Abstract
Many BPS partition functions depend on a choice of additional structure: fluxes, Spin or \(\hbox {Spin}^c\) structures, etc. In a context where the BPS-generating series depends on a choice of \(\hbox {Spin}^c\) structure, we show how different limits with respect to the expansion variable q and different ways of summing over \(\hbox {Spin}^c\) structures produce different invariants of homology cobordisms out of the BPS q-series.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The fact that \({\hat{Z}}_b (M_3,q)\) is labeled by \(\hbox {Spin}^c\) structures was carefully explained in [15] and recently justified further from a different perspective [16], by realizing \({\hat{Z}}_b (M_3,q)\) as a Rozansky–Witten theory with the target space based on the affine Grassmannian.
Another choice of conventions used in the literature is \(\mu (M_3, s) := \frac{\sigma (M_4)}{8}\) mod 2.
Note that modulo 2 the correction terms of [20] reduce to a more classical invariant (considered e.g. in [24]):
$$\begin{aligned} d(M_3,b)\; = \; \frac{c_1({\tilde{b}})^2-\sigma (M_4)}{4} \mod 2 \end{aligned}$$where \(M_4\) is a 4-manifold with boundary \(\partial M_4=M_3\) and a \(\hbox {Spin}^c\) structure \({\tilde{b}}\) that extends \(b = {\tilde{b}}|_{M_3}\).
We use the normalization of the WRT invariant such that \(\mathrm {WRT}(S^3,k)=1\), which is standard in the mathematical literature. Note that the partition function of \(SU(2)_k\) Chern–Simons theory, \(Z_{SU(2)_k}\), is naturally normalized such that \(Z_{SU(2)_k}(S^2\times S^1)=1\) instead, but has \(Z_{SU(2)_k}(S^3)=\sqrt{\frac{2}{k}}\sin \frac{\pi }{k}\).
In general, the pairing is only defined on the torsion subgroup.
There is a typo in the last term of Theorem 2.13 in [31].
It is important to pay attention to orientation conventions used in the literature. For example, since negative definite plumbings were favored in [14], the lens space L(p, 1) was naturally defined as a \(-p\) surgery on the unknot. The same convention was used in [31]. On the other hand, the opposite choice of orientation is used in [20], where L(p, 1) is a \(+p\) surgery on the unknot. Here, we follow this latter choice.
In order to fully account for BPS states in 3d \({{\mathcal {N}}}=2\) theory with 2d (0, 2) boundary condition or in relation to vertex algebras [22], one also needs to restore factors of \((q;q)_{\infty }\) that correspond to the “center-of-mass” chiral multiplet in 3d \({{\mathcal {N}}}=2\) theory and are also usually omitted. The normalization of \({\hat{Z}}_b (M_3,q)\) that relates to topological invariants of \(M_3\), such as WRT invariants, never includes such factors, though, and so they will not play any role here.
Recall, S consists of all vertices \(I \in \text {Vert} (\Gamma )\) that satisfy
$$\begin{aligned} \sum _{I \in S} Q_{IJ} \; \equiv \; Q_{JJ} \quad \text {mod}~2 \end{aligned}$$(3.50)for any \(J \in \text {Vert} (\Gamma )\). This is nothing but the familiar condition (2.11) expressed in terms of the adjacency matrix of the plumbing graph. The corresponding Kirby diagram is obtained by replacing every vertex of the graph \(\Gamma \) by a copy of the unknot.
The invariants \({\hat{Z}}_b (M_3,q)\) provide a non-perturbative definition of \(SL(2,{{\mathbb {C}}})\) Chern-Simons theory (that behaves well under cutting and gluing) since the perturbative expansion of the latter is reproduced in the limit \(\hbar \rightarrow 0\) (with \(q = e^{\hbar }\)). And, \({{\mathcal {H}}}(T^2)\) can be thought of as the Hilbert space in this theory [15], produced by quantizing the classical phase space \({{\mathcal {M}}}_{\text {flat}} (T^2, SL(2,{{\mathbb {C}}})) \cong \frac{{{\mathbb {C}}}^* \times {{\mathbb {C}}}^*}{{{\mathbb {Z}}}_2}\).
This equivalence can be shown by 3d Kirby moves.
