Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to revisit the proof of the Gearhart–Prüss–Huang–Greiner theorem for a semigroup S(t), following the general idea of the proofs that we have seen in the literature and to get an explicit estimate on \(\Vert S(t) \Vert \) in terms of bounds on the resolvent of the generator. A first version of this paper was presented by the two authors in ArXiv (2010) together with applications in semi-classical analysis and some of these results has been subsequently published in two books written by the authors. Our aim is to present new improvements, partially motivated by a paper of D. Wei. On the way we discuss optimization problems confirming the optimality of our results.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The definition will be given in Sect. 4.1.
We say that \(u=[0,a]\mapsto {\mathbb {R}}\) is piecewise \(C^1\) if \(u\in C^0([0,a])\) and \(u'\) is piecewise continuous, i.e. with at most finitely many jump discontinuities. We denote by \(C^1_{pw} ([0,a])\) the space of piecewise \(C^1\) functions.
Notice that by affine dilations in s, u we have the seemingly more general statement that if \({{\tilde{u}}}\) is a \(C^2\) Morse function on \([\sigma ,\tau ]\), where \(-\infty< \sigma< \tau < +\infty \), \({{\tilde{u}}} (\sigma ) < {{\tilde{u}}} (\tau )\), and \({{\tilde{u}}}(\sigma )\), \({{\tilde{u}}}(\tau )\) are not critical values, then there is a piecewise \(C^1\) function on \([\sigma ,\tau ]\), such that, \({{\tilde{v}}}' \ge 0\), \({{\tilde{v}}}(\sigma )={{\tilde{u}}} (\sigma )\), \({{\tilde{v}}}(\tau )={{\tilde{u}}}(\tau )\), and \(I_{]\sigma ,\tau [}({{\tilde{v}}}) \le I_{]\sigma ,\tau [} ({{\tilde{u}}})\).
More precisely, there exist \(C,\epsilon _0>0\) such that, for \(|\sigma -\tau | < \epsilon _0\), the Dirichlet realization in \(]\sigma ,\tau [\) (also denoted by \(P_m\)) satisfies the lower bound \(m^{-2}P_m\ge \frac{1}{C}\).
Here we use “neigh(A, B)” as an abbreviation for “some neighborhood of A in B”.
Here is our choice of normalization.
References
Burq, N., Zworski, M.: Geometric control in the presence of a black box. J. Am. Math. Soc. 17(2), 443–471 (2004)
Chill, R., Seifert, D., Tomilov, Y.: Semi-uniform Stability of operator Semigroups and Energy Decay of Damped Waves. Philosophical Transactions A. The Royal Society Publishing (2020)
Davies, E.B.: Linear Operators and Their Spectra, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 106. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)
Engel, K.J., Nagel, R.: One-Parameter Semigroups for Linear Evolution Equations, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 194. Springer, New York (2000)
Engel, K.J., Nagel, R.: A Short Course on Operator Semigroups. Springer, Unitext (2005)
Gallagher, I., Gallay, T., Nier, F.: Spectral asymptotics for large skew-symmetric perturbations of the harmonic oscillator. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 12, 2147–2199 (2009)
Helffer, B.: Spectral Theory and its Applications. Cambridge University Press (2013)
Helffer, B., Sjöstrand, J.: From resolvent bounds to semigroup bounds (2010). arXiv:1001.4171v1, math. FA
Hitrik, M.: Eigenfunctions and expansions for damped wave equations. Meth. Appl. Anal. 10(4), 1–22 (2003)
Pazy, A.: Semigroups of linear operators and applications to partial differential operators. Appl. Math. Sci. vol. 44. Springer (1983)
Schenk, E.: Systèmes quantiques ouverts et méthodes semi-classiques, thèse novembre (2009). http://www.lpthe.jussieu.fr/~schenck/thesis.pdf
Sjöstrand, J.: Resolvent estimates for non-self-adjoint operators via semigroups. In: Around the Research of Vladimir Maz’ya. III, Int. Math. Ser. (N. Y.), vol. 13, pp. 359–384. Springer, New York (2010)
