Skip to main content
Log in

Imaging Diffractions Using a Double-Order Weight Function

  • Published:
Pure and Applied Geophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Diffractions carry meaningful information on subsurface discontinuities and are regarded as effective tools for high-resolution seismic exploration. However, diffractions often behave as weak events and, therefore, are masked by strong specular reflections. In this study, the diffraction and reflection behaviors in common image gathers have been elucidated. Fortunately, diffractions are observed to be kinematically different from reflections in dip-angle gathers. Under a suitable velocity, diffractions appear as flat events, whereas reflections appear as curves with stationary phase apexes. Therefore, the diffraction energy has a wide and nearly uniform distribution along the flat events, while the reflection energy is concentrated in the Fresnel zone with the stationary phase point. Consequently, a single-order weight function was proposed and tested by measuring the difference between an individual sample and the mean of the entire data set to eliminate the reflection energy. It is observed that the weight function often leads to a reflection residual, if it is based only on the zero-order amplitude information. Therefore, first-order derivative information is used to build the weight function which is also called the double-order weight function, to further suppress reflections and highlight weak diffractions. Synthetic and field data applications demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed weight function in imaging subsurface discontinuities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bakhtiari, R., Schwarz, B., Gajewski, D., & Vanelle, C. (2018). Common-reflection-surface-based pre-stack diffraction separation and imaging. Geophysics, 83(1), S47–S55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkovitch, A., Belfer, L., Hassin, Y., & Landa, E. (2009). Diffraction imaging by multi-focusing. Geophysics, 74(6), WCA75–WCA81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berryhill, J. R. (1977). Diffraction response for nonzero separation of source and receiver. Geophysics, 42(6), 1158–1176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dell, S., & Gajewski, D. (2011). Common-reflection-surface-based workflow for diffraction imaging. Geophysics, 76(5), S187–S195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fomel, S. (2002). Applications of plane-wave destruction filters. Geophysics, 67(6), 1946–1960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fomel, S., Landa, E., & Taner, M. T. (2007). Poststack velocity analysis by separation and imaging of seismic diffractions. Geophysics, 72(6), U89–U94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forel, D., Benz, T., & Pennington, W. D. (2005). Seismic data processing with seismic unix: A 2D seismic data processing primer. SEG.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gong, X. B., Yu, C. X., & Wang, Z. H. (2016). Separation of pre-stack seismic diffractions using an improved sparse apex-shifted hyperbolic Radon transform. Exploration Geophysics, 48, 476–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubral, P., Schleicher, J., & Tygel, M. (1996). A unified approach to 3-D seismic reflection imaging, part I: Basic concepts. Geophysics, 61, 742–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karimpouli, S., Malehmir, A., Hassani, H., Khoshdel, H., & Nabi-Bidhendi, M. (2015). Automated diffraction delineation using an apex-shifted Radon transform. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 12, 199–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, J. B. (1962). Geometrical theory of diffraction. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 52, 116–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khaidukov, V., Landa, E., & Moser, T. J. (2004). Diffraction imaging by focusing-defocusing: An outlook on seismic superresolution. Geophysics, 69(6), 1478–1490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klokov, A., & Fomel, S. (2012). Separation and imaging of seismic diffractions using migrated dip-angle gathers. Geophysics, 77(6), S131–S143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozlov, E., Barasky, N., & Korolev, E. (2004). Imaging scattering objects masked by specular reflections. In 74th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, pp. 1131–1134.

  • Krey, T. (1952). The significance of diffraction in the investigation of faults. Geophysics, 17, 843–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laubach, S., Marrett, R., & Olson, J. (2000). New directions in fracture characterization. The Leading Edge, 19, 704–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, C. J., Zhao, J. T., Peng, S. P., Cui, X. Q., & Lin, P. (2020). Separating and imaging diffractions of seismic waves in the full-azimuth dip-angle domain. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 17, 339–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, C. J., Zhao, J. T., Peng, S. P., & Cui, X. Q. (2021). Prestack diffraction separation in the common virtual source gather. Geophysics, 86(2), 1MA-W19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, C. J., Zhao, J. T., Peng, S. P., & Zhou, Y. X. (2021). Diffraction imaging using a mathematical morphological filter with a time-varying structuring element. Geophysics, 86(3), A27-WB57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, L., Vincent, E., Ji, X., Qin, F., & Luo, Y. (2016). Imaging diffractors using wave-equation migration. Geophysics, 81(6), S459–S468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, P., Peng, S. P., Zhao, J. T., & Cui, X. Q. (2020). Diffraction separation and imaging using multichannel singular-spectrum analysis. Geophysics, 85(1), V11–V24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, P., Peng, S. P., Zhao, J. T., Cui, X. Q., & Wang, H. H. (2018). L1-norm regularization and wavelet transform: An improved plane-wave destruction method. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 148, 16–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser, T. J., & Howard, C. B. (2008). Diffraction imaging in depth. Geophysical Prospecting, 56, 627–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paffenholz, J., McLain, B., Zaske, J., Keliher, P. J. (2002). Subsalt multiple attenuation and imaging. In Observations from the Sigsbee2B synthetic dataset: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, pp. 2122–2125.

  • Peng, S. P., & Zhang, J. P. (2007). Engineering geology for underground rocks. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, B. (2019). Coherent wavefield subtraction for diffraction separation. Geophysics, 84(3), V157–V168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, C., Zhao, J., Wang, Y., Wang, C., & Geng, W. (2017). Separation and imaging diffractions by a sparsity-promoting model and subspace trust-region algorithm. Geophysical Journal International, 208, 1756–1763.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, J. T., Peng, S. P., Du, W. F., & Li, X. T. (2016). Diffraction imaging method by Mahalnobis-based amplitude damping. Geophysics, 81(6), S399–S408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, J. T., Sun, X. L., Peng, S. P., Wei, W., & Liu, T. (2019). Separating pre-stack diffractions with SVMF in the flattened shot domain. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 16, 389–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, J. T., Yu, C. X., Peng, S. P., & Li, C. J. (2020). 3D diffraction imaging method using low-rank matrix decomposition. Geophysics, 85(1), S1–S10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, X., & Wu, R. S. (2010). Imaging diffraction points using the local image matrices generated in pre-stack migration. Geophysics, 75(1), S1–S9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant nos. 42022031, 41874157), National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant no. 2020YFE0201300), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant no. 2020YQMT01, 2021YQDC10), 111 Project (No. B18052), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant no. 2021M693426). We thank Peng Research Group in CUMTB for support of this work. We express great appreciation to the anonymous reviewers and editors for promotion of this paper.

Funding

The authors have not disclosed any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peng Lin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have not disclosed any competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, C., Peng, S., Lin, P. et al. Imaging Diffractions Using a Double-Order Weight Function. Pure Appl. Geophys. 179, 1053–1067 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-022-02967-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-022-02967-4

Keywords

Navigation