Abstract
Intracellular vesicle transport is essential for cellular homeostasis and is partially mediated by SNARE proteins. Endosomal trafficking to the plasma membrane ensures cytokine secretion in dendritic cells (DCs) and the initiation of immune responses. Despite its critical importance, the specific molecular components that regulate DC cytokine secretion are poorly characterised. Galectin-9, a ß-galactoside-binding protein, has emerged as a novel cellular modulator although its exact intracellular roles in regulating (immune) cell homeostasis and vesicle transport are virtually unknown. We investigated galectin-9 function in primary human DCs and report that galectin-9 is essential for intracellular cytokine trafficking to the cell surface. Galectin-9-depleted DCs accumulate cytokine-containing vesicles in the Golgi complex that eventually undergo lysosomal degradation. We observed galectin-9 to molecularly interact with Vamp-3 using immunoprecipitation-mass-spectrometry and identified galectin-9 was required for rerouting Vamp-3-containing endosomes upon DC activation as the underlying mechanism. Overall, this study identifies galectin-9 as a necessary mechanistic component for intracellular trafficking. This may impact our general understanding of vesicle transport and sheds new light into the multiple roles galectins play in governing cell function.
Graphical abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Vesicle transport and secretion is essential to maintain intracellular organelle homeostasis and extracellular cell–cell communication. This process is regulated by dynamic changes in the cytoskeleton as well as by fusion proteins such as the soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) protein superfamily, that, amongst others, includes syntaxins and vesicle-associated membrane proteins (VAMPs) [1, 2]. In conjunction with the cytoskeleton, SNAREs drive vesicle sorting, docking and membrane fusion from the trans-Golgi network (TGN) to the plasma membrane via the endosomal machinery [2]. The tight regulation of vesicle trafficking and fusion events allows the functioning of complex biological processes such as the secretion of growth factors, neurotransmitters or hormones. In immune cells, SNARE proteins mediate the release of cytokines, chemokines or the delivery of surface components [3]. Despite its crucial importance, the molecular mechanisms that regulate SNARE function and govern endosomal trafficking are not fully described.
Dendritic cells (DCs) are unique immune cells specialised in detecting potentially hazardous elements and mounting early stages of innate and adaptive immunity [4]. To function, DCs rely heavily on the timely secretion of specific cytokines that ensure the activation of (immune) cells and the initiation of downstream effector mechanisms [5, 6]. DC activation induces context-dependent cytokine transcription [6, 7]. Newly synthesised cytokines are then transported from the endoplasmic reticulum onto the Golgi complex and the vesicle network to the plasma membrane [8,9,10]. DCs and monocytes use the recycling endosome pathway to sort, traffic and release key cytokines such as tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-12 and IL-10 [11,12,13,14]. Several publications have identified Vamp-3, a SNARE protein located in the early and recycling endosomal compartments [15], as a key player for the secretion of these cytokines in DCs through the recycling endosomes pathway [12,13,14]. Although cytokine secretion has been widely studied, detailed knowledge about the precise molecular components regulating vesicle movement and spatial segregation remains elusive.
Galectins, a family of β-galactoside-binding lectins, have emerged as modulators of cancer, inflammation and autoimmunity [16,17,18]. Galectins are located both intracellularly in the cysotol, where they establish carbohydrate-independent protein–protein interactions and extracellularly, where they bind oligosaccharide residues present on membrane glycoproteins, glycolipids and the extracellular matrix creating galectin-mediated lattices [19, 20]. This confers them the ability to play numerous functions either intracellular or extracellularly, in turn regulating (immune) cell homeostasis [21, 22]. Galectin-9, a ubiquitously expressed tandem-repeat type of galectin, has gained increasing importance due to its multiple roles in governing various cell functions [23]. For instance, intracellular galectin-9 has been associated with autophagy in hepatitis B infected cells and to activate AMPK upon lysosomal damage [24, 25]. Similarly, galectin-9 has been recently implicated in protein and membrane recycling in phagosome formation in macrophages [26]. Secreted galectin-9 has been described to play a role in epithelial cell morphology and polarisation via its interaction with the Forssman glycosphingolipid [27]. Galectin-9 has been extensively reported to participate in tumour cell adhesion, migration and aggregation [28]. Recently, several reports have also highlighted its functions in anti-tumour immunity and in dictating lymphocyte activation by modulating B and T cell receptor function [29, 30]. In contrast, virtually nothing is known regarding the involvement of any member of the galectin family in cytokine intracellular trafficking or secretion. The few reports available describe the association of galectin-9 in cytokine secretion in mast cells and macrophages although the underlying molecular mechanisms are not resolved [31, 32] and galectin-9 function in DC cytokine secretion has not been investigated. To address this, we depleted galectin-9 in human primary DCs and studied its effects on cytokine release. Our experiments revealed that cytokine secretion was significantly impaired in the absence of galectin-9 independently of transcription. We identified a novel molecular interaction between Vamp-3 and galectin-9, which governs the trafficking of Vamp-3 containing vesicles to the plasma membrane upon DC activation as the underlying mechanism. Overall, our work demonstrates that galectin-9 acts as a novel regulator of the cytokine trafficking machinery through controlling Vamp-3 function and subcellular localisation.
Results
Galectin-9 is required for cytokine secretion
The transcription and secretion of a large number of cytokines that act as key modulators of innate and adaptive immune responses is induced by immune cell activation. We investigated whether galectin-9 was involved in cytokine secretion using human monocyte derived DCs (moDCs) as model system for immune cell function. moDCs lacking galectin-9 were generated by electroporating them with either specific galectin-9 (LGALS9) siRNA or non-targeting (NT) siRNA control (hereby referred to as gal-9 KD and WT cells, respectively) prior to examine their cytokine response to various stimuli. Galectin-9 depletion, both surface-bound and intracellularly, was confirmed by flow cytometry (Fig. S1A, B) and Western Blot (Fig. S1C), showing a downregulation of the protein level of approximately 90%. The involvement of galectin-9 in cytokine secretion was studied in four key cytokines in DCs, namely pro-inflammatory cytokines interleukin (IL)-6 (IL-6) and tumour necrosis factor α (TNFα), the T cell activator cytokine IL-12 and the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10. We first determined the optimal secretion time point and stimulus for each of them (Fig. S2), and observed that IL-6 and TNFα were secreted after stimulation with the bacterial membrane component lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and TLR4 agonist; IL-10 in response to zymosan stimulation (a fungal cell wall extract) and IL-12 in response to R848 (a TLR7 and TLR8 agonist) (Fig. S2A). The secretion peak for all cytokines was shown to occur 16 h after treatment, while IL-10 secretion spiked at 24 h instead (Fig. S2B). These conditions were then used to measure cytokine secretion in WT and in gal-9 KD moDCs across various independent donors. Depletion of galectin-9 significantly impaired the secretion of all cytokines analysed when compared to WT control cells (Fig. 1A). To determine whether galectin-9 depletion resulted in a general protein synthesis and/or trafficking defect upon DC activation, we first studied the expression of plasma membrane proteins known to be enhanced in response to LPS treatment and DC maturation. In resting DCs, CD83, HLA-DR, CD86 or CD80 traffic to the membrane upon activation and are therefore well-established markers for intracellular transport and membrane re-organisation upon cell activation [49, 50]. Flow cytometry performed on activated WT and gal-9 KD cells showed these proteins to be equally upregulated upon incubation with LPS (Fig. 1B, C). These data indicate that galectin-9 acts specifically in modulating cytokine secretion and does not affect general cellular trafficking to the plasma membrane.