Sjöstrand, J.: Spectral properties for non self-adjoint differential operators. In: Proceedings of the Colloque sur les équations aux dérivées partielles, Évian (2009)
Sjöstrand, J.: Non self-adjoint differential operators, spectral asymptotics and random perturbations. In: Pseudo-Differential Operators and Applications. Birkhäuser (2018)
Trefethen, L.N., Embree, M.: Spectra and Pseudospectra. The Behavior of Nonnormal Matrices and Operators. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ (2005)
Wei, D.: Diffusion and mixing in fluid flow via the resolvent estimate. Sci. China Math. 64, 507–518 (2021)
Acknowledgements
The IMB receives support from the EIPHI Graduate School (contract ANR-17-EURE-0002).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix A. Optimization with \(\epsilon _1=\epsilon _2=+\)
Appendix A. Optimization with \(\epsilon _1=\epsilon _2=+\)
In this section we let \(\epsilon _1=\epsilon _2=+\) in Theorem 1.6 and assume that \(\mathrm {supp\,}(r(\omega )^2-\phi '^2)_-\subset [0,a]\), \(\mathrm {supp\,}(r(\omega )^2-\psi '^2)_-\subset [0,b]\) for some \(a,b>0\), where \(\Phi =e^\phi \), \(\Psi =e^\psi \). The results we get in this case seem less conclusive, but are perhaps still of some interest. Assuming, to start with, that \(\phi \) and \(\psi \) are given on [0, a] and [0, b] respectively, we shall discuss how to choose \(\phi \) on \(]a,+\infty [\) and \(\psi \) on \(]b,+\infty [\), for every given \(t>a+b\), in order to optimize the estimate on \(\Vert S(t)\Vert \). A later problem will be to choose a, b with \(a+b<t\) and the restrictions of \(\phi \), \(\psi \) to [0, a] and [0, b] respectively.
From (1.8) we get with \(r=r(\omega )\),
where
Here we put \(\iota _t \psi (s)=\psi (t-s)\), and write simply \(\iota \) when the choice of t is clear. We try to choose \(\phi (s) \) for \(s\ge a\) and \(\psi (s)\) for \(s\ge b\) so that \(I(\phi ,\psi )\) is as large as possible. Write
For \(s\in [a,t-b]\), set \(s=a+{\widetilde{s}}\), \(0\le {\widetilde{s}}\le t-a-b\). Then with \({\widetilde{t}}=t-a-b\),
and we get with \({\widetilde{\iota }} =\iota _{{\widetilde{t}}}\),
We wish to choose \({\widetilde{\phi }}\), \({\widetilde{\psi }}\) with \({\widetilde{\phi }}(0)={\widetilde{\psi }}(0)=0\) such that \({\widetilde{I}}({\widetilde{\phi }} ,\widetilde{\psi })=I_{0,0,{\widetilde{t}}}({\widetilde{\phi }},{\widetilde{\psi }})\) is as large as possible.
We temporarily drop the tildes. The problem is then to choose \(\phi \), \(\psi \) with \(\phi (0)=\psi (0)=0\) such that
is as large as possible.
At this moment we do not know how to solve this general problem, so we restrict the class of functions (satisfying \(\phi (0)=\psi (0)=0\)) by requiring that
In other words, we require that \((\iota \psi )'=-\phi '\). The constant in (5.5) is then equal to \(\phi (t)=\int _0^t \phi '(s)ds\). With \(\Vert \cdot \Vert \) denoting the \(L^2([0,t])\)-norm, we get
requiring also that \(|\phi '|\le r\). Here we have equality precisely when \(\phi '\) is equal to some constant \(\alpha \in [0,r]\), so for any given value \(\beta \in [0,r\sqrt{t}]\) of \(\Vert \phi '\Vert \), we should choose
The corresponding maximal value of \(I(\phi ,\psi )\) is given by
We look for the maximum of this function of \(\alpha \):
The two critical points are given by a local maximum at
and a local minimum at
We see that \(\alpha _+\) is a global maximum. The corresponding maximal value is given by
Let us compute the asymptotic behaviour of \(J_{\mathrm {max}}(t)\) when \(t\rightarrow +\infty \). We get
Here we recall that the new \(t={\widetilde{t}}\) is equal to \(t-a-b\) for the original t. Returning to the original \(I(\phi ,\psi )=I_{a,b,t}(\phi ,\psi )\) (cf. (5.3)) with \({{\phi }_\vert }_{[0,a]}\), \({{\psi }_\vert }_{[0,b]}\) prescribed, we get with the choice
that
when \(r=r(\omega )>0\) is fixed.
