Abstract
The measurement of a quantum system becomes itself a quantum-mechanical process once the apparatus is internalized. That shift of perspective may result in different physical predictions for a variety of reasons. We present a model describing both system and apparatus and consisting of a harmonic oscillator coupled to a field. The equation of motion is a quantum stochastic differential equation. By solving it, we establish the conditions ensuring that the two perspectives are compatible, in that the apparatus indeed measures the observable it is ideally supposed to.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alsing, P., Milburn, G.J., Walls, D.F.: Quantum nondemolition measurements in optical cavities. Phys. Rev. A 37(8), 2970 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.37.2970
Ballesteros, M., Fraas, M., Fröhlich, J., Schubnel, B.: Indirect acquisition of information in quantum mechanics: states associated with tail events (2016). arxiv:1611.07895.pdf
Ballesteros, M., Crawford, N., Fraas, M., Fröhlich, J., Schubnel, B.: Non-demolition measurements of observables with general spectra (2017). arXiv:1706.09584
Ballesteros, M., Crawford, N., Fraas, M., Fröhlich, J., Schubnel, B.: Perturbation theory for weak measurements in quantum mechanics, I—systems with finite-dimensional state space (2017). arxiv: 1709.03149.pdf
Barchielli, A., Lupieri, G.: Quantum stochastic calculus, operation valued stochastic processes and continual measurements in quantum mechanics. J. Math. Phys. (1985). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.526851
Barchielli, A.: Measurement theory and stochastic differential equations in quantum mechanics. Phys. Rev. A (1986). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.34.1642
Barchielli, A.: Quantum stochastic differential equations: an application to the electron Shelving effect. J. Phys. A Math. Gen. (1987). https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/20/18/034
Barchielli, A.: Input and output channels in quantum systems and quantum stochastic differential equations. In: Accardi, L., von Waldenfels, W. (eds.) Quantum Probability and Applications III. Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer, Berlin (1988)
Barchielli, A.: Direct and heterodyne detection and other applications of quantum stochastic calculus to quantum optics. Quantum Opt. (1990). https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-8998/2/6/002
Bauer, M., Bernard, D.: Convergence of repeated quantum nondemolition measurements and wave-function collapse. Phys. Rev. A (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.84.044103
Belavkin, V.: Quantum continual measurements and a posteriori collapse on CCR. Commun. Math. Phys. (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02097018
Belavkin, V.: Quantum stochastic calculus and quantum nonlinear filtering. J. Multivar. Anal. (1992). https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-259X(92)90042-E
Berman, G.P., Merkli, M., Sigal, I.M.: Decoherence and thermalization. Phys. Rev. Lett. (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.130401
Berman, G.P., Merkli, M., Sigal, I.M.: Resonance theory of decoherence and thermalization. Ann. Phys. (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2007.04.013
Blanchard, P., Fröhlich, J., Schubnel, B.: A “Garden of Forking Paths”—the qantum mechanics of histories of events. Nucl. Phys. B (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2016.04.010
Bouten, L., Maassen, H., Kümmerer, B.: Constructing the Davies process of resonance fluorescence with quantum stochastic calculus. Opt. Spectrosc. (2003). https://doi.org/10.1134/1.1586743
Bouten, L., Guta, M., Maassen, H.: Stochastic Schrödinger equations. J. Phys. A Math. Gen. (2004). https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/37/9/010
Brune, M., Haroche, S., Lefevre, V., Raimond, J.M., Zagury, N.: Quantum nondemolition measurement of small photon numbers by Rydberg-atom phase-sensitive detection. Phys. Rev. Lett. (1990). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.976
Bruneau, L., Joye, A., Merkli, M.: Asymptotics of repeated interaction quantum systems. J. Funct. Anal. (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfa.2006.02.006
Collet, M.J., Walls, D.F.: Quantum limits to light amplifiers. Phys. Rev. Lett. (1988). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.2442
Frigerio, A.: Covariant Markov dilations of quantum dynamical semigroups. Publ. RIMS Kyoto Univ. (1985). https://doi.org/10.2977/prims/1195179060
