Skip to main content
Log in

Dependence of the Density of States on the Probability Distribution. Part II: Schrödinger Operators on \(\pmb {\mathbb {R}}^d\) and Non-compactly Supported Probability Measures

  • Published:
Annales Henri Poincaré Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We extend our results in Hislop and Marx (Int Math Res Not, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1093/imrn/rny156) on the quantitative continuity properties, with respect to the single-site probability measure, of the density of states measure and the integrated density of states for random Schrödinger operators. For lattice models on \(\mathbb {Z}^d\), with \(d \geqslant 1\), we treat the case of non-compactly supported probability measures with finite first moments. For random Schrödinger operators on \(\mathbb {R}^d\), with \(d \geqslant 1\), we prove results analogous to those in Hislop and Marx (2018) for compactly supported probability measures. The method of proof makes use of the Combes–Thomas estimate and the Helffer–Sjöstrand formula.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aizenman, M., Warzel, S.: Random Operators: Disorder Effects on Quantum Spectra and Dynamics. Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 168. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2015)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Barbaroux, J.M., Combes, J.M., Hislop, P.D.: Localization near band edges for random Schrödinger operators. Helv. Phys. Acta 70, 16–43 (1997)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bouclet, J., Germinet, F., Klein, A.: Sub-exponential decay of operator kernels for functions of generalized Schrödinger operators. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 132, 2703–2712 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bourgain, J., Klein, A.: Bounds on the density of states for Schrödinger operators. Invent. Math. 194(1), 41–72 (2013)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Craig, W., Simon, B.: Log Hölder continuity of the integrated density of states for stochastic Jacobi matrices. Commun. Math. Phys. 90(2), 207–218 (1983)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cycon, H., Froese, R., Kirsch, W., Simon, B.: Schrödinger Operators with Application to Quantum Mechanics and Global Geometry. Texts and Monographs in Physics. Springer, Berlin (1987)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Damanik, D., Sims, R., Stolz, G.: Localization for discrete one-dimensional random word models. J. Fun. Anal. 208, 423–445 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Davies, E.B.: Spectral Theory and Differential Operators. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 42. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. De Bièvre, S., Germinet, F.: Dynamical localization for the random dimer Schrödinger operator. J. Stat. Phys. 98(5–6), 1135–1148 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Delyon, F., Souillard, B.: Remark on the continuity of the density of states of ergodic finite difference operators. Commun. Math. Phys. 94, 289–291 (1984)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Dudley, R.M.: Convergence of Baire measures. Studia Math. 27, 251–268 (1966); see also R. M. Dudley, Correction to: “Convergence of Baire measures” (Studia Math. 27, 251–268 (1966)). Studia Math. 51, 275 (1974)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Dudley, R.M.: Probabilities and metrics. Lecture Notes Series, No. 45. Matematisk Institut, Aarhus Universitet, Aarhus, ii+126 pp. (1976)

  13. Gesztesy, F., Pushnitski, A., Simon, B.: On the Koplienko spectral shift function. I. Basics. Zh. Mat. Fiz. Anal. Geom. 4(1), 63–107 (2008)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Gamelin, T.W.: Complex Analysis. Springer, New York (2001)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Hislop, P.D., Marx, C.A.: Dependence of the density of states on the probability distribution for discrete random Schrödinger operators. Int. Math. Res. Not. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1093/imrn/rny156. (Appeared as online first in July 2018 as rny156)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kachkovskiy, I.: Private communication (2019)

  17. Saxton, A.: Decay estimates on trace norms of localized functions of Schrödinger operators, PhD dissertation. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/math_ etds/19/ (2014)

  18. Jitomirskaya, S., Schulz-Baldes, H., Stolz, G.: Delocalization in random polymer models. Commun. Math. Phys. 233(1), 27–48 (2003)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Shamis, M.: On the continuity of the integrated density of states in the disorder. arXiv:1903.12222

  20. Shen, Zh: An improved Combes-Thomas estimate of magnetic Schrödinger operators. Ark. Mat. 52(2), 383–414 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Simon, B.: Trace Ideals and their Applications. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 120, 2nd edn. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Teschl, G.: Mathematical Methods in Quantum Mechanics: With Applications to Schrödinger Operators. Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 157, 2nd edn. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2014)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank S. Jitomirskaya for several discussions and for the invitation to work together at UCI. We also thank I. Kachkovskiy, M. Shamis, and A. Skripka for several discussions on topics related to this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter D. Hislop.

