Abstract
Viscoelastic seismic modeling is essential to incorporate intrinsic attenuation effects in the wave propagation. Attenuation and dispersion can be quantified in terms of the quality factor Q. The consideration of these phenomena is crucial to improve the seismic processing and imaging, mainly in very deep reservoirs, having a thick salt layer above it. This work aims to evaluate the seismic attenuation effects through the 3D finite-difference viscoelastic seismic modeling using the three classical rheological models - Maxwell (M), Kelvin-Voigt (KV) and Standard Linear Solid (SLS). These viscoelastic models are analyzed comparatively considering the seismic attributes: waveform, amplitude and phase spectra. In addition, seismic attenuation of the real seismic data from Búzios field are evaluated through a frequency analysis. Synthetic seismograms of each rheological model are generated for a multi-layered geological model considering two approaches of Q distribution: a constant Q for the entire model and different Q values per layer. The amplitude spectra of real data confirmed that the shallowest post-salt package is more dissipative than deeper regions. The analysis of synthetic data shows that KV and SLS models proved to be effective to mimic seismic wave propagation at Búzios field. Thus, the KV model can be a good approach to simulate seismic waves in anelastic media due to its lower computational cost when compared to SLS. Our results also suggest that a Q distribution per layer can yield a seismic attenuation behavior similar to that observed in the seismic data of the Búzios field.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Augusto, F., Tostes, D., & Cetale, M., et al. (2021). Seismic Attenuation Analysis of Búzios oil field via Viscoelastic Modelling. In: 17th International Congress of the Brazilian Geophysical Society. Brazilian Geophysical Society (SBGf), Rio de Janeiro.
Bashir, Y., Ghosh, D.P., & Sum, C.W., et al. (2018). Enhanced wave modeling for high-resolution seismic imaging: Application in GOM. In SEG 2018 Workshop: SEG Seismic Imaging Workshop, Beijing, China, 12–14 November 2018. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, https://doi.org/10.1190/seim2018-07.1.
Bashir, Y., Ghosh, D.P., & Babasafari, A. (2019). Wave propagation characteristics using advance modelling algorithm for d-data imaging. In SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2019. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2019-3215236.1.
Brossier, R., Etienne, V., & Operto, S., et al. (2010). Frequency-domain numerical modelling of visco-acoustic waves based on finite-difference and finite-element discontinuous galerkin methods. In Acoustic Waves. Sciyo, https://doi.org/10.5772/9714.
Brown, T., Du, S., Eruslu, H., et al. (2018). Analysis of models for viscoelastic wave propagation. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1802.00825
Carcione, J. M. (2015). Wave Fields in Real Media: Wave Propagation in Anisotropic. Anelastic, Porous and Electromagnetic Media (3rd ed.). Elsevier.
Carcione, J. M., Kosloff, D., & Kosloff, R. (1988). Wave propagation simulation in a linear viscoelastic medium. Geophysical Journal International, 95(3), 597–611. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1988.tb06706.x
Carcione, J. M., Poletto, F., & Gei, D. (2004). 3-d wave simulation in anelastic media using the kelvin–voigt constitutive equation. Journal of Computational Physics, 196(1), 282–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2003.10.024
Cerjan, C., Kosloff, D., Kosloff, R., et al. (1985). A nonreflecting boundary condition for discrete acoustic and elastic wave equations. Geophysics, 50(4), 705–708. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441945
Christensen, R. M. (1982). Theory of Viscoelasticity: An Introduction. New York: Academic Press Inc.
Dalkhani, A. R., Javaherian, A., & Basir, H. M. (2017). Frequency domain finite-element and spectral-element acoustic wave modeling using absorbing boundaries and perfectly matched layer. Waves in Random and Complex Media, 28(2), 367–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/17455030.2017.1355079
Emmerich, H., & Korn, M. (1987). Incorporation of attenuation into time-domain computations of seismic wave fields. Geophysics, 52(9), 1252–1264. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442386
Findley, W., Lai, J., & Onaran, K. (1989). Creep and relaxation of nonlinear viscoelastic materials: with an introduction to linear viscoelasticity. New York: Dover Publications Inc.
Freitas, D. F., Cetale, M., Figueiredo, A. G., et al. (2023). Multi-window spectrum analysis of búzios oil field psdm seismic data applied to frequency attenuation study. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 213, 105015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2023.105015
Galis, M., Moczo, P., & Kristek, J. (2008). A 3-d hybrid finite-difference-finite-element viscoelastic modelling of seismic wave motion. Geophysical Journal International, 175(1), 153–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246x.2008.03866.x
Gosselin-Cliche, B., & Giroux, B. (2014). 3d frequency-domain finite-difference viscoelastic-wave modeling using weighted average 27-point operators with optimal coefficients. Geophysics, 79(3), T169–T188. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2013-0368.1
Ichou, M. A., Amri, H. E., & Ezziani, A. (2022). Fractional viscoelastic wave attenuation modeling. Pure and Applied Geophysics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-022-02968-3
Johann, P.R.S., & Monteiro, R.C. (2016). Geophysical reservoir characterization and monitoring at brazilian pre-salt oil fields. In: Day 2 Tue, May 03, 2016. OTC, https://doi.org/10.4043/27246-ms.