References
Donaldson, S.K., Thomas, R.P.: Gauge theory in higher dimensions. In: The Geometric Universe (Oxford, 1996), pp. 31–47. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford (1998)
Gopakumar, R., Vafa, C.: M theory and topological strings. 2. http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9812127
Aganagic, M., Klemm, A., Marino, M., Vafa, C.: The topological vertex. Commun. Math. Phys. 254, 425 (2005). [http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0305132]
Iqbal, A., Nekrasov, N., Okounkov, A., Vafa, C.: Quantum foam and topological strings. JHEP 04, 011 (2008). [http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0312022]
Maulik, D., Nekrasov, N., Okounkov, A., Pandharipande, R.: Gromov–Witten theory and Donaldson–Thomas theory, I. Compos. Math. 142, 1263 (2006). [http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0312059]
Vafa, C., Witten, E.: A Strong coupling test of S duality. Nucl. Phys. B 431, 3 (1994). [http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9408074]
Minahan, J.A., Nemeschansky, D., Vafa, C., Warner, N.P.: E strings and N=4 topological Yang–Mills theories. Nucl. Phys. B 527, 581 (1998). [http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9802168]
Gukov, S., Liu, C.-C.M., Sheshmani, A., Yau, S.-T.: On topological approach to local theory of surfaces in Calabi–Yau threefolds. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 21, 1679 (2017). [http://arxiv.org/abs/1609.04363]
Gholampour, A., Sheshmani, A., Yau, S.-T.: Localized Donaldson–Thomas theory of surfaces. Am. J. Math. 142, 2 (2020). [http://arxiv.org/abs/1701.08902]
Tanaka, Y., Thomas, R.P.: Vafa–Witten invariants for projective surfaces II: semistable case. Pure Appl. Math. Q. 13, 517 (2017)
Gukov, S., Putrov, P., Vafa, C.: Fivebranes and 3-manifold homology. JHEP 07, 071 (2017). [http://arxiv.org/abs/1602.05302]
Gadde, A., Gukov, S., Putrov, P.: Walls, lines, and spectral dualities in 3d Gauge theories. JHEP 05, 047 (2014). [http://arxiv.org/abs/1302.0015]
Witten, E.: Fivebranes and knots. Quantum Topol. 3, 1 (2012)
Gukov, S., Pei, D., Putrov, P., Vafa, C.: BPS spectra and 3-manifold invariants. J. Knot Theor. Ramifications 29, 2040003 (2020). [http://arxiv.org/abs/1701.06567]
Gukov, S., Manolescu, C.: A two-variable series for knot complements. http://arxiv.org/abs/1904.06057
Gukov, S., Hsin, P.-S., Nakajima, H., Park, S., Pei, D., Sopenko, N.: Rozansky–Witten geometry of Coulomb branches and logarithmic knot invariants. http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.05347
Kapustin, A., Thorngren, R., Turzillo, A., Wang, Z.: Fermionic symmetry protected topological phases and cobordisms. JHEP 12, 052 (2015). [http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.7329]
Freed, D.S., Hopkins, M.J.: Reflection positivity and invertible topological phases. http://arxiv.org/abs/1604.06527
Frøyshov, K.A.: Equivariant aspects of Yang–Mills Floer theory. Topology 41, 525 (2002)
Ozsváth, P., Szabó, Z.: Absolutely graded Floer homologies and intersection forms for four-manifolds with boundary. Adv. Math. 173, 179 (2003)
Manolescu, C.: Pin(2)-equivariant Seiberg–Witten Floer homology and the triangulation conjecture. J. Am. Math. Soc. 29, 147 (2016)
Cheng, M.C.N., Chun, S., Ferrari, F., Gukov, S., Harrison, S.M.: 3d Modularity. JHEP 10, 010 (2019). [http://arxiv.org/abs/1809.10148]
Gopakumar, R., Vafa, C.: Branes and fundamental groups. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 399 (1998). [http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9712048]
Atiyah, M., Patodi, V., Singer, I.: Spectral asymmetry and Riemannian geometry. II. Math. Proc. Cambr. Philos. Soc. 78(3), 405–432 (1975)
Chun, S., Gukov, S., Park, S., Sopenko, N.: 3d–3d correspondence for mapping tori. http://arxiv.org/abs/1911.08456
Kirby, R., Melvin, P.: The \(3\)-manifold invariants of Witten and Reshetikhin–Turaev for \({\rm sl}(2,{ C})\). Invent. Math. 105, 473 (1991)
Beliakova, A., Lê, T.T.Q.: Integrality of quantum 3-manifold invariants and a rational surgery formula. Compos. Math. 143, 1593 (2007)