We then performed quantitative reverse transcription (qPCR) for these cytokines to determine whether the deficiency in their secretion was due to an impairment in gene transcription or alternatively, responded to a defect in the intracellular cytokine trafficking. No differences in gene expression were found between gal-9 KD and WT cells for IL-6, TNFα and IL-10 (Fig. 1D). IL-12A gene expression levels were undetectable under basal conditions and thus only ΔCt could be calculated (Fig. 1D). Overall, these data show that galectin-9 is not involved in de novo transcription of cytokines in response to a stimulus, but rather in cytokine intracellular trafficking or in their secretion at the plasma membrane.
Galectin-9 is involved in cytokine trafficking
Newly formed cytokines do not accumulate intracellularly but are continuously secreted by trafficking through the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), the Golgi complex and the endosomal network to the plasma membrane [3, 10]. Having ruled out that differences in gene transcription explained the cytokine secretion defect observed upon galectin-9 depletion, we hypothesised that galectin-9 could play a role in cytokine trafficking to the plasma membrane. To study this, we treated WT and gal-9 KD cells with LPS and measured intracellular cytokine accumulation by focusing on TNFα (Fig. 2). Concomitant to an impaired cytokine secretion, TNFα was found to significantly accumulate intracellularly in gal-9 KD cells after 6 h of LPS treatment although this effect was gone at 16 h, most likely due to cytokine degradation (Fig. 2A, B). As a positive control, ER-Golgi trafficking was inhibited using the Golgi inhibitors Brefeldin A and Monensin. Blocking cytokine trafficking caused TNFα to accumulate intracellularly in both WT and gal-9 KD cells as expected, although the intracellular levels were significantly higher in galectin-9-depleted cells (Fig. 2A, B). To substantiate the flow cytometry data, WT or galectin-9-depleted cells were treated as before and stained against TNFα, galectin-9 and DAPI as nuclear marker. Confocal microscopy confirmed the intracellular cytokine accumulation in galectin-9-depleted cells upon LPS treatment and thus the involvement of galectin-9 in cytokine trafficking (Fig. 2C and Fig. S3). In agreement to what was observed by flow cytometry, the percentage of TNFα positive DCs was markedly higher upon galectin-9 depletion (Fig. 2D). The amount of TNFα accumulation, illustrated here by the integrated density, was also found to be significantly enhanced in gal-9 KD DCs compared to their WT counterparts (Fig. 2E). IL-10 was also shown to intracellularly accumulate in gal-9 KD DCs confirming the impairment in cytokine secretion upon galectin-9 depletion (Fig. S4).
Cytokines that fail to be secreted to the extracellular matrix need to be degraded to avoid cellular toxicity [3]. Given that the intracellular cytokine accumulation observed in gal-9 KD DCs upon LPS treatment was not sustained over time (Fig. 2B), we hypothesised that galectin-9 depleted cells degraded the cytokine pool that could not be secreted. To test this, we treated WT and gal-9 KD cells with Bafilomycin to block cytokine degradation via autophagy and measured TNFα intracellular levels using flow cytometry. As expected, inhibition of autophagy enhanced cytokine accumulation within the cytosol of DCs. This phenotype though, was markedly increased in cells depleted for galectin-9 compared to their WT counterparts as evidenced by quantifying the number of cells that showed cytokine accumulation (Fig. 3A) as well as at the amount of cytokine that accumulated intracellularly (Fig. 3B). Immunofluorescence performed on WT and gal-9 KD DCs treated with LPS and Bafilomycin confirmed these results (Fig. 3C and Fig. S5) and quantification of TNFα signal also showed the cytokine to significantly accumulate in gal-9 KD cells (Fig. 3D). Next, we examined the intracellular cytokine trafficking pathway in more detail to identify the organelle(s) in which cytokines accumulated en route to the plasma membrane for secretion in galectin-9 depleted DCs. To meet this end, fluorescence microscopy experiments were performed on WT and gal-9 KD cells treated with LPS. Upon galectin-9 depletion we observed co-localisation of TNFα at an intracellular pool that overlapped with compartments positive for the Golgi marker GM130 (Fig. 4A), which was also confirmed by quantifying Mander’s (Fig. 4B) and Pearson’s correlation coefficients (Fig. S6A). We did not detect cytokine co-localisation for those compartments positive for the early endosome marker (early endosomal autoantigen 1 (EEA1)), (Fig. 4C, D) and Figs. S6B and S7A). Concomitant with flow cytometry data presented before, WT cells did not show intracellular TNFα accumulation upon LPS treatment alone at any of the cellular compartments analysed and TNFα only accumulated in the Golgi upon its blockade with Brefeldin A (Fig. S7B). Nonetheless, we observed TNFα localisation in some early endosomes positive for EEA1 in WT cells, which is indication of a normal cytokine trafficking towards the plasma membrane (Fig. 4C, D and Fig. S7A). Next, we investigated cytokine ER-Golgi trafficking in live cells upon galectin-9 depletion using the retention using selective hooks (RUSH) system, which allows for the synchronised release of TNFα-GFP protein from the ER using biotin [33] (Fig. 5A). For this, a GFP-tagged TNFα construct was fused to an ER retention protein coupled to the streptavidin binding protein. WT and gal-9 KD DCs were transfected with the RUSH construct and live imaging was performed to visualise TNFα trafficking (Fig. 5B and Supplementary movies 1 and 2). Both WT and gal-9 KD expressed the construct to similar levels and TNFα achieved maximal Golgi localisation approximately 20 min after biotin was added (Fig. 5B). In agreement with our previous findings, TNFα exited the Golgi complex in WT DCs after this time but its traffic was halted in gal-9 KD cells (Fig. 5B and 5C). Confocal imaging of WT and gal-9 KD moDCs transfected with the RUSH construct confirmed the accumulation of TNFα at the Golgi apparatus in galectin-9-depleted cells (Fig. 5D and E), which was also quantified using the Mander’s (Fig. 5F) and Pearson’s correlation coefficients (Fig. S6C).
Overall, these results demonstrate TNFα is retained in the GM130 positive Golgi complex following galectin-9 depletion thus establishing galectin-9 as essential for cytokine trafficking to the plasma membrane via the endosomal machinery.
Galectin-9 interacts with VAMP-3 to regulate cytokine trafficking.
Newly synthesised cytokines are transported from the ER-Golgi complex to the plasma membrane by vesicular trafficking, a highly regulated process that involves, amongst others, proteins from the SNARE family of membrane fusion proteins [34]. To unravel the mechanism underlying galectin-9 function in cytokine trafficking, we used an unbiased immunoprecipitation (IP)- mass spectrometry approach to identify new galectin-9 binding partners in DCs. Gal-9 was found to be significantly enriched in the Gal-9 IP compared to isotype control, confirming the quality of the pulldown experiment. Analysis of all putative galectin-9 binding partners focused on components of the vesicular trafficking identified vesicle-associated membrane protein 3 (Vamp-3) to interact specifically with galectin-9 (Fig. 6A). Vamp-3 is a R-SNARE family member located in the early and recycling endosomal compartments [12, 15]. In exocytosis processes, it accumulates in nascent endosomes outside of the Golgi complex and it is crucial in controlling their docking and fusion to the plasma membrane for extracellular release [35, 36]. Vamp-3 is crucial for cytokine trafficking to the plasma membrane prior to their release and thus we examined if galectin-9 interaction with Vamp-3 explained the impairment in cytokine secretion in gal-9 KD cells. To confirm the molecular interaction between both proteins, co-immunoprecipitation experiments were performed in resting and in activated WT DCs. As shown, galectin-9 was found to associate with Vamp-3 both under basal conditions and upon DC activation after LPS treatment, demonstrating their molecular interaction and highlighting a novel binding partner for galectin-9 (Fig. 6B). Galectin-9 interaction with Vamp-3 was also confirmed in THP-1 cells (a monocytic cell model widely used to mimic monocytes/macrophage function), suggesting their association is conserved across (immune) cells and further confirming a role for galectin-9 in intracellular trafficking in mammalian cells (Fig. 6C). Further validating their relation, analysis of Vamp-3 protein levels revealed galectin-9 to specifically regulate Vamp-3 expression as Vamp-3 protein levels were diminished in gal-9 KD DCs (Fig. 6D, E). Interestingly, depletion of galectin-9 did not alter the protein levels of other trafficking proteins (SNAP23 or Rab11a) known to be involved in cytokine trafficking (Fig. 6D, E) [34]. This confirms a specific functional interaction between galectin-9 and Vamp-3.
