Abstract
We provide quantitative estimates on the location of eigenvalues of one-dimensional discrete Dirac operators with complex \(\ell ^p\)-potentials for \(1\le p \le \infty \). As a corollary, subsets of the essential spectrum free of embedded eigenvalues are determined for small \(\ell ^1\)-potential. Further possible improvements and sharpness of the obtained spectral bounds are also discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abramov, A.A., Aslanyan, A., Davies, E.B.: Bounds on complex eigenvalues and resonances. J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 34, 57–72 (2001)
Bagarello, F., Gazeau, J.-P., Szafraniec, F.H., Znojil, M. (eds.): Non-selfadjoint Operators in Quantum Physics: Mathematical Aspects. Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken (2015)
Bairamov, E., Çelebi, A.O.: Spectrum and spectral expansion for the non-selfadjoint discrete Dirac operators. Q. J. Math. Oxf. Ser. (2) 50(200), 371–384 (1999)
Boykin, T.B., Klimeck, G.: The discretized Schrödinger equation and simple models for semiconductor quantum wells. Eur. J. Phys. 25, 503–514 (2004)
Carvalho, S.L., de Oliveira, C.R., Prado, R.A.: Sparse one-dimensional discrete Dirac operators II: spectral properties. J. Math. Phys. 52(7), 073501, 21 (2011)
Cossetti, L.: Bounds on eigenvalues of perturbed Lamé operators with complex potentials (2019). ArXiv:1904.08445v1 [math.SP]
Cuenin, J.-C.: Estimates on complex eigenvalues for Dirac operators on the half-line. Integr. Equ. Oper. Theory 79(3), 377–388 (2014)
Cuenin, J.-C.: Eigenvalue bounds for Dirac and fractional Schrödinger operators with complex potentials. J. Funct. Anal. 272(7), 2987–3018 (2017)
Cuenin, J.-C., Laptev, A., Tretter, C.: Eigenvalue estimates for non-selfadjoint Dirac operators on the real line. Ann. Henri Poincaré 15, 707–736 (2014)
Cuenin, J.-C., Siegl, P.: Eigenvalues of one-dimensional non-self-adjoint Dirac operators and applications. Lett. Math. Phys. 108(7), 1757–1778 (2018)
de Oliveira, C.R., Prado, R.A.: Spectral and localization properties for the one-dimensional Bernoulli discrete Dirac operator. J. Math. Phys. 46(7), 072105, 17 (2005)
Dubuisson, C.: On quantitative bounds on eigenvalues of a complex perturbation of a Dirac operator. Integr. Equ. Oper. Theory 78, 249–269 (2014)
Enblom, A.: Resolvent estimates and bounds on eigenvalues for Dirac operators on the half-line. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 51, 165203 (2018)
Fanelli, L., Krejčiřík, D.: Location of eigenvalues of three-dimensional non-self-adjoint Dirac operators. Lett. Math. Phys. 109, 1473–1485 (2019)
Fanelli, L., Krejčiřík, D., Vega, L.: Absence of eigenvalues of two-dimensional magnetic Schrödinger operators. J. Funct. Anal. 275(9), 2453–2472 (2018)
Fanelli, L., Krejčiřík, D., Vega, L.: Spectral stability of Schrödinger operators with subordinated complex potentials. J. Spectr. Theory 8(2), 575–604 (2018)
Frank, R.L.: Eigenvalue bounds for Schrödinger operators with complex potentials. III. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 370(1), 219–240 (2018)
Frank, R.L., Simon, B.: Eigenvalue bounds for Schrödinger operators with complex potentials. II. J. Spectr. Theory 7(3), 633–658 (2017)
Geronimo, J.S., Van Assche, W.: Orthogonal polynomials with asymptotically periodic recurrence coefficients. J. Approx. Theory 46(3), 251–283 (1986)
Gohberg, I., Goldberg, S., Krupnik, N.: Traces and Determinants of Linear Operators, Operator Theory: Advances and Applications, vol. 116. Birkhäuser, Basel (2000)
Golénia, S., Haugomat, T.: On the a.c. spectrum of the 1D discrete Dirac operator. Methods Funct. Anal. Topol. 20(3), 252–273 (2014)
Hewitt, E., Ross, K.A.: Abstract harmonic analysis, vol. I, 2nd edn, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], vol. 115, Springer, Berlin-New York, Structure of Topological Groups, Integration Theory, Group Representations (1979)
Hulko, A.: On the number of eigenvalues of the discrete one-dimensional Dirac operator with a complex potential. Anal. Math. Phys. 9(1), 639–654 (2019)
Ibrogimov, O.O., Krejčiřík, D., Laptev, A.: Sharp bounds for eigenvalues of biharmonic operators with complex potentials in low dimensions (2019). ArXiv:1903.01810v1 [math.SP]
Ibrogimov, O.O., Štampach, F.: Spectral enclosures for non-self-adjoint discrete Schrödinger operators. Integr. Equ. Oper. Theory 91, 53 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00020-019-2553-z
