Abstract
Diffractions not only carry important information about small-scale subsurface structures, they also possess unique properties, which make them a powerful tool for seismic processing and imaging. Since a point diffractor scatters an incoming wave to all directions, a diffraction event implies better illumination than a reflection, because the rays travel through larger parts of the subsurface. Furthermore, unlike the reflection case, in which the emergence location of the reflected wave depends on the source position, in the case of non-Snell scattering, up-going and down-going raypaths are decoupled. Based on this decoupling, we introduce a diffraction traveltime decomposition principle, which establishes a direct connection between zero-offset and finite-offset diffraction wavefield attributes. By making use of this approach, we are able to enhance diffractions and obtain high-quality diffraction wavefield attributes at arbitrary offsets in the prestack domain solely based on zero-offset processing without any further optimization of attributes. We show the accuracy of the method by fitting diffraction traveltimes, and on simple waveform data. Application to complex synthetic data shows the ability of the proposed approach to enhance diffractions and provide high-quality wavefield attributes even in sparsely illuminated regions such as subsalt areas. The promising results reveal a high potential for improved prestack data enhancement and further applications such as efficient diffraction-based finite-offset tomography.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bauer A., 2014. From Zero-Offset to Common-Offset with Diffractions. MSc Thesis. University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Bauer A., Schwarz B. and Gajewski D., 2015. Zero-offset based prediction of common offset diffraction traveltimes. Extended Abstract. 77th EAGE Conference & Exhibition 2015, Session WS06. EAGE Publications, EAGE, Houten, The Netherlands, DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.201413508.
Baykulov M. and Gajewski D., 2009. Prestack seismic data enhancement with partial commonreflection-surface (CRS) stack. Geophysics, 74, V49–V58.
Bergler S., Duveneck E., Höcht G., Zhang Y. and Hubral P., 2002. Common-reflection surface stack for converted waves. Stud. Geophys. Geod., 46, 165–175.
Berkovitch A., Belfer I., Hassin Y. and Landa E., 2009. Diffraction imaging by multifocusing. Geophysics, 74, WCA75–WCA81.
Billette F. and Lambare G., 1998. Velocity macro-model estimation from seismic reflection data by stereotomography. Geophys. J. Int., 135, 671–690.
Bortfeld R., 1989. Geometrical ray theory: Rays and traveltimes in seismic systems (second-dorder approximations of the traveltimes). Geophysics, 54, 342–349.
Dell S. and Gajewski D., 2011. Common-reflection-surface-based workflow for diffraction imaging. Geophysics, 76, S187–S195.
Duveneck E., 2004. Velocity model estimation with data-derived wavefront attributes. Geophysics, 69, 265–274.
Fomel S., Landa E. and Taner M.T., 2007. Poststack velocity analysis by separation and imaging of seismic diffractions. Geophysics, 72, U89–U94.
Hubral P., 1983. Computing true amplitude reflections in a laterally inhomogeneous earth. Geophysics, 48, 1051–1062.
Jäger R., Mann J., Höcht G. and Hubral P., 2001. Common-reflection-surface stack: Image and attributes. Geophysics, 66, 97–109.
Khaidukov V., Landa E. and Moser T.J., 2004. Diffraction imaging by focusing-defocusing: An outlook on seismic superresolution. Geophysics, 69, 1478–1490.
Mann J., 2002. Extensions and Applications of the Common-Reflection-Surface Stack Method. PhD Thesis. University of Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Müller T., 1999. The Common Reflection Surface Stack Method - Seismic Imaging without Explicit Knowledge of the Velocity Model. PhD Thesis. University of Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Nelder J. and Mead R., 1965. A simplex method for function minimization. Am. Math. Mon., 105, 523–528.
Schwarz B., Vanelle C. and Gajewski D., 2014a. From zero-offset to common-offset with diffractions. Extended Abstract. 76th EAGE Conference & Exhibition 2014, Session WS11. EAGE Publications, EAGE, Houten, The Netherlands, DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.20140591.
Schwarz B., Vanelle C., Gajewski D. and Kashtan B., 2014b. Curvatures and inhomogeneities: an improved common-reflection-surface approach. Geophysics, 79, S231–S240.
Spinner M., Tomas C., Marchetti P., Gallo C. and Arfeen S., 2012. Common-offset CRS for advanced imaging in complex geological settings. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2012, 1–5, DOI: 10.1190/segam2012-1099.1.
Walda J. and Gajewski D., 2015. Common-reflection-surface stack improvement by differential evolution and conflicting dip processing. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2015, 3842–3847, DOI: 10.1190/segam2015-5910957.1.
Yilmaz Ö., 2001. Seismic Data Analysis: Processing, Inversion, and Interpretation of Seismic Data. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, OK.
Zhang Y., Bergler S. and Hubral P., 2001. Common-reflection-surface (CRS) stack for common offset. Geophys. Prospect., 49, 709–718.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bauer, A., Schwarz, B. & Gajewski, D. Enhancement of prestack diffraction data and attributes using a traveltime decomposition approach. Stud Geophys Geod 60, 471–486 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-015-1278-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-015-1278-y