Abstract
We consider Alexander spirals with \(M\ge 3\) branches, that is symmetric logarithmic spiral vortex sheets. We show that such vortex sheets are linearly unstable in the \(L^\infty \) (Kelvin–Helmholtz) sense, as solutions to the Birkhoff–Rott equation. To this end we consider Fourier modes in a logarithmic variable to identify unstable solutions with polynomial growth in time.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availibility
This work has no associated data.
References
Alexander, R.C.: Family of similarity flows with vortex sheets. Phys. Fluids 14(2), 231–239 (1971)
Birkhoff, G.: Helmholtz and Taylor instability. Proc. Symp. Appl. Math. XII I, 55–76 (1962)
Castro, A., Córdoba, D., Faraco, D.: Mixing solutions for the Muskat problem. Invent. Math. 226(1), 251–348 (2021)
Cieślak, T., Kokocki, P., Ożański, W.S.: Well-posedness of logarithmic spiral vortex sheets. J. Differ. Equ. (to appear), arXiv:2110.07543
Cieślak, T., Kokocki, P., Ożański, W.S.: Existence of nonsymmetric logarithmic spiral vortex sheet solutions to the 2D Euler equations. Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. (to appear), preprint available at arXiv:2207.06056
Elgindi, T.M., Jeong, I.: Symmetries and critical phenomena in fluids. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 73(2), 257–316 (2020)
Elling, V., Gnann, M.V.: Variety of unsymmetric multibranched logarithmic vortex spirals. Eur. J. Appl. Math. 30(1), 23–38 (2019)
Everson, R.M., Sreenivasan, K.R.: Accumulation rates of spiral-like structures in fluid flows. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 437, 391–401 (1992)
Friedlander, S., Strauss, W., Vishik, M.: Robustness of instability for the two-dimensional Euler equations. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 30(6), 1343–1354 (1999)
Gómez-Serrano, J., Park, J., Shi, J., Yao, Y.: Remarks on stationary and uniformly-rotating vortex sheets: rigidity results. Comm. Math. Phys. 386(3), 1845–1879 (2021)
Hadamard, J.: Lectures on Cauchy’s Problem in Linear Partial Differential Equations. Dover, New York (1953)
Jeong, I.-J., Said, A.R.: Logarithmic spirals in 2d perfect fluids, arXiv:2302.09447
Kelvin, L.: Nature 50(524), 549–573 (1894)
Lin, Z.: Nonlinear instability of ideal plane flows. Int. Math. Res. Not. 41, 2147–2178 (2004)
Lopes Filho, M.C., Nussenzveig Lopes, H.J., Souza, M.O.: On the equation satisfied by a steady Prandtl–Munk vortex sheet. Comm. Math. Sci. 1, 68–73 (2003)
Majda, A.J., Bertozzi, A.L.: Vorticity and Incompressible Flow. Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematics, vol. 27, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)
Maxwell, J.C.: On the Stability of the Motion of Saturn’s Rings. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1859)
Mengual, F., Székelyhidi, L., Jr.: Dissipative Euler flows for vortex sheet initial data without distinguished sign. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 76(1), 163–221 (2023)
Otto, F.: Evolution of microstructure in unstable porous media flow: a relaxational approach. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 52(7), 873–915 (1999)
Prandtl, L.: Über die Entstehung von Wirbeln in der idealen Flüssigkeit. In: von Kármán, T., Levi Civita, T. (Eds.) Vorträge aus dem Gebiete Hydro- und Aerodynamik. Springer, Berlin (1992)
Protas, B., Llewellyn Smith, S.G., Sakajo, T.: Finite rotating and translating vortex sheets. J. Fluid Mech. 923, A23 (2021)
Rott, N.: Diffraction of a weak Schock with vortex generation. J. Fluid Mech. 1, 111–128 (1956)
Székelyhidi, L., Jr.: Weak solutions to the incompressible Euler equations with vortex sheet initial data. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 349(19–20), 1063–1066 (2011)
Székelyhidi, L., Jr.: Relaxation of the incompressible porous media equation. Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. (4) 45(3), 491–509 (2012)
von Helmholtz, H.: Über discontinuirliche Flüssigkeitsbewegungen Monatsberichte d. königl. Akad. d. Wiss. zu Berlin, pp. 215–228 (1868)
Acknowledgements
T.C. was partially supported by the National Science Centre Grant SONATA BIS 7 number UMO-2017/26/E/ST1/00989. WSO was supported in part by the Simons Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Communicated by R. Shvydkoy.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Here we show some more properties of the notion of the finite part (recall (2.1)), and we prove (2.4) in Proposition 6.3 below.
Lemma 6.1
(Finite part of a regular or p.v. integral). If \(f(t) = g(t)(t-x)^{2}\) then
and if \(f(t) = g(t)(t-x)\) then
for every \(x\in (a,b)\) and every \(g\in C^{\infty }((a,b),\mathbb {R})\).
Proof
For the first claim we recall the definition (2.1) to get
and for the second claim we have
as desired. \(\square \)
We now consider a bit more general denominator, and we characterize the finite part from Definition 2.1 as the derivative of the principal value integral.
Lemma 6.2
(FP vs. PV). For any \(x\in (a,b)\), the following equality holds
where \(\gamma :[a,b]\rightarrow \mathbb {C}\) is a smooth curve such that \(\gamma '(t)\ne 0\) for \(t\in [a,b]\).
Proof
Let us observe that
Then we have the following asymptotics as \(\varepsilon \rightarrow 0\)
and furthermore
Since the limits in the definition of \(\mathrm {p.v.}\) and \(\mathrm {f.p.}\) are uniform with respect to x in compact subsets of (a, b), it follows that
and the proof of lemma is completed. \(\square \)
In the following proposition we prove the integration by parts formula (2.4).
Proposition 6.3
(FP vs. PV via integration by parts). Let us assume that \(\gamma :[a,b]\rightarrow \mathbb {C}\) is a smooth curve satisfying \(\gamma '(t)\ne 0\) for \(t\in [a,b]\). Then, for any \(x\in (a,b)\), we have
Proof
Let us define
Then we have
and similarly
Let us write
By the formula (2.3), to prove (6.2), it is enough to show that \(R(\varepsilon ) = o(1)\) as \(\varepsilon \rightarrow 0\). To this end we observe that
Then we have
which after changing of variables \(\varepsilon \mapsto -\varepsilon \) gives
Combining (6.3), (6.4) and (6.5) provides
Let us observe that
for \(\varepsilon \in \mathbb {R}\setminus \{0\}\), where we define
We show that \(K_{1}(\varepsilon ) - K_{1}(-\varepsilon ) + K_{2}(\varepsilon )-K_{2}(-\varepsilon )=o(\varepsilon ^{4})\) as \(\varepsilon \rightarrow 0\). To this end, we observe that
as \(\varepsilon \rightarrow 0\), and consequently
Furthermore we have
which implies that
Combining (6.6), (6.7), (6.8) and (6.9) we obtain
as \(\varepsilon \rightarrow 0\) and the proof of the proposition is completed. \(\square \)
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Cieślak, T., Kokocki, P. & Ożański, W.S. Linear Instability of Symmetric Logarithmic Spiral Vortex Sheets. J. Math. Fluid Mech. 26, 21 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00021-023-00847-y
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00021-023-00847-y
Keywords
- Logarithmic spiral
- Vortex sheets
- Kelvin–Helmholtz instability
- Linear instability
- Birkhoff–Rott equation
- 2D Euler equation