Under basal conditions, Vamp-3 is predominantly present in a cellular area juxtaposed to the nucleus [37]. Activation of WT DCs in response to LPS treatment and consequent cytokine trafficking caused Vamp-3 to redistribute throughout the cell and towards the plasma membrane (Fig. 7A). Interestingly, Vamp-3 failed to relocate upon activation in galectin-9-depleted DCs and stayed close to the nucleus (Fig. 7A). Quantification of multiple cells revealed Vamp-3-containing endosomes to mostly locate within 10 µm from the nuclei under basal conditions in both WT and gal-9 KD DCs (Fig. 7B). Nonetheless, already in the absence of any stimuli Vamp-3 was found to be significantly closer to the nucleus (0–5 μm distance) in the absence of galectin-9, which suggests galectin-9 is important for Vamp-3 localisation also under steady state conditions. Activation of the trafficking machinery resulted in Vamp-3 signal to evenly distribute across WT DCs and towards the plasma membrane for cargo release (distances of 0–20 µm from the nuclei, Fig. 7B). Relocation of Vamp-3 was not apparent in galectin-9-depleted DCs and the majority of Vamp-3 endosomes stayed close to the nucleus (0–10 µm distance) upon DC activation with LPS treatment (Fig. 7B). Immunofluorescence experiments confirmed Vamp-3 to be retained within the Golgi complex upon LPS treatment in Gal-9 KD DCs as Vamp-3 signal accumulated within areas positive for the Golgi marker GM130 (Fig. 7C). Vamp-3 did not co-localise with the ER marker PDI in either WT or gal-9 KD cells suggesting galectin-9 is not involved in the ER-Golgi trafficking but rather controls post-Golgi transport into the endosomal compartment (Fig. 7C). Relocation of Vamp-3 after LPS activation was apparent in WT cells as Vamp-3 co-localised with compartments positive for EEA1 (Fig. 7C).
Taken together, our data demonstrate that intracellular galectin-9 controls cytokine trafficking via its functional interaction with Vamp-3, which underlies Galectin-9 requirement to direct Vamp-3 containing endosomes to the plasma membrane for cytokine secretion in DCs.
Discussion
Vesicle trafficking is pivotal to maintain cellular homeostasis and coordinate exo- and endocytosis. Intracellular protein transport spans over different compartments (ER, Golgi complex and endosomes) that form a dynamic network in which vesicles deliver cargo from one to the other. This process is fundamental to ensure the timely delivery of specific components to the plasma membrane, for instance during (immune) cell activation. Illustrating this, DC stimulation markedly enhances the intracellular trafficking machinery required to transport specific surface receptors to the plasma membrane as well as the secretion of (immune) modulatory cytokines. In this study, we identify galectin-9, a tandem repeat member of the galectin family, as a key mediator of intracellular cytokine trafficking and report a novel functional interaction with the SNARE protein Vamp-3. Vamp-3 locates in early/recycling endosomes and is crucial for cytokine trafficking to the plasma membrane prior to their release [12, 13]. Depletion of galectin-9 results in lower Vamp-3 protein levels as well as in its aberrant subcellular localisation, which prevents cytokines from entering the endosomal transport machinery and causes their accumulation at the Golgi. Thus, this study shows that galectin-9 interacts with Vamp-3 and governs its redistribution throughout the cytosol upon DC activation, in turn allowing for Vamp-3 mediated trafficking to occur (Fig. 8 (Graphical abstract)).
Galectins are a family of β-galactoside binding proteins which have been identified as novel membrane organisers [19, 38, 39]. They are also abundantly expressed intracellularly and we and others have reported several members of the galectin family to modulate (immune) cell function via carbohydrate-independent interactions. In particular, galectin-9 is known to influence various processes such as cell adhesion, aggregation or apoptosis and we have previously identified a role for galectin-9 in phagocytosis by DCs [23, 40]. In contrast, very little is known regarding the involvement of any member of the galectin family in cytokine intracellular trafficking or secretion. The currently available data on this topic mainly refer to either descriptive observations or to the correlation of specific cytokines and galectin protein levels, while the regulatory mechanisms are largely lacking [16]. We now demonstrate a role for endogenous galectin-9 in mediating cytokine secretion in DCs via its function in regulating vesicle trafficking between the Golgi network and the plasma membrane. In addition, other studies report that extracellular recombinant galectin-9 enhances IL-6 and IL-8 secretion in human mast cells [31] and IL-12 secretion in moDCs [41]. However, underlying molecular mechanisms have not been resolved and the reported effects could be carbohydrate dependent (mast cells) or carbohydrate-independent (DCs), suggesting that galectin-9-mediated pathways differ in distinct cell types. These different results could also be explained by the use in these studies of excess recombinant galectin-9, which will bind to unknown carbohydrate-containing membrane proteins at the cell surface and not necessarily alter the intracellular cytokine secretion machinery. To decipher how endogenous galectin-9 protein functions, we exploited knockdown technology in primary human cells. Our data specifically demonstrate the intracellular interaction between endogenous Vamp-3 and galectin-9 and that galectin-9 depletion results in defective TNFα trafficking from the ER-Golgi to the cell surface. Still, it cannot be excluded that membrane bound galectin-9 may (indirectly) also participate in controlling cytokine secretion via other unknown mechanisms. Furthermore, and highlighting the translational relevance of our findings, galectin-9 plasma levels have been shown to correlate with elevated cytokines in COVID-19 patients and addition of recombinant galectin-9 induced IL-6 and TNFα secretion in those patients [42].
Our ELISA data revealed a significant decrease in cytokine release upon galectin-9 depletion, whilst maintaining cytokine de novo synthesis. Concomitantly, intracellular TNFα staining confirmed our hypothesis that if cytokine production was preserved between WT and gal-9 KD cells but secretion was impaired in the latter, cytokines should accumulate in the cytosol of galectin-9-depleted cells. Furthermore, we have demonstrated that galectin-9 deficient DCs eliminate the excess of cytosolic cytokines that cannot be released onto the extracellular matrix via the lysosomal machinery. This is in agreement with published literature that reported the importance of autophagy as a degradation mechanism in cytokine regulation [43, 44].
Galectin-9 did not alter the trafficking of other proteins to the plasma membrane upon DC activation, suggesting this lectin is not involved in global intracellular trafficking processes. In agreement with our data, galectin-9 has not been reported to participate in protein trafficking although other members of the galectin family have been described to aid in the cytosolic transport of various cell surface components in epithelial cells and erythrocytes [45,46,47,48]. The apparent dichotomy we here report between the normal trafficking of membrane components and the defect in cytokine secretion in gal-9 KD DCs can be explained by the different routes by which these proteins arrive to the plasma membrane. For instance, and although activation-induced cell surface display of several maturation markers depends on de novo synthesis, it has also been described that CD83 and MHC-II reside in distinct pools of recycling endosomes that fuse to the plasma membrane upon DC activation [49]. Similarly, ubiquitination serves as an important mechanism by which DCs regulate CD86 expression upon activation [50].
