Q. The consideration of these phenomena is crucial to improve the seismic processing and imaging, mainly in very deep reservoirs, having a thick salt layer above it. This work aims to evaluate the seismic attenuation effects through the 3D finite-difference viscoelastic seismic modeling using the three classical rheological models - Maxwell (M), Kelvin-Voigt (KV) and Standard Linear Solid (SLS). These viscoelastic models are analyzed comparatively considering the seismic attributes: waveform, amplitude and phase spectra. In addition, seismic attenuation of the real seismic data from Búzios field are evaluated through a frequency analysis. Synthetic seismograms of each rheological model are generated for a multi-layered geological model considering two approaches of Q distribution: a constant Q for the entire model and different Q values per layer. The amplitude spectra of real data confirmed that the shallowest post-salt package is more dissipative than deeper regions. The analysis of synthetic data shows that KV and SLS models proved to be effective to mimic seismic wave propagation at Búzios field. Thus, the KV model can be a good approach to simulate seismic waves in anelastic media due to its lower computational cost when compared to SLS. Our results also suggest that a Q distribution per layer can yield a seismic attenuation behavior similar to that observed in the seismic data of the Búzios field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge support from PETROBRAS (Petróleo Brasileiro S. A.) through the R &D Seismic Data Modeling Oriented to Pre-salt Reservoirs (Agreement no. 5850.0107681.18.9) project at Fluminense Federal University (UFF) and the strategic importance of the support given by National Agency for Petroleum (ANP) through the R &D levy regulation. Authors would like to thank the Seismic Inversion and Imaging Group (GISIS) team for all knowledge shared and also would like to thank UFF and Oceans and Land Dynamics Graduate Program (PPGDOT) for the infrastructure to develop this work. Also the authors would like to thank referees assertive comments, Rodrigo S. Stern (UFF/GISIS) for the crucial IT support and Sérgio Luiz E. F. da Silva (UFF/GISIS) for his constructive comments that have improved the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabrício O. A. Augusto.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix A Analytical Solution for Homogeneous Viscoelastic Media

Appendix A Analytical Solution for Homogeneous Viscoelastic Media

The viscoelastic analytical solution is obtained using the correspondence principle, which take into account the elastic solution (Carcione, 2015). The solution presented here is for a force acting in the positive z-direction and an homogeneous medium. Pilant (1979) derives the equation, and its simplification can be found in Gosselin-Cliche and Giroux (2014):

$$\begin{aligned} {{\textbf {W}}} =&\displaystyle \frac{F(\omega )}{4 \pi \rho R^{5} \omega ^{2}} \left\{ \begin{array}{c} xz\left[ \begin{array}{c} (R^{2}k_{p}^{2} - 3 - 3iRk_{p})e^{-ik_{p}R} +\\ (3 + 3iRk_{s} - R^{2}k_{s}^{2})e^{-ik_{s}R} \end{array} \right] \hat{{{\textbf {i}}}} + \\ \\ yz \left[ \begin{array}{c} (R^{2}k_{p}^{2} - 3 - 3iRk_{p})e^{-ik_{p}R} +\\ (3 + 3iRk_{s} - R^{2}k_{s}^{2})e^{-ik_{s}R} \end{array} \right] \hat{{{\textbf {j}}}} +\\ \\ \left[ \begin{array}{c} (x^{2} + y^{2} - 2z^{2})(e^{-ik_{p}R} - e^{-ik_{s}R} ) +\\ (z^2 R^2 k_{p}^{2} + i((x^{2} + y^{2} - 2z^{2})Rk_{p})e^{-ik_{p}R} + \\ ((x^{2} + y^{2})R^2 k_{s}^{2} - i(x^{2} + y^{2} - 2z^{2})Rk_{s})e^{-ik_{s}R} \end{array} \right] \hat{{{\textbf {k}}}} \end{array} \right\} \ \ \ \end{aligned}$$
(A.1)

The correspondence principle acts by substituting viscoelastic (complex) wavenumbers \(k_{p}\) and \(k_{s}\), contained in the complex modulus. Thus, the complex modulus of the Maxwell (Eq. 8), Kelvin-Voigt (Eq. 17) and SLS (Eq. 22) model are used in order to simulate each analytical solution.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Augusto, F.O.A., Moreira, R.M., Cetale, M. et al. A Comparative Study of Viscoelastic Rheological Models Using Finite-Difference Method and an Evaluation of the Seismic Attenuation in the Búzios Field Data. Pure Appl. Geophys. 180, 2939–2957 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-023-03316-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-023-03316-9

Keywords

Navigation