Frequency Characteristics and Numerical Computation of Seismic Records Generated by a Giant Debris Flow in Zhouqu, Western China
- 192 Downloads
The catastrophic Sanyanyu and Luojiayu debris flows, which were induced by heavy rain, struck Zhouqu County in Gannan Prefecture, Gansu Province, at approximately midnight, 7 August 2010 (Beijing time, UTC + 8), causing 1765 fatalities and huge economic loss. The ZHQ seismic station is located approximately 170 m west of the outlet of the Sanyanyu gully, and its power system was destroyed by the Sanyanyu debris flow when its leading edge reached the vicinity of the seismic station. In this paper, seismic signals recorded approximately 10 min before its termination are collected and analyzed to study the Sanyanyu debris flow. A double-exponential model is first proposed to quantitatively characterize seismic energy distributions in the frequency domain, which reveals that the peak frequency of seismic signals is around 5 Hz. Influenced by the Doppler effect, the peak frequency of the N–S component is the highest, and the U–D component is the lowest. Time–frequency analysis is applied to the seismic signals. From the spectrogram, it is easily observed that the formation time of the Sanyanyu debris flow is around 23:33:10. The entire debris flow is divided into three phases with distinct frequency characteristics, using 23:36:20 and 23:37:35 as crucial times. The frequency energy distributions in the first two phases are relatively stable, and are constrained in 0–8.8 Hz and 0–17.8 Hz, respectively. For the third phase, the upper boundary of frequency energy increases in a nearly linear manner, reaching approximately 35 Hz at the end. We calculate synthetic seismograms of the Sanyanyu debris flow. Generally, synthetic seismograms have morphological features and characteristics in key stages similar to those of the actual seismic records, and their maximum values are of the same magnitude. Our results suggest that the seismic source of a debris flow can be represented by a single-force model, and reveal that real-time monitoring and rapid identification of potential debris flows using broadband seismic network records is possible, which can provide approximately 15 min of pre-event warning for local residents and hopefully save many lives.
KeywordsAugust 7 Zhouqu debris flows broadband seismic signals frequency characteristics numerical computation
Most of western and southwest China is characterized by mountainous areas with dramatically varying terrain, resulting in extensive development of catastrophic natural geological hazards, such as landslides and debris flows, which seriously affect the lives of local residents (e.g., Cui et al. 2003; Zeng et al. 2014). Debris flows are generally induced by heavy rain. During a debris flow, mixtures containing water, debris, and loose sediment rush out of the outlet of a gully at a very high speed, carrying a large amount of material and energy, destroying cities and villages and causing widespread devastation. At present, studies on debris flows are mainly carried out after their occurrence, since they are usually unpredictable. They are also very destructive, and field measurement equipment is usually destroyed; thus data cannot be collected. Under these conditions, real-time monitoring and rapid identification of a potential debris flow is essential for enacting early warning protocols and enabling effective relief-and-rescue operations.
Remote and continuous observations from seismic networks provide a novel and reliable means to quantitatively extract physical properties of flows on the earth's surface; for example, seismic records have been used to monitor river discharge (Burtin et al. 2008) and to study the formation of a barrier lake by landslides and the collapse of a dam (Feng 2012). Studies show that broadband seismic records also provide a good tool for extraction of key parameters of debris flows (e.g., Arattano 1999; Burtin et al. 2009). Characteristics of the seismic signals generated by debris flows have been researched in detail by physical experiments and field observations, which have shown that they are caused by the friction between the flowing material and the boundary and the collision between the flowing substances (e.g., Huang et al. 2004, 2007; Ekström and Stark 2013; Yamada et al. 2013). In addition, the predominant frequency of seismic signals is relatively high, resulting in rapid seismic energy attenuation (e.g., Huang et al. 2008; Burtin et al. 2009), and the seismic amplitude is proportional to the discharge of the debris flow (Huang et al. 2008). An early warning system for debris flows based on seismic network observations requires properties of seismic signals recorded very close to the events; however, near-field observations of debris flow signals are seldom reported.
In this paper, we analyze seismic signals generated by a giant debris flow and recorded on a seismic station very close to the event to extract their frequency characteristics. Subsequently, we calculate synthetic seismograms of the debris flow on the seismic station using a single-force seismic source model and configurations of the Sanyanyu gully, and compare the results with the recorded seismic signals. The frequency characteristics of the debris flow seismic signals and procedures for computing its synthetic seismograms presented here are expected to support early warning systems for debris flows based on seismic network observations.