Additional information

Communicated by Claude-Alain Pillet.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix: Almost Analytic Extensions and the Helffer–Sjöstrand Functional Calculus

Appendix: Almost Analytic Extensions and the Helffer–Sjöstrand Functional Calculus

In what follows, we will rely on some aspects of the theory of almost analytic extensions of functions on the real line and the Helffer–Sjöstrand functional calculus. For reference purposes, we briefly summarize some facts here which will be of use to us; for a more detailed and pedagogical account, we refer, e.g., to [8].

Let \(\tau \in \mathcal {C}^\infty \) be a fixed bump function on \(\mathbb {R}\) with support in \([-2,2]\), satisfying \(\tau \equiv 1\) on \([-1,1]\). Set

$$\begin{aligned} \sigma (x,y) : = \tau \left( \dfrac{y}{\langle x \rangle } \right) . \end{aligned}$$
(5.1)

Given a (complex-valued) function \(f \in \mathcal {C}_c^\infty (\mathbb {R})\) and an integer \(P \in \mathbb {N}\), one can define an almost analytic extension\(\widetilde{f}\) of fof degreeP by

$$\begin{aligned} \widetilde{f}(x,y) = \left\{ \sum _{n=0}^P \frac{1}{n !} f^{(n)}(x) (i y)^n \right\} \sigma (x,y). \end{aligned}$$
(5.2)

Then, \(\widetilde{f} \equiv f\) on \(\mathbb {R}\), \(\widetilde{f}\) is compactly supported on \(\mathbb {C}\), and a straightforward computation shows that

$$\begin{aligned} \partial _{\overline{z}} \widetilde{f}&:= \frac{1}{2} ( \partial _x + i \partial _y ) \widetilde{f} \nonumber \\&= \frac{1}{2} \left\{ \sum _{n=0}^P \frac{1}{n !} f^{(n)}(x) (i y)^n \right\} (\sigma _x + i \sigma _y) + \frac{1}{2} \frac{1}{P!} f^{(P+1)}(x) (iy)^P \sigma . \end{aligned}$$
(5.3)

In particular, using the properties of \(\sigma \), (5.3) implies that \(\widetilde{f}\) is almost analytic in a neighborhood of \(\mathbb {R}\), in the sense that

$$\begin{aligned} \vert \partial _{\overline{z}} \widetilde{f}(x,y) \vert \leqslant {\Vert f^{(P+1)} \Vert _\infty } ~{\vert y \vert ^P},\ ~ \vert y \vert \leqslant \langle x \rangle . \end{aligned}$$
(5.4)

One important application of almost analytic extensions of functions on \(\mathbb {R}\) is an explicit representation of functions of operators via the Helffer–Sjöstrand functional calculus: For every self-adjoint operator H and \(f \in \mathcal {C}_c(\mathbb {R})\), one has the representation

$$\begin{aligned} f(H) = \dfrac{1}{\pi } \int \int _\mathbb {C} \partial _{\overline{z}} \widetilde{f}(x,y) \cdot (H - z)^{-1} ~\mathrm {d} x \mathrm {d} y. \end{aligned}$$
(5.5)

It can be shown (see, e.g., [8], Chapter 2.2) that this representation is well defined in the sense that f(H) is independent of the bump function \(\tau \) and the degree \(P \geqslant 1\) used to define the almost analytic extension \(\widetilde{f}\) in (5.2).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hislop, P.D., Marx, C.A. Dependence of the Density of States on the Probability Distribution. Part II: Schrödinger Operators on \(\pmb {\mathbb {R}}^d\) and Non-compactly Supported Probability Measures. Ann. Henri Poincaré 21, 539–570 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00023-019-00864-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00023-019-00864-6

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation