Abstract
In this note the two dimensional Dirac operator \(A_\eta \) with an electrostatic \(\delta \)-shell interaction of strength \(\eta \in {\mathbb {R}}\) supported on a straight line is studied. We observe a spectral transition in the sense that for the critical interaction strengths \(\eta =\pm 2\) the continuous spectrum of \(A_\eta \) inside the spectral gap of the free Dirac operator \(A_0\) collapses abruptly to a single point.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Differential operators that admit a spectral transition are of particular interest in mathematical analysis and its applications. Typically, one expects that the properties of a model described by a differential operator depend continuously on the parameters. However, in some cases it turns out that there is an abrupt change in the spectral properties-in other words, a spectral transition. A well known example in this regard is the Smilansky model [29, 30] (see also [4,5,6]) or the indefinite Laplacian studied in [13, 20]. A spectral transition was also observed for Dirac operators with singular potentials supported on bounded curves in \({\mathbb {R}}^2\) and surfaces in \({\mathbb {R}}^3\). More precisely, when studying perturbations \(A_\eta \) of the free Dirac operator by an electrostatic \(\delta \)-shell potential of strength \(\eta \in {\mathbb {R}}\), it turned out that there is an abrupt change in the spectral properties for \(\eta = \pm 2\). While for \(\eta \ne \pm 2\)-which is referred to as the non-critical case-it is shown in the three dimensional situation in [2, 3, 7, 8] that the essential spectrum consists of two unbounded rays and finitely many eigenvalues between these rays, the critical case \(\eta = \pm 2\) remained initially open. In the critical case it was then proved in [10, 18, 27] that there is a loss of smoothness in the operator domain and that there may be one additional point in the essential spectrum; for general combinations of interaction strengths in the two dimensional setting see [12]. We note that similar effects also appear in the study of Dirac operators on bounded domains with suitable boundary conditions; cf. [11, 17, 18, 21, 26].
In this note we study the spectrum of a Dirac operator in \({\mathbb {R}}^2\) with an electrostatic \(\delta \)-shell potential of strength \(\eta \in {\mathbb {R}}\) supported on the straight line \(\Sigma \cong {\mathbb {R}}\) which is formally given by
here and in the following \(\sigma _1, \sigma _2, \sigma _3\) are the \({\mathbb {C}}^{2 \times 2}\)-valued Pauli spin matrices defined in (1.3), \(\sigma _0\) is the \(2 \times 2\)-identity matrix, and \(m \in {\mathbb {R}} \setminus \{ 0 \}\). In order to define this expression rigorously, we denote by \({\mathbb {R}}^2_+\) and \({\mathbb {R}}^2_-\) the upper and lower half plane, respectively, and we use the notation \(f_\pm := f\upharpoonright {\mathbb {R}}^2_\pm \) for the restriction of a function f defined on \({\mathbb {R}}^2\). Next, let
Then there exists a bounded Dirichlet trace map \(H(\sigma , {\mathbb {R}}^2_\pm ) \rightarrow H^{-1/2}(\Sigma ; {\mathbb {C}}^2)\), \(f_\pm \mapsto f_\pm \vert _\Sigma \) (one shows this in the same way as in [17, Lemma 2.1] and [17, Lemma 2.3] for bounded domains), and this allows us to define for \(\eta \in {\mathbb {R}}\) and \(m \in {\mathbb {R}} \setminus \{ 0 \}\) the operator
in \(L^2({\mathbb {R}}^2; {\mathbb {C}}^2)\). This operator is the rigorous mathematical definition of a Dirac operator with an electrostatic \(\delta \)-shell interaction of strength \(\eta \) and models, for \(m>0\), the propagation of a particle with mass m and spin 1/2 under the influence of such a potential; cf. [2, 8, 12, 21]. Observe that for \(\eta =0\) the operator in (1.1) coincides with the free Dirac operator
and recall that \(A_0\) is self-adjoint in \(L^2({\mathbb {R}}^2; {\mathbb {C}}^2)\) with purely (absolutely) continuous spectrum
The main result of this paper is the following theorem on the self-adjointness and the spectra of the operators \(A_\eta \). It turns out that the continuous spectrum grows under the influence of the \(\delta \)-shell interaction and also half of the gap \((-|m|, |m|)\) is filled when \(\eta \) approaches the critical values \(\pm 2\) from above or below. In the critical case \(\eta =\pm 2\) a spectral transition appears: the continuous spectrum inside \((-|m|, |m|)\) vanishes abruptly and 0 becomes an infinite dimensional eigenvalue.
Theorem 1.1
The operator \(A_\eta \) is self-adjoint in \(L^2({\mathbb {R}}^2; {\mathbb {C}}^2)\) and the following holds for the spectrum of \(A_\eta \):
-
(i)
If \(\eta < -2\), then \(\sigma (A_\eta )=\big (-\infty , -|m|\frac{\eta ^2-4}{\eta ^2+4}\big ] \cup [|m|, +\infty )\).
-
(ii)
If \(\eta =- 2\), then \(\sigma (A_{\eta }) = (-\infty , -|m|] \cup \{ 0 \} \cup [|m|, +\infty )\).
-
(iii)
If \(-2<\eta < 0\), then \(\sigma (A_{\eta })=(-\infty , -|m|] \cup \big [|m| \frac{4-\eta ^2}{\eta ^2+4}, +\infty \big )\).
-
(iv)
If \(\eta =0\), then \(\sigma (A_{0})=(-\infty , -|m|] \cup \big [|m| , +\infty \big )\).
-
(v)
If \(0<\eta < 2\), then \(\sigma (A_{\eta })=\big (-\infty , -|m|\frac{4-\eta ^2}{\eta ^2+4}\big ] \cup [|m|, +\infty )\).
-
(vi)
If \(\eta = 2\), then \(\sigma (A_{\eta }) = (-\infty , -|m|] \cup \{ 0 \} \cup [|m|, +\infty )\).
-
(vii)
If \(2<\eta \), then \(\sigma (A_{\eta })=(-\infty , -|m|] \cup \big [|m| \frac{\eta ^2-4}{\eta ^2+4}, +\infty \big )\).
For \(\eta \not =\pm 2\) the spectrum of \(A_\eta \) is purely continuous and for \(\eta =\pm 2\) the point 0 is an isolated eigenvalue of \(A_\eta \) with infinite multiplicity and the remaining spectrum is purely continuous.
Note that the spectrum of \(A_\eta \) is invariant under the transformation \(\eta \mapsto -\frac{4}{\eta }\). This symmetry would also follow from the stronger fact that \(A_\eta \) and \(A_{-4/\eta }\) are unitary equivalent; this can be shown in the same way as in [12, Proposition 4.8 (i) and Proposition 4.15 (i)].
The proof of Theorem 1.1 is based on an efficient abstract technique that was applied in a similar form also in [12, 21]: We use a so-called boundary triple and its Weyl function to reduce the spectral analysis of \(A_\eta \) in the gap \((-\vert m\vert ,\vert m\vert )\) of \(A_0\) to a certain boundary operator in \(L^2(\Sigma ; {\mathbb {C}}^2) \simeq L^2({\mathbb {R}}; {\mathbb {C}}^2)\); cf. [9, 19, 22, 23] for details on boundary triples and Weyl functions in the extension theory of symmetric operators. Since \(\Sigma \) is a straight line the spectral properties of this boundary operator can be studied with the help of the Fourier transform. From the limit behaviour of the Weyl function and the boundary operator towards the real line we also conclude that the set \((-\infty , -|m|] \cup [|m|, +\infty )\) consists of purely continuous spectrum of \(A_\eta \) for all \(\eta \in {\mathbb {R}}\). For \(m=0\) this method is also applicable, then it follows for all \(\eta \in {\mathbb {R}}\) that \(\sigma (A_\eta ) = {\mathbb {R}}\), i.e. there is no spectral transition. We note that the method of direct integrals decomposing \(A_\eta \) in its fibers would yield a similar result; cf. [24] for a related problem on Dirac operators with Robin type boundary conditions. In this note we prefer to work with the boundary triple technique, since it allows generalizations for more complicated curves \(\Sigma \) in a natural way, which we plan to study in the near future.
1.1 Notations
Let
be the Pauli spin matrices and denote by \(\sigma _0\) the \(2 \times 2\)-identity matrix. Note that the Pauli matrices satisfy \( \sigma _j \sigma _k + \sigma _k \sigma _j = 2 \delta _{jk} \sigma _0\), \(j,k \in \{ 1,2,3\}\). For \(x = (x_1,x_2)\) we will often write \(\sigma \cdot x = \sigma _1 x_1 + \sigma _2 x_2\) and \(\sigma \cdot \nabla = \sigma _1 \partial _1 + \sigma _2 \partial _2\).
2 Proof of Theorem 1.1
Let \(A_0\) be the free Dirac operator in (1.2) and recall that for \(z \in \rho (A_0)\) the resolvent of \(A_0\) is given by
where
and \(K_j\) is the modified Bessel functions of the second kind and order j; cf. [1] and [31]. Here and in the following the complex square root is chosen such that it is holomorphic in \({\mathbb {C}} \setminus (-\infty , 0]\) and \(\text {Re}\, \sqrt{z} > 0\). An important object in our analysis is the mapping \({\mathcal {C}}_z\) which is defined for \(z \in \rho (A_0)\) by
where \({\mathcal {S}}(\Sigma ; {\mathbb {C}}^2) \simeq {\mathcal {S}}({\mathbb {R}}; {\mathbb {C}}^2)\) denotes the Schwartz space and the convolution is understood in the sense of distributions. The action of \({\mathcal {C}}_z\) is
In the following we will denote by \({\mathcal {F}}\) the Fourier transform on \(\Sigma \simeq {\mathbb {R}}\).
Lemma 2.1
The map \({\mathcal {F}} {\mathcal {C}}_z {\mathcal {F}}^{-1}\) is the multiplication operator with the matrix valued function
In particular, \({\mathcal {C}}_z\) gives rise to a bounded operator in \(H^s(\Sigma ; {\mathbb {C}}^2)\) for any \(s \in {\mathbb {R}}\).
Proof
Let \(\phi _z(x_1) := \frac{1}{2 \pi } K_0(\sqrt{m^2-z^2}|x_1|)\), \(x_1 \in {\mathbb {R}} \setminus \{ 0 \}\). Since the Fourier transform takes \(K_0(\kappa |x|)\) to \(\sqrt{\pi /2}(p^2+\kappa ^2)^{-1/2}\) we obtain
Now observe that
and hence the calculation rules for the Fourier transform of distributions [28, Chapter IX] lead to
for \(\varphi \in {\mathcal {S}}(\Sigma ; {\mathbb {R}}^2)\), which yields the claimed result about the representation of \({\mathcal {F}} {\mathcal {C}}_z {\mathcal {F}}^{-1}\). Finally, taking the definition of the norm in \(H^s(\Sigma ; {\mathbb {C}}^2) \simeq H^s({\mathbb {R}}; {\mathbb {C}}^2)\) with the help of the Fourier transform into account, one sees that \({\mathcal {C}}_z\) gives rise to a bounded operator in \(H^s(\Sigma ; {\mathbb {C}}^2)\) for all \(s \in {\mathbb {R}}\). \(\square \)
In the following we shall make use of the closed symmetric restriction
of the free Dirac operator \(A_0\), and its adjoint
the above mentioned properties of S and \(S^*\) can be shown in the same way as in [10, Proposition 3.1], where similar operators in \({\mathbb {R}}^3\) with compact surfaces \(\Sigma \) have been studied.
Fix some \(\zeta \in \rho (A_0)\). Define the maps \(\Gamma _0, \Gamma _1: \mathrm {dom}\,S^* \rightarrow L^2(\Sigma ; {\mathbb {C}}^2)\) by
where \(\Lambda =(-\Delta +1)^\frac{1}{4}={\mathcal {F}}^{-1}(p^2+1)^\frac{1}{4} {\mathcal {F}}\) is viewed as a bijective operator from \(H^s(\Sigma )\) onto \(H^{s-1/2}(\Sigma )\) for \(s=1/2\) or \(s=0\), or as a self-adjoint unbounded operator in \(L^2(\Sigma )\) defined on \(H^{1/2}(\Sigma )\). It follows in the same way as in [12, Proposition 3.5] or [21, Proposition 6.1] that \(\{ L^2(\Sigma ; {\mathbb {C}}^2), \Gamma _0, \Gamma _1 \}\) is a boundary triple for \(S^*\) with \(A_0 = S^* \upharpoonright \ker \Gamma _0\) and corresponding Weyl function
cf. [9, 19, 22, 23] for details on boundary triples and Weyl functions in the extension theory of symmetric operators.
Next we describe the operators \(A_\eta \) with the help of the boundary triple (2.2) and also conclude their self-adjointness in \(L^2({\mathbb {R}}^2; {\mathbb {C}}^2)\). The proof of this result follows the lines of [21, Proposition 6.3] and [12, Proposition 4.3].
Lemma 2.2
For \(\eta \in {\mathbb {R}}\setminus \{0\}\) the operator
is self-adjoint in \(L^2(\Sigma ; {\mathbb {C}}^2)\) and we have
In particular, the operator \(A_\eta \) is self-adjoint in \(L^2({\mathbb {R}}^2; {\mathbb {C}}^2)\).
Proof
Define the \({\mathbb {C}}^{2 \times 2}\)-valued function
Then, by Lemma 2.1 we have
Since \(\theta \) is a symmetric matrix and \({\mathcal {F}}\) is unitary, we conclude that \(\Theta \) is self-adjoint in \(L^2(\Sigma ; {\mathbb {C}}^2) \simeq L^2({\mathbb {R}}; {\mathbb {C}}^2)\). Using (2.2) it is not difficult to verify that (2.3) holds and hence the self-adjointness of \(A_\eta \) follows, see, e.g., [9, Corollary 2.1.4 (v)].\(\square \)
In the next lemma we analyze, when zero belongs to the point spectrum or continuous spectrum of \(\Theta - M(z)\) for \(z \in (-|m|, |m|)\).
Lemma 2.3
Let \(\eta \in {\mathbb {R}}\setminus \{0\}\). For \(z \in (-|m|, |m|)\) the following holds:
-
(i)
If \(\eta \ne \pm 2\), then \(0 \notin \sigma _p (\Theta - M(z))\) and \(0 \in \sigma _c (\Theta - M(z))\) if and only if
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{z \eta }{\eta ^2-4}>0 \end{aligned}$$(2.4)and
$$\begin{aligned} z \le - \frac{ |m (\eta ^2-4) |}{\eta ^2+4} \quad \text {or}\quad z \ge \frac{ |m (\eta ^2-4) |}{\eta ^2+4}. \end{aligned}$$ -
(ii)
If \(\eta =\pm 2\), then \(0 \in \sigma _p (\Theta - M(0))\) with \(\dim \ker (\Theta - M(0))=+\infty \), and \(0 \in \rho (\Theta - M(z))\) for \(z \ne 0\).
Proof
Let \(z \in (-|m|, |m|)\) and observe that
Using Lemma 2.1 we conclude
where
and hence it suffices to consider the self-adjoint multiplication operator with the function \(\theta _z\) in \(L^2({\mathbb {R}}; {\mathbb {C}}^2)\). In the following we discuss for which \(\eta \in {\mathbb {R}}\setminus \{0\}\) and \(z\in (-|m|, |m|)\) the multiplication operator \(\theta _z\) has 0 as an eigenvalue or as a point in the continuous spectrum. Note first that
We verify assertion (ii). In the case \(\eta =\pm 2\) we have \(\det \theta _z(p)=0\) if and only if \(z=0\), and in this situation \(\det \theta _z(p)=0\) for all \(p\in {\mathbb {R}}\). Therefore, 0 is an eigenvalue of infinite multiplicity of the multiplication operator \(\theta _z\). Observe that for \(z \in (-|m|, |m|)\setminus \{0\}\) we have \(\det \theta _z(p)\not =0\) and hence one finds that 0 is in the resolvent set of \(\theta _z\).
Now we prove (i). If \(\eta \ne \pm 2\), then \(\det \theta _z(p)=0\) is equivalent to
The left hand side of the last equation is positive and hence there exist solutions only if also the right hand side is positive, i.e. only if (2.4) holds. Assuming this, we see by squaring the last equation that it is equivalent to
When \(p \in {\mathbb {R}}\) varies the left hand side can be any non-negative number, and hence (2.6) has a solution, whenever the right hand side is non-negative, i.e. if and only if \(z \le z_-\) or \(z \ge z_+\), where \(z_{\pm }\) are the zeros of the polynomial on the right hand side of the last equation given by
It is also clear that for a fixed \(z \in (-|m|, |m|)\) with \(z \le z_-\) or \(z \ge z_+\) there are only two values \(p\in {\mathbb {R}}\) with (2.7) holds, and hence 0 is in the continuous spectrum of the multiplication operator associated with \(\theta _z\).\(\square \)
In order to prove Theorem 1.1, we also investigate the limiting behaviour of \(( \Theta - M(z) )^{-1}\), when \(z \in {\mathbb {C}} \setminus {\mathbb {R}}\) approaches \(\sigma (A_0) = (-\infty , -|m|] \cup [|m|, +\infty )\):
Lemma 2.4
Let \(\eta \in {\mathbb {R}} \setminus \{ 0 \}\). Then, the following is true:
-
(i)
For any \(x \in (-\infty , -|m|] \cup [|m|, +\infty )\) and all \(\varphi \in L^2(\Sigma ; {\mathbb {C}}^2)\) one has
$$\begin{aligned} \lim _{y \searrow 0} i y \big ( \Theta - M(x+iy) \big )^{-1} \varphi = 0. \end{aligned}$$(2.8) -
(ii)
For any \(x \in (-\infty , -|m|) \cup (|m|, +\infty )\) there exists \(\varphi \in L^2(\Sigma ; {\mathbb {C}}^2)\) such that
$$\begin{aligned} \lim _{y \searrow 0} Im \, \big ( \big ( \Theta - M(x+iy) \big )^{-1} \varphi , \varphi \big ) \ne 0. \end{aligned}$$(2.9)
Proof
In order to show the claims, we note first with the help of (2.5) that the operator \({\mathcal {F}} (\Theta -M(z))^{-1} {\mathcal {F}}^{-1}\), \(z \in {\mathbb {C}} \setminus {\mathbb {R}}\), is the maximal multiplication operator associated with the matrix-valued function
with
By the continuity of the complex square root one sees for a fixed \(p \in {\mathbb {R}}\) that the limit \(c_{x+i0}(p) := \lim _{y \searrow 0} c_{x+iy}(p)\) exists. One verifies for any number \(x \in (-\infty , -|m|] \cup [|m|, +\infty )\) in a similar way as in (2.6) and (2.7) that \(c_{x+i0}(p)\) has no zero, if \(\eta = \pm 2\) or if \(\frac{x \eta }{\eta ^2-4}<0\), and for \(\frac{x \eta }{\eta ^2-4}>0\) the term \(c_{x+i0}(p)\) has two zeros at
Let us prove (i). Let \(x \in (-\infty , -|m|] \cup [|m|, +\infty )\) be fixed. Since the map \(z\mapsto M(z)\) is the Weyl function of a boundary triple it is a Nevanlinna function and the values M(z) are bounded and everywhere defined operators in \(L^2(\Sigma ; {\mathbb {C}}^2)\); cf. [9, Corollary 2.3.7]. It follows that \(z\mapsto (\Theta -M(z))^{-1}\) is also a Nevanlinna function and for \(z\in \rho (A_\eta )\cap \rho (A_0)\) the values are also bounded and everywhere defined operators in \(L^2(\Sigma ; {\mathbb {C}}^2)\). From the operator representation of Nevanlinna functions (see, e.g., [25, Theorem 4.2]) we then conclude that there exists a constant \(C_1 > 0\) such that
for \(y>0\) sufficiently small. Since \((\Theta -M(x+iy))^{-1}\) is unitarily equivalent to the multiplication operator with the function \(\theta _{x+iy}^{-1}\), we conclude that
for all \(y>0\) sufficiently small. Next,we define for \(y>0\) the set
and prove for all sufficiently small \(y>0\) and \(p \in I_x(y)\) that
for some \(C_2 > 0\), where the absolute value is understood elementwise.
In order to show (2.13), we note first that for some \(C_3>0\) independent of \(p \in {\mathbb {R}}\) and \(y \in [0,1]\) one has the estimate
Consider first the case when \(c_{x+i0}\) has no zero. From the definition of \(c_{x+iy}\) we conclude that there exists \(P_0 > 0\) such that \(\big | c_{x+iy}(p) \big | > 1\) holds for all \(|p| > P_0\) and all sufficiently small \(y>0\). Moreover, the map \([-P_0, P_0] \times [0, 1] \ni (p,y) \mapsto c_{x+iy}(p)\) is uniformly continuous and hence, there exists a constant \(C_4 > 0\) such that for all sufficiently small \(y > 0\) and \(p \in [-P_0, P_0]\) the relation \(|c_{x+iy}(p)| > C_4\) holds, as \(c_{x+i0}\) has no zero. Thus, for \(y>0\) sufficiently small \(|c_{x+iy}|\) is uniformly bounded from below by a positive constant, which together with (2.14) leads to the estimate in (2.13).
Assume now that \(c_{x+i0}\) has the zeros \(p_\pm \), let \(y>0\) be sufficiently small, and fix \(p \in {\mathbb {R}}\) with \(|p-p_\pm | \ge \sqrt{y}\). From (2.10) we get \(\sqrt{p_\pm ^2 + m^2 - x^2} > 0\) and thus,
with a constant \(C_5>0\), where we used in the first inequality for the denominator that the real part of the complex square root is positive and in the last estimate that the functions
are uniformly bounded from below independently of \(y>0\) sufficiently small. Hence, we conclude for those \(y>0\) that
Together with (2.14) this yields (2.13).
Now, we have everything in hands to prove item (i). Let \(\chi \) be the characteristic function for the set \(I_x(y)\) defined in (2.12). Then (2.11) and (2.13) imply for an arbitrary \(\varphi \in L^2(\Sigma ; {\mathbb {C}}^2)\)
Thus, assertion (i) is true.
To show item (ii), let \(x \in (-\infty , -|m|) \cup (|m|, +\infty )\) and let I be a non-empty compact interval which is contained in \((-\sqrt{x^2-m^2},\sqrt{x^2-m^2})\). Note that the numbers \(p_\pm \) in (2.10) are not contained in I and that
for \(p \in I\). Let \({\widetilde{\chi }}\) be the characteristic function for I. Taking the form of \(\theta _{x+iy}^{-1}\) into account, we get that \(\text {Im}\, ({\widetilde{\chi }} \theta _{x+iy}^{-1})\) converges uniformly to a nontrivial limit and hence, one can choose \(\varphi \in L^2(\Sigma ; {\mathbb {C}}^2)\) supported in I such that
i.e. also item (ii) is true.\(\square \)
Proof
(Proof of Theorem 1.1) First, we note that the case \(\eta =0\) reduces to the free Dirac operator and hence, all claims are known here. So we assume from now on that \(\eta \ne 0\). The self-adjointness of \(A_\eta \) is shown in Lemma 2.2. The claims about \(\sigma (A_\eta ) \cap (-|m|, |m|)\) follow from Lemma 2.3 and [9, Theorem 2.6.2].