Beliakova, A., Blanchet, C., Lê, T.T.Q.: Unified quantum invariants and their refinements for homology 3-spheres with 2-torsion. Fund. Math. 201, 217 (2008)
Jeffrey, L.C.: Chern–Simons–Witten invariants of lens spaces and torus bundles, and the semiclassical approximation. Commun. Math. Phys. 147, 563 (1992)
Deloup, F., Turaev, V.: On reciprocity. J. Pure Appl. Alg. 208, 153 (2007)
Saveliev, N.: Invariants for homology \(3\)-spheres. Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences, vol. 140. Springer, Berlin (2002)
Lawrence, R., Zagier, D.: Modular forms and quantum invariants of \(3\)-manifolds. Asian J. Math. 3, 93–107 (1999)
Hikami, K.: Mock (false) theta functions as quantum invariants. Regul. Chaotic Dyn. 10, 509 (2005)
Kucharski, P.: \(\hat{Z}\) invariants at rational \(\tau \). JHEP 09, 092 (2019). [arXiv:1906.09768]]
Chung, H.-J.: BPS invariants for 3-manifolds at rational level \(K\). arXiv:1906.12344
Ni, Y., Wu, Z.: Cosmetic surgeries on knots in \(S^3\). J. Reine Angew. Math. 706, 1 (2015)
Ozsváth, P., Szabó, Z.: Heegaard Floer homology and alternating knots. Geom. Topol. 7, 225 (2003)
Rasmussen, J.A.: Floer homology and knot complements. Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University (2003)
Park, S.: Large color \(R\)-matrix for knot complements and strange identities. arXiv:2004.02087
Neumann, W.D.: An invariant of plumbed homology spheres, in Topology Symposium, Siegen 1979 (Proc. Sympos., Univ. Siegen, Siegen, 1979), vol. 788 of Lecture Notes in Math., pp. 125–144, Springer, Berlin (1980)
Tange, M.: Ozsváth Szabó’s correction term and lens surgery. Math. Proc. Cambr. Philos. Soc. 146, 119 (2009)
Rasmussen, J.: Lens space surgeries and a conjecture of Goda and Teragaito. Geom. Topol. 8, 1013 (2004)
Ozsváth, P., Szabó, Z.: On the Floer homology of plumbed three-manifolds. Geom. Topol. 7, 185 (2003)
Némethi, A.: On the Ozsváth–Szabó invariant of negative definite plumbed 3-manifolds. Geom. Topol. 9, 991 (2005)
Bringmann, K., Mahlburg, K., Milas, A.: Quantum modular forms and plumbing graphs of 3-manifolds, J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 170,105145, 32 (2020)
Bringmann, K., Mahlburg, K., Milas, A.: Higher depth quantum modular forms and plumbed 3-manifolds. arXiv:1906.10722
Cheng, M.C.N., Ferrari, F., Sgroi, G.: Three-manifold quantum invariants and mock theta functions. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 378, 20180439, 15 (2020)
Stipsicz, A.I.: On the \({\overline{\mu }}\)-invariant of rational surface singularities. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 136, 3815 (2008)
Ue, M.: The Fukumoto–Furuta and the Ozsváth–Szabó invariants for spherical 3-manifolds, in Algebraic topology—old and new, vol. 85 of Banach Center Publ., pp. 121–139. Polish Acad. Sci. Inst. Math., Warsaw (2009)
Dai, I.: On the \({\rm Pin}(2)\)-equivariant monopole Floer homology of plumbed 3-manifolds. Michigan Math. J. 67, 423 (2018)
Acknowledgements
We are especially grateful to Francesca Ferrari, Ciprian Manolescu, and Yi Ni for their help and insightful comments. It is also a pleasure to thank Rob Kirby and Paul Melvin for stimulating discussions and inspiration at the triple-header birthday conference “Topology in Dimensions 3, 3.5 and 4” in Berkeley (June, 2018). We also thank Cumrun Vafa for encouragement and comments. The work of S.G. is supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of High Energy Physics, under Award No. DE-SC0011632, and by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. NSF DMS 1664227. The research of S.P. is supported by Kwanjeong Educational Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Ruben Minasian.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gukov, S., Park, S. & Putrov, P. Cobordism Invariants from BPS q-Series. Ann. Henri Poincaré 22, 4173–4203 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00023-021-01089-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00023-021-01089-2