2 Zhouqu Debris Flows and Seismic Observations
Heavy rain began in Zhouqu County on the night of 7 August 2010 (Beijing time, UTC + 8, used throughout this paper), with maximum hourly intensity of up to 77.3 mm (Yu et al. 2010). Debris flows induced by the heavy rainfall rushed out from the Sanyanyu and Luojiayu gullies, destroying a large number of buildings in Zhouqu County and causing 1765 fatalities. The total amount of sedimentary deposits accumulated by the debris flows was as large as 2.2 × 106 m3, most of which was deposited on the original alluvial fan, and a small part rushed into the Bailong River in front, forming a 9-m-high dam (Tang et al. 2011) and a 3-km-long barrier lake (Fang et al. 2010). Blocked by the newly formed dam, the water level of the Bailong River rose about 8 m, and part of the water went over the bank into Zhouqu County, causing further disasters (Yu et al. 2010; Tang et al. 2011).
3 Seismic Signals Generated by the Sanyanyu Debris Flow
3.1 Frequency Characteristics of Seismic Signals
Best-fit coefficients of energy distribution model in frequency domain for three components
3.23 × 10−4
4.02 × 10−4
4.74 × 10−4
3.2 Stages of the Sanyanyu Debris Flow Revealed by Seismic Signals
3.3 Possible Precursors of the Debris Flow
4 Numerical Computations
4.1 Source Representation of a Debris Flow
It is generally agreed that the earthquake source can be represented by the double-couple model (Aki and Richards 2002). For movements on the earth's surface, such as landslides, debris flows, and glacier avalanches, the seismic source is better represented by a single-force (SF) model (e.g., Kanamori and Given 1982; Kanamori et al. 1984; Hasegawa and Kanamori 1987; Dahlen 1993; Fukao 1995; Ekström et al. 2003). Based on the analyses of a slope-slide model, the three component forces applied to the crust by a landslide or a debris flow can be expressed as (e.g., Zhao et al. 2015):
4.2 Synthetic Seismograms for the Sanyanyu Debris Flow
Figures 2 and 8 reveal that synthetic seismograms and actual seismic records have similar amplitude variation characteristics, i.e. they increase in approximately an exponential manner with time and finally reach around 0.1 mm/s. These characteristics are partly related to the shape of the debris flow channel and partly caused by the increase in the mass of the flowing material. Field seismic records show that seismic amplitude began to increase at approximately 23:33:10, 23:36:20, and 23:37:35, i.e. 6 min 5 s, 2 min 55 s, and 1 min 40 s before the end of the seismic records (23:39:15), indicating the increase in the debris flow discharge (Huang et al. 2007, 2008). Correspondingly, there are also three amplitude increase stages (especially on the U–D component) on the synthetic seismograms at approximately 125, 210, and 320 s, showing characteristics similar to the actual seismic records, suggesting that numerical computations of seismic signals generated by debris flows can effectively describe features of their movement stages. The seismic amplitude increases in an approximately exponential manner with time, which is partly because of the actual increase in the debris flow mass and partly because of the approaching debris flow with time. The increase in mass by entraining deposited material along the path plays a very important role in the increase in seismic amplitude, as the amplitude would increase at a lower rate if it were caused purely by the approach of the debris flow. In addition, satellite images before and after the debris flow reveal that the gully was widened significantly (Tang et al. 2011), indicating that additional material was entrained into the flowing mass.
5 Analyses, Discussion, and Conclusions
The Zhouqu debris flows, which were induced by heavy rain, resulted in 1765 fatalities and huge economic loss. The ZHQ seismic station is located on the path of the Sanyanyu debris flow to Zhouqu County and recorded the entire debris flow process, providing a good opportunity to analyze characteristics of debris flow seismic signals recorded at a very near field. We find that the energy distribution of seismic signals in the frequency domain can be well represented by a double-exponential model, and the direction of the debris flow can be estimated by analyzing the influence of the Doppler effect on the peak frequency of different components. Stages of the debris flow are well illustrated on spectrograms. Two possible precursors, i.e. a rapid increase in seismic amplitude and a series of signal spikes, are also identified.
The focal mechanism of earthquakes can be well represented by a double-couple model, and the radiation pattern of seismic energy satisfies four-quadrant distribution (Aki and Richards 2002). Seismic sources of large-scale earth surface processes such as landslides and debris flows can be represented by a single-force model, i.e. each component of the source is a time series of force acting on the crust. Seismic signals generated by landslides and debris flows consist of two components: the high-frequency component induced by fractions between the flowing (sliding) material and the boundaries, and the low-frequency component generated by unloading and reloading of the crust caused by acceleration and deceleration of the bulk movement. The duration of a debris flow is generally longer, and the velocity of a debris flow changes very little after reaching a stable state. Therefore, the seismic source of a debris flow is provided mainly by the frictional force. We modified the debris flow seismic source model by taking only the frictional terms of the force and used a moving point source to calculate synthetic seismograms of the Sanyanyu debris flow. The results are consistent with the field observations in the outlines of seismic amplitude, i.e. the pattern of exponential increase, and three obvious stages of increasing amplitude. Their maximum values are also close.