Cytokine (constitutive) release in DCs is primarily regulated at the transcriptional/translational level after a stimulus triggers their biosynthesis [11, 51]. This is in agreement with our own data, which demonstrate a rapid upregulation in cytokine gene transcription upon DC activation. Cytokine transcription was not impaired in galectin-9-depleted DCs demonstrating galectin-9 is not involved in the activation of the translational machinery in response to inflammatory stimuli. Newly formed cytokines are then subsequently trafficked through the endoplasmic reticulum, the Golgi complex and the vesicle network to the plasma membrane [9, 10]. In macrophages and DCs, newly synthesised cytokines do not traffic directly from the Golgi apparatus to the plasma membrane, but are instead routed via recycling endosomes that partially overlap with Vamp-3 (early/recycling endosomes) and the transferrin receptor (TfR), present in recycling endosomes [10, 12]. In agreement with galectin-9 governing Vamp-3 function in transporting cytokines away from the Golgi complex, our microscopy analysis revealed TNFα to accumulate at the Golgi after 4–6 h of LPS treatment in gal-9 KD cells. This indicates cytokine trafficking is abrogated after this point upon galectin-9 depletion and cytokines cannot be further trafficked, thus galectin-9 is required for cytokine transport from the Golgi to the plasma membrane. On the contrary, no cytokine could be detected at the Golgi complex of LPS-treated WT cells, which aligns with previous publications showing that in DCs and macrophages cytokine accumulation at the Golgi cannot be observed 2–4 h after LPS stimulation [11, 12, 52]. Furthermore, galectin-9 has been reported to be secreted to the extracellular space in many cells [53,54,55]and it is thus plausible that in DCs galectin-9 is also secreted together with cytokines as a functional complex in addition to facilitating their intracellular trafficking.
Mounting evidence suggests that post-Golgi trafficking is the rate-limiting step for the secretion of cytokines such as IL-6, IL-12 and TNFα as DCs need to upregulate their trafficking machinery to cope with the demand for cytokine production in response to stimuli [3]. In agreement, TNFα release at the plasma membrane depends on the protein levels of several SNAREs (i.e. Vamp-3 or syntaxin-4) and knockdown of Vamp-3 has been shown to reduce IL-6 and TNFα secretion in DCs [56,57,58]. This phenotype aligns with the impairment in cytokine secretion upon galectin-9 depletion we here report and argues the functional interaction of both proteins is required for effective cytokine trafficking and release. Vamp-3 is known to interact with various syntaxin proteins at the plasma membrane, namely syntaxin-4, which allows Vamp-3 containing endosomes to fuse with the plasma membrane [34, 37]. We have no evidence that galectin-9 is involved in the anchoring of endosomes to the plasma membrane prior to cargo release. In line with this, our Vamp-3 microscopy data unequivocally identified an earlier impairment in the trafficking machinery of galectin-9-depleted cells, namely the inability of Vamp-3 to relocate from the Golgi complex to the cell surface. Endosomes do not randomly diffuse throughout the cytosol but are rather captured by the cytoskeleton, which provides a functional structure for vesicle transport with motor proteins that transports them along the actin and microtubule fibres [59, 60]. We have previously found galectin-9 to locate within the cortical actin and to actively participate in actin polymerisation during phagosome formation and thus it is possible that galectin-9 impairs Vamp-3 intracellular movement due to its interactions with the cortical actin cytoskeleton [40]. Vamp-3 protein levels decrease upon galectin-9 depletion but we have not found Vamp-3 to be differently expressed in WT versus galectin-9-depleted moDCs (data not shown), which suggests galectin-9 may aid in Vamp-3 stabilisation.
In summary, our work demonstrates that galectin-9 controls cytokine intracellular trafficking and secretion through its functional interaction with the SNARE protein Vamp-3, which allows galectin-9 to govern Vamp-3 cytosolic redistribution upon cell activation, in turn allowing for Vamp-3 mediated trafficking to occur. Within the subcellular vesicle transport route, galectin-9 is required for vesicle transport from the Golgi to the plasma membrane. To the best of our knowledge, no intracellular binding partners of galectin-9 involved in the trafficking machinery have been previously reported. Given the myriad of cellular functions that depend on intracellular trafficking processes in all cells of our body, this novel mechanism reverberates in several fields within the cell biology research area. Furthermore, our findings increase our understanding of the multiple roles galectins play in governing (immune) cell function.
Materials and methods
Generation of monocyte-derived dendritic cells
Dendritic cells were derived from peripheral blood monocytes isolated from a buffy coat (Sanquin, Nijmegen, The Netherlands) [61]. Monocytes isolated from healthy blood donors (informed consent obtained) were cultured for up to five days in RPMI 1640 medium (Life Technologies, Bleiswijk, Netherlands) containing 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS, Greiner Bio-one, Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherlands), 1 mM ultra-glutamine (BioWhittaker), antibiotics (100 U/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin and 0.25 µg/ml amphotericin B, Life Technologies), IL-4 (500 U/ml) and GM-CSF (800 U/ml) in a humidified, 5% CO2. On day 3, moDCs were supplemented with new IL-4 (300 U/ml) and GM-CSF (450 U/ml).
Mammalian cell culture
THP-1 cells were grown in RPMI 1640 medium (Life Technologies) supplemented with 10% FBS, 1 mM ultra-glutamine and antibiotics (100 U/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin and 0.25 µg/ml amphotericin B, Life Technologies).
Small interfering RNA knockdown
On day 3 of DC differentiation, cells were harvested and subjected to electroporation. Three custom stealth small interfering RNA (siRNA) were used to silence galectin-9 (LGALS9HSS142807, LGALS9HSS142808 and LGALS9HSS142809) (Invitrogen). Equal amounts of the siRNA ON-TARGETplus non-targeting (NT) siRNA#1 (Thermo Scientific) were used as control. Cells were washed twice in PBS and once in OptiMEM without phenol red (Invitrogen). A total of 15 μg siRNA (5 μg from each siRNA) was transferred to a 4-mm cuvette (Bio-Rad) and 5–10 × 106 DCs were added in 200 μl OptiMEM and incubated for 3 min before being pulsed with an exponential decay pulse at 300 V, 150 mF, in a Genepulser Xcell (Bio-Rad, Veenendaal, Netherlands), as previously described [40]. Immediately after electroporation, cells were transferred to preheated (37 °C) phenol red–free RPMI 1640 culture medium supplemented with 1% ultraglutamine, 10% (v/v) FCS, IL-4 (300 U/ml), and GM-CSF (450 U/ml) and seeded at a final density of 5 × 105 cells/ml.
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
Day 5 moDCs were seeded in 96 well plates at a concentration of 1 × 10^5 cells/well in RPMI 1640 culture medium supplemented with 1% ultraglutamine, 10% (v/v) FCS, IL-4 (300 U/ml), and GM-CSF (450 U/ml). Cells were then treated for 6, 16 or 24 h with LPS (Sigma-Aldrich; 1 µg/ml), zymosan (life technologies, added at a 1:5 ratio) or R848 (Sigma-Aldrich; 4 µg/ml). After this time, cells were spun down for 2 min at 1500 rpm and supernatants collected for ELISA. TNFα and IL-6 were analysed from samples stimulated with LPS, IL-10 from samples treated with zymosan and IL-12 was measured on samples treated with R848.