Gardiner, C.W., Collet, M.J.: Input and output in damped quantum systems: quantum stochastic differential equations and the master equation. Phys. Rev. A (1985). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.31.3761
Gardiner, C.W.: Inhibition of atomic phase decays by squeezed light: a direct effect of squeezing. Phys. Rev. Lett. (1986). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.1917
Gredat, D., Dornic, I., Luck, J.M.: On an imaginary exponential functional of Brownian motion. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. (2011). https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/44/17/175003
Guerlin, C., Bernu, J., Deléglise, S., Sayrin, C., Gleyzes, S., Kuhr, S., Brune, M., Raimond, J.M., Haroche, S.: Progressive field-state collapse and quantum non-demolition photon counting. Nature (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06057
Ghirardi, G.C., Pearle, P., Rimini, A.: Markov processes in Hilbert space and continuous spontaneous localization of systems of identical particles. Phys. Rev. A (1990). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.42.78
Hepp, K.: Quantum-theory of measurement and macroscopic observables. Helv. Phys. Acta 45, 237–248 (1972)
Hudson, R.L., Parthasarathy, K.R.: Quantum Ito’s formula and stochastic evolutions. Commun. Math. Phys. (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01258530
Kac, M.: On distributions of certain Wiener functionals. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. (1949). https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1949-0027960-X
Lane, A.S., Reid, M.D., Walls, D.F.: Quantum analysis of intensity fluctuations in the nondegenerate parametric oscillator. Phys. Rev. A (1988). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.38.788
Lax, M.: Quantum noise. IV. Quantum theory of noise sources. Phys. Rev (1966). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.145.110
Makhlin, Y., Schön, G., Shnirman, A.: Quantum-state engineering with Josephson-junction devices. Rev. Mod. Phys. (2001). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.73.357
Milburn, G.J.: Quantum measurement theory of optical heterodyne detection. Phys. Rev. A (1987). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.36.5271
Pazy, A.: Semigroups of Linear Operators and Applications to Partial Differential Equations. Springer, New York (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5561-1
Peres, A., Rosen, N.: Macroscopic bodies in quantum theory. Phys. Rev. (1964). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.135.B1486
Simon, B.: Functional Integration and Quantum Physics. Pure and Applied Mathematics. A Series of monographs and textbooks. American Mathematical Society (1979)
Spehner, D., Haake, F.: Quantum measurements without macroscopic superpositions. Phys. Rev. A (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.77.052114
von Neumann, J.: Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik. Springer, Berlin (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-61409-5
Acknowledgements
This research was partly supported by the NCCR SwissMAP, funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Alain Joye.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
We shall derive (1.4, 1.5). The commutation relation \([a, a^*]=1\) implies \({{\,\mathrm{i}\,}}[H_0,a]=-{{\,\mathrm{i}\,}}\omega a\) and thus \({{\,\mathrm{e}\,}}^{{{\,\mathrm{i}\,}}H_0 t}a{{\,\mathrm{e}\,}}^{-{{\,\mathrm{i}\,}}H_0 t}=a{{\,\mathrm{e}\,}}^{-{{\,\mathrm{i}\,}}\omega t}\). Since the relation remains true upon replacing a by \(a-\alpha \), and \(a^*\) accordingly, we also have
By (1.1) that expression has to be multiplied from the left by its adjoint and then time averaged in order to obtain \({\overline{N}}_T\). As a result
because terms \(\sim {{\,\mathrm{e}\,}}^{\pm {{\,\mathrm{i}\,}}\omega t}\) do not contribute to the limit. This proves (1.4), which in turn implies
because monomials \((a^*)^la^m\) with \(l\not =m\) have vanishing expectation. The first term on the r.h.s. equals \(\langle n |\, {\overline{N}}_{\infty } \,| n \rangle ^2\) and (1.5) follows.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fraas, M., Graf, G.M. & Hänggli, L. Indirect Measurements of a Harmonic Oscillator. Ann. Henri Poincaré 20, 2937–2970 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00023-019-00817-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00023-019-00817-z