Seismic signals reveal that there are at least two types of possible precursor characteristics before the formation of the Sanyanyu debris flow: first, a series of signal spikes starting at about 22:50:00; second, about 10 min before the formation, the seismic amplitude begins to increase rapidly. If we take the features as the precursors of the debris flow, we have at least 15 min before the debris flow destroys Zhouqu County. If the warning information can be issued to the local residents in time, the number of casualties will be significantly reduced. An efficient debris flow early warning system should be established to prevent such disasters in the future. The system should include at least the following components: First, a small network containing at least three seismic stations should be deployed in a carefully designed location taking into account the local terrain. Second, seismic characteristics in both the time and frequency domains should be monitored in real time. This work is not necessarily carried out at the seismic station; instead, it can be done remotely. Third, a complete information exchange system is needed to ensure that the early warning information obtained from the seismic station can be transmitted to the control center in time and then distributed to the public. This system must be responsive, since the time involved is just tens of minutes. In addition, since geological and geographical features are different for different debris flow gullies, if numerical simulations are performed based on the seismic geological characteristics of each region to obtain the expected seismic response, the results could be very helpful for the early warning system. Other factors, such as rainfall, also need to be considered.
We would like to thank Ruifeng Liu, Zhibin Huang, and Yong Zhao from the China Earthquake Networks Center for their helpful comments on seismic wave recognition. We also thank Wenhao Zeng and Yanping Niu from the Lanzhou Institute of Seismology for their kind help in the field investigation. Seismic Analysis Code (SAC, http://ds.iris.edu/files/sac-manual/) and rdseed (http://ds.iris.edu/ds/nodes/dmc/manuals/rdseed/) were used in seismic data processing. The software package Generic Mapping Tools (GMT, http://gmt.soest.hawaii.edu/) was used in preparing figures. Green’s functions were calculated using the QSEIS developed by Dr. Rongjiang Wang from GFZ (http://www.gfz-potsdam.de/en/section/physics-of-earthquakes-and-volcanoes/staff/profil/rongjiang-wang/). This research is financially supported by the 973 Program 2013CB733200 and the 863 Program 2012AA121302.
- Aki, K., & Richards, P. G. (2002). Quantitative Seismology: Theory and Methods (2nd ed.). Sausalito: University Science Books.Google Scholar
- Burtin, A., Bollinger, L., Vergne, J., Cattin, R., & Nábělek, J. L. (2008). Spectral analysis of seismic noise induced by rivers: A new tool to monitor spatiotemporal changes in stream hydrodynamics. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 113(B5), B05301. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JB005034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cui, P., Wei, F., Xie, H., Yang, K., He, Y., & Ma, D. (2003). Debris flow and disaster reduction strategies in western china. Quaternary Sciences (in Chinese), 23(02), 142–151.Google Scholar
- Dahlen, F. A. (1993). Single-force representation of shallow landslide sources. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 83(1), 130–143.Google Scholar
- Fang, H., Cai, Q., Li, Q., Sun, L., & He, J. (2010). Causes and countermeasures of giant flash flood and debris flow disaster in Zhouqu County in Gansu Province on August 7, 2010. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 8(6), 14–18+23. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
- Fukao, Y. (1995). Single-force representation of earthquakes due to landslides or the collapse of caverns. Geophysical Journal International, 122(1), 243–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1995.tb03551.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hasegawa, H., & Kanamori, H. (1987). Source mechanism of the magnitude 7.2 Grand Banks earthquake of November 1929: Double couple or submarine landslide? Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 77(6), 1984–2004.Google Scholar
- Tang, C., Rengers, N., van Asch, T. W. J., Yang, Y. H., & Wang, G. F. (2011). Triggering conditions and depositional characteristics of a disastrous debris flow event in Zhouqu city, Gansu Province, northwestern China. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 11(11), 2903–2912. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-11-2903-2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Toksöz, M. N., & Johnston, D. H. (1981). Seismic wave attenuation (Geophysics reprint series no. 2). Tulsa, Okla: Society of Exploration Geophysicists.Google Scholar
- Wang, R. (1999). A simple orthonormalization method for stable and efficient computation of Green’s functions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 89(3), 733–741.Google Scholar
- Yu, B., Yang, Y., Su, Y., Huang, W., & Wang, G. (2010). Research on the giant debris flow hazards in Zhouqu County, Gansu Province on August 7, 2010. Journal of Engineering Geology (in Chinese), 18(4), 437–444.Google Scholar
- Zeng, C., Cui, P., Ge, Y., Zhang, J., Lei, Y., & Yan, Y. (2014). Characteristics and Mechanism of Buildings Damaged by Debris Flows on 11 July, 2013 in Qipangou of Wenchuan, Sichuan. Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment (in Chinese), 36(02), 81–91.Google Scholar
- Zhao, J., Moretti, L., Mangeney, A., Stutzmann, E., Kanamori, H., Capdeville, Y., et al. (2015). Model space exploration for determining landslide source history from long-period seismic data. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 172(2), 389–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-014-0852-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.