Secreted levels of TNFα, IL-6 and IL-10 were analysed using human ELISA Ready-SET-Go! Kits (eBioscience) and following manufacturer’s instructions. To determine IL-12 secretion, 96-well ELISA plates were coated with coating buffer (Na2CO3 0.1 M pH 9.6) containing IL-12p70 coating antibody (Invitrogen, clone 20C2 M122 and used at 3 µg/ml) overnight and at 4 °C. Samples were afterwards incubated for 1 h at room temperature before adding the detection antibody (Pierce Endogen, clone M121B at 250 ng/ml). After this time, streptavidin-HRP (Invitrogen, used at 250 ng/ml) was added and samples were further incubated for 30 min at room temperature. Tetrametilbenzidine (TMB) was used to start the colorimetric reaction and when appropriate, H3PO4 was used to stop the reaction. All plates were read using an iMark Microplate absorbance reader (Bio-Rad) and processed using GraphPad Prism 6 software.
Flow cytometry
To determine depletion of galectin-9 following siRNA transfection, single cell suspensions were stained with a goat anti-galectin-9 antibody (AF2045, R&D systems) at 40 μg/ml or isotype control as negative control for 30 min at 4 °C. Before staining, moDCs cells were incubated with 2% human serum for 10 min on ice to block non-specific interaction of the antibodies with FcRs. A donkey-anti goat secondary antibody conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488 was used (Invitrogen; 1:400 (v/v). All antibody incubations were performed in PBA containing 2% human serum.
When necessary, day 6 moDCs were seeded in low adhesion plates and treated with Brefeldin A (BFA; 10 ug/ml) and Monensin (eBioscience; 2 µM) for 6 or 16 h alone or in combination with LPS (1 µg/ml). For experiments with lysosomal inhibitors, day 6 moDCs were treated with 200 nM Bafilomycin A1 (Sigma-Aldrich) alone or in combination with LPS (1 µg/ml) for 6 h prior to being collected. Cells were then stained with the Zombi violet viability dye (BioLegend, 1:2000 dilution) prior to being fixed and permeabilised using the Fixation/permeabilisation solution kit (BD Bioscience) and following manufacturer’s instructions. Cell suspensions were then stained using the directly-labelled primary antibody TNFα_PE (BioLegend; 502,929) or mouse IgG1 (eBiosciences, #12–4714-42) as negative control.
Cells were analysed with a FACSVerse or a FACSLyric instrument (BD Biosciences) and results analysed using FlowJo version X software (Tree Star, Ashland, Oregon).
Co-immunoprecipitation and mass-spectrometry
Day 6 moDCs (10 × 106) were detached using cold PBS, collected and lysed in 1 ml lysis buffer containing 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5), 2 mM MgCl2, 1% Brij97, 2 mM CaCl2, 5 mM NaF, 1 mM NaVO4 and 1 mM PMSF for 30 min on ice. Cell lysates were then incubated with 2 μg of anti-galectin-9 (AF2545, R&D systems) or isotype control under rotation. After incubating for 1 h at 4 °C, agarose beads were added and samples were further incubated for 3 h. Afterwards, beads were washed five times in washing buffer (150 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5), 2 mM MgCl2, 0.1% Brij97, 2 mM CaCl2, 5 mM NaF, 1 mM Na3VO4 and 1 mM PMSF) followed by three washes with PBS and bound proteins eluted in SDS sample buffer (62.5 mM Tris pH 6.8, 2% SDS, 10% glycerol). Proteins were separated by PAGE and blotted onto PVDF membranes. Membranes were blocked in TBS containing 3% BSA and 1% skim milk powder at room temperature for 1 h prior to be stained with specific antibodies against Vamp-3 and Galectin-9. Antibody signals were detected with HRP coupled secondary antibodies and developed using Odyssey CLx (Li-Cor) following manufacturer’s instructions. Images were retrieved using the Image Studio Lite 5.0 software.
For mass spectrometry analysis, immunoprecipitation on MoDCs was performed as above. After removal of all supernatant, on-bead digestion was performed as described [62]. In short, proteins were denatured and reduced in 50 µl of 2 M urea, 100 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0 and 10 mM DTT. Cysteines were alkylated using 50 mM Iodoacetamide for 15 min at room temperature and proteins digested using 0.25 µg MS-grade trypsin for 2 h at room temperature in a thermoshaker. Peptide-containing supernatants were collected and incubated with 0.1 µg fresh trypsin overnight. The next day, peptides were desalted using STAGE-tips. Samples were eluted from the stagetips using buffer B (80% acetonitrile, 0.1% formic acid), after which acetonitrile was evaporated using a speedvac. Samples were diluted in buffer A (0.1% formic acid) to 10 µl, of which half was injected. Peptides were separated on a reverse phase column connected to an Easy-nLC1000 (ThermoFisher) coupled on-line to a Thermo Orbitrap Exploris 480. A buffer B gradient (30 to 95%) was run over a period of 60 min, during which a dynamic exclusion list of 30 s was applied. RAW data was analysed using Maxquant version 1.6.0.1 [63], with a Uniprot database of the human proteome downloaded in June 2017. Options for match-between runs and LFQ (label free quantification) were enabled. Data was further analysed in Perseus [64] to filter out contaminants and reverse hits. Proteins with less than 2 peptides or less than 6 valid values were also removed. A two samples test was performed and a volcano plot was generated using R.
For immunoprecipitations performed on THP-1 cells were first transfected with 2 µg of empty vector pCDNA 3.1 or plasmid containing 3 × FLAG_Vamp-3 using the Amaxa 4D nucleoporator system (Lonza) with the Amaxa SG Cell line kit and program FF-100 and following manufacturer’s instructions. The human Vamp-3 was obtained via RT-PCR from human cDNA derived from monocyte derived dendritic cells. This hVAMP3 was cloned into pCDNA3.1( +) vector containing a 3 × FLAG-tag via standard molecular techniques using Hind III/ BamH I sites. The construct sequence was verified by the Radboudumc sequencing facility.
Forty-eight hours after transfection, cells were collected and lysed in 1 ml lysis buffer containing 150 mM NaCl, 25 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5), 2 mM EDTA, 1% Brij97 (v/v) and phosphatase and proteins inhibitors (Roche, # 4,906,837,001 and # 4,693,132,001) for 30 min under end over end rotation at 4 °C. Cell lysates were then spun for 10 min at 6000 rpm at 4 °C and pre-cleared by incubating them under rotation with 25 µl of Sepharose CL-4B beads (G-Biosciences, #786–1560) for further 30 min at 4 °C. Lysates were spun as before and the supernatant transferred to a new tube from which an aliquot was taken (as input control). The remaining volume was divided into two tubes and incubated on ice with either 1 μg of anti-galectin-9 (AF2545, R&D systems) or goat isotype control (Jackson Immunoresearch, #005–000-003). After incubating for 30 at 4 °C, 25 µl of protein G sepharose beads (Cytiva, #17,061,801) were added and samples were further incubated for 3 h under rotation at 4 °C. Afterwards, beads were washed five times in washing buffer (150 mM NaCl, 25 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5), 2 mM EDTA, 1% Brij97) and bound proteins eluted in SDS sample buffer (62.5 mM Tris pH 6.8, 2% SDS, 10% glycerol). Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and blotted onto PVDF membranes. Membranes were blocked in TBS containing 3% BSA and 1% skim milk powder at room temperature for 1 h prior to be stained with specific antibodies against FLAG and Galectin-9. Antibody signals were detected with HRP coupled secondary antibodies and developed using Odyssey CLx (Li-Cor) following manufacturer’s instructions. Images were retrieved using the Image Studio Lite 5.0 software.