It remains to show for \(\eta \in {\mathbb {R}} \setminus \{ 0 \}\) that \((-\infty , -|m|] \cup [|m|, +\infty )\) is purely continuous spectrum of \(A_\eta \). For this purpose let S be the operator from (2.1) and define the operator \(T := S^* \upharpoonright (\mathrm {dom}\,A_\eta + \mathrm {dom}\,A_0)\). Let \(\Gamma _0, \Gamma _1\) be the mappings from (2.2) and define \(\Gamma _0^\Theta , \Gamma _1^\Theta : \mathrm {dom}\,T \rightarrow L^2(\Sigma ; {\mathbb {C}}^2)\) by
Similarly as in [11, Proposition 2.4] one verifies that \(\{L^2(\Sigma ; {\mathbb {C}}^2), \Gamma _0^\Theta , \Gamma _1^\Theta \}\) is a quasi boundary triple for \(S^*\) in the sense of [14] with \(T \upharpoonright \ker \Gamma _0^\Theta = A_\eta \) and Weyl function
Note that the operator S in (2.1) is simple; this can be shown as in [11, Proposition 3.2] using [16, Step 2 in the proof of Theorem 3.4]. Hence, Lemma 2.4 (i) and [15, Theorem 3.2] imply that \((-\infty , -|m|] \cup [|m|, +\infty ) \cap \sigma _\text {p}(A_\eta )=\emptyset \). Furthermore, Lemma 2.4 (ii) and [15, Theorem 3.5] yield that the inclusion \((-\infty , -|m|) \cup (|m|, +\infty ) \subset \sigma _\text {c}(A_\eta )\) holds. By combining these facts one shows that \((-\infty , -|m|] \cup [|m|, +\infty )\) is contained in the purely continuous spectrum of \(A_\eta \). \(\square \)
Data Availibility Statement
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
References
Abramowitz, M., Stegun, I.: Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables. Wiley, Washington, D.C. (1984)
Arrizabalaga, N., Mas, A., Vega, L.: Shell interactions for Dirac operators. J. Math. Pures Appl. 102, 617–639 (2014)
Arrizabalaga, N., Mas, A., Vega, L.: Shell interactions for Dirac operators: on the point spectrum and the confinement. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 47, 1044–1069 (2015)
Barseghyan, D., Exner, P.: A regular version of Smilansky model. J. Math. Phys. 55, 042104 (2014)
Barseghyan, D., Exner, P.: A magnetic version of the Smilansky-Solomyak model. J. Phys. A 50, 485203 (2017)
Barseghyan, D., Exner, P., Khrabustovskyi, A., Tater, M.: Spectral analysis of a class of Schrödinger operators exhibiting a parameter-dependent spectral transition. J. Phys. A 49, 165302 (2016)
Behrndt, J., Exner, P., Holzmann, M., Lotoreichik, V.: On the spectral properties of Dirac operators with electrostatic \(\delta \)-shell interactions. J. Math. Pures Appl. 111, 47–78 (2018)
Behrndt, J., Exner, P., Holzmann, M., Lotoreichik, V.: On Dirac operators in \({\mathbb{R} }^3\) with electrostatic and Lorentz scalar \(\delta \)-shell interactions. Quant. Stud. Math. Found. 6, 295–314 (2019)
Behrndt, J., Hassi, S., de Snoo, H.S.V.: Boundary Value Problems, Weyl Functions, and Differential Operators. Monographs in Mathematics 108. Birkhäuser/Springer, Cham (2020)
Behrndt, J., Holzmann, M.: On Dirac operators with electrostatic \(\delta \)-shell interactions of critical strength. J. Spectr. Theory 10(1), 147–184 (2020)
Behrndt, J., Holzmann, M., Mas, A.: Self-adjoint Dirac operators on domains in \({\mathbb{R} }^3\). Ann. Henri Poincare 21, 2681–2735 (2020)
Behrndt, J., Holzmann, M., Ourmières-Bonafos, T., Pankrashkin, K.: Two-dimensional Dirac operators with singular interactions supported on closed curves. J. Funct. Anal. 279, 108700 (2020)
Behrndt, J., Krejčiřík, D.: An indefinite Laplacian on a rectangle. J. Anal. Math. 134, 501–522 (2018)
Behrndt, J., Langer, M.: Boundary value problems for elliptic partial differential operators on bounded domains. J. Funct. Anal. 243(2), 536–565 (2007)