Jones, T. D. (1986). Pore fluids and frequency-dependent wave propagation in rocks. Geophysics, 51(10), 1939–1953. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442050
Levander, A. (1988). Fourth-order finite-difference P-SV seismograms. Geophysics, 53(1), 1425–1436. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2008.03866.x
Liu, X., Chen, J., Zhao, Z., et al. (2018). Simulating seismic wave propagation in viscoelastic media with an irregular free surface. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 175(10), 3419–3439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-018-1879-9
Mayr, S. I., & Burkhardt, H. (2006). Ultrasonic properties of sedimentary rocks: effect of pressure, saturation, frequency and microcracks. Geophysical Journal International, 164(1), 246–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246x.2005.02826.x
Moczo, P., Robertsson, J. O. A., & Eisner, L. (2007). The Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method for Modeling of Seismic Wave Propagation. Advances in Geophysics, 48(06), 421–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2687(06)48008-0
Moczo, P., Kristek, J., & Galis, M. (2014). 3D finite-difference schemes. The Finite-Difference Modelling of Earthquake Motions (pp. 166–198). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139236911.011
Pilant, W. L. (1979). Developments in Solid Earth Geophysics (1st ed.). New York: Elsevier-North-Holland Inc.
Poynting, J. H., & Thomson, J. J. (1902). Properties of Matter. London: C. Griffin and Co.
Qausar, M. (1989). Attenuation properties of viscoelastic material. Pure and Applied Geophysics PAGEOPH, 131(4), 703–713. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00876269
Robertsson, J. O. A., Blanch, J. O., & Symes, W. W. (1994). Viscoelastic finite-difference modeling. Geophysics, 59(9), 1444–1456. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443701
Schuster, G.T. (2017). Seismic Inversion. Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
Spencer, J. W., & Shine, J. (2016). Seismic wave attenuation and modulus dispersion in sandstones. Geophysics, 81(3), D211–D231. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2015-0342.1
Tan, S., Lee, S., & Anderson, J.E., et al. (2022). Fast anisotropic viscoelastic modeling and application in quantitative seismic reservoir characterization. In Second International Meeting for Applied Geoscience & Energy. Society of Exploration Geophysicists and American Association of Petroleum Geologists, https://doi.org/10.1190/image2022-3735215.1.
Tisato, N., & Quintal, B. (2014). Laboratory measurements of seismic attenuation in sandstone: Strain versus fluid saturation effects. Geophysics, 79(5), WB9–WB14. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2013-0419.1
Toksöz, M. N., Johnston, D. H., & Timur, A. (1979). Attenuation of seismic waves in dry and saturated rocks: I. laboratory measurements. Geophysics, 44(4), 681–690. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1440969
Virieux, J. (1986). P-SV wave propagation in heterogeneous media: Velocity-stress finite-difference method. Geophysics, 51(4), 889–901. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442147
Wang, Y. (2008). Seismic Inverse Q Filtering. Chichester, Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing
Winkler, K. W., & Nur, A. (1982). Seismic attenuation: Effects of pore fluids and frictional-sliding. Geophysics, 47(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441276
Zener, C. (1948). Elasticity and anelasticity of metals. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.
Zhu, J., Wu, W., & Zhao, J. (2011). Effects of Joints of Maxwell Viscoelastic Behavior On Wave Propagation. In 45th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, San Francisco, California, ARMA-11-144, https://onepetro.org/ARMAUSRMS/proceedings-pdf/ARMA11/All-ARMA11/ARMA-11-144/1668085/arma-11-144.pdf.
Zhu, T., Carcione, J. M., & Harris, J. M. (2013). Approximating constant-\(Q\) seismic propagation in the time domain. Geophysical Prospecting, 61(5), 931–940. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12044
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge support from PETROBRAS (Petróleo Brasileiro S. A.) through the R &D Seismic Data Modeling Oriented to Pre-salt Reservoirs (Agreement no. 5850.0107681.18.9) project at Fluminense Federal University (UFF) and the strategic importance of the support given by National Agency for Petroleum (ANP) through the R &D levy regulation. Authors would like to thank the Seismic Inversion and Imaging Group (GISIS) team for all knowledge shared and also would like to thank UFF and Oceans and Land Dynamics Graduate Program (PPGDOT) for the infrastructure to develop this work. Also the authors would like to thank referees assertive comments, Rodrigo S. Stern (UFF/GISIS) for the crucial IT support and Sérgio Luiz E. F. da Silva (UFF/GISIS) for his constructive comments that have improved the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix A Analytical Solution for Homogeneous Viscoelastic Media
Appendix A Analytical Solution for Homogeneous Viscoelastic Media
The viscoelastic analytical solution is obtained using the correspondence principle, which take into account the elastic solution (Carcione, 2015). The solution presented here is for a force acting in the positive z-direction and an homogeneous medium. Pilant (1979) derives the equation, and its simplification can be found in Gosselin-Cliche and Giroux (2014):
The correspondence principle acts by substituting viscoelastic (complex) wavenumbers \(k_{p}\) and \(k_{s}\), contained in the complex modulus. Thus, the complex modulus of the Maxwell (Eq. 8), Kelvin-Voigt (Eq. 17) and SLS (Eq. 22) model are used in order to simulate each analytical solution.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Augusto, F.O.A., Moreira, R.M., Cetale, M. et al. A Comparative Study of Viscoelastic Rheological Models Using Finite-Difference Method and an Evaluation of the Seismic Attenuation in the Búzios Field Data. Pure Appl. Geophys. 180, 2939–2957 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-023-03316-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-023-03316-9