Kopylova, E., Teschl, G.: Dispersion estimates for one-dimensional discrete Dirac equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 434(1), 191–208 (2016)
Lieb, E.H., Loss, M.: Analysis. Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 14, 2nd edn. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2001)
Sambou, D.: A criterion for the existence of nonreal eigenvalues for a Dirac operator. N. Y. J. Math. 22, 469–500 (2016)
Stein, E.M.: Interpolation of linear operators. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 83, 482–492 (1956)
Teschl, G.: Jacobi Operators and Completely Integrable Nonlinear Lattices, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 72. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2000)
Thaller, B.: The Dirac Equation. Springer, Berlin (1992)
Acknowledgements
The research of B.C. was partially supported by the Grant No. 17-01706S of the Czech Science Foundation (GAČR) and by Fondo Sociale Europeo—Programma Operativo Nazionale Ricerca e Innovazione 2014–2020, progetto PON: progetto AIM1892920-attività 2, linea 2.1—CUP H95G18000150006 ATT2. The research of D. K. was partially supported by the GACR Grant No. 18-08835S. F.Š. acknowledges financial support by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic project No. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000778.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Claude-Alain Pillet.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix: Illustrative and Comparison Plots
Appendix: Illustrative and Comparison Plots
1.1 A: Plots of the Spectral Enclosures from Theorem 2
The spectral enclosure for the \(\ell ^{1}\)-potentials from Theorem 1 was displayed already in the introduction in Fig. 1. Similarly, we provide several plots illustrating the spectral enclosures from Theorem 2 in Fig. 2 below. Namely, the plots show the boundary curves given by the equation
for \(m=1\), \(\Vert V\Vert _p=\frac{j}{4}\), \(j\in \{1,2,\dots ,7\}\), and four choices of \(p\in \{3/2,2,3,5\}\).
1.2 B: Comparison Plots for the \(\ell ^{1}\)-Bounds of Theorems 1 and 3 and Optimality
Next set of plots show the boundary curve of the spectral enclosure from Theorem 1 together with the corresponding improved result of Theorem 3 for a comparison. Moreover, the boundary curve of the improved spectral enclosure is made in two colors distinguishing the parts that are eigenvalues of some discrete Dirac operators as discussed in Theorem 5.
More concretely, in Fig. 3, we plot the boundary curve of Theorem 1 by blue dashed lines for \(m=1/2\) and several choices of \(\Vert V\Vert _{1}\). At the same time, we add a plot of the curve defined by the equation
by red or green solid lines for the same choice of parameters. The parts of the curve made in green belong to the set \(\mathcal {D}\) and hence these points are eigenvalues of some discrete Dirac operators with \(\ell ^{1}\)-potentials. The remaining parts are made in red.
1.3 C: Comparison Plots for the \(\ell ^{p}\)-Bounds from Theorems 2, 3, and Corollary 2
In the next plots, we compare the spectral enclosures given in Theorems 2 and 3 for \(\ell ^{p}\)-potentials with \(p>1\). As an extra, we add also the spectral enclosure of Corollary 2 into these plots. In this numerical comparison, we exclude the result of Theorem 4 due to its complexity and non-reliability of the numerical computations. Note that it is clear from the proofs that Theorem 4 is an improvement of Theorem 2.
The comparison is made in plots in Fig. 4 where the boundary curve of the spectral enclosure from Theorem 2 is made in solid yellow lines, from Theorem 3 in red dashed lines, and from Corollary 2 in blue dotted lines for \(m=1\), \(\Vert V\Vert _{p}=0.7\), and four choices of the parameter \(p\in \{3/2,2,3,5\}\).
It is by no means evident whether one of the spectral enclosures of Theorems 2 and 3 is better than the other. However, numerical experiments indicate that none is better than the other, i.e. none is a subset of the other, in general.
1.4 D: A Plot for Remark 6
Finally, as an illustration for Remark 6, Fig. 5 shows for what k’s within the unit disk the norm of the diagonal element \(T_{0}(k)\) of the resolvent (2.1) is not dominant.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cassano, B., Ibrogimov, O.O., Krejčiřík, D. et al. Location of Eigenvalues of Non-self-adjoint Discrete Dirac Operators. Ann. Henri Poincaré 21, 2193–2217 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00023-020-00916-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00023-020-00916-2