Behrndt, J., Rohleder, J.: Spectral analysis of selfadjoint elliptic differential operators, Dirichlet-to-Neumann maps, and abstract Weyl functions. Adv. Math. 285, 1301–1338 (2015)
Behrndt, J., Rohleder, J.: Inverse problems with partial data for elliptic operators on unbounded Lipschitz domains. Inverse Prob. 36, 035009 (2020)
Benguria, R.D., Fournais, S., Stockmeyer, E., Van Den Bosch, H.: Self-adjointness of two-dimensional Dirac operators on domains. Ann. Henri Poincaré 18, 1371–1383 (2017)
Benhellal, B.: Spectral properties of the Dirac operator coupled with \(\delta \)-shell interactions. Lett. Math. Phys. 112, 52 (2022)
Brüning, J., Geyler, V., Pankrashkin, K.: Spectra of self-adjoint extensions and applications to solvable Schrödinger operators. Rev. Math. Phys. 20, 1–70 (2008)
Cacciapuoti, C., Pankrashkin, K., Posilicano, A.: Self-adjoint indefinite Laplacians. J. Anal. Math. 139, 155–177 (2019)
Cassano, B., Lotoreichik, V., Mas, A., Tušek, M.: General \(\delta \)-shell interactions for the two-dimensional Dirac operator: self-adjointness and approximation. to appear in Rev. Mat. Iberoam. (2022). https://doi.org/10.4171/RMI/1354
Derkach, V.A., Malamud, M.M.: Generalized resolvents and the boundary value problems for Hermitian operators with gaps. J. Funct. Anal. 95, 1–95 (1991)
Derkach, V.A., Malamud, M.M.: The extension theory of Hermitian operators and the moment problem. J. Math. Sci. 73, 141–242 (1995)
Gruber, M., Leitner, M.: Spontaneous edge currents for the Dirac equation in two space dimensions. Lett. Math. Phys. 75, 25–37 (2006)
Hassi, S., de Snoo, H.S.V.: Some interpolation problems of Nevanlinna-Pick type. The Krein-Langer method. Oper. Theory Adv. Appl 106, 201–216 (1998)
Holzmann, M.: A note on the three dimensional Dirac operator with zigzag type boundary conditions. Complex Anal. Oper. Theory 15, 47 (2021)
Ourmières-Bonafos, T., Vega, L.: A strategy for self-adjointness of Dirac operators: application to the MIT bag model and \(\delta \)-shell interactions. Publ. Mat. 62, 397–437 (2018)
Reed, M., Simon, B.: Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics. II. Fourier Analysis, Self-adjointness. Academic Press, New York (1975)
Solomyak, M.: On a differential operator appearing in the theory of irreversible quantum graphs. Waves Random Media 14, 173–185 (2004)
Solomyak, M.: On the discrete spectrum of a family of differential operators. Funct. Anal. Appl. 38, 217–223 (2004)
Thaller, B.: The Dirac Equation. Texts and Monographs in Physics. Springer, Berlin (1992)
Acknowledgements
J. Behrndt and M. Holzmann gratefully acknowledge financial support by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF): P 33568-N. M. Tušek was partially supported by the grant No. 21-07129S of the Czech Science Foundation (GAČR) and by the project CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000778 from the European Regional Development Fund. This publication is based upon work from COST Action CA 18232 MAT-DYN-NET, supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology), www.cost.eu.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Austrian Science Fund (FWF).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Behrndt, J., Holzmann, M. & Tušek, M. Spectral Transition for Dirac Operators with Electrostatic \(\delta \)-Shell Potentials Supported on the Straight Line. Integr. Equ. Oper. Theory 94, 33 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00020-022-02711-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00020-022-02711-6