Summing up the discussion so far, we get from (5.1), (5.14):
Proposition 5.1
Let \(a,b>0\) and let \(\Phi \in C([0,a]; {\mathbb {R}})\), \(\Psi \in C([0,b])\) be increasing, piecewise \(C^1\) with \(\Phi (0)=\Psi (0)=0\),
Write \(\Phi = e^\phi \), \(\Psi =e^\psi \), with \(\phi \), \(\psi \) real. Then for \(t>a+b\), with \(r=r(\omega )\),
where \(J_{\mathrm {max}}({\widetilde{t}})\) is given in (5.10) and has the asymptotics (5.11). In particular for large values of \(t-a-b\),
Here we meet the same quantities as in the previous section. Hence we obtain (cf Theorem 1.9), if \(a^{*} (m)\) is bounded, \(r=1\), \(\omega =0\) and \(a, b \le a^{*} (m)\), \(t> a+b\),
As \(t\rightarrow +\infty \), we have lost a factor (e/2) in comparison with the statement of Theorem 1.9. Nevertheless it is conceivable that for some t the estimate obtained by this approach is better.
Non optimality. Possible improvements? We have solved the optimization problem for \(I(\phi ,\psi )\) in (5.4) for \((\phi ,\psi )\) varying in a restricted class. The purpose of this remark is to show that the solution \((\phi ,\psi )\) in (5.7) with \(\alpha =\alpha _+\) is not a critical point for \(I(\phi ,\psi )\) when \((\phi ,\psi )\) varies more freely and hence we can perturb our special solution slightly (leaving the restricted class) and find an even larger value of \(I(\phi ,\psi )\).
Write \(f=\iota \psi \) for simplicity. We then want to find \(\phi ,f\in C^2([0,1])\) with
\(\phi \) increasing, f decreasing (i.e. \(\phi '\ge 0\), \(f'\le 0\)) with
such that \(I(\phi ,\iota f)\) is as large as possible and in particular such that \((\phi ,f)\) is a critical point for I. We make a variational calculation considering infinitessimal variations \((\phi +\delta \phi ,f+\delta f)\) with \(\delta \phi (0)=\delta f(t)=0\). Then
where with \( K(\phi ,f)(s):=e^{\phi +f}(r^2-\phi '^2)^{\frac{1}{2}}(r^2-f '^2)^{\frac{1}{2}}: \)
Here,
and similarly for f, so
Here we integrate by parts, using that \(\delta \phi (0)=\delta f(t)=0\):
This gives,
Assumption (5.19) implies that \(K(\phi ,f)(r^2-\phi '^2)>0\), \(K(\phi ,f)(r^2-f '^2)>0\) and we see that \((\phi ,f)\) is a critical point precisely when
(in addition to (5.18)) and
We conclude that \((\phi ,\psi )\) in (5.7) with \(\alpha =\alpha _+\), is not a critical point for \(I(\cdot , \cdot )\), since it does not satisfy (5.19). Hence by modifying \(\phi \) slightly near \(s=t\), we can increase \(I(\phi ,\psi )\) further.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Helffer, B., Sjöstrand, J. Improving Semigroup Bounds with Resolvent Estimates. Integr. Equ. Oper. Theory 93, 36 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00020-021-02652-6
Received:
Revised:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00020-021-02652-6