Western blot
Day 6 moDCs were lysed in lysis buffer for 30 min on ice prior to being spun down at 10,000 rpm for 5 min. The BCA protein assay (Pierce, ThermoFisher scientific) was conducted to determine protein concentration and following manufacturer’s instructions and for each sample, 20 µg of total protein were diluted using SDS sample buffer (62.5 mM Tris pH 6.8, 2% SDS, 10% glycerol).
Proteins were separated by PAGE and blotted onto PVDF membranes. Membranes were blocked in TBS containing 3% BSA and 1% skimmed milk powder at room temperature for 1 h prior to be stained with specific antibodies. Antibody signals were detected with HRP coupled secondary antibodies and developed using Odyssey CLx (Li-Cor) following manufacturer’s instructions. Images were retrieved using the Image Studio Lite 5.0 software. The following primary antibodies were used for Western Blotting: goat anti-Galectin-9 (AF2045, R&D systems, Minneapolis, Minnesota) at 1:1000 (v/v), anti-Vamp-3 (ab5789, Abcam) at 1:1000 (v/v), anti-SNAP23 (111,203, Synaptic Systems) at 1:1000 (v/v), anti-Rab11a (sc-166523, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) at 1:1000 (v/v), mouse anti-FLAG at 1:1000 (v/v) (Sigma-Aldrich M2 clone, B3111) and rat anti-tubulin (Novus Biological, Abingdon, United Kingdom) at 1:2000 (v/v). The following secondary antibodies were used: donkey anti-goat IRDye 680 (920–32224, Li-Cor, Lincoln, Nebraska), goat anti-mouse IRDye 800 (926–32,210), donkey anti-rabbit IRDye 800 (926–32,213, Li-Cor), donkey anti rabbit IRDye 680 (926–68,073, Li-Cor), goat anti rabbit IRDye 800 (926–32,211, LiCor), goat anti-rat IRDye 680 (A21096, Invitrogen, Landsmeer, Netherlands). All secondary antibodies were used at 1:5000 (v/v).
RNA preparation and quantitative real-time PCR
Day 6 moDCs that had been previously transfected with either NT or gal9 siRNA were treated with either 1 µg/ml LPS for 4 h to analyse IL-6 and TNFα expression, with 1:5 ratio of Zymosan particles for 6h to study IL-10 gene expression or with 4 µg/ml R848 for 8 h to study IL-12 expression prior to being harvested, total RNA extracted using the quick-RNA miniprep kit (#R1055; Zymo research) and 1 µg reverse transcribed using the M-MLV reverse transcriptase kit (#28,025,021; ThermoFisher scientific). TNFα, IL-6, IL-12A and IL-10 gene expression was assessed by quantitative real-time PCR using FAST Reaction SYBR-Green mixture (applied Biosystems). Data were normalised to actin expression. Primer sequences are shown in Supplementary Table 1.
Live imaging
Day 5 moDCs previously transfected with either NT or gal9 siRNA were transfected with 2 ug of the Str-KDEL_TNFα_SBP_EGFP plasmid (Addgene, #65,278) [33] using the Neon transfection system (Invitrogen) and following manufacturer’s instructions. After transfection cells were seeded in DMEM (Gibco, #31,966–021) on low attachment plates (Corning, #3471) and treated with 1 μg/ml LPs 3 h after transfection. Sixteen hours later, GFP positive cells were sorted out using the BD FACSMelody cell sorter (BD Biosciences) and immediately seeded onto glass bottom imaging chambers (Greiner Bio-one #627,870) on DMEM to attach. Three hours later, cells were washed once in PBS and incubated in Leibovitz’s medium (Gibco; 21,083–027) prior to imaging. Cells were imaged using a Leica DMI6000 epifluorescence microscope fitted with a 63 × 1.4 NA oil immersion objective, a metal halide EL6000 lamp for excitation, a DFC365FX CCD camera and GFP filter sets (all from Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). Focus was kept stable with the adaptive focus control from Leica. Images were analysed with ImageJ software. Biotin (1:1 dilution, 80 µM stock solution) was added immediately prior to imaging and images were taken every minute for 1 h. Movies obtained from the time-lapse images were processed using the ImageJ plugin HyperStackReg V5.6. (Ved Sharma) and the fluorescence intensity decay due to photobleaching was corrected using the Exponential Fitting method from the ImageJ Bleach Correction tool ( https://f1000research.com/articles/9-1494/v1). The TNFα_GFP mean fluorescence intensity was quantified from images taken at 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 min and plotted using GraphPad Prism 8 software.
Immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy
2*10^5 day 3 moDCs were seeded on a coverslip and 72 h later treated with LPS (1 µg/ml) alone or in combination with Brefeldin A (10 µg/ml) and Monensin (2 µM), or with Bafilomycin (100 nM) for 6 h. DMSO was used as negative control. After this time, cells were fixed in either 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) or in 100% methanol and subsequently incubated for 20 min in 0.1 M quenching solution (NH4Cl in PBS). Cells transfected with the TNFα plasmid were also seeded on coverslips using Leibovitz’s medium for 3 h prior to being treated with biotin (1:1 dilution) for 30 min. After this time, cells were fixed with 4% PFA. PFA-fixed cells were then washed twice with PBS and permeabilised in permeabilisation buffer (2.5% Bovine Serum Albumin, 1% donkey serum and 0.15% Triton X-100) for 30 min prior to being incubated o/n and at 4 °C with specific antibodies against TNF-α (MACS miltenyi biotec, #130–091-649), Vamp-3 (Abcam #Ab5789, 1:200 final dilution, the ER marker PDI (Novus Biologicals #NBP2-02082), the Golgi cis/trans marker GM130 (BD transduction laboratories #610,822), the early endosomal marker EEA1 (BD Biosciences #610,456/57, 1:100 final dilution) and galectin-9 (R&D biosystems, #AF2425, 1:40 final dilution). Methanol-fixated cells were washed, permeabilised and incubated o/n at 4 ºC with antibodies against Vamp-3 and galectin-9 (as per previous staining protocol). Please note that methanol-fixed cells show galectin-9 nuclear staining as an artefact of the fixation process, which does not represent real localisation of the protein.
Cells were afterwards washed extensively prior to being incubated for 1 h at room temperature with a donkey-anti-mouse alexa 488 secondary antibody (ThermoFisher, Massachusettes, US, A21202, 1:400 final dilution) and a donkey-anti-goat alexa 568 (ThermoFisher Scientific, #A11055, 1:400 final dilution) in permeabilisation buffer. PFA and methanol fixed cells were then washed and nuclei stained with DAPI for 10 min at room temperature. Coverslips were embedded in glass slides using Mowiol prior to being stored at 4 °C until imaging. Samples were imaged with both a Leica DMI6000 epi-fluorescence microscope fitted with a 63 × 1.4 NA oil immersion objective, a metal halide EL6000 lamp for excitation, a DFC365FX CCD camera and GFP and DsRed filter sets (all from Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) as well as a Zeiss LSM900 confocal laser scanning microscope. For the images acquired with the Leica DMI6000 epi-fluorescence microscope we used a 63 × 1.4 NA oil immersion objective, a metal halide EL6000 lamp for excitation, a DFC365FX CCD camera and GFP and DsRed filter sets (all from Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). Focus was kept stable with the adaptive focus control from Leica. For the images acquired with eh Zeiss LSM900 microscope we used a 63 × EC Epiplan-NEOFLOUAR oil immersion objective and three laser module URGB (405, 488, 561, 640 nm). Images were analysed with ImageJ software. Fluorescence overlap was quantified using an unbiased macro in ImageJ which automatically selected imaged cell areas based on fluorescence intensity. The Mander’s and Pearson’s correlation coefficients were calculated using the JACoP plugin and the line scan graphs representing the fluorescence cross-sections were quantified using the Plots profile command in ImageJ and depicted using GraphPad Prism 8 software. The cross-sections were established by drawing a perpendicular line from the nuclear membrane 20–250 microns (for Vamp-3 intensity quantification or the colocalization analysis, respectively) towards the plasma membrane furthest away from the nucleus.
Image analysis from experiments using the TNFα RUSH construct was performed using ImageJ. Integrated density of Vamp3 in the PD1, GM130 and EEA1 channels was quantified using an unbiased macro in ImageJ which masked the fluorescence intensity in each subcellular compartment after applying the Yen, Default and Yen thresholding algorithms (for the PD1, GM130 and EEA1 channels respectively). Each mask was saved as a region of interest (ROI), transferred to the Vamp3 channel, and the integrated fluorescence density from each ROI was quantified.
Statistical analysis
The statistical test used to analyse each data set is described in the corresponding figure legend. Unpaired t-test was used to compare mean values between NT and gal9 siRNA transfected cells. An Anova-two way test was used to quantify Vamp-3 intensity across the cytosol.
Data availability
All data are available upon request. Mass spectrometry dataset is deposited in the public proteomics identifications database PRIDE and is available upon request.
References
Hehnly H, Stamnes M (2007) Regulating cytoskeleton-based vesicle motility. FEBS Lett 581:2112–2118
Jahn R, Scheller RH (2006) SNAREs–engines for membrane fusion. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7:631–643
Revelo NH, Ter Beest M, van den Bogaart G (2019) Membrane trafficking as an active regulator of constitutively secreted cytokines. J Cell Sci 133:jcs234781
Banchereau J, Steinman RM (1998) Dendritic cells and the control of immunity. Nature 392:245–252
Joffre O, Nolte MA, Sporri R, Reis Sousa C (2009) Inflammatory signals in dendritic cell activation and the induction of adaptive immunity. Immunol Rev 227:234–247
Kapsenberg ML (2003) Dendritic-cell control of pathogen-driven T-cell polarization. Nat Rev Immunol 3:984–993
Mazzoni A, Segal DM (2004) Controlling the Toll road to dendritic cell polarization. J Leukoc Biol 75:721–730
Murray RZ, Stow JL (2014) Cytokine secretion in macrophages: SNAREs, rabs, and membrane trafficking. Front Immunol 5:538
Stanley AC, Lacy P (2010) Pathways for cytokine secretion. Physiology (Bethesda) 25:218–229
Verboogen DRJ, Ter Beest M, Honigmann A, van den Bogaart G (2018) Secretory vesicles of immune cells contain only a limited number of interleukin 6 molecules. FEBS Lett 592:1535–1544
Chiaruttini G, Piperno GM, Jouve M, De Nardi F, Larghi P, Peden AA et al (2016) The SNARE VAMP7 regulates exocytic trafficking of interleukin-12 in dendritic cells. Cell Rep 14:2624–2636
Manderson AP, Kay JG, Hammond LA, Brown DL, Stow JL (2007) Subcompartments of the macrophage recycling endosome direct the differential secretion of IL-6 and TNFalpha. J Cell Biol 178:57–69
Murray RZ, Kay JG, Sangermani DG, Stow JL (2005) A role for the phagosome in cytokine secretion. Science 310:1492–1495
Stanley AC, Lieu ZZ, Wall AA, Venturato J, Khromykh T, Hamilton NA et al (2012) Recycling endosome-dependent and -independent mechanisms for IL-10 secretion in LPS-activated macrophages. J Leukoc Biol 92:1227–1239
Bajno L, Peng XR, Schreiber AD, Moore HP, Trimble WS, Grinstein S (2000) Focal exocytosis of VAMP3-containing vesicles at sites of phagosome formation. J Cell Biol 149:697–706
Gordon-Alonso M, Bruger AM, van der Bruggen P (2018) Extracellular galectins as controllers of cytokines in hematological cancer. Blood 132:484–491
Vasta GR, Feng C, Gonzalez-Montalban N, Mancini J, Yang L, Abernathy K et al (2017) Functions of galectins as ’self/non-self’-recognition and effector factors. Pathog Dis 75:ftx046
Liu FT, Rabinovich GA (2010) Galectins: regulators of acute and chronic inflammation. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1183:158–182
Nabi IR, Shankar J, Dennis JW (2015) The galectin lattice at a glance. J Cell Sci 128:2213–2219
Thiemann S, Baum LG (2016) Galectins and immune responses-just how do they do those things they do? Annu Rev Immunol 34:243–264
Johannes L, Jacob R, Leffler H (2018) Galectins at a glance. J Cell Sci 131:jcs208884
Liu FT, Patterson RJ, Wang JL (2002) Intracellular functions of galectins. Biochim Biophys Acta 1572:263–273
John S, Mishra R (2016) Galectin-9: From cell biology to complex disease dynamics. J Biosci 41:507–534
Miyakawa K, Nishi M, Ogawa M, Matsunaga S, Sugiyama M, Nishitsuji H et al (2022) Galectin-9 restricts hepatitis B virus replication via p62/SQSTM1-mediated selective autophagy of viral core proteins. Nat Commun 13:531
Jia J, Abudu YP, Claude-Taupin A, Gu Y, Kumar S, Choi SW et al (2019) Galectins control MTOR and AMPK in response to lysosomal damage to induce autophagy. Autophagy 15:169–171
Klose M, Salloum JE, Gonschior H, Linder S (2019) SNX3 drives maturation of Borrelia phagosomes by forming a hub for PI(3)P, Rab5a, and galectin-9. J Cell Biol 218:3039–3059
Mishra R, Grzybek M, Niki T, Hirashima M, Simons K (2010) Galectin-9 trafficking regulates apical-basal polarity in Madin-Darby canine kidney epithelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:17633–17638
Vladoiu MC, Labrie M, St-Pierre Y (2014) Intracellular galectins in cancer cells: potential new targets for therapy (Review). Int J Oncol 44:1001–1014
Yang R, Sun L, Li CF, Wang YH, Yao J, Li H et al (2021) Galectin-9 interacts with PD-1 and TIM-3 to regulate T cell death and is a target for cancer immunotherapy. Nat Commun 12:832
Ustyanovska Avtenyuk N, Choukrani G, Ammatuna E, Niki T, Cendrowicz E, Lourens HJ et al (2021) Galectin-9 triggers neutrophil-mediated anticancer immunity. Biomedicines 10:66
Kojima R, Ohno T, Iikura M, Niki T, Hirashima M, Iwaya K et al (2014) Galectin-9 enhances cytokine secretion, but suppresses survival and degranulation, in human mast cell line. PLoS ONE 9:e86106
Lv R, Bao Q, Li Y (2017) Regulation of M1type and M2type macrophage polarization in RAW264.7 cells by Galectin9. Mol Med Rep 16:9111–9119
Boncompain G, Divoux S, Gareil N, de Forges H, Lescure A, Latreche L et al (2012) Synchronization of secretory protein traffic in populations of cells. Nat Methods 9:493–498
Dingjan I, Linders PTA, Verboogen DRJ, Revelo NH, Ter Beest M, van den Bogaart G (2018) Endosomal and phagosomal SNAREs. Physiol Rev 98:1465–1492
Barysch SV, Aggarwal S, Jahn R, Rizzoli SO (2009) Sorting in early endosomes reveals connections to docking- and fusion-associated factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:9697–9702
Mallard F, Tang BL, Galli T, Tenza D, Saint-Pol A, Yue X et al (2002) Early/recycling endosomes-to-TGN transport involves two SNARE complexes and a Rab6 isoform. J Cell Biol 156:653–664
Verboogen DRJ, Gonzalez Mancha N, Ter Beest M, van den Bogaart G (2017) Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging Microscopy reveals rerouting of SNARE trafficking driving dendritic cell activation. Elife 6:e23525
Elola MT, Blidner AG, Ferragut F, Bracalente C, Rabinovich GA (2015) Assembly, organization and regulation of cell-surface receptors by lectin-glycan complexes. Biochem J 469:1–16
Lajoie P, Goetz JG, Dennis JW, Nabi IR (2009) Lattices, rafts, and scaffolds: domain regulation of receptor signaling at the plasma membrane. J Cell Biol 185:381–385
Querol Cano L, Tagit O, Dolen Y, van Duffelen A, Dieltjes S, Buschow SI et al (2019) Intracellular galectin-9 controls dendritic cell function by maintaining plasma membrane rigidity. iScience 22:240–255
Dai SY, Nakagawa R, Itoh A, Murakami H, Kashio Y, Abe H et al (2005) Galectin-9 induces maturation of human monocyte-derived dendritic cells. J Immunol 175:2974–2981
Bozorgmehr N, Mashhouri S, Perez Rosero E, Xu L, Shahbaz S, Sligl W et al (2021) Galectin-9, a player in cytokine release syndrome and a surrogate diagnostic biomarker in SARS-CoV-2 infection. MBio 12(3):e00384–21
Wu TT, Li WM, Yao YM (2016) Interactions between autophagy and inhibitory cytokines. Int J Biol Sci 12:884–897
Jiang GM, Tan Y, Wang H, Peng L, Chen HT, Meng XJ et al (2019) The relationship between autophagy and the immune system and its applications for tumor immunotherapy. Mol Cancer 18:17
Barres C, Blanc L, Bette-Bobillo P, Andre S, Mamoun R, Gabius HJ et al (2010) Galectin-5 is bound onto the surface of rat reticulocyte exosomes and modulates vesicle uptake by macrophages. Blood 115:696–705
Straube T, von Mach T, Honig E, Greb C, Schneider D, Jacob R (2013) pH-dependent recycling of galectin-3 at the apical membrane of epithelial cells. Traffic 14:1014–1027
Stechly L, Morelle W, Dessein AF, Andre S, Grard G, Trinel D et al (2009) Galectin-4-regulated delivery of glycoproteins to the brush border membrane of enterocyte-like cells. Traffic 10:438–450
Delacour D, Cramm-Behrens CI, Drobecq H, Le Bivic A, Naim HY, Jacob R (2006) Requirement for galectin-3 in apical protein sorting. Curr Biol 16:408–414
Klein E, Koch S, Borm B, Neumann J, Herzog V, Koch N et al (2005) CD83 localization in a recycling compartment of immature human monocyte-derived dendritic cells. Int Immunol 17:477–487
Baravalle G, Park H, McSweeney M, Ohmura-Hoshino M, Matsuki Y, Ishido S et al (2011) Ubiquitination of CD86 is a key mechanism in regulating antigen presentation by dendritic cells. J Immunol 187:2966–2973
Tanaka T, Narazaki M, Masuda K, Kishimoto T (2016) Regulation of IL-6 in immunity and diseases. Adv Exp Med Biol 941:79–88
Shurety W, Merino-Trigo A, Brown D, Hume DA, Stow JL (2000) Localization and post-Golgi trafficking of tumor necrosis factor-alpha in macrophages. J Interferon Cytokine Res 20:427–438
McTague A, Tazhitdinova R, Timoshenko AV (2022) O-GlcNAc-mediated regulation of galectin expression and secretion in human promyelocytic HL-60 cells undergoing neutrophilic differentiation. Biomolecules 12:1763
Schlichtner S, Yasinska IM, Lall GS, Berger SM, Ruggiero S, Cholewa D et al (2023) T lymphocytes induce human cancer cells derived from solid malignant tumors to secrete galectin-9 which facilitates immunosuppression in cooperation with other immune checkpoint proteins. J Immunother Cancer 11:e005714
Liu Y, Luo J, Li Y, Cao J, Wang X (2020) IFNgamma and TNFalpha synergistically promote galectin 9 secretion by human osteosarcoma cells MG-63 to prevent T cell killing. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 13:2009–2017
Collins LE, DeCourcey J, Rochfort KD, Kristek M, Loscher CE (2014) A role for syntaxin 3 in the secretion of IL-6 from dendritic cells following activation of toll-like receptors. Front Immunol 5:691
Mori R, Ikematsu K, Kitaguchi T, Kim SE, Okamoto M, Chiba T et al (2011) Release of TNF-alpha from macrophages is mediated by small GTPase Rab37. Eur J Immunol 41:3230–3239
Boddul SV, Meng J, Dolly JO, Wang J (2014) SNAP-23 and VAMP-3 contribute to the release of IL-6 and TNFalpha from a human synovial sarcoma cell line. FEBS J 281:750–765
Klann M, Koeppl H, Reuss M (2012) Spatial modeling of vesicle transport and the cytoskeleton: the challenge of hitting the right road. PLoS ONE 7:e29645
Granger E, McNee G, Allan V, Woodman P (2014) The role of the cytoskeleton and molecular motors in endosomal dynamics. Semin Cell Dev Biol 31:20–29
de Vries IJ, Eggert AA, Scharenborg NM, Vissers JL, Lesterhuis WJ, Boerman OC et al (2002) Phenotypical and functional characterization of clinical grade dendritic cells. J Immunother 25:429–438
Baymaz HI, Spruijt CG, Vermeulen M (2014) Identifying nuclear protein-protein interactions using GFP affinity purification and SILAC-based quantitative mass spectrometry. Methods Mol Biol 1188:207–226
Cox J, Mann M (2008) MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat Biotechnol 26:1367–1372
Tyanova S, Temu T, Sinitcyn P, Carlson A, Hein MY, Geiger T et al (2016) The Perseus computational platform for comprehensive analysis of (prote)omics data. Nat Methods 13:731–740
Acknowledgements
We thank Franck Perez for depositing the TNFα_EGFP RUSH construct to Addgene. We thank Pascal W. T. C. Jansen for his assistance with the proteomics experiments. We thank Geert van den Bogaart for critical reading of the manuscript and helpful discussion. This work is supported by grant 11618 from the Dutch Cancer Society. C.G Spruijt and Michiel Vermeulen are part of the Oncode Institute, which is partly funded by the Dutch Cancer Society. Annemiek van Spriel is supported by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research NWO Gravitation Programme 2013 grant (ICI 000-23), ZonMW (project 09120012010023), the Dutch Cancer Society (KWF) (12949/2020, 14726/2023) and the European Research Council (Consolidator Grant Secret Surface 724281 and Proof-of-Concept project 101112687).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by RSM, ARF, RC, KF, MH, MCC, AvD and MtB. Mass spectrometry data analysis was conducted by CGS and MV. The first draft of the manuscript was written by RSM, ARF, AvS and LQC, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Peripheral blood monocytes were isolated from buffy coats obtained from healthy blood donors (Sanquin, Nijmegen, The Netherlands). Informed consent was obtained from all blood donors included in the study.
Consent for publication
Blood donors provided informed consent for publication of all data included in the manuscript (main and supplementary figures and supplementary movies).
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary movie 1. Wild type DC TNFα-GFP trafficking dynamics. Movie corresponding to Figure 5B
Supplementary movie 2. Galectin-9 depleted DC TNFα-GFP trafficking dynamics. Movie corresponding to Figure 5B
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Santalla Méndez, R., Rodgers Furones, A., Classens, R. et al. Galectin-9 interacts with Vamp-3 to regulate cytokine secretion in dendritic cells. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 80, 306 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-023-04954-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-023-04954-x